CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06387264Updated Sep 19, 2024

Compont - Varicose Veins of the Lower Extremities

An interventional study of Medical Adhesive and ClosureFast Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation(RFA) Catheter in Varicose Veins of Lower Limb, sponsored by Peking University People's Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.

Sponsored by Peking University People's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2023, registered Apr 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
188
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Medical Adhesive produced by Beijing Compont Medical Devices Co., Ltd. in the treatment of varicose veins in the lower extremities.

The main questions it aims to answer is: What medical problems do participants have when using tissue glue? Researchers will compare Medical Adhesive to ClosureFast Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) Catheter (produced by Medtronic Inc. to see if Medical Adhesive works to treat varicose veins in the lower extremities.

Participants will:

Treated with closed varicose veins of the lower extremity by Medical Adhesive or ClosureFast.

Return to the hospital at 1, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively for Doppler ultrasound, and at 4, 12, 24 weeks postoperatively for venous scoring.

02

Conditions studied

  • Varicose Veins of Lower Limb

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Varicose Veins of Lower Limb
  • NBCA
03

In context

Varicose Veins

253 studies on the registry are indexed under Varicose Veins; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 188 is above the median of 104 across 162 interventional studies indexed under Varicose Veins.

Browse Varicose Veins studies →

Lead sponsor

Peking University People's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 584 studies on the registry; 233 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinically diagnosed as great saphenous vein varices. (This operation only dealt with one side varicose veins of the lower extremities.)
  • CEAP is graded C2-C6.
  • Doppler ultrasound confirmed the patency of deep veins of lower limbs.
  • Sign informed consent, voluntarily participate in the trial and follow up as required

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
  • Recurrent varicose veins
  • The diameter of target lesion of the great saphenous vein less than 2 mm or more than 15 mm
  • The great saphenous vein is severely distorted or tuberculated at the root
  • Sepsis or septicemia
  • Allergic to n-butyl cyanoacrylate
  • The distance between the skin and the target vessel wall of the great saphenous vein less than 5 mm
  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease, shock, coma or multiple organ failure
  • Lactating or pregnant women
  • Participated in other clinical trials within 1 month before surgery
  • The researchers considered it unsuitable for inclusion
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
188 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Medical Adhesive treatment group

    Device: Medical Adhesive

  • Active comparator
    Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter

    Device: ClosureFast Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation(RFA) Catheter

Interventions

  • DeviceMedical Adhesive

    Medical Adhesive (produced by Beijing Compont Medical Devices Co., Ltd.) For varicose veins in the main saphenous vein, use 0.1 ml glue for every 3 cm of blood vessels.

  • DeviceClosureFast Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation(RFA) Catheter

    ClosureFast Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) Catheter (produced by America Medtronic Inc.) The ClosureFast catheter precisely heats a 7 cm vein segment in one 20-second interval.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical success rate

    At 24 weeks after surgery, Doppler ultrasound was used to check the closure of the target blood vessels.

    Time frame: 24 weeks after operation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Technical success rate

    Immediately after operation, Doppler ultrasound was used to check the closure of the target blood vessels.

    Time frame: Immediately after operation

  2. Target vascular closure rate at 12 weeks after operation.

    At 12 weeks after surgery, Doppler ultrasound was used to check the closure of the target blood vessels.

    Time frame: 12 weeks after operation.

  3. Clinical signs

    The severity of the patient's clinical presentation was assessed according to the Clinical signs- etiologic classification- anatomic distribution- pathophysiologic dysfunction classification (CEAP classification) criteria. classification are as follows. C0: Without any visible or palpable signs of disease. C1: Telangiectasia or reticular veins C2: Varicose veins C2r: Recurrent varicose veins C3: Edema is present. C4: Changes in skin and subcutaneous tissue C4a: Pigmentation or eczema C4b: Lipodermatosclerosis or atrophie blanche C4c: Corona phlebectatica C5: Healed ulcers C6: Active ulcers C6r: Recurrent active venous ulcer

    Time frame: Screening period, 12 and 24 weeks after operation.

  4. Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)

    The VCSS score ranges from 0 to 30, with a larger value indicating approximately severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Screening period, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after operation.

  5. Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ)

    AVVQ scores range between 0 and 33, a higher score indicates a lower quality of life for patients.

    Time frame: Screening period, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after operation.

  6. Operation duration

    Time frame: Immediately after operation

  7. Evaluation of product performance

    The researchers evaluated the operation performance of the product from the aspects of ease of operation and injection function, and divided the evaluation into three levels: satisfactory, general and unsatisfactory.

    Time frame: within 24 hours after operation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Peking University People's Hospital
    Beijing, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Balint R, Farics A, Parti K, Vizsy L, Batorfi J, Menyhei G, Balint IB. Which endovenous ablation method does offer a better long-term technical success in the treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein? Review. Vascular. 2016 Dec;24(6):649-657. doi: 10.1177/1708538116648035. Epub 2016 Apr 28. PubMed 27126643 ↗
  • Morrison N, Gibson K, McEnroe S, Goldman M, King T, Weiss R, Cher D, Jones A. Randomized trial comparing cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins (VeClose). J Vasc Surg. 2015 Apr;61(4):985-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.071. Epub 2015 Jan 31. PubMed 25650040 ↗
  • Morrison N, Gibson K, Vasquez M, Weiss R, Cher D, Madsen M, Jones A. VeClose trial 12-month outcomes of cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 May;5(3):321-330. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.12.005. Epub 2017 Mar 6. PubMed 28411697 ↗
  • Dimech AP, Cassar K. Efficacy of Cyanoacrylate Glue Ablation of Primary Truncal Varicose Veins Compared to Existing Endovenous Techniques: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Surg J (N Y). 2020 Jun 19;6(2):e77-e86. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1708866. eCollection 2020 Apr. PubMed 32577526 ↗
  • Beteli CB, Rossi FH, de Almeida BL, Izukawa NM, Onofre Rossi CB, Gabriel SA, Kambara AM, de Moraes Rego Sousa AG, Thorpe P. Prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing electrocoagulation and radiofrequency in the treatment of patients with great saphenous vein insufficiency and lower limb varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018 Mar;6(2):212-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Dec 9. PubMed 29229466 ↗
  • Nordon IM, Hinchliffe RJ, Brar R, Moxey P, Black SA, Thompson MM, Loftus IM. A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency versus laser treatment of the great saphenous vein in patients with varicose veins. Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):876-81. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318230af5a. PubMed 21934487 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06387264
Lead sponsor
Peking University People's Hospital
Collaborators
Peking University First Hospital, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University, Liaocheng People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Responsible party
Zhang Xiaoming (Chief physician of Vascular Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 29, 2024
Start date
Jan 11, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 3, 2024
Completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 19, 2024

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion