CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06393322Updated Jul 30, 2025

Evaluate the Usefulness of Mental Health e-Learning

An interventional study of Depression e-Learning A and Depression e-Learning B in Depression and Anxiety, sponsored by McMaster University. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 45 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-30.

Sponsored by McMaster University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
125
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this proposal, the investigators plan to study the impact of In this proposal, we plan to study the impact of e-learning on mental health literacy and stigma related to anxiety and depression. Participants will be randomized to one of four groups - Depression e-Learning A, Depression e-Learning B, Anxiety e-Learning A, and Anxiety e-Learning B. All participants will be given access to all e-learning at the conclusion of the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression
  • Anxiety

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Mental Health
  • Mental Health Literacy
  • e-Learning
  • Knowledge
  • Stigma
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
03

In context

Depression

8,057 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,643 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 125 is above the median of 84 across 6,718 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

McMaster University is the lead sponsor of 720 studies on the registry; 124 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Live in Canada
  • 45 years of age and over
  • Good command of the English language
  • Access to email and high speed internet
  • Comfortable using email and internet

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lives outside of Canada
  • Not 45 years of age or over
  • Does not speak English,
  • Does not have access to email or high speed internet
  • Is not comfortable using email of internet
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
125 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Depression e-Learning A

    Other: Depression e-Learning A

  • Experimental
    Anxiety e-Learning A

    Other: Anxiety e-Learning A

  • Experimental
    Depression e-Learning B

    Other: Depression e-Learning B

  • Experimental
    Anxiety e-Learning B

    Other: Anxiety e-Learning B

Interventions

  • OtherDepression e-Learning A

    Participants in Depression e-Learning A will be provided e-learning about depression, consisting of following components: 1. One multimedia e-learning lesson on depression; 2. A series of 4 'micro-learning' emails (2 emails/week) with small segments of content to reinforce the material from the lesson. 1\. One multimedia e-learning lesson on depression; 2. A series of 4 'micro-learning' emails (2 emails/week) with small segments of content to reinforce the material from the lesson.

  • OtherDepression e-Learning B

    Participants in Depression e-Learning B will be provided e-learning about depression, consisting of following components: 1. One multimedia e-learning lesson on depression; 2. A series of 4 'micro-learning' emails (2 emails/week) with small segments of content to reinforce the material from the lesson. 1\. One multimedia e-learning lesson on depression; 2. A series of 4 'micro-learning' emails (2 emails/week) with small segments of content to reinforce the material from the lesson.

  • OtherAnxiety e-Learning A

    Participants in Anxiety e-Learning A will be provided e-learning about anxiety, consisting of following components: 1. One multimedia e-learning lesson on anxiety; 2. A series of 4 'micro-learning' emails (2 emails/week) with small segments of content to reinforce the material from the lesson.

  • OtherAnxiety e-Learning B

    Participants in Anxiety e-Learning B will be provided e-learning about anxiety, consisting of following components: 1. One multimedia e-learning lesson on anxiety; 2. A series of 4 'micro-learning' emails (2 emails/week) with small segments of content to reinforce the material from the lesson.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in the Depression Literacy Questionnaire

    The Depression Literacy Questionnaire assesses mental health literacy specific to depression. The questionnaire consists of 22 items which are true or false. Respondents can answer each item with one of three options - true, false, or I don't know. Each correct response receives one point. Higher scores indicate higher depression literacy.

    Time frame: 0, 2, 4 weeks

  2. Change from baseline in the Anxiety Literacy Questionnaire

    The Anxiety Literacy Questionnaire assesses mental health literacy specific to anxiety. The questionnaire consists of 22 items which are true or false. Respondents can answer each item with one of three options - true, false, or I don't know. Each correct response receives one point. Higher scores indicate higher depression literacy.

    Time frame: 0, 2, 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in the Depression Stigma Scale

    The Depression Stigma Scale is a 9-item assessment designed to measure stigma associated with depression with two subscales: personal and perceived. The Personal Stigma Subscale measures stigma in the respondents' own attitudes towards depression by asking them to indicate how strongly they personally agree with nine statements about depression. The Perceived Stigma Subscale measures the respondent's perception about the attitudes of others towards depression by asking them to indicate what they think most other people believe about the same nine statements. Responses to each item are measured on a five-point scale (ranging from zero 'strongly disagree' to four 'strongly agree'). Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression stigma.

    Time frame: 0, 2, 4 weeks

  2. Change from baseline in the Generalized Anxiety Stigma Scale

    The Generalised Anxiety Stigma Scale is analogous, but designed to measure stigma associated with anxiety disorders. It has two subscales: personal and perceived. The Personal Stigma Subscale measures stigma in the respondents' own attitudes towards anxiety disorders by asking them to indicate how strongly they personally agree with 10 statements about anxiety disorders. The Perceived Stigma Subscale measures the respondent's perception about the attitudes of others towards anxiety disorders by asking them to indicate what they think most other people believe about the same 10 statements. Responses to each item are measured on a five-point scale (ranging from zero 'strongly disagree' to four 'strongly agree'). Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety stigma.

    Time frame: 0, 2, 4 weeks

  3. Participant satisfaction

    A custom satisfaction questionnaire data adapted from the Information Assessment Method For All (IAM4all) will be collected and saved to assess satisfaction with the intervention.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • McMaster University
    Hamilton, Ontario L8S4L8, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06393322
Lead sponsor
McMaster University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 1, 2024
Start date
Aug 6, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 12, 2024
Completion
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Jul 30, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion