CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06256601Updated Jul 29, 2026

Clinical Investigation of Effectiveness of a Calcium Silicate Cement

An interventional study of Theracal (calcium silicate) and Dycal (calcium hydroxide) in Deep Caries and Dentin Caries, sponsored by Hacettepe University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2023, registered Feb 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this clinical study is to investigate the clinical performance of a calcium silicate used in the treatment of deep caries lesions. Individuals participating in the research will be selected from patients with at least one deep dentin caries (D3) who apply to the Restorative Dentistry Clinic of Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry. The age range will be range 18-45.

The teeth to be restored will be evaluated clinically and radiographically. A rubber dam will be used during the treatment. After the removal of enamel, carious tissue at the lateral walls of cavities will be removed to hard dentin using round and single-use round steel burs operating at low speed in all groups. A reasonable amount of soft carious tissue will be left over the pulp.

In test (Calcium silicate) and control(calcium hydroxide) groups, after caries removal, respective material will be applied on the pulpal floor. Then, materials will be sealed by resin-modified glass ionomer cement and permanent restoration will be performed. Evaluation will be conducted after 6, 12, and 18 months.

Read the detailed description

This clinical study aims to investigate the 18-month clinical performance of calcium silicate and calcium hydroxide materials used in the treatment of deep caries lesions.

Material and Methods: Eighty patients who applied to the Restorative Dentistry Clinic of Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry, aged between 18-45 years, will be recruited for the study. Patients to be included must have at least one deep dentin caries (D3). For standardization purposes, one researcher will carry out the interventional procedures. Before interventions, any attachments on the teeth will be removed using pumice and polishing rubbers. Restorations will be carried out under rubber dam isolation (OptraDam, Liechtenstein). If the patient experiences any pain, anesthesia will be applied. Dentinal carious lesions will be accessed by the removal of surrounding unsupported enamel with a round diamond bur at high speed under water cooling. Carious tissue in the pulpal aspect of the cavity will be excavated by hand instruments to soft dentin. Only disorganized dentine will be removed. A reasonable amount of soft carious tissue will be left over the pulp. The procedure will be carried out considering the risk of exposing the pulp tissue. In the test group a Calcium silicate, (TheraCal LC, Bisco, Schaumburg, IL, USA), and in the control group a calcium hydroxide (Dycal, Dentsply, Caulk, Milford, DE, USA) materials will be applied to the pulpal floor following the instructions of the manufacturer. Then, these materials in both groups will be sealed by resin-modified glass ionomer cement (SDI, Bayswater, Australia).

Selective etching with 37% phosphoric acid (Total Etch-Ivoclar/Vivadent, Liechtenstein) will be applied for 10 s in enamel. Cavities will be rinsed for 10 s, and adhesive material (G-Premio-bond, GC Europe, Leuven, Belgium) will be applied with a micro brush in cavity walls with rubbing for 20 s. After gentle air drying for approximately 5 s, a 1200 W/cm2 intensity LED light device) will be used for 10 s light curing. For the restoration of Class II cavities, a sectional matrix (Palodent V3, Dentsply Sirona, York/Pennsylvania, USA) will be placed. Then, permanent restoration with a posterior composite resin (Gradia Direct Posterior, GC, GC Coop., Tokyo, Japan) will be carried out at the same session. Evaluations will be conducted by two independent researchers after 6, 12, and 18 months according to FDI criteria.

02

Conditions studied

  • Deep Caries
  • Dentin Caries

Keywords

  • deep dentin caries
  • calcium silicate
  • calcium hydroxide
  • selective caries removal
  • randomized clinical trial
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University is the lead sponsor of 983 studies on the registry; 212 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • The age of the patient should be ranged between 18-45.
  • The score of the caries lesion should be D3.
  • Absence of a history of spontaneous pain in the teeth to be included.
  • Absence of periapical pathology
  • No displacement or mobility of the teeth.
  • Caries should not have reached the pulp tissue, and there should be no root fractures.
  • Restorable by direct restoration and functional

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Poor oral hygiene of the participant.
  • Parafunctional habits such as teeth clenching or grinding.
  • Caries extending to the underneath of gingival margin
  • Severe periodontal pathology
  • Previous restored teeth
  • Teeth undergoing orthodontic treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Theracal (calcium silicate)

    TheraCal LC is a light-cured resin-modified calcium silicate pulp protectant/liner designed to perform as a barrier and to protect the dental pulpal complex. It contains; resin bis-phenyl glycidyl methacrylate (BisGMA) \& polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate (PEGD), modified calcium silicated with CaO, calcium silicate particles (type III Portland cement), Sr glass, fumed silica, barium sulphate, barium zirconate. After caries removal, TheraCal is applied directly to the cavity floor in incremental layers. The layer is not to exceed 1 mm in depth. Each layer polymerized for 20 seconds.

    Device: Theracal (calcium silicate)

  • Active comparator
    Dycal (calcium hydroxide)

    Dycal,Calcium Hydroxide Liner is a two-component, rigid-setting, self-curing material designed for use in direct and indirect pulp capping and as a protective liner under dental adhesives, varnishes, filling materials, cements, and other base materials. It will not inhibit the polymerization of acrylic and composite restorations. Dycal, a two-paste system made of a base paste (1,3-butylene glycol disalicylate, zinc oxide, calcium phosphate, calcium tungstate, iron oxide pigments) and a catalyst paste (calcium hydroxide, N-ethyl-o/p-toluene sulphonamide, zinc oxide, titanium oxide, zinc stearate, iron oxide pigments) is prepared following the manufacturer's instructions by mixing equal amounts of catalyst paste and base paste. After caries removal, Dycal is applied directly to the cavity floor, material thickness should be approximately 0.8mm-1mm. The mixed material will set in approximately 2-3 minutes.

    Device: Dycal (calcium hydroxide)

Interventions

  • DeviceTheracal (calcium silicate)

    selective removal to soft dentin, restorations with calcium silicate

  • DeviceDycal (calcium hydroxide)

    selective removal to soft dentin, restoration with calcium hydroxide

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fracture of restorative material and retention

    Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using FDI criteria regarding fracture of restorative material and retention. Fracture of restorative material and retention was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror was performed. Scores; 1: Restoration retained, no fractures, cracks or chipping 2: Small hairline crack 3: Two or more or larger hairline cracks and/or chipping (not affecting the marginal integrity or proximal contact) 4: Chipping fractures affect marginal quality and/or proximal contacts; bulk fractures with or without partial loss of (\<1/2 of the restoration) 5: (Partial or complete) loss of the restoration

    Time frame: From Baseline to 12 Month

  2. Postoperative sensitivity and tooth vitality

    Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using FDI criteria regarding postoperative sensitivity and tooth vitality. Postoperative sensitivity and tooth vitality was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Scores; 1: No hypersensitivity, normal vitality 2: Low hypersensitivity for a limited period of time, normal vitality 3: Premature/slightly more intense or delayed/weak hypersensitivity. No subjective complaints 4:Premature/very intense or extremely delayed/weak hypersensitivity with subjective complaints. Or negative sensitivity 5: Very intense, acute pulpitis or non vital tooth. Removal of restoration with or without immediate root canal treatment is required or the tooth must be extracted

    Time frame: From Baseline to 12 Month

  3. Recurrence of initial pathology (secondary caries)

    Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using FDI criteria regarding recurrence of initial pathology (secondary caries). Recurrence of initial pathology (secondary caries) was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror was performed. Scores; 1: No secondary or primary caries 2: Very small, localized demineralization area 3: Larger areas of demineralisation, preventive measures necessary (dentine not exposed) 4: Caries with cavitation 5: Deep secondary caries or exposed dentine that is not accessible for repair

    Time frame: From Baseline to 12 Month

  4. Tooth cracks and fractures

    Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using FDI criteria regarding tooth cracks and fractures. Tooth cracks and fractures was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror was performed. Scores; 1: Complete integrity 2: Minor marginal crack or a hairline crack which cannot be probed. The patient has no clinical symptoms 3: Enamel split or crack \<250 μm. No adverse effects 4: Major enamel split (gap \>250 μm or dentine/base exposed. Or crack\>250 μm (explorer penetrates) 5: Cusp or tooth fracture

    Time frame: From Baseline to 12 Month

  5. Localised reactions of soft tissue

    Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using FDI criteria regarding localised reactions of soft tissue. Localised reactions of soft tissue in direct contact with the restoration was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Scores; 1: Healthy mucosa adjacent to restoration 2: Healthy after minor removal of mechanical irritations (sharp edges etc.) 3: Alteration of mucosa but no suspicion of causal relationship with filling material 4: Suspected mild allergic, lichenoid or toxicological reaction 5: Suspected severe allergic, lichenoid or toxicological reaction

    Time frame: [Time Frame: From Baseline to 12 Month]

  6. Oral and somatic/ psychiatric symptoms

    Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using FDI criteria regarding oral and somatic/ psychiatric symptoms. Oral and somatic/ psychiatric symptoms in direct contact with the restoration was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Scores; 1: No symptoms of adverse effects 2: Short-term minor transient symptoms 3: Minor oral and/or general symptoms of malaise 4: Persistent oral/general symptoms, recurrent symptoms 5: Acute/severe oral/general symptoms requires immediate replacement

    Time frame: [Time Frame: From Baseline to 12 Month]

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hacettepe University
    Ankara, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schwendicke F, Walsh T, Lamont T, Al-Yaseen W, Bjorndal L, Clarkson JE, Fontana M, Gomez Rossi J, Gostemeyer G, Levey C, Muller A, Ricketts D, Robertson M, Santamaria RM, Innes NP. Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):CD013039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013039.pub2. PubMed 34280957 ↗
  • Figundio N, Lopes P, Tedesco TK, Fernandes JCH, Fernandes GVO, Mello-Moura ACV. Deep Carious Lesions Management with Stepwise, Selective, or Non-Selective Removal in Permanent Dentition: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 18;11(16):2338. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162338. PubMed 37628535 ↗
  • Schwendicke, F., in Management of Deep Carious Lesions. 2018, Springer Nature: Gewerbestrasse.
  • Innes NP, Frencken JE, Bjorndal L, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Ricketts D, Van Landuyt K, Banerjee A, Campus G, Domejean S, Fontana M, Leal S, Lo E, Machiulskiene V, Schulte A, Splieth C, Zandona A, Schwendicke F. Managing Carious Lesions: Consensus Recommendations on Terminology. Adv Dent Res. 2016 May;28(2):49-57. doi: 10.1177/0022034516639276. PubMed 27099357 ↗
  • Barros MMAF, De Queiroz Rodrigues MI, Muniz FWMG, Rodrigues LKA. Selective, stepwise, or nonselective removal of carious tissue: which technique offers lower risk for the treatment of dental caries in permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Feb;24(2):521-532. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03114-5. Epub 2019 Nov 26. PubMed 31773371 ↗
  • Kunert M, Lukomska-Szymanska M. Bio-Inductive Materials in Direct and Indirect Pulp Capping-A Review Article. Materials (Basel). 2020 Mar 7;13(5):1204. doi: 10.3390/ma13051204. PubMed 32155997 ↗
  • Schmidt J, Buenger L, Krohn S, Kallies R, Zeller K, Schneider H, Ziebolz D, Berg T, Haak R. Effect of a bioactive cement on the microbial community in carious dentin after selective caries removal - An in-vivo study. J Dent. 2020 Jan;92:103264. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103264. Epub 2019 Dec 13. PubMed 31843419 ↗
  • Koc Vural U, Kiremitci A, Gokalp S. Which is the most effective biomaterial in indirect pulp capping? 4- year comparative randomized clinical trial. Eur Oral Res. 2022 Jan 1;56(1):35-41. doi: 10.26650/eor.2022895748. PubMed 35478709 ↗
  • Edwards D, Stone S, Bailey O, Tomson P. Preserving pulp vitality: part one - strategies for managing deep caries in permanent teeth. Br Dent J. 2021 Jan;230(2):77-82. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-2590-7. Epub 2021 Jan 22. PubMed 33483661 ↗
  • Jurasic MM, Gillespie S, Sorbara P, Clarkson J, Ramsay C, Nyongesa D, McEdward D, Gilbert GH, Vollmer WM; National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group. Deep caries removal strategies: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc. 2022 Nov;153(11):1078-1088.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Sep 26. PubMed 36175201 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06256601
Lead sponsor
Hacettepe University
Responsible party
Betul Kesim (Principal Investigator, Hacettepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 13, 2024
Start date
Jul 12, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 12, 2024
Completion
Jul 12, 2026
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Study contacts

Arlin Serpuhi Kiremitci, Prof.
study director · Hacettepe University
Uzay Koç Vural, Assoc. Prof.
principal investigator · Hacettepe University
Betül Kesim
principal investigator · Hacettepe University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion