ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06427850Updated May 24, 2024

Effect of Topical Tranexamic Acid on Postoperative Drainage in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF)

An interventional study of Tranexamic acid and Normal saline in Degenerative Spine Diseases and Surgical Wound, sponsored by Thanawan Longsuwan. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-24.

Sponsored by Thanawan Longsuwan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The randomized controlled study which compare the efficacy outcomes (reducing blood loss and drainage output in patients) in patients undergoing single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) and received topical tranexamic acid injection in the surgical site to those who received placebo injection.

Read the detailed description

Detail : Randomization of Patients for intra-surgical site topical tranexamic acid injection

Objective : To compare the efficacy of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) injection into the surgical wound versus placebo injection in reducing blood loss and drainage output in patients undergoing single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) surgery.

Methods:

Patient: Patients with degenerative spine conditions undergoing single-level MI-TLIF surgery, who received treatment at Ramathibodi Hospital and Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute from 2024 to 2027.

Randomization : Patients will be randomly by various block randomization (1:1) was performed using STATA 16.0 to ensure that the two groups were comparable in size and that the sequence of randomization was unpredictable.

Intervention :

Group 1 : Patients in this group will receive an injection of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) into the surgical site(50mg/ml) 10 ml after wound exposure and after wound decompression.

Group 2: Patients in this group will receive a placebo injection (Normal saline 10 ml) into the surgical site after wound exposure and after wound decompression.

Allocation Concealment :

A central randomization service will prepare sealed envelopes labeled with sequence numbers corresponding to the sample size. This method decreasing selection bias in assigning participants to the treatment groups. The envelopes were opened and equipment prepared after anesthesia was administered and before the surgeon began the incision.

Blinding :

The study participants and assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation. The surgeons were blinded by clear fluid as same in 2 groups but if tranexamic acid can be effective to decrease blood loss in intraoperation. So we cannot controlled blinding surgeons.

Primary outcome measurement: postoperative drainage (ml)

Secondary outcome measurement:

calculated total blood loss, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion rate, duration of drain maintenance, length of hospital stay, complication of tranexamic acid (TXA) and surgery.

Statistical Analysis:

Demographic Analysis :

For continuous data reported as Mean and Standard Deviation (S.D.) and analyzed by Independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test.

For categorical data reported as Percentages and analyzed by Chi-square test.

Compare the results of the study:

Postoperative drainage (ml),calculated total blood loss (ml), intraoperative blood loss (mL) , duration of drain maintenance (day), length of hospital stay (day)were report to Mean and Standard Deviation (S.D.) analyzed by Independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data.

Complication of tranexamic acid (TXA) and surgery(%), blood transfusion rate (%) were reported to Percentages and analyzed by Chi-square test. Use STATA 16.0 software for statistical calculations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Degenerative Spine Diseases
  • Surgical Wound

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Degenerative spine diseases
  • Surgical wound
  • Tranexamic acid (TXA)
03

In context

Surgical Wound

315 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 28 is below the median of 66 across 242 interventional studies indexed under Surgical Wound.

Browse Surgical Wound studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Thanawan Longsuwan as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 30-80 years old
  • Degenerative spine problems including spinal stenosis, disc degeneration, spondylolithesis that indicated for single level MI-TLIF

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revision surgery
  • Patients who had high risk of complication from TXA
  • History of seizure, PE, DVT, thromboembolic episode
  • History of TXA allergy
  • Patients who had high risk for bleeding
  • U/D : CKD stage more than IIIb (\< 45 ml/min/1.73m2), hepatic disease, bleeding disorder
  • On anticoagulation drug or antiplatelet drug in 7 days before surgery
  • Abnormal coagulation profile ( > 1.5) or CBC ( \< 100000)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
28 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Topical tranexamic acid (TXA) injection

    receive an injection of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) into the surgical site

    Drug: Tranexamic acid

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo group

    receive an injection Normal saline into the surgical site

    Drug: Normal saline

Interventions

  • receive an injection of Tranexamic acid into the surgical site

  • DrugNormal saline

    receive an injection of Normal saline into the surgical site

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. postoperative drainage (mL)

    Fluid drainage after operation

    Time frame: 120 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. calculated total blood loss (mL)

    calculated total blood loss by Gross formular

    Time frame: 120 hours

  2. intraoperative blood loss (mL)

    Evaluated by anesthesiologists

    Time frame: Intraoperative time

  3. duration of drain maintenance (day)

    Duration time of drain insertion to off drain

    Time frame: 120 hours

  4. length of hospital stay (day)

    Duration time of patients stay in hospital

    Time frame: 120 hours

  5. complication of tranexamic acid (TXA) and surgery(%)

    The patients who had complication from tranexamic acid (TXA) and surgery in each group

    Time frame: 120 hours

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ravindra VM, Senglaub SS, Rattani A, Dewan MC, Hartl R, Bisson E, Park KB, Shrime MG. Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: Estimating Global Incidence and Worldwide Volume. Global Spine J. 2018 Dec;8(8):784-794. doi: 10.1177/2192568218770769. Epub 2018 Apr 24. PubMed 30560029 ↗
  • Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 15;30(8):936-43. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000158953.57966.c0. PubMed 15834339 ↗
  • Harms JG, Jeszenszky D. Die posteriore, lumbale, interkorporelle Fusion in unilateraler transforaminaler Technik. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 1998 Jun;10(2):90-102. doi: 10.1007/s00064-006-0112-7. No abstract available. German. PubMed 17332991 ↗
  • Holly LT, Schwender JD, Rouben DP, Foley KT. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications. Neurosurg Focus. 2006 Mar 15;20(3):E6. doi: 10.3171/foc.2006.20.3.7. PubMed 16599422 ↗
  • Moskowitz A. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002 Apr;33(2):359-66. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(01)00008-6. PubMed 12389281 ↗
  • Hong JY, Kim WS, Park J, Kim CH, Jang HD. Comparison of minimally invasive and open TLIF outcomes with more than seven years of follow-up. N Am Spine Soc J. 2022 Jun 11;11:100131. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100131. eCollection 2022 Sep. PubMed 35783004 ↗
  • Kleinert K, Theusinger OM, Nuernberg J, Werner CM. Alternative procedures for reducing allogeneic blood transfusion in elective orthopedic surgery. HSS J. 2010 Sep;6(2):190-8. doi: 10.1007/s11420-009-9151-6. Epub 2010 Jan 28. PubMed 21886535 ↗
  • Dodd RY. The risk of transfusion-transmitted infection. N Engl J Med. 1992 Aug 6;327(6):419-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199208063270610. No abstract available. PubMed 1625717 ↗
  • Myles PS, Smith JA, Forbes A, Silbert B, Jayarajah M, Painter T, Cooper DJ, Marasco S, McNeil J, Bussieres JS, McGuinness S, Byrne K, Chan MT, Landoni G, Wallace S; ATACAS Investigators of the ANZCA Clinical Trials Network. Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Coronary-Artery Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 12;376(2):136-148. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606424. Epub 2016 Oct 23. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):782. doi: 10.1056/NEJMx180005. PubMed 27774838 ↗
  • Danninger T, Memtsoudis SG. Tranexamic acid and orthopedic surgery-the search for the holy grail of blood conservation. Ann Transl Med. 2015 Apr;3(6):77. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.01.25. No abstract available. PubMed 25992376 ↗
  • Badeaux J, Hawley D. A systematic review of the effectiveness of intravenous tranexamic acid administration in managing perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing spine surgery. J Perianesth Nurs. 2014 Dec;29(6):459-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Nov 20. PubMed 25458625 ↗
  • Xiong Z, Liu J, Yi P, Wang H, Tan M. Comparison of Intravenous versus Topical Tranexamic Acid in Nondeformity Spine Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2020 Mar 9;2020:7403034. doi: 10.1155/2020/7403034. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32219141 ↗
  • Winter SF, Santaguida C, Wong J, Fehlings MG. Systemic and Topical Use of Tranexamic Acid in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review. Global Spine J. 2016 May;6(3):284-95. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563609. Epub 2015 Sep 21. PubMed 27099820 ↗
  • Gulabi D, Yuce Y, Erkal KH, Saglam N, Camur S. The combined administration of systemic and topical tranexamic acid for total hip arthroplasty: Is it better than systemic? Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019 Jul;53(4):297-300. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Apr 4. PubMed 30954338 ↗
  • Li J, Wang L, Bai T, Liu Y, Huang Y. Combined use of intravenous and topical tranexamic acid efficiently reduces blood loss in patients aged over 60 operated with a 2-level lumbar fusion. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 20;15(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01758-8. PubMed 32819445 ↗
  • Ker K, Edwards P, Perel P, Shakur H, Roberts I. Effect of tranexamic acid on surgical bleeding: systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012 May 17;344:e3054. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3054. PubMed 22611164 ↗
  • Murkin JM, Falter F, Granton J, Young B, Burt C, Chu M. High-dose tranexamic Acid is associated with nonischemic clinical seizures in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2010 Feb 1;110(2):350-3. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c92b23. Epub 2009 Dec 8. PubMed 19996135 ↗
  • Cravens GT, Brown MJ, Brown DR, Wass CT. Antifibrinolytic therapy use to mitigate blood loss during staged complex major spine surgery: Postoperative visual color changes after tranexamic acid administration. Anesthesiology. 2006 Dec;105(6):1274-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200612000-00029. No abstract available. PubMed 17122592 ↗
  • Murao S, Nakata H, Roberts I, Yamakawa K. Effect of tranexamic acid on thrombotic events and seizures in bleeding patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2021 Nov 1;25(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03799-9. PubMed 34724964 ↗
  • Mikhail C, Pennington Z, Arnold PM, Brodke DS, Chapman JR, Chutkan N, Daubs MD, DeVine JG, Fehlings MG, Gelb DE, Ghobrial GM, Harrop JS, Hoelscher C, Jiang F, Knightly JJ, Kwon BK, Mroz TE, Nassr A, Riew KD, Sekhon LH, Smith JS, Traynelis VC, Wang JC, Weber MH, Wilson JR, Witiw CD, Sciubba DM, Cho SK. Minimizing Blood Loss in Spine Surgery. Global Spine J. 2020 Jan;10(1 Suppl):71S-83S. doi: 10.1177/2192568219868475. Epub 2020 Jan 6. PubMed 31934525 ↗
  • Montroy J, Hutton B, Moodley P, Fergusson NA, Cheng W, Tinmouth A, Lavallee LT, Fergusson DA, Breau RH. The efficacy and safety of topical tranexamic acid: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transfus Med Rev. 2018 Feb 19:S0887-7963(17)30151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2018.02.003. Online ahead of print. PubMed 29567052 ↗
  • Mallepally AR, Mahajan R, Rustagi T, Goel SA, Das K, Chhabra HS. Use of Topical Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):593-600. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0134. Epub 2020 Mar 30. PubMed 32213797 ↗
  • Wang F, Wang SG, Yang Q, Nan LP, Cai TC, Wu DS, Zhang L. Cytotoxicity and Effect of Topical Application of Tranexamic Acid on Human Fibroblast in Spine Surgery. World Neurosurg. 2021 Sep;153:e380-e391. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.125. Epub 2021 Jul 2. PubMed 34224885 ↗
  • Schwarzkopf R, Dang P, Luu M, Mozaffar T, Gupta R. Topical tranexamic Acid does not affect electrophysiologic or neurovascular sciatic nerve markers in an animal model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Mar;473(3):1074-82. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4098-4. Epub 2015 Jan 6. PubMed 25560955 ↗
  • Ren Z, Li S, Sheng L, Zhuang Q, Li Z, Xu D, Chen X, Jiang P, Zhang X. Topical use of tranexamic acid can effectively decrease hidden blood loss during posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(42):e8233. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008233. PubMed 29049210 ↗
  • Sudprasert W, Tanaviriyachai T, Choovongkomol K, Jongkittanakul S, Piyapromdee U. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Topical Application of Tranexamic Acid in Patients with Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma Undergoing Long-Segment Instrumented Posterior Spinal Fusion. Asian Spine J. 2019 Feb;13(1):146-154. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0125. Epub 2018 Oct 24. PubMed 30347526 ↗
  • Gybel M, Kristensen K, Roseva-Nielsen N. [Cardiac arrest caused by massive pulmonary embolism during treatment with tranexamic acid]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2013 May 13;175(20):1426-7. Danish. PubMed 23663400 ↗
  • Taparia M, Cordingley FT, Leahy MF. Pulmonary embolism associated with tranexamic acid in severe acquired haemophilia. Eur J Haematol. 2002 May;68(5):307-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2002.01607.x. PubMed 12144537 ↗
  • Krivokuca I, Lammers JW. Recurrent pulmonary embolism associated with a hemostatic drug: tranexamic acid. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2011 Feb;17(1):106-7. doi: 10.1177/1076029609340902. Epub 2009 Oct 14. PubMed 19833620 ↗
  • Colomina MJ, Contreras L, Guilabert P, Koo M, M Ndez E, Sabate A. Clinical use of tranexamic acid: evidences and controversies. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 Nov-Dec;72(6):795-812. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.08.022. Epub 2021 Oct 7. PubMed 34626756 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jul 2024; primary completion for Dec 2026, 29 months later.

Of 99 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Surgical Wound, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 53. This study's planned 29 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 126 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 20, 2024
First posted
May 24, 2024
StartEst.
Jul 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Last update
May 24, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06427850
Lead sponsor
Thanawan Longsuwan
Responsible party
Thanawan Longsuwan (Doctor, Ramathibodi Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 24, 2024
Start date
Jul 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 24, 2024

Study contacts

Thanawan Longsuwan, Doctor of medicine
Contact
bland.demon3@gmail.com
(+66)892966855
Kan Kaewroj, Diploma of Orthopaedics
Contact
(+66) 022011589

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tranexamic Acid

Start the discussion