ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06356207SALT-TILTUpdated Apr 11, 2024

Syncope-Asystole Latency Time in Tilt Table Test: The SALT-TILT Study

An observational study in Syncope, Pacemaker and Asystole, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera di Bolzano. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-11.

Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera di Bolzano · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2026, 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
64
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Syncope is a common presenting condition. Pacemaker implantation can significantly reduce syncope recurrences in reflex syncope. However, despite careful selection, a substantial proportion of patients treated with pacemakers suffer recurrences of syncope. It is thought that a pronounced vasodepressor component may hinder the efficacy of pacing in patients, preventing adequate cerebral perfusion during the reflex, thus relativizing the anti-bradycardia function of the pacemaker to prevent syncope. It is hypothesised that the time elapsed from the actual loss of consciousness to the asystole recorded on the ECG during Tilt Table Test may be predictive in terms of response to pacemaker therapy, so this parameter becomes the subject of the present study.

Read the detailed description

Syncope is a common leading affection and is responsible for 1-3% of the presentations in emergency departments and up to 3% of inpatient admissions. Syncope poses often a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for the attending physician and is often misdiagnosed or underdiagnosed. Patients can be treated with pacemaker implantation when the syncope cause is a cardioinhibition with documented asystole during the syncopal event. When accurately selected, patients benefit from pacemaker therapy with a significant reduction of syncope recurrence in the follow up. However, a substantial portion of the patients (approx. 25%) experience recurrence of syncope despite optimal pacemaker therapy. The underlying mechanism is not well understood and object of the current study.

The main target of the study is to evaluate the time elapsed between the T-LOC during Video Tilt Table Testing and the asystole at the ECG using a registry and to assess its predictive value in patients undergoing invasive treatment. The hypothesis is that a vasodepressive component could lessen the effect of pacing in a patient, leading to cerebral hypoperfusion and syncope despite maintaining a stable rhythm.

This is a prospective, multi-center observational study with 2 year follow-up of patients. Patients eligible for invasive treatment of reflex syncope are included.

If after guideline-directed implantable loop recorder insertion no cardioinhibition has been recorded, the patient is included automatically in the registry.

02

Conditions studied

  • Syncope
  • Pacemaker
  • Asystole
  • Neurally Mediated Syncope

Keywords

  • Syncope
  • Pacemaker
  • Tilt Table Test
  • Asystole
  • SALT
  • Syncope-Asystole Latency Time
03

In context

Syncope

201 studies on the registry are indexed under Syncope; 36 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 64 is below the median of 250 across 84 observational studies indexed under Syncope.

Browse Syncope studies →

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliera di Bolzano is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients affected by neurally mediated syncope eligible for invasive treatment according to the ESC Guidelines for pacing 2021

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients eligible for invasive treatment according to the ESC Guidelines for pacing 2021
  • Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other condition which explains syncope cause other than reflex syncope
  • Structural heart disease (valvular, ischaemic, cardiomyopathies)
  • Pregnancy
  • Patient denial to be recorded on video during tilt table test
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
64 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
2 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients affected by neuronally mediated syncope

    Diagnostic Test: Tilt Table Test

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testTilt Table Test

    The main goal of the study is to evaluate the time elapsed between the T-LOC during Video Tilt Table Testing and the asystole at the ECG using a national registry and to assess its predictive value in patients undergoing invasive treatment. The hypothesis is that a vasodepressive component could lessen the effect of pacing in a patient, leading to cerebral hypoperfusion and syncope despite maintaining a stable rhythm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. SALT (Syncope-Asystole Latency Time)

    • Syncope to asystole latency time (SALT) and its prognostic value regarding freedom of syncope recurrence after pacemaker implantation

    Time frame: From enrollment to end of treatment 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recurrence of syncope

    • Recurrence of syncope in patients treated with different pacemaker configurations (DDD-CLS, DDD-RDR, DDDrr) and Neurocardioablation

    Time frame: From enrollment to treatment end 24 months

  2. Recurrence of syncope

    • Recurrences of syncope in treated patients selected by CSM or loop recorder and negative or positive vasodepressive VTTT

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 11, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06356207
Lead sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera di Bolzano
Responsible party
Matthias Unterhuber (Principal Investigator, Azienda Ospedaliera di Bolzano) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 10, 2024
Start date
Mar 20, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 11, 2024

Study contacts

Matthias Unterhuber, Dr. Dr.
Contact
matthias.unterhuber@gmail.com
0471 43 9950
Marco Tomaino, Dr.
Contact
marco.tomaino@sabes.it
0471 43 9950

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion