An interventional study of Four-point scleral fixation of Akreos AO60 IOL and Sutureless scleral fixation of AcrySof MA60AC IOL with Yamane technique in Aphakia, sponsored by Military Institute od Medicine National Research Institute. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-29.
Sponsored by Military Institute od Medicine National Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Comparison of safety and efficacy of two scleral fixation intraocular lens (IOL) methods of four-point scleral fixation ( Akreos AO60) and the Yamane technique (AcrySof MA60AC)
Purpose of the study is to compare two methods of scleral fixation of IOL: two-point fixation of AcrySof MA60AC IOL (Alcon) using Yamane technique and four-point fixation of the Akreos AO60 IOL (Bausch \& Lomb) using polypropylene suture. The investigators rated the BCVA, refractive outcomes, intraocular pressure, and also determined intra- and postoperative complications.
69 studies on the registry are indexed under Aphakia; 6 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 103 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Aphakia.
Browse Aphakia studies →Military Institute od Medicine National Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Four-point scleral fixation group
Procedure: Four-point scleral fixation of Akreos AO60 IOL
Yamane technique group
Procedure: Sutureless scleral fixation of AcrySof MA60AC IOL with Yamane technique
Intrascleral tunnels were marked at a distance of 2 mm from the corneal limbus, 6 mm apart (4 in number) after retrobulbar anesthesia. Next corneal incisions were performed. An artificial lens was then implanted into the anterior chamber. The 6-0 polypropylene suture was introduced into the anterior chamber through openings in the cornea. The next stage was to perform a sclerotomy using a 30G needle. Then the needle was passed through the hole in the haptic and 6-0 polypropylene suture was inserted into the needle hole and guided outside. The other end of the suture, passed through the opening in the haptic, was placed in the lumen of the needle and carried out through another sclerotomy and then externalised. This maneuver was repeated with another haptics as well. Correct position of the IOL in the eye was achieved by pulling on the ends of the monofilament. The ends of sutures were trimmed and cauterized. The melted tips of the sutures were then fixed subconjunctivally.
The surgery was performed under retrobulbar anesthesia. The first step of the procedure was to mark the locations of the intrascleral tunnels (2 mm from the corneal limbus) and locate them at a distance of 180° from each other to prevent the lens from tilting in the eyeball. Openings in the cornea were done. Three-piece IOL was implanted into the anterior chamber. The first sclerotomy was performed through the conjunctiva using a 30G needle 2 mm from the limbus. One of the haptics was inserted into the needle lumen and then brought out. Same procedure was performed with another haptic at a distance of 180°. The next step was to perform cautery of the tips of the haptics, obtaining a 0.3 mm collar that prevents the risk of the haptic coming out of the tunnel and displacing the lens inside the eyeball. The tips of the haptics were finally gently inserted into the scleral canals and covered with conjunctiva.
BCVA
The change of best- corrected visual acuity
Time frame: before and 12 months after surgery
RE
Postoperative total refractive error
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
ECC
corneal endothelial cell density
Time frame: before and 12 months after surgery
Number of complications
Rate of complications
Time frame: from day 1 until 12 months after surgery
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Military Institute od Medicine National Research Institute