CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06306001Updated Mar 12, 2024

Intravenous Methylene Blue for Treating Refractory Neonatal Septic Shock

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Methylene Blue and Placebo in Neonatal Sepsis and Shock, Septic, sponsored by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 0 Days to 28 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-12.

Sponsored by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
130
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
0 Days to 28 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Preterm infants (born at less than 37 weeks of pregnancy) sometimes develop a serious blood infection leading to low blood pressure, which does not respond to saline or to the standard medicines for increasing blood pressure, such as dopamine and epinephrine. The goal of this research study is to compare the effect of giving an injectable medicine called Methylene blue (MB) versus not giving MB to such preterm infants who are unresponsive to standard treatment. The main questions that this study aims to answer is:

  1. Whether MB treatment reduces death to any cause as compared to no MB treatment.
  2. Whether treatment with MB reduces the time to achieve normal blood pressure
  3. Whether treatment with MB reduces the time to stoppage of all blood pressure medications, steroids and normal saline.
  4. Whether treatment with MB improves heart function as measured by echocardiography at 24 and 48 hours.
Read the detailed description

Preterm infants with definite or probable sepsis and fluid-refractory, catecholamine-resistant septic shock will be eligible for enrolment if they have no contraindication to receive MB. After obtaining parental consent, they will be stratified as per the first-line catecholamine used and randomly allocated to receive MB (bolus followed by infusion) or no MB for 24 hours. They will be observed for all-cause mortality (primary outcome), cause-specific mortality, time to achieve hemodynamic stability and adverse effects (secondary outcomes) over a 7-day period, all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality hospital stay and duration of hospital stay.

The main questions it aims to answer are

  1. To determine whether treatment with intravenous MB therapy reduces all-cause mortality when compared to no MB treatment, among preterm neonates with catecholamine-resistant septic shock
  2. To compare the time to achieve therapeutic endpoints among preterm neonates with catecholamine-resistant septic shock treated with intravenous MB versus no MB
  3. To compare time to stoppage of all inotrope/vasopressor treatment among preterm neonates with catecholamine-resistant septic shock treated with intravenous MB versus no MB
  4. To compare echocardiographic parameters (at 24 hours after randomization) among preterm neonates with catecholamine-resistant septic shock treated with intravenous MB versus no MB
02

Conditions studied

  • Neonatal Sepsis
  • Shock, Septic

Keywords

  • Methylene blue
  • Neonate
  • Septic shock
  • Clinical trial
03

In context

Shock, Septic

862 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Septic; 207 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 130 is above the median of 80 across 530 interventional studies indexed under Shock, Septic.

Browse Shock, Septic studies →

Lead sponsor

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh is the lead sponsor of 290 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Days to 28 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Screening Criteria: preterm infants (\<37 weeks, \<28 days) clinically diagnosed to have septic shock will be screened for inclusion Inclusion criteria: Subjects must fulfill all the following

  1. Definite/probable sepsis :Clinical syndrome of sepsis for which bedside neonatologist starts intravenous antibiotics AND either a positive culture of otherwise sterile body fluid OR presence of any 2 or more of the following five markers of sepsis: (a) C-reactive protein >10 mg/dL; (b) procalcitonin as per age-appropriate cut-off (c) total leukocyte count and absolute neutrophilic count beyond acceptable range (d) chest X-ray adjudged as pneumonia by two independent Neonatologists.
  2. Shock: adapted from the definition given by Davis et al 2017

    1. Either SBP \< age and gestation appropriate cut-off OR
    2. Presence of any 2 of the following 6 parameters i. HR >205/min ii. Central pulses either week OR bounding iii. CRT >3 sec OR flash refill (\<1 sec) iv. skin mottled/cool OR flushed v. urine output \<0.5 ml/kg/h in the preceding 6 hours vi. DBP \< age and gestation appropriate cut-off
  3. Fluid and catecholamine-resistant shock: received fluid boluses up to a maximum of 40 ml/kg followed by catecholamine infusion titrated up to the maximum dose. The catecholamine infusion could be either dopamine (maximum dose 20 µg/kg/min) or epinephrine (maximum dose 0.4 µg/kg/min) or norepinephrine (maximum dose 0.4 µg/kg/min).

Exclusion Criteria:

excluded if ≥1 criterion positive:

  1. G6PD deficient or family history of G6PD deficiency
  2. Potentially lethal malformation
  3. Congenital heart disease
  4. Severe acute kidney injury
  5. Family history of allergy to methylene blue or food dyes
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
130 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Methylene blue

    Subjects in the intervention arm will receive a 1 mg/kg bolus of methylene blue over 30 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.15 mg/kg/h. The infusion rate may be increased in steps of 0.15 mg/kg/h every 30 minutes until a maximum of 0.5 mg/kg/h.

    Drug: Methylene Blue

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo infusion

    Subjects in the control arm will receive a placebo infusion (normal saline) at the same volumetric rate.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugMethylene Blue

    Subjects in the intervention arm will receive a 1 mg/kg bolus of methylene blue over 30 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.15 mg/kg/h. The infusion rate may be increased in steps of 0.15 mg/kg/h every 30 minutes until a maximum of 0.5 mg/kg/h.

    Also known as: MB

  • OtherPlacebo

    Subjects in the placebo arm will receive normal saline in the same volumetric dose as methylene blue in the intervention arm

    Also known as: Normal saline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. All-cause mortality within 7 days after randomization

    Mortality due to any cause over 7 days after randomization

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time taken to achieve therapeutic end-points within 7 days after randomization

    Time taken to achieve therapeutic end points of shock (which include capillary refill time less than 3 seconds, normal volume pulses, warm extremities, urine output greater than 1 ml/kg/h, normal sensorium, normal mean blood pressure, normal systolic blood pressure and normal diastolic blood pressure) up to 7 days after randomization.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Time taken to stop all inotrope/vasopressor treatment within 7 days after randomisation

    Time taken for all inotrope and vasopressor therapy to finally stop up to a maximum of 7 days after randomisation

    Time frame: 7 days

  3. Echocardiographic fractional shortening at 24 hour after randomization

    Fractional shortening will be calculated on echocardiography by measuring the percentage change in the left ventricular diameter during systole at 24 hours after randomization.

    Time frame: 24 hour

  4. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) by echocardiography at 24 hour after randomization

    Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) will be measured in millimetres by echocardiography at 24 hour after randomization

    Time frame: 24 hour

  5. Left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) by echocardiography at 24 hour after randomization

    Left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) will be measured in millimeters by echocardiography at 24 hour after randomization

    Time frame: 24 hour

  6. Aortic diameter by echocardiography at 24 hour after randomization

    Aortic diameter will be measured in millimeters by echocardiography at 24 hour after randomization

    Time frame: 24 hour

  7. Velocity time integral (LVI) by echocardiography at 24 hours after randomization

    Velocity time integral (LVI) will be measured in centimeters by echocardiography at 24 hours after randomization to calculate the cardiac output.

    Time frame: 24 hour

  8. Echocardiographic fractional shortening at 48 hour after randomization

    Fractional shortening will be calculated on echocardiography by measuring the percentage change in the left ventricular diameter during systole at 48 hours after randomization.

    Time frame: 48 hour

  9. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) on echocardiography at 48 hour after randomization

    Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) will be measured in millimeters by echocardiography at 48 hour after randomization

    Time frame: 48 hour

  10. Left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) by echocardiography at 48 hour after randomization

    Left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) will be measured in millimeters by echocardiography at 48 hour after randomization

    Time frame: 48 hour

  11. Aortic diameter by echocardiography at 48 hour after randomization

    Aortic diameter will be measured in millimeters by echocardiography at 48 hour after randomization

    Time frame: 48 hour

  12. Velocity time integral (LVI) by echocardiography at 48 hours after randomization

    Velocity time integral (LVI) be measured by echocardiography in centimeters at 48 hours after randomization to calculate the cardiac output.

    Time frame: 48 hour

  13. Time taken to stop vasopressor treatment

    Time taken to stop all vasopressors during hospital stay up to a maximum of 100 days

    Time frame: 100 days

  14. Mortality during hospital stay

    Mortality during the period of hospital stay up to a maximum of 100 days

    Time frame: 100 days

  15. Serious adverse effects

    Serious adverse effect with special reference to oliguria, gastrointestinal bleeds, abdominal distension, and bluish discoloration of skin and urine during hospital stay up to a maximum of 100 days

    Time frame: 100 days

  16. Septic shock-related mortality

    Mortality attributed to septic shock up to 7 days post-randomisation

    Time frame: 7 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER)
    Chandigarh, 160012, India
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE. The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 9;348(2):138-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra021333. No abstract available. PubMed 12519925 ↗
  • Stolk RF, Kox M, Pickkers P. Noradrenaline drives immunosuppression in sepsis: clinical consequences. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jun;46(6):1246-1248. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06025-2. Epub 2020 Apr 8. No abstract available. PubMed 32270211 ↗
  • Stolk RF, van der Pasch E, Naumann F, Schouwstra J, Bressers S, van Herwaarden AE, Gerretsen J, Schambergen R, Ruth MM, van der Hoeven JG, van Leeuwen H, Pickkers P, Kox M. Norepinephrine Dysregulates the Immune Response and Compromises Host Defense during Sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep 15;202(6):830-842. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202002-0339OC. PubMed 32520577 ↗
  • Levin RL, Degrange MA, Bruno GF, Del Mazo CD, Taborda DJ, Griotti JJ, Boullon FJ. Methylene blue reduces mortality and morbidity in vasoplegic patients after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Feb;77(2):496-9. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01510-8. PubMed 14759425 ↗
  • Ismail R, Awad H, Allam R, Youssef O, Ibrahim M, Shehata B. Methylene blue versus vasopressin analog for refractory septic shock in the preterm neonate: A randomized controlled trial. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2022;15(2):265-273. doi: 10.3233/NPM-210824. PubMed 34719443 ↗
  • Otero Luna AV, Johnson R, Funaro M, Canarie MF, Pierce RW. Methylene Blue for Refractory Shock in Children: A Systematic Review and Survey Practice Analysis. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun;21(6):e378-e386. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002295. PubMed 32453920 ↗
  • Luis-Silva F, Menegueti MG, Sato L, Peres LM, Dos Reis Sepeda C, Petroski-Moraes BC, Donadel MD, Gallo GB, Jordani MC, Mestriner F, Becari C, Basile-Filho A, Evora PRB, Martins-Filho OA, Auxiliadora-Martins M. Effect of methylene blue on hemodynamic response in the early phase of septic shock: A case series. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jan 27;102(4):e32743. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032743. PubMed 36705345 ↗
  • Ibarra-Estrada M, Kattan E, Aguilera-Gonzalez P, Sandoval-Plascencia L, Rico-Jauregui U, Gomez-Partida CA, Ortiz-Macias IX, Lopez-Pulgarin JA, Chavez-Pena Q, Mijangos-Mendez JC, Aguirre-Avalos G, Hernandez G. Early adjunctive methylene blue in patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2023 Mar 13;27(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04397-7. PubMed 36915146 ↗
  • Memis D, Karamanlioglu B, Yuksel M, Gemlik I, Pamukcu Z. The influence of methylene blue infusion on cytokine levels during severe sepsis. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002 Dec;30(6):755-62. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0203000606. PubMed 12500513 ↗
  • Kirov MY, Evgenov OV, Evgenov NV, Egorina EM, Sovershaev MA, Sveinbjornsson B, Nedashkovsky EV, Bjertnaes LJ. Infusion of methylene blue in human septic shock: a pilot, randomized, controlled study. Crit Care Med. 2001 Oct;29(10):1860-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200110000-00002. PubMed 11588440 ↗
  • Zhang X, Gao Y, Pan P, Wang Y, Li W, Yu X. [Methylene blue in the treatment of vasodilatory shock: a Meta-analysis]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Nov;29(11):982-987. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.11.005. Chinese. PubMed 29151412 ↗
  • Dumbarton TC, Minor S, Yeung CK, Green R. Prolonged methylene blue infusion in refractory septic shock: a case report. Can J Anaesth. 2011 Apr;58(4):401-5. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9458-x. Epub 2011 Jan 19. PubMed 21246318 ↗
  • Zhao CC, Zhai YJ, Hu ZJ, Huo Y, Li ZQ, Zhu GJ. Efficacy and safety of methylene blue in patients with vasodilatory shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 26;9:950596. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.950596. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36237547 ↗
  • Fleischmann-Struzek C, Goldfarb DM, Schlattmann P, Schlapbach LJ, Reinhart K, Kissoon N. The global burden of paediatric and neonatal sepsis: a systematic review. Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Mar;6(3):223-230. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30063-8. PubMed 29508706 ↗
  • Bentzer P, Griesdale DE, Boyd J, MacLean K, Sirounis D, Ayas NT. Will This Hemodynamically Unstable Patient Respond to a Bolus of Intravenous Fluids? JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1298-309. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12310. PubMed 27673307 ↗
  • Aya HD, Ster IC, Fletcher N, Grounds RM, Rhodes A, Cecconi M. Pharmacodynamic Analysis of a Fluid Challenge. Crit Care Med. 2016 May;44(5):880-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001517. PubMed 26683506 ↗
  • Nandhabalan P, Ioannou N, Meadows C, Wyncoll D. Refractory septic shock: our pragmatic approach. Crit Care. 2018 Sep 19;22(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2144-4. PubMed 30231909 ↗
  • Park BK, Shim TS, Lim CM, Lee SD, Kim WS, Kim DS, Kim WD, Koh Y. The effects of methylene blue on hemodynamic parameters and cytokine levels in refractory septic shock. Korean J Intern Med. 2005 Jun;20(2):123-8. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2005.20.2.123. PubMed 16134766 ↗
  • Evora PR, Roselino CH, Schiaveto PM. Methylene blue in anaphylactic shock. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Aug;30(2):240. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70152-5. No abstract available. PubMed 9250657 ↗
  • Kudawla M, Dutta S, Narang A. Validation of a clinical score for the diagnosis of late onset neonatal septicemia in babies weighing 1000-2500 g. J Trop Pediatr. 2008 Feb;54(1):66-9. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmm065. Epub 2007 Aug 14. PubMed 17698886 ↗
  • Davis AL, Carcillo JA, Aneja RK, Deymann AJ, Lin JC, Nguyen TC, Okhuysen-Cawley RS, Relvas MS, Rozenfeld RA, Skippen PW, Stojadinovic BJ, Williams EA, Yeh TS, Balamuth F, Brierley J, de Caen AR, Cheifetz IM, Choong K, Conway E Jr, Cornell T, Doctor A, Dugas MA, Feldman JD, Fitzgerald JC, Flori HR, Fortenberry JD, Graciano AL, Greenwald BM, Hall MW, Han YY, Hernan LJ, Irazuzta JE, Iselin E, van der Jagt EW, Jeffries HE, Kache S, Katyal C, Kissoon N, Kon AA, Kutko MC, MacLaren G, Maul T, Mehta R, Odetola F, Parbuoni K, Paul R, Peters MJ, Ranjit S, Reuter-Rice KE, Schnitzler EJ, Scott HF, Torres A Jr, Weingarten-Abrams J, Weiss SL, Zimmerman JJ, Zuckerberg AL. The American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Parameters for Hemodynamic Support of Pediatric and Neonatal Septic Shock: Executive Summary. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;18(9):884-890. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001259. No abstract available. PubMed 28723883 ↗
  • Zubrow AB, Hulman S, Kushner H, Falkner B. Determinants of blood pressure in infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study. Philadelphia Neonatal Blood Pressure Study Group. J Perinatol. 1995 Nov-Dec;15(6):470-9. PubMed 8648456 ↗
  • Kermorvant-Duchemin E, Laborie S, Rabilloud M, Lapillonne A, Claris O. Outcome and prognostic factors in neonates with septic shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;9(2):186-91. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31816689a8. PubMed 18477932 ↗
  • Baske K, Saini SS, Dutta S, Sundaram V. Epinephrine versus dopamine in neonatal septic shock: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Sep;177(9):1335-1342. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3195-x. Epub 2018 Jun 23. PubMed 29936590 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 22, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized, individual patient data pertaining to publications from the study which are in the public domain will be shared with other researchers planning to conduct a study, upon reasonable written request

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06306001
Lead sponsor
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Responsible party
Sourabh Dutta (Professor, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 12, 2024
Start date
Mar 15, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 14, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 12, 2024

Study contacts

Sourabh Dutta, MD, PhD
Contact
sourabhdutta1@gmail.com
+91-1722755313
Sajan Saini, MD, DM
Contact
sajansaini1@gmail.com
+91-1722756264
Sourabh Dutta, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion