ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07304401CIPRESSUpdated Dec 26, 2025

Evaluation of Effectiveness of Closed-loop Spinal Cord Stimulation (CL-SCS) Therapy for Treatment of Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

An observational study in Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) and Neuropathic Pain, sponsored by Rijnstate Hospital. Recruiting at 5 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-26.

Sponsored by Rijnstate Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the effectiveness of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) therapy for treatment of painful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy.

The closed-loop SCS (CL-SCS) system stimulates the nerves in the spinal cord, measures their responses and automatically adjust the stimulation level accordingly in real time for each delivered pulse.

Read the detailed description

Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a serious condition that is diagnosed in up to 40% of patients who require chemotherapy. Conventional treatments for painful CIPN include both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, although the underlying evidence is scarce. Spinal cord stimulation is an established treatment for pain associated with painful peripheral neuropathies. Several studies demonstrate pain relief by open-loop spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with painful CIPN, with a positive effect of SCS on pain and quality of life. In the Netherlands, CIPN is an accepted indication for SCS treatment and thus SCS is a regular treatment for patients with painful and refractory CIPN. The closed-loop SCS (CL-SCS) system stimulates the dorsal column in the spinal cord, measures the response through evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs), and automatically adjust the stimulation level accordingly in real time for each delivered pulse.

The current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) therapy in patients with CIPN.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)
  • Neuropathic Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • CIPN
  • Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy
  • Spinal Cord Stimulation
  • SCS
  • Closed-Loop
  • neuropathic pain
03

In context

Neuralgia

1,100 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuralgia; 241 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 102 across 231 observational studies indexed under Neuralgia.

Browse Neuralgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Rijnstate Hospital is the lead sponsor of 130 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with painful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy resistent to conventional medical management. Patients are eligible for SCS implantation and are scheduled to undergo closed-loop SCS implantation.

Eligibility criteria

  • Subject is deemed a suitable candidate for SCS implantation and has been routinely scheduled to undergo an SCS implantation with the Evoke SCS System.
  • Subject has a minimum of leg or arm pain intensity of 5/10 on the numeric rating scale (NRS) at baseline due to CIPN.
  • Patients with CIPN following chemotherapy and at least 6 months post-treatment
  • CIPN symptoms for a minimum duration of 3 months.
  • Patient deemed to be in remission per discretion of treating oncologist
  • No existing for SCS
  • Subject is ≥ 18 years old.
  • Subject is not pregnant or nursing.
  • Subject is willing and capable of giving .
  • No satisfactory treatment effect with anti-neuropathic medication or intolerable side-effects
  • No satisfactory treatment effect with minimal invasive pain treatments (including ketamine or lidocaine infusion therapy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal to be included in study
  • Patients unwilling or mentally incapable to complete the study questionnaires
  • Other causes of neuropathy (for example diabetic- or small fiber neuropathy)
  • Previous treatment with SCS for CIPN
  • Presence of another pain syndrome unrelated to CIPN
  • History of lower limb amputation or ulceration
  • (BMI) ≥ 40
  • Severe psychiatric or neurological disorders
  • Any other contra indication for locoregional anaesthesia
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with painful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)

    Subjects diagnosed with painful CIPN and eligible for SCS implantation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall pain intensity

    The primary effectiveness outcome measure is pain intensity measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0 no pain, 10 worst imaginable pain) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.

    Time frame: The difference between baseline and the evaluation at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity for the extremities (arms and/or legs)

    Pain intensity for the arms and/or legs measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0 no pain, 10 worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: The difference between baseline and the evaluation at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.

  2. 9-Item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)

    Assessment of quality of life in seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) all assessed using the PROMIS-29 questionnaire. PROMIS-29 is scored on a T-score metric with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the U.S. general population, with a higher score representing more symptoms.

    Time frame: The difference between baseline and the evaluation 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.

  3. CIPN-related symptoms

    Assessment of CIPN-related symptoms using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20). EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 contains 20 items scored on a 4-point Likert scale for sensory, motor and autonomic symptoms. Scale scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating increased symptoms.

    Time frame: The change between baseline and the evaluation 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.

  4. Medication use

    Assessment of pain medication use

    Time frame: The change between baseline and the evaluation 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with closed-loop SCS

  5. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    Assessment of the patient impression of global improvement with treatment using a 7-point rating scale, ranging from 1 to 7. Higher scores indicate a patient perspective of a worsening of the health condition.

    Time frame: The change between baseline and the evaluation 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.

  6. Stimulation coverage and patient stimulation awareness and satisfaction

    Assessment of the percentage of stimulation coverage of the painful area, and of stimulation sensation (awareness and quality) during closed-loop spinal cord stimulator (CL-SCS) therapy

    Time frame: Evaluation at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation

  7. SCS stimulation pulse width

    The pulse width in milliseconds of the active SCS stimulation program will be collected.

    Time frame: Evaluation at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.

  8. SCS stimulation frequency

    Frequency of the active SCS stimulation program measured in Hertz will be collected

    Time frame: Evaluation at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.

  9. (Serious) adverse events

    Assessment of treatment-related complications

    Time frame: Evaluation at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07304401
Lead sponsor
Rijnstate Hospital
Collaborators
Saluda Medical Pty Ltd
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 26, 2025
Start date
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 26, 2025

Study contacts

Esmee Van Leeuwen, MSc
Contact
evanleeuwen@rijnstate.nl
088 005 8888
Nick Koning, MD PhD
Contact

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion