ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06287827Updated Oct 2, 2024

Treatment of Acute Malnutrition in Outpatient Care Services in Venezuela: a Prospective Cohort Research

An observational study in Acute Malnutrition in Childhood, Wasting and Child Malnutrition, sponsored by UNICEF - Venezuela. Completed at 4 sites in Venezuela. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 59 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-02.

Sponsored by UNICEF - Venezuela · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
299
Ages
6 Months to 59 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to compare the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of the simplified protocol, which includes the following three modifications: a) use of a single treatment product (RUTF), b) reduced dose, c) expanded cut-offs, with the standard protocol based on the 2023 World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute malnutrition in children aged 6 to 59 months, in outpatient care services of the states of Bolívar, Capital District, La Guaira, and Miranda of Venezuela.

The main question it aims to answer is:

What is the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of the simplified protocol, which includes these three modifications (use of a single treatment product (RUTF), reduced dose, expanded cut-offs) when compared to a standard protocol that is based on the 2023 WHO guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute malnutrition in children aged 6 to 59 months in the outpatient care services of the states of Bolívar, Capital District, La Guaira, and Miranda of Venezuela? This prospective cohort, longitudinal study will be conducted in 4 states, treating children aged 6-59 months diagnosed with uncomplicated AM, defined as WHZ \<-2 or mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) \<125mm or bilateral edema. Children will be prospectively followed for 16 weeks or until their recovery.

Researchers will compare the simplified protocol cohort with the standard protocol cohort to determine which one has the best effectiveness, safety, and efficiency indicators in the Venezuela context.

The effectiveness of the treatment will be measured by the recovery rate, duration of the treatment, and changes in anthropometry (weight, height, and arm circumference). Other treatment effects will also be measured, including how many are admitted to the hospital, death, and relapse rates from the nutritional program. An economic evaluation component will be incorporated. Total costs will be aggregated and presented as costs per child treated and per child recovered.

Read the detailed description

The general objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of the simplified protocol, which includes the following three modifications: a) use of a single treatment product (RUTF), b) reduced dose, c) expanded cut-offs, with the standard protocol based on the 2023 WHO guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute malnutrition in children aged 6 to 59 months in outpatient care services in the states Bolívar, Capital District, La Guaira, and Miranda of Venezuela.

This will be a multicentric and prospective cohort study assessing the Simplified Protocol with the Standard Protocol, among children with uncomplicated acute malnutrition. Children will be prospectively followed until their recovery or for a maximum of 16 weeks.

The study will be implemented in 4 Venezuelan states chosen based on their acute malnutrition prevalence and operational constraints.

The protocol will be implemented by health professionals from each institution, duly previously trained in applying the study protocol.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Malnutrition in Childhood
  • Wasting
  • Child Malnutrition

Keywords

  • Severe acute malnutrition
  • Moderate acute malnutrition
  • Ready-to-use therapeutic food
  • Malnutrition treatment
  • Venezuela
  • Mid-upper arm circumference
  • Wasting
  • Simplified protocol
  • Standard protocol
03

In context

Cachexia

331 studies on the registry are indexed under Cachexia; 75 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 299 is above the median of 150 across 88 observational studies indexed under Cachexia.

Browse Cachexia studies →

Lead sponsor

UNICEF - Venezuela is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 59 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The research population consisted of children with uncomplicated moderate or severe acute malnutrition who are admitted to the nutritional care program in care centers and associated institutions in Bolívar, Capital District, La Guaira, and Miranda.

Given the observational nature of the research, the sample size of the population will not be calculated. Rather, a research group or intentional sample will be analyzed, made up of all children who attend the care centers and meet the inclusion criteria of the research during a collection period of two months in each cohort.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Simplified protocol cohort

    • MUAC \<125 mm or
    • Weight-Height/length Z Score \<-2 or
    • Mild bipedal pitting oedema.

And all the following:

  • No medical complications
  • Positive appetite test.

    • Standard protocol cohort

SAM:

  • MUAC \<115 mm or
  • Weight-Height/length Z Score \<-3 or
  • Mild bipedal pitting oedema

And all the following:

  • No medical complications
  • Positive appetite test

MAM (Although MAM cases are not traditionally included, in this study they will be incorporated if they meet the following criteria):

  • MUAC ≥ 115 mm to \< 125 mm or
  • Weight-Height/length Z Score ≥ -3 to \< -2 and
  • No nutritional oedema

And at least one the following:

  • Failing to recover from moderate wasting after receiving other interventions (counselling alone).
  • Having to moderate wasting
  • History of severe wasting
  • Households' low socioeconomic status (Determined by Graffar-Mendez-Castellanos method)
  • Co-morbidity (, tuberculosis, or a physical or mental disability that does not jeopardize the anthropometric measurements)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Both cohorts:

    • Congenital malformations that make anthropometric measurements impossible.
    • Family that intends to leave the study area before four months.
    • Presence of medical condition requiring referral for hospitalization. Presence of medical condition requiring referral for hospitalization.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
299 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Simplified protocol

    The first cohort will be composed of all children between 6 and 59 months of age who attend predefined outpatient care points in the states Distrito Capital, Miranda, and La Guaira. These children must meet the inclusion criteria for the research. For those selected in these centers, the method of nutritional treatment for acute malnutrition will be the simplified protocol. Adaptations in this protocol include: 1. Use of a single treatment product (Ready to use therapeutic food). 2. Reduced dose. 3. Expanded cut-offs.

    Procedure: Simplified protocol

  • Standard protocol

    The second cohort will be composed of all children between 6 and 59 months of age who attend other predefined outpatient care points in the four states and met the inclusion criteria for this research. Nutritional treatment will be administered to these children, following the WHO Standard Protocol.

    Procedure: Standard protocol

Interventions

  • ProcedureSimplified protocol

    MUAC-based dosing: * SAM \[MUAC \<115mm or WHZ \<-3 or oedema (+/++)\] = Two 92g sachets Ready to use Therapeutic Food (RUTF)/day (Approx. 1000 kcal/day). * MAM \[MUAC 115mm\<125mm or WHZ \<-2\] = One 92g sachet RUTF/day (Approx. 500 kcal/day).

  • ProcedureStandard protocol

    Weight-based dosing * SAM: Mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) \<115mm or Weight-Height/length Z Score \<-3 or mild or moderate bipedal oedema: 150-185 kcal/kg/day is offered using RUTF until the patient passes to MAM and then the dose is reduced to 100 -130 kcal/kg/day using RUTF until recovery. * MAM: MUAC 115-\<125mm or Weight-Height/length Z Score \<-2: 100-130 kcal/kg/day is offered using RUTF until recovery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recovery rate

    This indicator is defined as the number of children who recovered from SAM and MAM (WHZ\>-2 and MUAC\>=125mm and the absence of bilateral edema for two consecutive visits, within 16 weeks of enrollment in the program, divided by the total number of treated children.

    Time frame: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first

  2. Weight gain

    Average weight change in each protocol.

    Time frame: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first

  3. Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) gain

    Average Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) change in each protocol.

    Time frame: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first

  4. Duration of the treatment

    Defined as the average number of weeks spent on treatment (enrollment and recovery) in children 6-59 months of age at enrollment, according to health registers

    Time frame: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first

  5. Prevalence of child morbidity

    Defined by the number of days with symptoms of acute respiratory infections, fever, diarrhea (three or more loose or liquid stools per day) and malaria divided by the total number of days observed/reported in the recall period

    Time frame: From date of enrolment until the date of recovery, last documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first.

  6. Number of RUTF delivered per child

    Average number of RUTF delivered per child (SAM/MAM) in each protocol

    Time frame: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first

  7. Cost per child

    Average number of dollars that cost to recovery a child in each cohort

    Time frame: From date of inclusion in the program until the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of child stunting

    Proportion of children with Height-for-age Z-score (LAZ)\<-2 (according to the 2006 World Health Organization reference) at the end of the study

    Time frame: At the date of recovery or 16th week after inclusion in the program or date of death from any cause, whichever came first

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Bolivar State Centers
    Puerto Ordaz, Bolivar 8050, Venezuela
  • Ditrict Capital centers
    Caracas, Capital District 1090, Venezuela
  • Miranda State Centers
    Santa Lucia, Miranda 1214, Venezuela
  • La Guaira State Centers
    La Guaira, 1160, Venezuela
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alvarez Moran JL, Ale GBF, Charle P, Sessions N, Doumbia S, Guerrero S. The effectiveness of treatment for Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) delivered by community health workers compared to a traditional facility based model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2987-z. PubMed 29580238 ↗
  • Bahwere P. Severe acute malnutrition during emergencies: burden management, and gaps. Food Nutr Bull. 2014 Jun;35(2 Suppl):S47-51. doi: 10.1177/15648265140352S107. PubMed 25069293 ↗
  • Maust A, Koroma AS, Abla C, Molokwu N, Ryan KN, Singh L, Manary MJ. Severe and Moderate Acute Malnutrition Can Be Successfully Managed with an Integrated Protocol in Sierra Leone. J Nutr. 2015 Nov;145(11):2604-9. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.214957. Epub 2015 Sep 30. PubMed 26423737 ↗
  • Bailey J, Opondo C, Lelijveld N, Marron B, Onyo P, Musyoki EN, Adongo SW, Manary M, Briend A, Kerac M. A simplified, combined protocol versus standard treatment for acute malnutrition in children 6-59 months (ComPAS trial): A cluster-randomized controlled non-inferiority trial in Kenya and South Sudan. PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 9;17(7):e1003192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003192. eCollection 2020 Jul. PubMed 32645109 ↗
  • Stephenson KB, Agapova SE, Hendrixson DT, Koroma AS, Manary MJ. An Optimized Dose of Therapeutic Feeding Results in Noninferior Growth in Midupper Arm Circumference Compared with a Standard Dose in Children in Sierra Leone Recovering from Acute Malnutrition. Curr Dev Nutr. 2021 Feb 2;5(2):nzab007. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzab007. eCollection 2021 Feb. PubMed 33659773 ↗
  • James PT, Van den Briel N, Rozet A, Israel AD, Fenn B, Navarro-Colorado C. Low-dose RUTF protocol and improved service delivery lead to good programme outcomes in the treatment of uncomplicated SAM: a programme report from Myanmar. Matern Child Nutr. 2015 Oct;11(4):859-69. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12192. Epub 2015 Apr 7. PubMed 25850698 ↗
  • Daures M, Phelan K, Issoufou M, Kouanda S, Sawadogo O, Issaley K, Cazes C, Seri B, Ouaro B, Akpakpo B, Mendiboure V, Shepherd S, Becquet R. New approach to simplifying and optimising acute malnutrition treatment in children aged 6-59 months: the OptiMA single-arm proof-of-concept trial in Burkina Faso. Br J Nutr. 2020 Apr 14;123(7):756-767. doi: 10.1017/S0007114519003258. Epub 2019 Dec 10. PubMed 31818335 ↗
  • Hussain I, Habib A, Ariff S, Khan GN, Rizvi A, Channar S, Hussain A, Fazal S, Kumar D, Alvarez JL, Guerrero S, Grant A, Soofi SB. Effectiveness of management of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) through community health workers as compared to a traditional facility-based model: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Eur J Nutr. 2021 Oct;60(7):3853-3860. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02550-y. Epub 2021 Apr 20. PubMed 33880645 ↗
  • Lelijveld N, Bailey J, Mayberry A, Trenouth L, N'Diaye DS, Haghparast-Bidgoli H, Puett C. The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation. Trials. 2018 Apr 24;19(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2594-7. PubMed 29690899 ↗
  • Bailey J, Lelijveld N, Marron B, Onyoo P, Ho LS, Manary M, Briend A, Opondo C, Kerac M. Combined Protocol for Acute Malnutrition Study (ComPAS) in rural South Sudan and urban Kenya: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Apr 24;19(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2643-2. PubMed 29690916 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2024 to primary completion in Aug 2024, 6 months.

Of 38 observational studies under Cachexia, half reached primary completion within 38 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 48. This study's 6 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 19, 2024
First posted
Mar 1, 2024
StartActual
Feb 14, 2024
Primary completionActual
Aug 31, 2024
CompletionActual
Aug 31, 2024
Last update
Oct 2, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 2, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06287827
Lead sponsor
UNICEF - Venezuela
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 1, 2024
Start date
Feb 14, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2024
Completion
Aug 31, 2024
Last update
Oct 2, 2024

Study contacts

Pablo Hernandez, MSc
principal investigator · Nutri Consult

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion