ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06359561Updated Nov 15, 2024

Assessment of Effectiveness and Stimulation Coverage of Closed-loop Spinal Cord Stimulation (CL-SCS) Therapy in Patients with Cervical Lead Placement

An observational study in Chronic Pain Syndrome, Multi Focal Pain and Failed Neck Surgery Syndrome, sponsored by Rijnstate Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-15.

Sponsored by Rijnstate Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational, prospective data collection is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and stimulation coverage of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) therapy in patients with cervical lead placement.

Read the detailed description

Title Assessment of effectiveness and stimulation coverage of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) therapy in patients with cervical lead placement.

Device used in the study The Saluda Medical EvokeTM Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulator (CL-SCS) System (Evoke System). The CE marked Evoke System will be used within its licensed use and manuals. The Evoke System measures and records spinal cord (SC) activation resulting from stimulation via evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs). The Evoke System can be programmed to provide ECAP-controlled, closed-loop SCS or open-loop, fixed-output (traditional) SCS; ECAPs may be measured and recorded in either stimulation mode.

Indication for use The Evoke SCS System is indicated as an aid in the management of chronic intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs and will be used within its licensed indication during this study.

Rational This observational, prospective data collection is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and stimulation coverage of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) therapy in patients with cervical lead placement.

Study design An observational, prospective, multi-center, single-arm study. Study population Up to 40 subjects eligible for SCS trial and permanent implant with a minimum of pain intensity of 5/10 on NRS at baseline will be enrolled.

Objectives

  • Evaluate stimulation coverage in pain area and other parts of the body, sensation (awareness and quality) and pain relief using a 0-10 numeric rating score (NRS) in patient implanted with one or two leads at cervical level receiving closed-loop spinal cord stimulator (CL-SCS) therapy.
  • Assessment of holistic outcomes: measure quality of life in seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) assessed by the PROMIS-29 questionnaire.
  • Evaluate medication intake, patient satisfaction and patient global impression of change (PGIC).
  • Assessment of device data and programming parameters.
  • Neurophysiological measurements: neuronal activation, conduction velocity and posture change assessment.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is deemed a suitable candidate for SCS trail and permanent implant and has been routinely scheduled to undergo an SCS trial phase with the Evoke SCS System.
  • Subject is ≥ 18 years old.
  • Subject is not pregnant or nursing.
  • Subject is willing and capable of giving informed consent. Exclusion criteria
  • Subject currently has an active implantable device including pacemakers, spinal cord stimulator or intrathecal drug delivery system.
  • Subject is incapable of understanding or responding to the study questionnaires.
  • Subject is incapable of understanding or operating the patient programmer handset.

Burden and Risk

  • There will be no additional burden associated with participation in the study. The data will be collected during the standard of care visits. Data collection required by the study protocol will add no additional time to standard clinical appointments, as the data will be downloaded from the clinical interface or entered directly into the database.
  • The benefits of this study could enable improved treatment of chronic trunk and/or limb pain with the closed loop system and cervical lead placement.
02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain Syndrome
  • Multi Focal Pain
  • Failed Neck Surgery Syndrome
  • Polyneuropathies

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Spinal cord stimulation
  • Cervical lead placement
  • Closed loop stimulation
  • Multi focal pain
03

In context

Polyneuropathies

133 studies on the registry are indexed under Polyneuropathies; 33 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 100 across 53 observational studies indexed under Polyneuropathies.

Browse Polyneuropathies studies →

Lead sponsor

Rijnstate Hospital is the lead sponsor of 130 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Subjects eligible for SCS trial and permanent implant will be recruited to participate in the study. Subjects will read and sign an informed consent prior to study participation. Subjects meeting all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria and receiving a permanent implant with cervical lead placement will be considered enrolled. Up to 40 subjects receiving a permanent implant will be enrolled.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is deemed a suitable candidate for SCS trail and permanent implant and has been routinely scheduled to undergo an SCS trial phase with the Evoke SCS System.
  • Subject is ≥ 18 years old.
  • Subject is not pregnant or nursing.
  • Subject is willing and capable of giving .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject currently has an active implantable device including pacemakers, spinal cord stimulator or intrathecal drug delivery system.
  • Subject is incapable of understanding or responding to the study questionnaires.
  • Subject is incapable of understanding or operating the patient programmer handset.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • single arm

    Up to 40 subjects eligible for SCS trial and permanent implant with a minimum of pain intensity of 5/10 on NRS at baseline will be enrolled.

    Device: cervical lead placement

Interventions

  • Devicecervical lead placement

    implant of cervical lead neurostimulation, using saluda medical devices

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity in pain region(s) of pain using the 11-box pain numeric rating scale (NRS)

    NRS scoring: 0 no pain, 10 worst imaginable pain

    Time frame: baseline, 3months, 6 months, 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain distribution using Patient Reported Dermatomal Coverage Map

    Subjects will be asked to map and track pain distribution (extent and location) by shading in the areas where they typically experience pain on a body map drawing. "Shade in the areas where you typically experience "study pain" on the pain map below. If the pain goes from front to back, then shade in those areas on each side of the picture."

    Time frame: baseline, 3months, 6 months, 12 months

  2. Assessment of holistic outcomes: quality of life in seven domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depression, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) assessed by the PROMIS-29 questionnaire

    The PROMIS 29+2 Profile v2.1 is a 29-item profile instrument that assesses 8 universal domains (not disease-specific): Physical Function, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity. The first seven domains are assessed with 4 questions each. High scores represent more of the domain being measured. Thus, on symptom-oriented (negatively worded) domains of PROMIS 29+2 Profile v2.1 (anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, and sleep disturbance), higher scores represent worse symptomatology. On the function-oriented (positively worded) domains (physical functioning and social role) higher scores represent better functioning. Pain Intensity is measured with a single 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: baseline, 3months, 6 months, 12 months

  3. Pain-related medication intake.

    Time frame: baseline, 3months, 6 months, 12 months

  4. Programming parameters.

    Program parameters (e.g., leads programmed: configuration ) will be collected. This data is automatically recorded on the SCS-device.

    Time frame: 3months, 6 months, 12 months

  5. Programming parameters.

    Program parameters (e.g., pulsed width recorded in unit: micro seconds) will be collected. This data is automatically recorded on the SCS-device.

    Time frame: 3months, 6 months, 12 months

  6. Evaluate stimulation sensation (awareness and quality)

    Subject will be asked how aware he/she is of the stimulation sensation and is presented with a 5-point rating scale containing the options "Always aware of stimulation sensation", "Usually aware of stimulation sensation", "Sometimes aware of stimulation sensation", "Rarely aware of stimulation sensation", and "Never aware of stimulation sensation". Subjects will be asked a question about stimulation sensation quality and can rate from "Unpleasant", "Neither pleasant nor unpleasant", "Pleasant" to "No sensation".

    Time frame: 3months, 6 months, 12 months

  7. Evaluate stimulation coverage in pain region(s)

    Subjects will be asked to map and track stimulation distribution (extent and location) by shading in the areas where they typically experience stimulation sensation on a body map drawing. "Shade in the areas where you typically experience stimulation on the body map below. If the stimulation goes from front to back, then shade in those areas on each side of the picture."

    Time frame: 3months, 6 months, 12 months

  8. Posture Change Measurements

    Data on stimulation intensity and ECAP amplitude at various stimulation levels (i.e., activation plot) and in different postures will be collected in both stimulation modes. Subjects will rate the stimulation intensity on an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 equals "no feeling" and 10 equals "very intense"). All these measurements are automatically recorded on the device except subject ratings, which will be recorded on the CRF.

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006 May;10(4):287-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009. Epub 2005 Aug 10. PubMed 16095934 ↗
  • Cameron T. Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg. 2004 Mar;100(3 Suppl Spine):254-67. doi: 10.3171/spi.2004.100.3.0254. PubMed 15029914 ↗
  • Deer TR, Mekhail N, Provenzano D, Pope J, Krames E, Leong M, Levy RM, Abejon D, Buchser E, Burton A, Buvanendran A, Candido K, Caraway D, Cousins M, DeJongste M, Diwan S, Eldabe S, Gatzinsky K, Foreman RD, Hayek S, Kim P, Kinfe T, Kloth D, Kumar K, Rizvi S, Lad SP, Liem L, Linderoth B, Mackey S, McDowell G, McRoberts P, Poree L, Prager J, Raso L, Rauck R, Russo M, Simpson B, Slavin K, Staats P, Stanton-Hicks M, Verrills P, Wellington J, Williams K, North R; Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. Neuromodulation. 2014 Aug;17(6):515-50; discussion 550. doi: 10.1111/ner.12208. PubMed 25112889 ↗
  • Turner JA, Loeser JD, Deyo RA, Sanders SB. Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome or complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Pain. 2004 Mar;108(1-2):137-47. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.016. PubMed 15109517 ↗
  • Surges G, Paulus J, Blass T, Mendryscha K, Bettag M, Rotte A. Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience. Pain Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):1255-1268. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00287-4. Epub 2021 Jul 8. PubMed 34236671 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06359561
Lead sponsor
Rijnstate Hospital
Collaborators
Saluda Medical Pty Ltd
Responsible party
Jan Willem Kallewaard phd (MD PhD dr., Rijnstate Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 11, 2024
Start date
Oct 5, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 15, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion