ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07027826Updated Nov 10, 2026

The Esophageal String Test as a Diagnostic Screening Tool for Eosinophilic Esophagitis Among Africans With Dysphagia in Mali and the United States

An interventional study of Esophageal string test in Dysphagia and Eosinophilic Esophagitis, sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Recruiting at 3 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Updated Nov 10, 2026Start date movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a disease that causes inflammation in the esophagus. The esophagus is the tube that moves food from the mouth to the stomach. Diagnosing EoE currently requires a specialized tool called an endoscope. The esophageal string test (EST) is another test; the EST collects fluid from the upper digestive tract. An EST is simpler and cheaper than an endoscopy. Researchers want to know if an EST can diagnose EoE.

Objective:

To test if the EST can diagnose EoE in people who have trouble swallowing.

Eligibility:

Adults aged 18 to 65 years with trouble swallowing. They must have been born in the African continent or their parents were born in Africa.

Design:

Participants will be screened. They will give blood, stool, urine, and skin swab samples. They will complete surveys about their medical history, diet, symptoms, and home environment. They will bring a sample of their drinking water for testing.

Participants will have an EST. They will swallow a pill capsule that contains a nylon string. One end of the string will be taped to their cheek. The string will unravel down the esophagus and into the stomach. It will be pulled out after 1 hour. Fluids that soaked into the string will be tested.

At a different visit, participants will have an endoscopic exam. An endoscope is a flexible tube that is inserted down the mouth; it can be used to take tissue samples from the esophagus, stomach, and small intestine.

Participants will have a final visit in person, online, or by phone. They will take a survey and talk about their test results.

Read the detailed description

Study Description:

Eligible participants will be enrolled to assess the performance and accuracy of the 1-hour esophageal string test (EST) as a diagnostic screening tool for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Consenting participants in the U.S. (n=30) and Mali (n=30) undergoing clinically indicated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) will have an EST performed prior to the procedure. Clinical data, including medical history and laboratory test results, will be captured on a case report form. Symptoms will also be assessed using validated patient reporting outcome measures: the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-GI and -57). Dietary, sociodemographic, and environmental histories will be obtained by validated questionnaires. Blood, urine, stool, and skin swab/tape strip samples will be obtained for additional biomarker studies.

Participants will be screened for intestinal helminth infections by stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Tissue samples obtained during EGD will be assessed for Helicobacter pylori by histopathology. Esophageal biopsy samples and remaining EST eluents will be allocated for investigational studies. Air and water samples will be collected from areas within the participants community and analyzed to determine potential correlation with elevated levels of environmental pollutants. The hypothesis of this study is that the 1-hour EST will provide a preliminary estimate of EoE prevalence among Africans and African immigrants presenting with dysphagia.

Primary Objective:

-Assess the accuracy of the 1-hour EST as a diagnostic screening tool for EoE among African individuals presenting with dysphagia in the U.S. and Mali.

Secondary Objective:

-Determine the frequency of EoE among African individuals presenting with dysphagia in the U.S. and Mali.

Primary Endpoint(s):

  • Sensitivity, as estimated by the proportion of positive EST-obtained EoE-Score(TM) results out of those diagnosed with EoE by the gold standard of esophageal biopsy.
  • Specificity, as estimated by the proportion of negative EST-obtained EoE-Score(TM) results out of those diagnosed with EoE by the gold standard of esophageal biopsy.

Secondary Endpoints:

-Proportion of EoE cases diagnosed in each cohort.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dysphagia
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Keywords

  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Dysphagia
  • Esophageal string test
03

In context

Deglutition Disorders

871 studies on the registry are indexed under Deglutition Disorders; 237 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is above the median of 60 across 578 interventional studies indexed under Deglutition Disorders.

Browse Deglutition Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is the lead sponsor of 2,446 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Of its 405 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 302 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Able to provide .
  2. Aged 18 to 65 years.
  3. Born in the African continent or their parents were born in Africa,
  4. Exhibiting symptoms of dysphagia and/or prior history of food impaction.
  5. Undergoing clinically indicated endoscopy at the NIH Clinical Center (U.S.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Gabriel Tour(SqrRoot)(Copyright) (Mali), or other local clinics (Mali) and willing to provide research samples and data.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  1. Recent use (systemic or swallowed/topical corticosteroid) within 4 weeks prior to endoscopy.
  2. Recent use of dupilumab (Dupixent) within the last 6 months.
  3. Recent use of other biologic medications (within either 6 months or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer). Examples of biologic medications include:

3a. mepolizumab (Nucala)

3b. reslizumab (Cinqair, Cinqaero)

3c. benralizumab (Fasenra)

3d. cendakimab

3e. tezepelumab (Tezspire)

3f. barzolvolimab

4. Individuals suffering from a bleeding diathesis (e.g., hemophilia, severe thrombocytopenia).

5. Current use of anticoagulant medications.

6. Pregnancy.

7. Treatment with another drug or other investigational intervention within 6 months or 5 half-lives whichever is longer.

8. Individuals with a known history of any of the following:

8a. eosinophilic esophagitis

8b. esophageal stricture unable to be passed with an upper endoscope

8c. esophageal cancer

8d. esophageal motility disorder (e.g., achalasia)

8e. esophageal varices

8f. esophageal or gastric surgery including fundoplication

8g. neurologic cause of dysphagia (e.g., stroke, Parkinson s disease, etc.)

8h. allergy to gelatin

8i. inability to swallow pills

9. Any condition that, in the investigator s opinion, places the individual at undue risk by participating in the study.

Co-enrollment guidelines: Co-enrollment in other trials is restricted, other than enrollment on observational studies. Consideration for co-enrollment in trials evaluating the use of a licensed medication will require the approval of the principal investigator in consultation with the medical monitor. Study staff should be notified of co-enrollment on any other protocol as it may require the approval of the principal investigator.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Esophageal string test

    The esophageal string test is a minimally invasive procedure used to collect esophageal secretions for diagnostic analysis.

    Device: Esophageal string test

Interventions

  • DeviceEsophageal string test

    The esophageal string test consists of a gelatin or cellulose capsule containing a nylon string. The capsule dissolves allowing the nylon string to absorb esophageal secretions which can be analyzed for various inflammatory mediators.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and specificity of the esophageal string test to detect Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

    Assess the accuracy of the 1-hour EST as a diagnostic screening tool for EoE in populations with limited access to subspecialty care. Sensitivity and specificity provide a measure of accuracy when compared to the diagnostic gold standard.

    Time frame: End of study

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Eosinophilic Esophagitis cases diagnosed in each cohort.

    Determine the frequency of EoE among African individuals presenting with dysphagia in the U.S. and Mali. Allows for the comparison of diagnostic rates across different groups, providing insights into the prevalence.

    Time frame: End of study

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
    Recruiting
  • Gabriel Toure University Hospital Center
    Bamako, Mali
    Not yet recruiting
  • Mali International Center for Excellence in Research
    Bamako, Mali
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

32 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Aug 2027, 9 months later.

Of 288 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Deglutition Disorders, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 39. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 297 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 38.

Start moved 32 times since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Sep 2026 → Nov 2026, last on Nov 10, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 18, 2025
First posted
Jun 19, 2025
StartEst.
Nov 15, 2026was Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2027
Last update
Nov 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Sep 29, 2026→Nov 15, 2026
moved 32 times, Sep 25, 2026 – Nov 10, 2026
Show all 32 updates
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    Start date Nov 12, 2026→Nov 15, 2026
  2. Nov 9, 2026
    Start date Nov 11, 2026→Nov 12, 2026
  3. Nov 6, 2026
    Start date Nov 10, 2026→Nov 11, 2026
  4. Nov 5, 2026
    Start date Nov 9, 2026→Nov 10, 2026
  5. Nov 4, 2026
    Start date Nov 8, 2026→Nov 9, 2026
  6. Nov 3, 2026
    Start date Nov 5, 2026→Nov 8, 2026
    + 1 other change: verification date
  7. Nov 2, 2026
    Start date Nov 4, 2026→Nov 5, 2026
  8. Oct 30, 2026
    Start date Nov 3, 2026→Nov 4, 2026
  9. Oct 29, 2026
    Start date Nov 2, 2026→Nov 3, 2026
  10. Oct 28, 2026
    Start date Nov 1, 2026→Nov 2, 2026
  11. Oct 27, 2026
    Start date Oct 29, 2026→Nov 1, 2026
  12. Oct 26, 2026
    Start date Oct 28, 2026→Oct 29, 2026
  13. Oct 23, 2026
    Start date Oct 27, 2026→Oct 28, 2026
  14. Oct 22, 2026
    Start date Oct 26, 2026→Oct 27, 2026
  15. Oct 21, 2026
    Start date Oct 25, 2026→Oct 26, 2026
  16. Oct 20, 2026
    Start date Oct 22, 2026→Oct 25, 2026
  17. Oct 19, 2026
    Start date Oct 21, 2026→Oct 22, 2026
  18. Oct 16, 2026
    Start date Oct 20, 2026→Oct 21, 2026
  19. Oct 15, 2026
    Start date Oct 19, 2026→Oct 20, 2026
  20. Oct 14, 2026
    Start date Oct 18, 2026→Oct 19, 2026
  21. Oct 13, 2026
    Start date Oct 14, 2026→Oct 18, 2026
  22. Oct 9, 2026
    Start date Oct 13, 2026→Oct 14, 2026
  23. Oct 8, 2026
    Start date Oct 12, 2026→Oct 13, 2026
  24. Oct 7, 2026
    Start date Oct 11, 2026→Oct 12, 2026
  25. Oct 6, 2026
    Start date Oct 8, 2026→Oct 11, 2026
  26. Oct 5, 2026
    Start date Oct 7, 2026→Oct 8, 2026
  27. Oct 2, 2026
    Start date Oct 6, 2026→Oct 7, 2026
  28. Oct 1, 2026
    Start date Oct 5, 2026→Oct 6, 2026
  29. Sep 30, 2026
    Start date Oct 4, 2026→Oct 5, 2026
  30. Sep 29, 2026
    Start date Oct 1, 2026→Oct 4, 2026
  31. Sep 28, 2026
    Start date Sep 30, 2026→Oct 1, 2026
  32. Sep 25, 2026
    Start date Sep 29, 2026→Sep 30, 2026

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07027826
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 19, 2025
Start date
Nov 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

Gregory M Constantine, M.D.
Contact
constantinegm@nih.gov
(301) 633-6453
Gregory M Constantine, M.D.
principal investigator · National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion