ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06377319STRATIFYHFUpdated Oct 16, 2024

Decision Support System for Diagnosis and Progression of Heart Failure

An observational study in Heart Failure, sponsored by Coventry University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 45 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-16.

Sponsored by Coventry University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,600
Ages
45 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome associated with impaired heart function, poor quality of life for patients and high healthcare costs. Accurate risk stratification and early diagnosis in HF are challenging as signs and symptoms are non-specific. Here the investigators propose to address this global challenge by developing novel analytic methods for HF (STRATIFYHF). A prospective clinical study will collect patient-specific data related to medical history, a physical examination for signs and symptoms, blood tests including natriuretic peptides, an electrocardiogram (ECG), an echocardiogram (ultrasound of the heart), cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), demographic, socio-economic and lifestyle data along with novel technologies (cardiac output response to stress (CORS) test and voice recognition biomarkers) from individuals at-risk of developing HF and those with a confirmed diagnosis of HF. STRATIFYHF will use these data to develop, validate and implement the first artificial intelligence (AI)-based, Decision Support System (DSS) for assessing and predicting the risk of HF development, its early diagnosis and progression. STRATIFYHF will integrate 1) patient-specific data i.e. demographic, clinical, genetic, lifestyle and socio-economic, 2) an AI-based digital patient library and AI-driven algorithms for risk stratification, early diagnosis, and disease progression in HF, and 3) a highly innovative multifunctional AI-based DSS and mobile application for informing a patient-centred, personalised, prevention and treatment strategies for HF.

Read the detailed description

Aim and Objectives:

This prospective study is part of the STRATIFYHF project which aims to validate a decision support system for risk prediction, diagnosis, and progression of HF.

To achieve this, the investigators will undertake a prospective study to collect data and deliver proof-of-concept study with a duration of 36 months.

Eight clinical centres will recruit 1,600 patients (i.e., 800 suspected and 800 confirmed HF patients) with recruitment target of 8-9 patients per month and up to 24-month follow-up.

Design and Methods:

The present study is a prospective, longitudinal, clinical observational study comprising eight clinical partners across Europe. The study will start on 1st July 2024 and last for 36 months.

Research visits and clinical assessments:

Eligible participants will attend the clinical research site of participating centres for two visits (i.e., baseline and follow-up clinical assessments at month 12). Each visit will last approximately 2.5 hours. An additional visit will be arranged in a subset of participants for a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging scan. Further monitoring of patient outcomes (e.g., hospitalization) will be performed via examination of medical records and telephone calls to patients.

i) Consent and Screening Questionnaires

Patients will be provided with the opportunity to ask further questions and requested to provide written informed consent. Review of the medical history will be performed.

ii) Physical examination anthropometric and body composition

Physical examination will be performed by a medically trained member of the research team. Body weight and height will be measured using a hospital-based scale and stadiometer. The amount of fat and muscle in the body will be assessed using bioimpedance or other appropriate methods. In case of contraindications only anthropometrics (weight, height, and waist circumference) will be measured.

iii) Blood Samples

Blood sample will be taken from the antecubital vein. The blood sample will be assessed for cardiac biomarkers (brain natriuretic peptides (NTproBNP), troponin, total protein, creatine kinase myocardial band), lipid profile (total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides), full blood count, glucose, HbA1c, markers of renal function (albumin, urea, creatinine, eGFR), markers of liver function (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine transaminase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, bilirubin), calcium, potassium, sodium, uric acid, markers of inflammation (C-Reactive Protein), and thyroid-stimulating hormone.

iv) Quality of life questionnaires

All participants will be asked to complete the Short Form-36 quality of life questionnaire. In addition, participants with diagnosed HF will be asked to complete the validated Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHFQ) questionnaire.

v) Health Economics

Health economics analysis will be performed based on clinical records on participants' use of healthcare facilities related to HF (including visits to GP, Cardiology department, rehabilitation, and other specialist services), clinical investigations completed, and medication use.

vi) Electrocardiography

An ECG with integrated heart rate variability will be performed using a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram in the supine position. In addition, cardiac autonomic function i.e., heart rate variability integrated into the ECG device will also be assessed.

vii) Arterial stiffness assessment (Coventry University only)

Arterial stiffness, as a measure of arterial function, will be assessed using the non-invasive SphygmoCor device, which allows for both pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity to be performed non-invasively using the gold standard techniques. The measurement is simple and painless, taking only a few minutes to perform. While the participant is in a comfortable supine position, the researcher will place a tonometer (pencil-like sensor) gently against the wrist and will record blood pressure signal from the pulse.

viii) Transthoracic Echocardiography (ultrasound of the heart)

An echocardiogram is an ultrasound scan of the heart which detail's structure and function of the heart. Transthoracic echocardiography including colour and tissue Doppler will be performed at rest and in response to Valsalva manoeuvre. Real-time images acquired in the standard parasternal (long-axis) and apical (apical 4 chamber, apical 2 chamber, and apical long axis) views, for which three cardiac cycles recorded. Parasternal short-axis views acquired at three levels: basal (at mitral valve level), midpapillary, and apical (minimum cavity distal to papillary muscle level). Parasternal long axis of the right ventricle and right ventricular outflow tract will be monitored. Peak velocity of the left ventricular outflow tract will be recorded from the apical 5 chamber view by pulse Doppler, used to calculate pressure gradient. Apical 4-chamber view will be used for right ventricular evaluation.

ix) Cardiac output response to stress (CORS) test

Participants will then be connected to the bioreactance Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitor (NICOM, Starling, Baxter Inc., USA) which the investigators have previously evaluated. The method uses four pairs of electrodes applied at the front side of the upper and lower thorax (similar to ECG). Bioreactance is a novel method for continuous non-invasive cardiac function monitoring and estimates cardiac output by analysing the frequency of relative phase shift of electronic current delivered across the thorax. Measurements will be performed using the protocol the investigators have recently developed consisting of three phases: 3-min rest (supine) phase, 3-min challenge (standing) phase, and 3-min stress (exercise step-test) phase.

x) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Each centre will undertake CMR assessment in a subset of 20-40 participants who have not had CMR over the previous 6 months or have no contraindications to CMR studies as determined by a cardiologist or qualified radiographer. Participants will undergo cardiac cine imaging, to evaluate cardiac morphology, systolic and diastolic function. These measurements will be taken according to standard imaging protocol of the clinical testing facility.

xi) Voice recording

Subtle changes in speech pattern have emerged as a tool to risk stratify, diagnose, and monitor cardiovascular conditions. Participants will be seated in a quiet room in the clinical research facility to complete the recording. Participants' voices will be audio recorded for up to five minutes while they read a standardised text aloud. The recorder will be started just before patients start to read the text and stopped at the end of the task. The standardised text will be translated in different languages to ensure diversity and inclusion is achieved. The audio-file will be transferred to a computer and then processed using a dedicated software which is available from https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/. The software extracts relevant voice features after low-level acoustic features and sudden impulsive noise have been removed using spectral noise gating and voice processing techniques. Extracted voice features are presented in numerical values and will be stored in a password protected computer for further analysis using machine learning and artificial intelligence.

xii) Home-based monitoring

Participants will have the opportunity to opt in to participate in the home-based monitoring. Thirty participants per centre who have provided consent for the mobile application, will undertake home-based monitoring for body weight, blood pressure, accelerometry, and electrocardiography during six months follow-up. Participants will be selected from the first 30 participants who have opted in to participate in this part of the study. Participants who do not have access at home to body weight scale or blood pressure monitor will be provided the same by the local research team. Accelerometry and electrocardiography will be monitored using a wrist-worn watch (ScanWatch 2, Withings, France).

xiii) Focus groups and semi-structured interviews

Interviews with up to 15 healthcare professionals and up to 20 study participants (i.e., 10 at risk of HF and 10 diagnosed with HF), will be conducted to explore the needs of patients and health care providers prior to the development of decision support system (DSS) and to evaluate the acceptability of the mobile application. Additionally, Coventry and Newcastle Universities will conduct interviews with up to 20 study participants in total to evaluate their perception of being at risk of heart failure, medical support available to them, and their experience of completing the CORS test. An online training programme to guide the use of the DSS will be developed with healthcare professionals. The training programme will be delivered face-to-face to general practitioners, cardiologists, and nurses by a trained researcher. The stand-alone online training programme will also be made available.

Sample size and statistical analysis:

Power calculation: With an anticipated drop-out to follow-up assessments rate of 20%, it is estimated that recruitment of 1,600 patients in prospective phase will be sufficient to achieve a desired specificity and sensitivity of >95% within a 4% margin of error. This sample size will also provide sufficient power to evaluate accuracy of prediction and diagnosis of different types of HF based on the most recent guidelines (i.e., heart failure reduced ejection fraction; heart failure mildly reduced ejection fraction; heart failure improved ejection fraction and heart failure preserved ejection fraction) assuming a sensitivity of at least 90% with a margin of error of 12% and a prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) of \~50% in patients with a diagnosis of HF. Logistic regression will be used to evaluate the accuracy of the DSS. Cross tabulation of test versus observed disease status will enable calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios. 95% confidence intervals will be calculated using the binomial exact method. To assess the accuracy of the DSS to detect different types of HF a multinomial regression and classification trees will be used. The AUC-ROC (area under receiver operator characteristic) curve for each diagnostic test result will be separately assessed through univariate logistic regression models. Multiple logistic regressions will also be used to evaluate the DSS added diagnostic value. Reclassification measures will be used to assess how many patients are reclassified by adding the novel technologies (CORS test and voice biomarkers) to the existing investigations (combined into a multivariable model) after introducing a particular probability of disease presence threshold. Multiple logistic regressions will be used for the initial development of the DSS for primary and secondary care to predict the presence or absence and type of HF. Data on diagnostic efficacy outcomes, use of resources and unit costs of the resources used will be utilised for health economic assessment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure

Keywords

  • heart failure
  • risk prediction
  • diagnosis
  • progression
  • decision support system
03

In context

Heart Failure

6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,600 is above the median of 200 across 1,983 observational studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Coventry University is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population would include men and women suspected with heart failure who have been referred to secondary care for specialist review and have attended a heart failure diagnostic clinic.

Eligibility criteria

  1. Inclusion criteria for patients at risk of heart failure:

    1. Individuals at risk of developing HF ≥45 years of age sub-divided into two categories based on current definitions i.e.,

      (i) patients with current or prior symptoms or signs of HF, but without structural, biomarker, or genetic markers of heart disease but have evidence of one of the following: hypertension, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, known exposure to cardiotoxins and family history of cardiomyopathy and

      (ii) Patients with current or prior symptoms or signs of HF and have evidence of one of the following - structural heart disease (e.g. Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, chamber enlargement, wall motion abnormality, valvular disease), abnormal cardiac function (e.g., reduced LV or right ventricular systolic function, evidence of increased filling pressures or abnormal diastolic function), elevated natriuretic peptide or elevated cardiac troponin on exposure to a cardiotoxin.

    2. All patients willing to visit the clinical research facility and able to provide written .
  2. Inclusion criteria for patients with confirmed diagnosis of heart failure:

    1. Patients with confirmed diagnosis of HF (heart failure reduced ; heart failure mildly reduced ejection fraction; heart failure improved ejection fraction; and heart failure preserved ejection fraction) over the previous 24 months or
    2. hospitalisation due to HF ≥45 years of age
    3. willing to visit the clinical research facility and able to provide written informed consent.
  3. Exclusion criteria for at-risk individuals and diagnosed heart failure patients:

    1. inability to provide verbal informed consent
    2. presenting with severe symptoms
    3. major co-morbidity or other alternative diagnoses (e.g., , severe respiratory disease, mental health problem); recent acute coronary syndrome (within 60 days)
    4. severe physical disability preventing independence
    5. scheduled or implanted pacemaker or cardio-defibrillator in the last 3 months
    6. severe renal insufficiency
    7. present or planned pregnancy
    8. less than 12 months.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,600 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients at risk of developing heart failure

    Individuals at risk of developing HF ≥45 years of age sub-divided into two categories i.e., (i) patients with current or prior symptoms or signs of HF, but without structural, biomarker, or genetic markers of heart disease but have evidence of one of the following: hypertension, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, known exposure to cardiotoxins and family history of cardiomyopathy and (ii) Patients with current or prior symptoms or signs of HF and have evidence of one of the following - structural heart disease (e.g. Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, chamber enlargement, wall motion abnormality, valvular disease), abnormal cardiac function (e.g., reduced LV or right ventricular systolic function, evidence of increased filling pressures or abnormal diastolic function), elevated natriuretic peptide or elevated cardiac troponin on exposure to a cardiotoxin. Willing to visit the clinical research facility and able to provide written informed consent.

    Diagnostic Test: Cardiac Output Response to Stress (CORS) test

  • Patients diagnosed with heart failure

    Patients with confirmed diagnosis of HF (heart failure reduced ejection fraction; heart failure mildly reduced ejection fraction; heart failure improved ejection fraction; and heart failure preserved ejection fraction) over the previous 24 months or hospitalisation due to HF ≥45 years of age; willingness to visit the clinical research facility and able to provide written informed consent.

    Diagnostic Test: Cardiac Output Response to Stress (CORS) test

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testCardiac Output Response to Stress (CORS) test

    Cardiac Output Response to Stress (CORS) is a novel, non-invasive, easy-to-use test developed by the Newcastle and Coventry Universities. CORS test measures heart function (cardiac output) at rest and in response to short step-exercise using validated electrical signal processing bioreactance technology, similar to an ECG.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of the DSS

    Collection of prospective data for the diagnostic accuracy (i.e., sensitivity and specificity) of the DSS to predict risk of developing HF within 12 months.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Demographic and clinical predictors of risk, diagnosis, and progression of heart failure.

    To identify demographic and clinical predictors of risk, diagnosis, and progression of heart failure.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Conrad N, Judge A, Tran J, Mohseni H, Hedgecott D, Crespillo AP, Allison M, Hemingway H, Cleland JG, McMurray JJV, Rahimi K. Temporal trends and patterns in heart failure incidence: a population-based study of 4 million individuals. Lancet. 2018 Feb 10;391(10120):572-580. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32520-5. Epub 2017 Nov 21. PubMed 29174292 ↗
  • McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Bohm M, Burri H, Butler J, Celutkiene J, Chioncel O, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CSP, Lyon AR, McMurray JJV, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano GMC, Ruschitzka F, Kathrine Skibelund A; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368. No abstract available. PubMed 34447992 ↗
  • Maggioni AP. Epidemiology of Heart Failure in Europe. Heart Fail Clin. 2015 Oct;11(4):625-35. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2015.07.015. Epub 2015 Aug 8. PubMed 26462102 ↗
  • Roberts E, Ludman AJ, Dworzynski K, Al-Mohammad A, Cowie MR, McMurray JJ, Mant J; NICE Guideline Development Group for Acute Heart Failure. The diagnostic accuracy of the natriuretic peptides in heart failure: systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis in the acute care setting. BMJ. 2015 Mar 4;350:h910. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h910. PubMed 25740799 ↗
  • Bozkurt B, Coats A, Tsutsui H. Universal Definition and Classification of Heart Failure. J Card Fail. 2021 Feb 7:S1071-9164(21)00050-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.01.022. Online ahead of print. PubMed 33662581 ↗
  • Jakovljevic DG, Trenell MI, MacGowan GA. Bioimpedance and bioreactance methods for monitoring cardiac output. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Dec;28(4):381-94. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 23. PubMed 25480768 ↗
  • Jones TW, Houghton D, Cassidy S, MacGowan GA, Trenell MI, Jakovljevic DG. Bioreactance is a reliable method for estimating cardiac output at rest and during exercise. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Sep;115(3):386-91. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu560. Epub 2015 Feb 6. PubMed 25659999 ↗
  • Jakovljevic DG, Moore S, Hallsworth K, Fattakhova G, Thoma C, Trenell MI. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance and bioreactance methods at rest and during exercise. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012 Apr;26(2):63-8. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9334-4. Epub 2012 Jan 11. PubMed 22234400 ↗
  • Okwose NC, Chowdhury S, Houghton D, Trenell MI, Eggett C, Bates M, MacGowan GA, Jakovljevic DG. Comparison of cardiac output estimates by bioreactance and inert gas rebreathing methods during cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018 May;38(3):483-490. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12442. Epub 2017 Jun 2. PubMed 28574213 ↗
  • Charman SJ, Okwose NC, Taylor CJ, Bailey K, Fuat A, Ristic A, Mant J, Deaton C, Seferovic PM, Coats AJS, Hobbs FDR, MacGowan GA, Jakovljevic DG. Feasibility of the cardiac output response to stress test in suspected heart failure patients. Fam Pract. 2022 Sep 24;39(5):805-812. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab184. PubMed 35083480 ↗
  • Charman S, Okwose N, Maniatopoulos G, Graziadio S, Metzler T, Banks H, Vale L, MacGowan GA, Seferovic PM, Fuat A, Deaton C, Mant J, Hobbs RFD, Jakovljevic DG. Opportunities and challenges of a novel cardiac output response to stress (CORS) test to enhance diagnosis of heart failure in primary care: qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 14;9(4):e028122. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028122. PubMed 30987993 ↗
  • Krittanawong C, Johnson KW, Rosenson RS, Wang Z, Aydar M, Baber U, Min JK, Tang WHW, Halperin JL, Narayan SM. Deep learning for cardiovascular medicine: a practical primer. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 1;40(25):2058-2073. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz056. PubMed 30815669 ↗
  • Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):1008-15. PubMed 11095242 ↗
  • National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK). Chronic Heart Failure: National Clinical Guideline for Diagnosis and Management in Primary and Secondary Care: Partial Update [Internet]. London: Royal College of Physicians (UK); 2010 Aug. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK65340/ PubMed 22741186 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The investigators plan to share anonymised data with all project partners.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: Months 0 to 24

Access criteria: Data sharing agreement already in place with all project partners

Data sharing details ↗ · stratifyhf.eu

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2024; primary completion for Jul 2027, 32 months later.

Of 793 non-industry observational studies under Heart Failure, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 99. This study's planned 32 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 975 studies reached it within 41 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 89.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 17, 2024
First posted
Apr 22, 2024
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jul 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 31, 2027
Last update
Oct 16, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06377319
Lead sponsor
Coventry University
Collaborators
Newcastle University, University of Cambridge, University of Novi Sad, University of Florence, University of Regensburg, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands., Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
Responsible party
Djordje Jakovljevic (Professor, Coventry University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 22, 2024
Start date
Nov 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2024

Study contacts

Djordje Jakovljevic
Contact
djordje.jakovljevic@coventry.ac.uk
07522694321
Nduka Okwose
Contact
ad6707@coventry.ac.uk
+447448930074
Djordje Jakovljevic
principal investigator · Coventry University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion