ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07895225Updated Oct 26, 2026

PRP Versus NP Injections for Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injection and Nucleus Pulposus (NP) Injection in Discogenic Low Back Pain, sponsored by Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.

Sponsored by Walter Reed National Military Medical Center · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 26, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this randomized, single-blind comparative-effectiveness pilot study is to compare the effectiveness of two types of injections on pain and function over 6 months in patients with chronic discogenic (originating from the intervertebral discs) low back pain (LBP). Eligible participants will have failed an adequate trial of previous conservative treatments, had no prior surgery, and had no prior injections within the preceding 12 months of study participation.

One of the treatments in this study is called platelet-rich plasma (PRP). It uses a sample of a participant's own blood, which is spun in a machine to concentrate the platelets. These platelets are then injected into the participant's back to help healing and reduce pain and swelling. The other treatment available in this study uses donor tissue from the center of a spinal disc, called the nucleus pulposus (NP). This gel-like material normally helps absorb shock in the spine. In this therapy, NP tissue from a donor is injected into the damaged disc to help restore its cushioning function and replace lost tissue. In this study, participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two injections (either PRP or NP) to treat chronic discogenic LBP. In order to limit bias in outcome data, participants will not know what injection they received until 6 months post-procedure.

Participants will be asked to complete between 5-6 in-person visits with the study team. Beyond procedure-related activities including a blood draw and injection, participants will also complete questionnaires and physical examinations at the respective study visits.

02

Conditions studied

  • Discogenic Low Back Pain
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 78 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Can read and understand English
  • DEERS eligible
  • Ages 18-100
  • Low back pain duration > 3 months
  • Failed an adequate trial of previous conservative treatments for > 3 months including PT, and oral analgesics, anti-inflammatory medications, or injection therapy within the past 12 months
  • Average pain score ≥ 4/10 over the past week
  • Presumed clinical diagnosis of discogenic LBP (such as central, midline back pain exacerbated with flexion and loading; non-radiating; normal sensorimotor exam)
  • Lumbar MRI within the last 12 months showing disc degeneration in ≤ 2 lumbar discs; Modified Pfirrmann scoring III-VII
  • Agrees to have disc injection(s) and no other low back interventional (e.g., lumbar epidural steroid injections) or new pharmacological treatments (other than permitted supplemental medications which must be stopped 2 weeks prior to each follow-up) outside of the study for at least 6 months [Physical therapy (PT), exercise, or psychotherapy are allowed prior to 6 months]
  • Agrees to be off all NSAIDs (e.g., aspirin, ibuprofen, Aleve, naproxen, Advil, Motrin, Celebrex) from 2 weeks prior to and 3 months after the injection
  • Agrees to be off all corticosteroids (e.g., systemic, other injections) for at least 6 weeks after the injection
  • Stable dose of analgesic medications (excluding NSAIDs) for at least 2 weeks (off schedule 2 opioids for 1 month)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy (Women of childbearing capacity will have pregnancy test to confirm status)
  • Actively breastfeeding
  • Low back pain > 15 years in duration
  • Previous disc directed therapy involving heat (e.g., Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET), biacuplasty)
  • Previous disc injection therapy in the last 12 months (e.g., corticosteroid, PRP)
  • Corticosteroid injections of the low back in the 3 months prior to injection and other corticosteroid therapy (e.g., systemic, other injections) in the 6 weeks prior to injection
  • Previous lumbar spine surgery (e.g., discectomy, fusion) at the affected levels (i.e., those with relief after surgery in whom adjacent segment discogenic pain is suspected can be considered on a case-by-case basis)
  • Focal neurological deficit attributed to disc pathology (i.e., abnormal sensorimotor exam consistent with disc pathology)
  • Individuals deemed at risk to require systemic steroid over the 6-month study course (e.g., individuals with poorly controlled asthma or COPD, individuals with a poorly controlled autoimmune disease)
  • Individuals with poorly controlled medical or psychiatric co-morbidities, as determined by their specialist or primary care provider (in those not receiving specialty care)
  • Poorly controlled medical (e.g., unstable angina, congestive heart failure, poorly controlled diabetes) or psychiatric condition that has required medication adjustments within the past 2 weeks (severe depression or schizophrenia)
  • Untreated coagulopathy or inability to safely stop anticoagulants
  • Allergy to contrast dye or local anesthetics
  • Inability to stop Schedule 2 opioid use within 1 month of enrollment due to chronic pain
  • Diffuse pain phenotype (e.g., diagnosis of fibromyalgia)
  • Secondary gain (e.g., ongoing medical board or litigation related to injury)
  • Anticipated PCS or deployment within 12 months of enrollment
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intradiscal Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injection

    Biological: Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injection

  • Active comparator
    Intradiscal Allogeneic Nucleus Pulposus (NP) Tissue Graft Injection

    Biological: Nucleus Pulposus (NP) Injection

Interventions

  • Participants will receive up to a 2 mL intradiscal injection of autologous leukocyte-poor PRP in up to two discs

  • BiologicalNucleus Pulposus (NP) Injection

    Participants will receive up to a 2 mL intradiscal injection containing a single dose of allogenic NP tissue graft in saline in up to two discs

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Between-Group Difference in Mean Change in Average LBP (NPRS)

    The 11-item NPRS scale is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity. It is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale in which participants will select a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of their pain. The scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. no pain) to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. worst possible pain).

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months will be assessed. Change from Baseline to 6 months is the primary outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Between-Group Difference in Mean Change in Function (ODI)

    The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of low back pain on an individual's overall function. The ODI is scored on a scale from 0-100%, where a lower percentage reflects better function.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months will be assessed. 6 months is the primary timepoint.

  2. Patient Perception of Change/Satisfaction

    The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a 7-point Likert scale to measure changes in overall clinical status and satisfaction in response to an intervention. The PGIC has the following response options: 1 - No change (or condition has gotten worse); 2 - Almost the same, hardly any change at all; 3 - A little better, but no noticeable change; 4 - Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference; 5 - Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change; 6 - Better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference; 7 - A great deal better and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference.

    Time frame: Will capture at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months from Baseline. 6 months is the primary timepoint.

  3. Proportion of Participants with Significant Medication Reduction

    Medication use will be assessed at each timepoint. A reduction \> 20% in opioid usage or cessation of a non-opioid analgesic will be considered significant. The proportion of participants with a significant medication reduction will be reported.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months will be assessed. 6 months is the primary timepoint.

  4. Proportion of Participants with Positive Categorical Outcome

    A positive categorical outcome is defined as a ≥ 2-point decrease in average NPRS score coupled with a PGIC score ≥ 5/7 or ≥ 10-point decrease in ODI, without significant supplemental medication use.

    Time frame: Will capture at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months from Baseline. 6 months is the primary timepoint.

  5. Effect on Quality of Life (HADS, AIS)

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a 14-item questionnaire scored from 0-21, where low scores indicate lower levels of anxiety and depression. The Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) is an 8-item questionnaire scored from 0-24, where low scores indicate lower levels of insomnia. The HADS and AIS provide additional information on an individual's overall quality of life in terms of mental health and sleep quality.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months will be assessed. 6 months is primary timepoint.

  6. Between-Group Difference in Average LBP (DVPRS)

    The Defense Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) is a 11-point scale measuring pain intensity, where a lower score indicates less pain. 4 additional supplemental questions are included if average pain level is ≥ 4/10.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months will be assessed. 6 months is the primary timepoint.

  7. Demographic and Clinical Predictors of Treatment Response

    Subgroup exploratory analyses will be performed to determine whether any demographic and clinical variables (e.g., biological sex, baseline pain severity, cell and immunoregulatory profiles) predict treatment response.

    Time frame: Will capture at Baseline, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months. 6 months is the primary timepoint.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
    Bethesda, Maryland 20889, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tuakli-Wosornu YA, Terry A, Boachie-Adjei K, Harrison JR, Gribbin CK, LaSalle EE, Nguyen JT, Solomon JL, Lutz GE. Lumbar Intradiskal Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injections: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study. PM R. 2016 Jan;8(1):1-10; quiz 10. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Aug 24. PubMed 26314234 ↗
  • Lorio MP, Tate JL, Myers TJ, Block JE, Beall DP. Perspective on Intradiscal Therapies for Lumbar Discogenic Pain: State of the Science, Knowledge Gaps, and Imperatives for Clinical Adoption. J Pain Res. 2024 Mar 18;17:1171-1182. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S441180. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38524692 ↗
  • Schneider BJ, Hunt C, Conger A, Qu W, Maus TP, Vorobeychik Y, Cheng J, Duszynski B, McCormick ZL. The effectiveness of intradiscal biologic treatments for discogenic low back pain: a systematic review. Spine J. 2022 Feb;22(2):226-237. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.07.015. Epub 2021 Aug 2. PubMed 34352363 ↗
  • Manchikanti L, Knezevic E, Knezevic NN, Kaye AD, Atluri S, Sanapati MR, Pampati V, Hirsch JA. Effectiveness of Intradiscal Regenerative Medicine Therapies for Long-Term Relief of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Physician. 2024 Dec;27(10):E995-E1032. PubMed 39688822 ↗
  • Beall DP, Davis TT, Amirdelfan K, Naidu RK, DePalma MJ, Costandi S, Fleming JW, Yoon ES, Ganey T, Block JE, Mekhail N. Nucleus Pulposus Allograft Supplementation in Patients with Lumbar Discogenic Pain: Initial 6-month Outcomes from a Prospective Clinical Pilot Study. Pain Physician. 2024 Nov;27(8):E865-E871. PubMed 39621986 ↗
  • Navani A, Ambach M, Calodney A, Rosenthal R, Li G, Mahoney CB, Everts PA. The Safety and Effectiveness of Orthobiologic Injections for Discogenic Chronic Low Back Pain: A Multicenter Prospective, Crossover, Randomized Controlled Trial with 12 Months Follow-up. Pain Physician. 2024 Jan;27(1):E65-E77. PubMed 38285032 ↗
  • Navani A, Manchikanti L, Albers SL, Latchaw RE, Sanapati J, Kaye AD, Atluri S, Jordan S, Gupta A, Cedeno D, Vallejo A, Fellows B, Knezevic NN, Pappolla M, Diwan S, Trescot AM, Soin A, Kaye AM, Aydin SM, Calodney AK, Candido KD, Bakshi S, Benyamin RM, Vallejo R, Watanabe A, Beall D, Stitik TP, Foye PM, Helander EM, Hirsch JA. Responsible, Safe, and Effective Use of Biologics in the Management of Low Back Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines. Pain Physician. 2019 Jan;22(1S):S1-S74. PubMed 30717500 ↗
  • Pettine KA, Murphy MB, Suzuki RK, Sand TT. Percutaneous injection of autologous bone marrow concentrate cells significantly reduces lumbar discogenic pain through 12 months. Stem Cells. 2015 Jan;33(1):146-56. doi: 10.1002/stem.1845. PubMed 25187512 ↗
  • Cohen SP, Wenzell D, Hurley RW, Kurihara C, Buckenmaier CC 3rd, Griffith S, Larkin TM, Dahl E, Morlando BJ. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response pilot study evaluating intradiscal etanercept in patients with chronic discogenic low back pain or lumbosacral radiculopathy. Anesthesiology. 2007 Jul;107(1):99-105. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000267518.20363.0d. PubMed 17585221 ↗
  • Cao P, Jiang L, Zhuang C, Yang Y, Zhang Z, Chen W, Zheng T. Intradiscal injection therapy for degenerative chronic discogenic low back pain with end plate Modic changes. Spine J. 2011 Feb;11(2):100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Sep 20. PubMed 20850390 ↗
  • Serio MA, Bartolina R, Sudini S, MacDonald EM, Thomassen AS, Shekoohi S, Chami AA, Kaye AD. Clinical Efficacy and Risks of Intradiscal Orthobiological Injections: A Narrative Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025 Jul 11;29(1):99. doi: 10.1007/s11916-025-01414-y. PubMed 40646365 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Jun 2028, 18 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 19, 2026
First posted
Oct 26, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
Oct 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 26, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 26, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07895225
Lead sponsor
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Collaborators
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Responsible party
Edward Dolomisiewicz (Principal Investigator, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 26, 2026
Start date
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 26, 2026

Study contacts

Edward Dolomisiewicz
Contact
edward.a.dolomisiewicz.mil@health.mil
301-295-8571

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Platelet rich plasma

Start the discussion