An interventional study of Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy and Transdermal Nd:YAG 1064 nm laser in Varicose Veins, sponsored by Hospital Universitario Pedro Ernesto. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-05.
Sponsored by Hospital Universitario Pedro Ernesto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This randomized, parallel clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment will compare the clinical and aesthetic outcomes of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy alone versus polidocanol foam associated with long-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG transdermal laser in the treatment of lower-limb tributary varicose veins. The primary endpoint is venous occlusion rate at 30 days, assessed by Doppler ultrasound. Secondary outcomes include cutaneous hyperpigmentation, pain, patient satisfaction, and adverse events.
The study aims to evaluate whether the association of transdermal Nd:YAG 1064 nm laser with polidocanol foam improves venous occlusion and aesthetic outcomes compared to foam alone. Participants will be adult patients with lower limb varicose veins CEAP 1-3 confirmed by Doppler ultrasound. After randomization (1:1), the control group will receive 0.5% polidocanol foam, while the intervention group will receive 0.25% polidocanol foam followed by transdermal laser application. A second session will be performed only if partial occlusion persists at the 30-day follow-up. Assessments will include venous occlusion at 30, 90 and 180 days after the procedure, pigmentation, pain intensity, number of sessions required, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Standardized photographs will be taken at baseline, 30, 90 and 180 days.
226 studies on the registry are indexed under Varicose Veins; 30 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 102 is close to the median of 101 across 154 interventional studies indexed under Varicose Veins.
Browse Varicose Veins studies →Hospital Universitario Pedro Ernesto is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.
Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.
BMI (body mass index)
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Autoimmune disease
A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.
Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Polidocanol 0,5% foam prepared with 1 mL of sclerosant and 3 mL of room air, injected under visualization of reticular vein (5 - 8 mL total).
Drug: Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy
Polidocanol 0,25% foam (1 mL of sclerosant + 2 mL of room air) followed within 2 minutes by long-pulse Nd:YAG 1064 nm laser (spot 6 mm; pulse 20-30 ms; fluence 60-70 J/cm²), with skin cooling.
Drug: Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy · Device: Transdermal Nd:YAG 1064 nm laser
Polidocanol foam prepared using the Tessari method. Concentration 0,5% (Foam Arm) or 0,25% (Foam + Laser Arm), injected under ultrasound guidance.
Long-pulse Nd:YAG 1064 nm transdermal laser applied along the treated vein path immediately after foam injection.
Venous occlusion rate at 30 days
Ultrasound assessment of the treated vein segment 30 days after the first session, defined as complete absence of detectable flow in the treated vein or partial occlusion with significant reduction in reflux and/or venous diameter, and performed by an independent physician who is blinded to group assignment and not involved in the treatment procedures.
Time frame: 30 days after the first session
Venous occlusion rate at 90 days
Ultrasound assessment of the treated vein segment 90 days after the first session, defined as complete occlusion or partial occlusion with improvement inreflux and/or reduction in venous diameter, and performed by an independent physician who is blinded to group assignment and not involved in the treatment procedures.
Time frame: 90 days after the first session
Final venous occlusion rate at 180 days
Ultrasound assessment of the treated vein segment 180 days after the first session, defined as complete absence of detectable flow in the treated vein or partial occlusion with significant reduction in reflux and/or venous diameter, and performed by an independent physician who is blinded to group assignment and not involved in the treatment procedures.
Time frame: 180 days after the first session
Pain intensity immediately after the procedure
Participant-reported pain intensity in the treated limb, measured immediately after the session, using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Higher scores indicate greater pain.
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure (within 30 minutes)
Hyperpigmentation at the treated site
Skin hyperpigmentation will be assessed by an independent physician blinded to the treatment allocation, using standardized comparative photographs obtained at baseline, 30 days, 90 days, and 180 days.
Time frame: 30, 90, and 180 days after the first session.
Number of treatment sessions required
Total number of sessions needed to achieve venous occlusion according to the study protocol (maximum of two sessions).
Time frame: Up to 90 days after the first session.
Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction
Patient global assessment of cosmetic improvement using a 5-point Likert scale (from "no improvement" to "complete improvement").
Time frame: Assessed at 90 days after the first session.
Plan to share: No — The study will not share individual particiapnt data (IPD). Aggregate results will be published in scientific journals.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hospital Universitario Pedro Ernesto