CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06289491Updated Mar 30, 2026

A Trial of Hydrus Microstent Versus Goniotomy

An interventional study of Hydrus Microstent and Incisional goniotomy in Glaucoma and Glaucoma, Open-Angle, sponsored by Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-30.

Sponsored by Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
243
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of Hydrus Microstent, incisional goniotomy, and excisional goniotomy when combined with cataract surgery in patients with mild and moderate open-angle glaucoma. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • How do the intraocular pressure lowering effects of these three microinvasive glaucoma surgeries compare?
  • How do the safety profiles of these three microinvasive glaucoma surgeries compare?

Participants will be randomized to one of these three microinvasive glaucoma surgeries in combination with cataract surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Glaucoma
  • Glaucoma, Open-Angle

Keywords

  • Incisional goniotomy
  • Excisional goniotomy
  • Hydrus Microstent
  • Goniotomy
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Visually significant cataract planned for surgery
  • Mild to moderate open-angle glaucoma, including pigmentary glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma
  • Mild stage glaucoma includes glaucomatous optic neuropathy and visual field mean deviation better than -6.0 dB, with no points in the central 5 degrees \<15 dB
  • Moderate stage glaucoma includes: 1) glaucomatous optic neuropathy and visual field mean deviation equal to or worse than -6.0 dB but no worse than -12.0 dB and no central 5 degree points \<15 dB or 2) mean deviation -12.0 dB or better with 1 central 5 degree point \<15 dB
  • Medicated IOP between 10 to 31 mm Hg, inclusive, at time of decision for surgery
  • Willing and able to understand and provide informed consent
  • Willing and able to attend postoperative examinations per protocol schedule

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior argon laser trabeculoplasty, laser peripheral iridotomy, incisional glaucoma surgery, or cyclophotocoagulation
  • Selective laser trabeculoplasty within 90 days of study enrollment
  • Iridotrabecular contact for 180 degrees or greater
  • Peripheral anterior synechiae in nasal or inferior angle
  • Best corrected visual acuity worse than 20/200
  • Phacodonesis on pre-operative examination
  • Vitreous in anterior chamber on pre-operative examination
  • Nanophthalmos
  • Anti-platelet and anticoagulant medications other than aspirin 81mg daily
  • Active treatment for another ophthalmic condition in either eye (e.g., anti-VEGF injections, steroids for corneal transplant)
  • Abnormality in study eye that could affect tonometry
  • Glaucoma diagnosis other than the above
  • Normal tension glaucoma
  • Conditions that can cause elevated episcleral venous pressure (e.g., Sturge-Weber syndrome, Graves disease, retrobulbar tumor)
  • History of uveitis in either eye
  • Inability to complete gonioscopy examination
  • Use of oral steroids within 90 days or anticipated use of oral steroids
  • Oral medications that can affect IOP, including oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors such as acetazolamide and methazolamide
  • History of steroid-associated IOP elevation
  • Medically unfit for attending planned study visits
  • Involvement in another interventional research study
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
243 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hydrus Microstent

    Procedure: Hydrus Microstent

  • Experimental
    Incisional goniotomy

    Procedure: Incisional goniotomy

  • Experimental
    Excisional goniotomy

    Procedure: Excisional goniotomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureHydrus Microstent

    Patients will have a Hydrus Microstent inserted into the canal of Schlemm at the time of cataract surgery

  • ProcedureIncisional goniotomy

    Patients will have incisional goniotomy to open the trabecular meshwork with a Sinskey hook at the time of cataract surgery

  • ProcedureExcisional goniotomy

    Patients will have excisional goniotomy to remove the trabecular meshwork with a Kahook Dual Blade at the time of cataract surgery

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intraocular pressure

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Intraocular pressure-lowering medications

    Time frame: 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Surgical complications

    Time frame: 3 years

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06289491
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Responsible party
Michael M. Lin, MD (Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 4, 2024
Start date
Feb 14, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 30, 2026

Study contacts

Michael M Lin, MD
Contact
michael_lin@meei.harvard.edu
617-573-3707

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion