ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06387329Updated Feb 19, 2025

Bladder Botox UTI Antibiotic Prophylaxis

A Phase 4 interventional study of Nitrofurantoin 100 MG in Overactive Bladder and Bladder Pain Syndrome, sponsored by Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-19.

Sponsored by Walter Reed National Military Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Apr 2024; still recruiting 2 years 7 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition with a prevalence of 17% in the general population that significantly affects quality of life. Intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections are an advanced therapy for OAB as well as interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). The most common adverse event following intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA in urinary tract infection (UTI), which occurs in 8.6-48.1% of patients. To prevent UTIs, patients are given a course of antibiotics, however the ideal prophylactic regimen has not been determined for the timing, duration, and type of antibiotic. Four retrospective studies in the literature address this question with variable conclusions, and there are no prospective studies. Identifying the ideal regimen is important for preventing UTIs as well as minimizing antibiotic use to prevent adverse effects and development of antibiotic resistance.

The population to be studied will be female patients 18 years and older who are patients of the urogynecology and urology clinics at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center with a diagnosis of OAB or IC/BPS and have chosen to be treated with intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections. It will be a non-blinded randomized controlled noninferiority trial in which the patients are randomly placed into 2 groups. The first group will receive a 3 day course of twice daily oral nitrofurantoin 100mg starting at the time of the procedure, and the second group will receive a single dose of 100mg oral nitrofurantoin at the time of the procedure.

The patients will be screened at the clinic at the time that they schedule their intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection appointment or by phone 1-2 weeks prior to their procedure. If the patient agrees to participate in the study then they will be instructed to give a urine sample for urinalysis and culture 1 week prior to the procedure appointment to exclude existing UTI. If a UTI is diagnosed at this time they must complete treatment prior to the procedure or will need to reschedule their procedure. On the day of the procedure patients will receive the clinic standard 10ml of 2% viscous lidocaine through the urethra 10-20 minutes prior to the procedure, and may be offered 5-10mg oral diazepam at the discretion of the treating physician. All patients will be given 200mg of phenazopyridine and 100mg of nitrofurantoin prior to the initiation of the procedure. The procedure will take place as directed by the treating physician per standard operating procedure.

A urinalysis and urine culture will be placed for all study participants at time of their procedure appointment in case they have symptoms of UTI, and they will be instructed to follow up with the research team by phone if they have concerns for a UTI. Patients will be contacted 30-45 days after the procedure by phone, email, or message through genesis and asked about any UTI symptoms, UTI diagnoses and secondary outcomes during the 30 days following the procedure. Data will be analyzed for the primary outcome of UTI rates in the 30 days following intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection.

Read the detailed description

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition with a prevalence of 17% in the general population that significantly affects quality of life (1). It is characterized by urinary urgency, urinary frequency as well as nocturia in the absence of infection or other proven pathology. Approximately a third of patients with OAB also experience incontinence with urgency while the remaining two thirds do not experience incontinence. Average annual per capita costs estimated to be around $80 billion (2). First line treatment is behavioral and lifestyle modifications along with pelvic floor strengthening. Oral medications are considered second line treatment. Of patients that initiate oral pharmacotherapy, less than 50% will remain on it by one year after initiation due to lack of efficacy, inability to tolerate side effects or other reasons. Many patients will go on to advanced treatment options, such as neuromodulation or onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®, Allergan Inc.) (3-6). A large body of evidence has demonstrated the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of both idiopathic and neurogenic OAB and it has increasingly become the advanced therapy of choice for OAB by clinicians and patients (7-20). In 2013 onabotulinumtoxinA was approved by the FDA for treatment of both idiopathic and neurogenic OAB. OnabotulinumtoxinA is also commonly used to treat urinary urgency and frequency in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS).

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a well-documented adverse event following intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA. Prior studies have demonstrated that UTI occurs in 8.6% - 48.1% of patients, for which data was collected for between 1 and 6 months after the procedure (7-9, 12, 13, 21-24). The package insert states that "oral prophylactic antibiotics, except aminoglycosides, should be administered 1-3 days pre-treatment, on the treatment day, and 1-3 days post-treatment to reduce the likelihood of procedure-related UTI" (25). However, this recommendation is supported by little evidence as few studies have addressed antibiotic prophylaxis for intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA procedures. Furthermore, the American Urological Association best practice recommendations state that in cystourethroscopy procedures with minor break in mucosal barriers such as with biopsy or fulguration it is uncertain whether UTI prophylaxis is required, however if given, then a single dose of antibiotics is recommended (26). In practice, urologists and urogynecologists have a wide range of regimens used for UTI prophylaxis with timing ranging from starting before the procedure or initiated at the time of the procedure, variable duration ranging from 1 to 7 days, and choice of antibiotic including nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, and others.

Four retrospective studies have evaluated variable antibiotic regimens for intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection procedures and rate of UTIs. Martin, et al. studied 290 patients undergoing 896 injections of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA receiving either no antibiotics, a single day of antibiotics, or a multi-day course of antibiotics (21). Antibiotics used included ciprofloxacin (64.4%), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (15.1%), nitrofurantoin (10.6%), and cephalexin (5.6%). The primary outcome was UTI within 30 days by culture, or by empiric treatment with improvement in symptoms. The overall UTI rate was 11.4%. With no prophylaxis it was 23.2%, with single day prophylaxis it was 8.6%, and with multi day prophylaxis it was 13.2%. Use of any antibiotic was significantly associated with a lower risk of UTI (OR 0.34, P\<.001), but there was no significant difference between groups (23).

Bickhaus, et al. retrospectively reviewed 2 cohorts of patients (n=111), one of which received ciprofloxacin for 1-3 days starting at the time of the procedure and the second of which received 3 days of ciprofloxacin starting the day prior to the procedure (22). The primary outcome was UTI within 90 days of the procedure, and they found no statistical difference between the groups (p=0.18) with 34% of the group receiving postprocedure antibiotics only developing a UTI versus 22% of the group that received pre- and postprocedure antibiotics (24).

Eckhardt, et al. performed a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study on women undergoing intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection for OAB (23). 565 patients were studied of which 44.4% received intravenous (IV) antibiotics only, 8.9% received oral (PO) antibiotics only, and 39.7% received combination IV and PO. 7.1% received no antibiotics. For the primary outcome of UTI within 3 months determined by International Classification of Diseases(ICD) codes for cystitis, 30.4% of patient developed a UTI with no significant difference between the groups (25).

Houman, et al. reviewed the use of intramuscular ceftriaxone immediately prior to intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections versus a 3-day course of ciprofloxacin starting the day prior to the procedure (24). UTI was defined as a positive culture or new onset urgency, frequency, or dysuria within 30 days of the procedure. 284 patient charts were reviewed. They found that the UTI rate for patients who received ciprofloxacin was 20% versus 36% for patients who a single received ceftriaxone injection, p=.04 (26 ).

Antibiotic resistance is increasingly becoming a problem in modern medicine. Notably, almost 15% of all antibiotics used are to treat UTIs (27). Among all bacteria isolated in UTI, resistance to nitrofurantoin is low at 8%, but resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole has increased to over 20% in some areas and resistance to ciprofloxacin has more than tripled to 11.8% (28-30). Minimizing unnecessary antibiotic use and shortening antibiotic courses is an important part of antibiotic stewardship programs and can help reduce antibiotic resistance to ensure that treatment for UTIs in the future remains effective (31).

The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends that based on resistance rates and patient tolerance that the first line antibiotics for uncomplicated UTI are nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, and fosfomycin (32). The American Urologic Association's antimicrobial prophylaxis recommendations state that for "cystourethroscopy with minor manipulation, break in mucosal barriers, biopsy, fulguration, etc." it is uncertain whether prophylaxis is indicated, but if given should be done with a single dose of antibiotics (33).

Based on the lack of level 1 evidence on antibiotic prophylaxis after intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections, we propose a randomized controlled trial comparing nitrofurantoin given as a single dose at the time of the procedure to a 3 day course started at the time of the procedure. The primary outcome is to evaluate the rate of culture proven urinary tract infections within 30 days after the procedure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overactive Bladder
  • Bladder Pain Syndrome

Keywords

  • Intradetrusor Onabotulinumtoxin A
  • Urinary tract infection
  • Antibiotic prophylaxis
03

In context

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

858 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive; 127 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 70 across 649 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive.

Browse Urinary Bladder, Overactive studies →

Lead sponsor

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 78 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (30%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients 18 years or older being seen at the WRNMMC Urogynecology clinic
  • Diagnosis of OAB or IC/BPS
  • Planning to undergo intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection for treatment of their OAB or IC/BPS
  • Ability to follow instructions and complete follow up

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • to nitrofurantoin (allergy, \<30mL/minute)
  • If performed in the operating room, the patient cannot undergo a concurrent procedure that would increase the risk of UTI or require an alternate antibiotic regimen (such as hysterectomy, prolapse repair, or anti-incontinence procedure)
  • Active UTI at the time of procedure
  • Neurogenic bladder
  • Recurrent UTI (3 in 12 month period or 2 in 6 months)
  • Post void residual bladder volume ≥150mL
  • Patient is already taking antibiotics at the time of the procedure
  • Contraindication to onabotulinumtoxinA (allergy, pregnancy, greater than 400 units of onabotulinumtoxinA received in the last 3 months)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    3 day arm

    Subjects will be given a 3 day twice daily course of 100mg nitrofurantoin by mouth starting at the time of intradetrusor injection of 100u onabotulinumtoxinA

    Drug: Nitrofurantoin 100 MG

  • Experimental
    Single dose arm

    Subjects will be given a single dose of 100mg nitrofurantoin by mouth at the time of intradetrusor injection of 100u onabotulinumtoxinA

    Drug: Nitrofurantoin 100 MG

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Urinary tract infection

    To evaluate for non-inferiority in the number of post-procedure urinary tract infections proven by a urine culture

    Time frame: Within 30 days after intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA

Secondary outcomes

  1. Urinary tract infection symptoms

    To evaluate for the number of patients with new symptoms of dysuria, urgency, or frequency

    Time frame: Within 30 days after intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA

  2. Urinary retention

    Post void residual greater than 150mL

    Time frame: Within 30 days after intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA

  3. Adverse effects

    Secondary infection, nausea, headache

    Time frame: Within 30 days after intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, Van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02243-4. No abstract available. PubMed 12559262 ↗
  • Ganz ML, Smalarz AM, Krupski TL, Anger JT, Hu JC, Wittrup-Jensen KU, Pashos CL. Economic costs of overactive bladder in the United States. Urology. 2010 Mar;75(3):526-32, 532.e1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.096. Epub 2009 Dec 29. PubMed 20035977 ↗
  • Reynolds WS, Fowke J, Dmochowski R. The Burden of Overactive Bladder on US Public Health. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2016 Mar;11(1):8-13. doi: 10.1007/s11884-016-0344-9. Epub 2016 Jan 23. PubMed 27057265 ↗
  • Coyne KS, Wein A, Nicholson S, Kvasz M, Chen CI, Milsom I. Economic burden of urgency urinary incontinence in the United States: a systematic review. J Manag Care Pharm. 2014 Feb;20(2):130-40. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.2.130. PubMed 24456314 ↗
  • Milsom I, Coyne KS, Nicholson S, Kvasz M, Chen CI, Wein AJ. Global prevalence and economic burden of urgency urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):79-95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.031. Epub 2013 Aug 27. PubMed 24007713 ↗
  • Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Burgio KL, Chai TC, Clemens JQ, Culkin DJ, Das AK, Foster HE Jr, Scarpero HM, Tessier CD, Vasavada SP; American Urological Association; Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2012 Dec;188(6 Suppl):2455-63. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.079. Epub 2012 Oct 24. PubMed 23098785 ↗
  • Dmochowski R, Chapple C, Nitti VW, Chancellor M, Everaert K, Thompson C, Daniell G, Zhou J, Haag-Molkenteller C. Efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA for idiopathic overactive bladder: a double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized, dose ranging trial. J Urol. 2010 Dec;184(6):2416-22. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.021. Epub 2010 Oct 16. PubMed 20952013 ↗
  • Flynn MK, Amundsen CL, Perevich M, Liu F, Webster GD. Outcome of a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of botulinum A toxin for refractory overactive bladder. J Urol. 2009 Jun;181(6):2608-15. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.117. Epub 2009 Apr 16. PubMed 19375091 ↗
  • Sahai A, Khan MS, Dasgupta P. Efficacy of botulinum toxin-A for treating idiopathic detrusor overactivity: results from a single center, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2231-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.130. PubMed 17509328 ↗
  • Kessler TM, Danuser H, Schumacher M, Studer UE, Burkhard FC. Botulinum A toxin injections into the detrusor: an effective treatment in idiopathic and neurogenic detrusor overactivity? Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(3):231-6. doi: 10.1002/nau.20105. PubMed 15747344 ↗
  • Rajkumar GN, Small DR, Mustafa AW, Conn G. A prospective study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy and durability of response of intravesical injection of botulinum toxin type A into detrusor muscle in patients with refractory idiopathic detrusor overactivity. BJU Int. 2005 Oct;96(6):848-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05725.x. PubMed 16153215 ↗
  • Chapple C, Sievert KD, MacDiarmid S, Khullar V, Radziszewski P, Nardo C, Thompson C, Zhou J, Haag-Molkenteller C. OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U significantly improves all idiopathic overactive bladder symptoms and quality of life in patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2013 Aug;64(2):249-56. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 Apr 10. PubMed 23608668 ↗
  • Orasanu B, Mahajan ST. The use of botulinum toxin for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. Indian J Urol. 2013 Jan;29(1):2-11. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.109975. PubMed 23671356 ↗
  • Benner JS, Nichol MB, Rovner ES, Jumadilova Z, Alvir J, Hussein M, Fanning K, Trocio JN, Brubaker L. Patient-reported reasons for discontinuing overactive bladder medication. BJU Int. 2010 May;105(9):1276-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09036.x. Epub 2009 Nov 12. PubMed 19912188 ↗
  • Gray SL, Anderson ML, Dublin S, Hanlon JT, Hubbard R, Walker R, Yu O, Crane PK, Larson EB. Cumulative use of strong anticholinergics and incident dementia: a prospective cohort study. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Mar;175(3):401-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7663. PubMed 25621434 ↗
  • Chancellor MB, Migliaccio-Walle K, Bramley TJ, Chaudhari SL, Corbell C, Globe D. Long-term patterns of use and treatment failure with anticholinergic agents for overactive bladder. Clin Ther. 2013 Nov;35(11):1744-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.08.017. Epub 2013 Oct 3. PubMed 24091072 ↗
  • Chua KJ, Patel HV, Tabakin A, Srivastava A, Doppalapudi SK, Hyams E, Tunuguntla HSGR. Yearly Trends of Overactive Bladder Medication Usage. Urol Pract. 2021 Sep;8(5):546-554. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000243. Epub 2021 Jun 24. PubMed 37145398 ↗
  • Maman K, Aballea S, Nazir J, Desroziers K, Neine ME, Siddiqui E, Odeyemi I, Hakimi Z. Comparative efficacy and safety of medical treatments for the management of overactive bladder: a systematic literature review and mixed treatment comparison. Eur Urol. 2014 Apr;65(4):755-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Nov 18. PubMed 24275310 ↗
  • Welk B, McArthur E. Increased risk of dementia among patients with overactive bladder treated with an anticholinergic medication compared to a beta-3 agonist: a population-based cohort study. BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):183-190. doi: 10.1111/bju.15040. Epub 2020 Mar 19. PubMed 32167223 ↗
  • Wu T, Duan X, Cao CX, Peng CD, Bu SY, Wang KJ. The role of mirabegron in overactive bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2014;93(3):326-37. doi: 10.1159/000361079. Epub 2014 Aug 7. PubMed 25115445 ↗
  • Martin S, Zillioux J, Goldman HB, Slopnick E. Impact of Duration of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Incidence of UTI after OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection. Urology. 2022 Aug;166:140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 May 17. PubMed 35595075 ↗
  • Bickhaus JA, Vaughan M, Truong T, Li YJ, Siddiqui NY. A comparison of antibiotic prophylaxis regimens to decrease the risk of post-procedure urinary tract infection after onabotulinum toxin A injection. Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Sep;31(9):1907-1912. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04230-7. Epub 2020 Jan 27. PubMed 31989204 ↗
  • Eckhardt SE, Takashima Y, Handler SJ, Tenggardjaja C, Yazdany T. Antibiotic regimen and route of administration do not alter rates of urinary tract infection after intravesical botulinum toxin injection for overactive bladder. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Mar;33(3):703-709. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04691-4. Epub 2021 Feb 16. PubMed 33594517 ↗
  • Houman J, Moradzadeh A, Patel DN, Asanad K, Anger JT, Eilber KS. What is the ideal antibiotic prophylaxis for intravesically administered Botox injection? A comparison of two different regimens. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 May;30(5):701-704. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3721-4. Epub 2018 Aug 3. PubMed 30074062 ↗
  • BOTOX® Prescribing Information, February 2021
  • Lightner DJ, Wymer K, Sanchez J, Kavoussi L. Best Practice Statement on Urologic Procedures and Antimicrobial Prophylaxis. J Urol. 2020 Feb;203(2):351-356. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000509. Epub 2019 Aug 23. PubMed 31441676 ↗
  • Mazzariol A, Bazaj A, Cornaglia G. Multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria causing urinary tract infections: a review. J Chemother. 2017 Dec;29(sup1):2-9. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2017.1380395. PubMed 29271736 ↗
  • Bader MS, Loeb M, Brooks AA. An update on the management of urinary tract infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance. Postgrad Med. 2017 Mar;129(2):242-258. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2017.1246055. Epub 2016 Oct 21. PubMed 27712137 ↗
  • Stapleton PJ, Lundon DJ, McWade R, Scanlon N, Hannan MM, O'Kelly F, Lynch M. Antibiotic resistance patterns of Escherichia coli urinary isolates and comparison with antibiotic consumption data over 10 years, 2005-2014. Ir J Med Sci. 2017 Aug;186(3):733-741. doi: 10.1007/s11845-016-1538-z. Epub 2017 Jan 4. PubMed 28054236 ↗
  • Sanchez GV, Babiker A, Master RN, Luu T, Mathur A, Bordon J. Antibiotic Resistance among Urinary Isolates from Female Outpatients in the United States in 2003 and 2012. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Apr 22;60(5):2680-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02897-15. Print 2016 May. PubMed 26883714 ↗
  • Abbo LM, Hooton TM. Antimicrobial Stewardship and Urinary Tract Infections. Antibiotics (Basel). 2014 May 5;3(2):174-92. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics3020174. PubMed 27025743 ↗
  • Gupta K, Hooton TM, Naber KG, Wullt B, Colgan R, Miller LG, Moran GJ, Nicolle LE, Raz R, Schaeffer AJ, Soper DE; Infectious Diseases Society of America; European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: A 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Mar 1;52(5):e103-20. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq257. PubMed 21292654 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2025, 14 months after the start.

Of 42 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Urinary Bladder, Overactive, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 51. This study's planned 14 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 54 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 19, 2024
First posted
Apr 29, 2024
StartActual
Apr 4, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Feb 19, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06387329
Lead sponsor
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 29, 2024
Start date
Apr 4, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 19, 2025

Study contacts

Jordan Gisseman, MD
Contact
jordan.gisseman.mil@health.mil
301-400-2468
Jordan Gisseman, MD
principal investigator · Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Nitrofurantoin

Start the discussion