ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06258707LuxBoostUpdated Aug 18, 2026

Bicentric Clinical Investigation to Assess Safety and Performance of LuxBoost IOL

An interventional study of LuxBoost IOL and LuxGood IOL in Aphakia, sponsored by Cutting Edge SAS. Recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-18.

Sponsored by Cutting Edge SAS · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 2 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study purpose is to demonstrate safety and performance of bilateral implantation of LuxBoost intraocular lenses compared with the LuxGood Monofocal lens.

Read the detailed description

The study purpose is to demonstrate safety and performance after bilateral implantation of LuxBoost intraocular lenses.

The device under investigation is a hydrophobic acrylic monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) manufactured by the sponsor of this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aphakia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Enhanced monofocal IOL
03

In context

Aphakia

69 studies on the registry are indexed under Aphakia; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 58 is below the median of 103 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Aphakia.

Browse Aphakia studies →

Lead sponsor

Cutting Edge SAS is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject aged 50 or over on the day of inclusion, presenting a
  • bilateral cataract for which posterior chamber IOL implantation
  • has been planned.
  • Fit within the available IOL diopter range.
  • Have had no previous refractive surgery.
  • Regular corneal astigmatism \< 1 dioptre by an automatic
  • keratometer (regularity measured by topographer).
  • Availability, willingness, and sufficient cognitive awareness to
  • comply with examination procedures.
  • Ability to attend all study follow-ups.
  • Signed .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ocular surface disease potentially affecting study results
  • Subjects suffering from diagnosed degenerative visual disorders
  • Pre-existing ocular pathology
  • Acute or chronic disease or illness that would increase risk or confound study results
  • Axial lengths and keratometry such as the IOL spherical power is
  • not in the range of 14 to 28 D
  • Instability of keratometry or biometry measurements
  • Amblyopia
  • History of ocular trauma or any prior ocular surgery including refractive procedures
  • Capsular or zonular abnormalities that may affect postoperative centration or tilt of the lens
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
58 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LuxBoost Group

    the experimental group will receive the LuxBoost intraocular lens.

    Device: LuxBoost IOL

  • Active comparator
    LuxGood group

    the control group will receive the LuxGood parent intraocular lens.

    Device: LuxGood IOL

Interventions

  • DeviceLuxBoost IOL

    Bilateral implantation in the capsular bag to replace the cataractous human crystalline lens.

  • DeviceLuxGood IOL

    Bilateral implantation in the capsular bag to replace the cataractous human crystalline lens.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA)

    To demonstrate the non-inferiority of LuxBoost IOL compared with the LuxGood monofocal control lens in terms of best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) by means of statistical significance.

    Time frame: 4/6 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA), Uncorrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (UIVA), Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA), Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity (UNVA), Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA)

    Photopic visual acuity at far, intermediate and near distance in monocular and binocular with LuxBoost lens compared to LuxGood lens.

    Time frame: 4/6 months after surgery

  2. Defocus curve

    Binocular defocus curve with the distance correction

    Time frame: 4/6 months after surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Patient-reported outcomes

    Patient satisfaction using Catquest-9SF questionnaire : To assess if difficulties in daily life occur due to impaired sight. This questionnaire is a 9-item Rasch-scaled instrument to assess subjective perception of visual impairment after surgery \[Lundström et al, 2009\]. The acceptable values are \> 3.00 for differentiation between low, medium, and high abilities. Rasch analysis is commonly reported as the mean of square residual (MNSQ) and z-standardized score (ZSTD).

    Time frame: at preoperative visit and 4/6 months after surgery

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06258707
Lead sponsor
Cutting Edge SAS
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 14, 2024
Start date
Oct 14, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 15, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 18, 2026

Study contacts

Ilham XHAARD
Contact
ilham.xhaard@cutting-edge.fr
620 050 651 ext. +33
Line BETTINELLI
Contact
line.bettinelli@cutting-edge.fr
619 530 701 ext. +33
Vincent GUALINO
principal investigator · Clinique Honoré Cave 82000 Montauban
Christophe CESSES
study director · Cutting Edge S.A.S (Sponsor)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion