CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06375408TACSUpdated Apr 19, 2024

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Prevents Delirium in Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

An interventional study of Real transcranial alternating electrical stimulation and Sham transcranial alternating electrical stimulation in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-19.

Sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2026, 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
74
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about using the latest transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to reduce the incidence of delirium in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. The main question it aims to answer is:

  • To evaluate the effect of tACS on reducing delirium in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Participants will treated with real tACS or sham tACS. Researchers will mainly compare the two groups to see if patients' delirium will reduce by using tACS.

Read the detailed description

Research objectives: To reduce the incidence of delirium in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage by using the latest transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Research contents:

  1. To evaluate the effect of transcranial alternating current stimulation on improving sleep quality in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage;
  2. To evaluate the effect of transcranial alternating current stimulation on reducing delirium in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Research hypothesis: Transcranial alternating current stimulation can improve sleep quality and reduce the incidence of delirium in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Study design:

  1. double-blind randomized clinical trial
  2. Subjects:Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage admitted to the neurosurgical intensive care unit during the study period.
  3. Number of participating centers and names of centers: Single research center, Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
  4. Sample size: The total number of plans was 74, and the total number of study centers was 74.
  5. Grouping of subjects:The random number table method was used for randomization, and the envelope method was used for randomization. The random serial number was stored in an airtight envelope, a patient was admitted, and an envelope was opened.
  6. Intervention measures: ① The control group was treated with sham transcranial electrical stimulation; ② The experimental group was treated with real transcranial electrical stimulation.
  7. Outcome measures: ① Efficacy indicators: the incidence and duration of delirium; The scores of Richard Campell sleep questionnaire, Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, numerical rating scale for pain and muscle strength were recorded.② Safety indicators: the incidence of adverse reactions.
02

Conditions studied

  • Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
  • transcranial alternating current stimulation
  • delirium
  • Sleep quality
03

In context

Delirium

1,057 studies on the registry are indexed under Delirium; 238 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 74 is below the median of 120 across 599 interventional studies indexed under Delirium.

Browse Delirium studies →

Lead sponsor

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing is the lead sponsor of 346 studies on the registry; 217 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage was consistent with the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage 2015;
  • Patients after completion of surgical treatment;
  • over 18 years of age;
  • Hunt \& Hess grade I-III;
  • No major organ failure;
  • The patient has no speech or hearing impairment;
  • Informed consent of patients and their families, signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who have delirium at the time of enrollment;
  • had substance abuse/dependence within 6 months before enrollment;
  • had suffered from other mental illness within 6 months before enrollment;
  • Suffering from serious or unstable organic diseases;
  • Pregnant or lactating women and those planning to become pregnant in the near future;
  • Damaged skin integrity at the electrode placement site, allergic to electrode gels or adhesives.
  • with an implanted electronic stimulator;
  • Patients who had received other noninvasive neuromodulation therapy within 1 month before enrollment;
  • Participants in any other clinical trial within 1 month prior to baseline;
  • There are circumstances in which the researcher considers it inappropriate to participate in this study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
74 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    The intervention group

    The intervention group was treated with real transcranial alternating electrical stimulation.

    Device: Real transcranial alternating electrical stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    The control group

    The control group was treated with sham transcranial alternating electrical stimulation.

    Device: Sham transcranial alternating electrical stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceReal transcranial alternating electrical stimulation

    The patients in the intervention group were treated with real tACS produced by Nexalin company. There were 3 treatment sites. According to the international 10-20 EEG system positioning method, one electrode was placed in the prefrontal lobe (Fp1, Fpz, Fp2 area, electrode size was 4.45cm×9.53cm), and the other two electrodes were placed in the left and right mastoid respectively (electrode size was 3.18cm×3.81cm). The treatment parameters were 40min twice daily with an interval of ≥4 hours for a total of 8 sessions over 4 days. tACS procedures were performed by trained and qualified full-time therapeutic nurses.

  • DeviceSham transcranial alternating electrical stimulation

    The patients in the control group were treated with sham tACS produced by Nexalin company. The fake tACS does not emit current, so it does not stimulate the cerebral cortex. The appearance, button, electrode, and quality of the fake tACS are exactly the same as those of the real tACS in patients' senses. There were 3 treatment sites. According to the international 10-20 EEG system positioning method, one electrode was placed in the prefrontal lobe (Fp1, Fpz, Fp2 area, electrode size was 4.45cm×9.53cm), and the other two electrodes were placed in the left and right mastoid respectively (electrode size was 3.18cm×3.81cm). The treatment parameters were 40min twice daily with an interval of ≥4 hours for a total of 8 sessions over 4 days. tACS procedures were performed by trained and qualified full-time therapeutic nurses.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of delirium

    (occurrence of delirium was assessed 3 times a day from the start of the intervention to the day after the intervention ended ) Delirium incidence = Number of people who had experienced delirium within 5 days/total number of people in the intervention or control group.

    Time frame: up to 5days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sleep quality score

    The Richard Campell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) consists of five sleep-related items: sleep depth, sleep fall, wake up during sleep, fall back to sleep, and overall sleep quality. A visual analog scale was used to score the patients, with each score ranging from 0 to 100. The average score of 5 sleep-related items was calculated, with 0 to 25 being low-quality sleep and 76 to 100 being high-quality sleep.

    Time frame: up to 5days

  2. Anxiety score

    Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), which has 14 items, adopts a 5-level scoring method ranging from 0 to 4 points. The total score is the sum of the scores of 14 items, and the total score is \>29 points, which may be severe anxiety. \>21 points, there must be obvious anxiety; \>14 points, there must be anxiety; More than 7 points, may have anxiety; If the score is less than 7, there is no anxiety symptom.

    Time frame: up to 5days

  3. Duration of delirium

    The duration of patients' delirium from onset to end.

    Time frame: up to 5days

  4. Cognitive function score

    mini-mental state examination (MMSE) : There are 30 items in the scale, each item is 1 point, one correct answer will get 1 point, the full score is 30 points, the higher the score, the better the cognitive function: MMSE≥27 is classified as normal, 21-26 as mild dementia, 10-20 as moderate dementia, and \< 10 as severe dementia. MMSE is susceptible to the influence of education level, according to the level of education, its boundary standards are illiterate ≤17 points, primary school ≤20 points, secondary school or above education ≤24 points, indicating dementia.

    Time frame: up to 5days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University
    Beijing, Beijing 100053, China
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06375408
Lead sponsor
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 19, 2024
Start date
Mar 24, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 24, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 24, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 19, 2024

Study contacts

Jun Wang, master
Contact
wangj229@126.com
+86-010-83922775

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion