CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06374004Updated Jul 26, 2024

The Effect of Thoracic Mobilization in Individuals With Subacromial Pain Syndrome

An interventional study of Exercise Group and Thoracic Mobilization Group in Subacromial Pain Syndrome, sponsored by Hacettepe University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-26.

Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of six-week thoracic mobilization on pain intensity, muscle tone, functional and muscle activation in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS) is the most common shoulder problem and accounts for 44%-65% of all shoulder problems. Repetitive compression of the rotator cuff tendons as they pass through the subacromial space affects shoulder function along with pain.

Studies have shown that scapular kinematics are affected in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome. In addition to increased scapular internal rotation, scapular upward rotation and posterior tilt during elevation are decreased in these individuals. These kinematic changes have been associated with decreased activation of the middle and lower trapezius and serratus anterior muscles and excessive upper trapezius activation. This change in scapular kinematics causes narrowing of the subacromial space and repeated traumatization of the rotator cuff muscles passing through it. In addition, kyphotic posture in the thoracic region (insufficient extension of the thoracic vertebrae) negatively affects scapular kinematics. Kyphotic posture has been shown to be associated with subacromial pain syndrome by causing anterior tilt, downward rotation and protraction in the scapula.

Exercise and mobilization applications are frequently applied in subacromial pain syndrome. Strengthening the muscles around the shoulder and scapula, increasing glenohumeral and scapulothoracic joint mobility, and stretching the posterior capsule are frequently applied to reduce pain and increase function. Studies on increasing thoracic mobilization are limited in number. In these studies, the acute effects of thoracic manipulation applications on pain, normal joint motion and functional activity level were examined in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome. There is only one pilot study that examined the effect of mobilization applied to the thoracic region. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of six-week thoracic mobilization on pain intensity, muscle tone, functional and muscle activation in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Subacromial Pain Syndrome

Keywords

  • Rehabilitation
  • Electromyography
  • Acromiohumeral Distance
  • Pain
03

In context

Syndrome

9,217 studies on the registry are indexed under Syndrome; 1,031 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 50 across 6,515 interventional studies indexed under Syndrome.

Browse Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University is the lead sponsor of 983 studies on the registry; 212 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Thoracic kyphosis angle > 40°
  • Full active shoulder abduction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral shoulder pain
  • Rotator cuff tear
  • Shoulder/cervical injury other than SAPS
  • Surgery history
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Exercise Group

    The exercise group will perform stretching and strengthening exercises involving the muscle groups around the shoulder and scapula for 12 weeks.

    Other: Exercise Group

  • Active comparator
    Thoracic Mobilization Group

    The exercise group will perform stretching and strengthening exercises involving the muscle groups around the shoulder and scapula for 12 weeks. In addition to the exercises, thoracic mobilization will be applied to the participants in this group 1 day a week for a total of 6 weeks.

    Other: Exercise Group · Other: Thoracic Mobilization Group

Interventions

  • OtherExercise Group

    The exercises will be given as a home program and each exercise will be performed 2 times a day for a total of 12 weeks. Participants will perform the exercises 1 day a week under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The exercise program lasts approximately 30 minutes.

  • OtherThoracic Mobilization Group

    The exercises will be given as a home program and each exercise will be performed 2 times a day for a total of 12 weeks. Participants will perform the exercises 1 day a week under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The exercise program lasts approximately 30 minutes. Thoracic mobilization will be applied to segments where passive accessory movement is insufficient or painful. 30 repetitions/4 sets will be applied to each determined segment. Thoracic mobilization will be performed with the patient lying prone position.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Electromyography (EMG)

    A surface EMG system with 8 channels will use to measure muscle activation levels. A synchronized video record will take at 50 frames per second to identify 3 phases of the exercises ascending phase of the abduction (from 0°-60°, 60°-120°, and 120°-180°). Measurements will make from the affected side. The same examiner will place bipolar Ag-Cl surface electrodes over the Upper Trapezius (UT), Middle Trapezius (MT), Lower Trapezius (LT), Infraspinatus (IS), Middle Deltoid (MD), and Serratus Anterior (SA) muscles of all participants. Investigators will measure maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) of the UT, MT, LT, IS, MD, and SA muscles in randomized order first. The width of the wooden blocks will adjust according to the arm distance of the patients. Shoulder abduction angles of 60° and 120° will mark with tape on the wooden blocks.

    Time frame: twelve weeks

  2. Acromiohumeral Distance (AHD)

    Real-time ultrasonography (US) images of the subacromial space will obtain with a 4 to 13 Megahertz linear transducer. All US images will evaluate by the same researcher with 5 years of experience in US imaging of the shoulder. US images will obtain from the affected side shoulder. The AHD will measure linearly (as a millimetres) between the highest point of the humeral head and the lowest point of the acromion using the on-screen calibrations of the US system. Measurements will do at 0°, 60° and 90° abduction of the shoulder.

    Time frame: twelve weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Muscle Tone

    The participant's upper trapezius muscle tone will assess. Measurements will make by placing the tip of the muscle tone assessment device vertically at the midpoint of the individuals' upper trapezius muscle. The resulting changes in muscle tone and stiffness will record as results.

    Time frame: twelve weeks

  2. Functional Activity Level

    American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) will use to determine functional activity level. ASES is frequently use in the evaluation of shoulder functions in rotator cuff injuries. Participants can score between 0-100 points in the ASES assessment. A high score on the ASES assessment indicates high activity level and low disability level.The Turkish version of the questionnaire will use in our study.

    Time frame: twelve weeks

  3. Pain Intensity

    A pain intensity will evaluate with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Participants will ask to mark the intensity of pain participants feel during rest and night pain and daily life activity on a 0-10 cm straight line. The length between the point will mark by the patient and the starting point on the line will measure with a ruler and the pain intensity will record in cm.

    Time frame: twelve weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation
    Ankara, 06100, Turkey
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06374004
Lead sponsor
Hacettepe University
Responsible party
Mahmut Çalık (MSc, PhD Student, Principal Investigator, Hacettepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 18, 2024
Start date
Apr 10, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 5, 2024
Completion
Jul 5, 2024
Last update
Jul 26, 2024

Study contacts

MAHMUT ÇALIK, PhD Student
principal investigator · Hacettepe University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion