ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06325904Updated Mar 25, 2024

Uniportal VATS Versus Chest Tube for Early Empyema

An interventional study of Uniportal VATS and Tube thoracostomy in Empyema, Pleural, sponsored by Minia University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-25.

Sponsored by Minia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2021, registered Mar 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled study compared uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) versus chest tube drainage for initial (first-line) treatment of stage I (exudative) and stage II (fibrinopurulent) empyema in adult patients (>18 years old). The primary end-point of outcome was the overall success of treatment (no need for re-intervention or death). The main results demonstrated the safety of minimally invasive U-VATS procedure in the initial treatment of early stages of pleural empyema in comparison to traditional chest tube drainage. Initial use of U-VATS was safe and feasible due to postoperative freedom from complex or marked effusion, in addition to significant reduction in the need for additional intervention, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and total cost.

02

Conditions studied

  • Empyema, Pleural

Keywords

  • Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
  • Pleura
  • Empyema
03

In context

Empyema, Pleural

33 studies on the registry are indexed under Empyema, Pleural; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is close to the median of 77 across 26 interventional studies indexed under Empyema, Pleural.

Browse Empyema, Pleural studies →

Lead sponsor

Minia University is the lead sponsor of 370 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed to have empyema and indicated for surgery.
  • Age above 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to tolerate single lung ventilation.
  • for general anesthesia/ medically unfit
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    * This group included 30 adult patients with stage I/II pleural empyema who operated initially by VATS. * All patients were subjected to the following: 1. Full history taking. 2.Full clinical examination. 3-Routine Laboratory investigations and Pleural fluid sample analysis. 4- Radiological investigations: Chest X-ray , CT chest. * All patients will be managed by general anesthesia using double lumen endoteracheal tube to achieve single lung ventilation. * All patients were positioned in lateral decubitus position. * Single port skin incisions was made to pass the port through which the camera head and instruments were introduced into the chest . * One chest tubes ws inserted as drains.

    Procedure: Uniportal VATS

  • Placebo comparator
    2

    * This group included 30 adult patients with stage I/II pleural empyema who underwent conventional tube thoracotomy. * All patients were subjected to the following: 1. Full history taking. 2.Full clinical examination. 3-Routine Laboratory investigations and Pleural fluid sample analysis. 4- Radiological investigations: Chest X-ray , CT chest. * The patient is placed in a supine position. * The intercostals pace is opened . * Chest tube is inserted in proper position regarding the site of fluid collection.

    Procedure: Tube thoracostomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureUniportal VATS

    * single port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the 5th intercostal space * performed under general anesthesia. * pleural fluid/pus was drained * pleural adhesions was removed

  • ProcedureTube thoracostomy

    * Chest tube is inserted in 5th mid-axillary line * performed under local anaesthesia

    Also known as: Chest tube

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Need for further management

    Need for further method for pleural fluid drainage or decortication.

    Time frame: 6 months after inital treatment

  2. Mortality

    Postoperative in-hospital or follow-up death.

    Time frame: 6 months after inital treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Minia University
    Minya, 61111, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06325904
Lead sponsor
Minia University
Responsible party
Yasser Ali Kamal (Clinical professor, Minia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 22, 2024
Start date
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2023
Completion
Dec 1, 2023
Last update
Mar 25, 2024

Study contacts

Mostafa M Elsayed, MD
principal investigator · Minia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion