ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06405711Updated May 8, 2024

To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Defocus Lens in Slowing the Progression of Myopia

An interventional study of frame lens in Myopia, Progressive, sponsored by Tianjin Eye Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 13 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-08.

Sponsored by Tianjin Eye Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
138
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
8 Years to 13 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To confirm the efficacy of DIMS lenses in controlling myopia progression, we planned a prospective, single-centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled, non-inferiority clinical study.

Read the detailed description

Prior to the trial, subjects signed an informed consent form, screened and qualified subjects were enrolled, and subjects received framed spectacles for correction of myopic refractive error in both eyes, and were fitted with framed spectacles by the investigator according to the standard fitting procedure specified in this protocol. Subjects were randomized to Trial Group A (strong high order aberration group) and Trial Group B (medium high order aberration group) and Control Group (HOYA MiYOSMART).

The index of effectiveness in this clinical trial was to assess the effectiveness of the test group of lenses in slowing the rate of myopia progression by examining the subject's objective optometric values after ciliary muscle paralysis. The basic examination of this clinical trial included slit lamp examination, eye axis examination, fundus examination, corneal topography, best-corrected visual acuity, binocular visual function, refractive status and best-corrected visual acuity after ciliary muscle paralysis, and intraocular pressure measurements, etc. The spectacle fitting was also recorded, as well as the subjective feeling of the subjects when wearing the lenses.

Each subject was followed up for 12 months, and the efficacy and safety of the test product for delaying the progression of myopia was evaluated by the investigator at 1 week ± 1 day (telephone follow-up), 1 month ± 15 days (telephone follow-up), 3 months ± 15 days, 6 months ± 15 days, and 12 months ± 30 days after wearing the lenses.

During the course of this clinical trial, the lenses were replaced due to loss, breakage, change in refraction or poor vision with the lenses, etc., after evaluation by the investigator, and the changes were recorded.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myopia, Progressive

Keywords

  • myopia
  • axial length
  • defocus
03

In context

Myopia, Degenerative

71 studies on the registry are indexed under Myopia, Degenerative; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 138 is above the median of 122 across 57 interventional studies indexed under Myopia, Degenerative.

Browse Myopia, Degenerative studies →

Lead sponsor

Tianjin Eye Hospital is the lead sponsor of 52 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 13 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The subjects had spherical RE of -1.00 to -6.00 D, astigmatism ≤ 1.50 D, anisometropia ≤ 1.50 D
  • the best corrected visual acuity in the left and right eyes subjective optometry is greater than or equal to 1.0

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Candidate subjects were excluded from the study if they had strabismus, ocular limitations, or systemic abnormalities affecting vision and ocular motility
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
138 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Test group A (strong higher-order aberrations group)

    Simultaneous myopic defocus and strong higher-order aberrations lenses

    Device: frame lens

  • Experimental
    Test group B (medium higher-order aberrations group)

    Both myopic defocus and medium higher-order aberrations lenses

    Device: frame lens

  • Active comparator
    control groups(HOYA MiYOSMART)

    HOYA MiYOSMART lenses

    Device: frame lens

Interventions

  • Deviceframe lens

    A randomized block group design was used to randomly assign the included study subjects. The appropriate randomization number and random allocation scheme will be given after enrollment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cycloplegic objective refraction

    Cycloplegic objective refraction was measured with an autorefractor (Topcon KR8900, Japan)

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Axial Length

    Axial length (AL) was measured with an AL-Scan optical biometer (Nidek, Japan)

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Tianjin Eye Hospital
    Tianjin, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for May 2024; primary completion for May 2026, 24 months later.

Of 30 interventional studies with no phase under Myopia, Degenerative, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 30 and three quarters within 96. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 5, 2024
First posted
May 8, 2024
StartEst.
May 2024
Primary completionEst.
May 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
May 8, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 8, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06405711
Lead sponsor
Tianjin Eye Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 8, 2024
Start date
May 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 8, 2024

Study contacts

Xiaoqin Chen, MD
Contact
chenxq017@163.com
+8618202681988
Xiaoqin Chen, MD
principal investigator · Tianjin Eye Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion