CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06255327Updated May 6, 2024

Effectiveness of I COUGH Program to Dyspnea, Respiratory Parameters, Mobility and Pain After Major Abdominal Surgery

An interventional study of I COUGH care program in Dyspnea, Pain and Respiratory Insufficiency, sponsored by Yeditepe University. Completed at 3 sites in Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-06.

Sponsored by Yeditepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effect of the I COUGH care program following major abdominal surgery dyspnea, oxygen saturation, pulmonary function, mobility, and pain after major abdominal surgery (MAS), participants were subjected to the "I COUGH" care program designed to support their health condition and reduce complications. The study aimed to investigate a simple and inexpensive pulmonary care program that can be easily understood and remembered by patients, their families, and medical staff.

Ho: The I COUGH care program after MAS does not improves pulmonary functions, oxygen saturation, mobility and decrease dyspnea and pain after MAS.

H1: The I COUGH care program improves pulmonary functions, oxygen saturation mobility and decrease dyspnea and pain after MAS.

Read the detailed description

A total of 60 adult individuals aged between 30 and 60 years (mean age of 39.9±8.82) comprising 13 males and 47 females underwent major abdominal surgery requiring general anesthesia and hospitalization were invited to study. Patients were randomly assigned to either the Control Group (CG, n=30) or the Experimental Group (EG, n=30) using the block randomization method. Patients in the EG participated in the I COUGH care program included flow-incentive spirometer, oral care, coughing and breathing exercises, patient, and family education, getting out of bed, and elevating the head of the bed by more than 30 degrees for 3 days post-surgery. The patients in the CG did not undergo any interventions. All participants were assessed in terms of vital signs as heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation. Moreover, dyspnea was assessed using the Modified Borg dyspnea Scale, pulmonary functions were evaluated using spirometry, mobility was assessed by Activity and Mobility Promotion scale and pain assessed Visual Analog Scale. Data were collected from all patients at baseline 10 h after the first day of surgery and on the day of discharge from the hospitals. The findings of the present study revealed that the I COUGH care program effectively improved pulmonary function and blood oxygenation, reduced the incidence of dyspnea, increased mobility, and decreased postoperative pain, with a statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups (p\<0.05).

02

Conditions studied

  • Dyspnea
  • Pain
  • Respiratory Insufficiency
  • Mobility Limitation

Keywords

  • I COUGH
  • Dyspnea
  • Respiratory Parameters
  • Pain
  • Major Abdominal Surgery
03

In context

Dyspnea

656 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyspnea; 153 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is above the median of 48 across 430 interventional studies indexed under Dyspnea.

Browse Dyspnea studies →

Lead sponsor

Yeditepe University is the lead sponsor of 127 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Volunteering to participate in the study.
  • Eligible patients are adults of both sexes between 30-60 years (Through the study, we are trying to reduce the variance and confounding factors that may arise from including patients who are less than 30 years old due to different stages of growth, physical abilities, hormonal levels, etc., or over 60 years old due to the prevalence of chronic diseases or diseases associated with aging).
  • Patients underwent elective abdominal surgery that required general anaesthesia and hospital stay e.g., Hernia repair, gall bladder removal, exploratory laparotomy, morbid obesity, ovarian cyst, Sigmoid diverticulitis, appendicitis, or other abdominal cavity procedures performed by laparoscopy and conventional laparotomy with a 5 cm or less incision above or extending above the umbilicus. (Incisions > 5cm may affect on possible results might be impacted in terms of: Increased risk of infection, risk of bleeding, pain, and discomfort during ambulation).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient complains of an unstable heart rate or cardiac condition.
  • Symptomatic heart failure, unstable angina.
  • Pulmonary Hypertension
  • Unstable hypertension
  • The patient underwent organ transplants.
  • The patient presented an aneurysm of any arterial segment.
  • Serious condition or transferred to the intensive care unit after surgery.
  • Severe nephropathy.
  • A patient with cancer.
  • Cerebrovascular accident / Stroke.
  • Patient with balance or vestibular disorder.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control group

    The control group participants underwent evaluations on the first day after 10 hours following surgery and, on the day, they were discharged from the clinic, by using pulse oximetry, sphygmometer, spirometry tests, VAS, MBDS and activity and mobility promotion (AMP). Participants in the control group were not given any information or training before or after the operation, and they were on routine hospital care.

  • Experimental
    Experimental group

    The participants in the experimental group underwent the application of I COUGH (Incentive spirometry, Coughing/Deep breathing, Oral care, Understanding (Education of patient and family), Getting out of bed, and raising the Head of the bed). The participants underwent evaluations on the first day after 10 hours following surgery and, on the day, they were discharged from the clinic. Including Pulse Oximetry, Sphygmometer, Spirometry Tests, VAS, MBDS, AMP.

    Other: I COUGH care program

Interventions

  • OtherI COUGH care program

    The I COUGH program, initiated 10 hours after surgery, emphasizes the following elements: Incentive spirometry: Encouraging patients to use the Flow-IS device ten times every two hours for three days. Coughing and deep breathing: Participants should perform 3-5 coughs and deep breaths every 2 hours for 3 days. Oral care: Brushing teeth and using mouthwash twice daily between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Mouth brushes should be sterile, and non-alcoholic mouthwash is recommended. Understanding (education): Patients and their relatives receive instructions on the care program and steps to follow. Getting out of bed: Patients are encouraged to sit in a chair at least once and walk at least 3 times per day in the room and corridor with assistance as needed. Head-of-bed elevation: Keeping the head of the bed elevated more than 30 degrees.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Heart Rate (HR)

    The number of heart beats per minute.

    Time frame: 3 days of postoperatively

  2. Systolic Blood pressure (SBP)

    The minimum pressure recorded just prior to the next contraction.

    Time frame: 3 days of postoperatively

  3. Diastolic Blood pressure (DBP)

    The maximum blood pressure during contraction of the ventricles.

    Time frame: 3 days of postoperatively

  4. Respiratory Rate (RR)

    The number of breaths they take per minute.

    Time frame: 3 days of postoperatively

  5. Oxygen Saturation (SPO2)

    A pulse oximeter reading that indicates what percentage of your blood is saturated.

    Time frame: 3 days of postoperatively

  6. Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale (MBDS)

    A valid and reliable tool to measure the intensity of dyspnea. It is a categorical scale with ratio properties, rating from 0 to 10, 0 being not dyspneic at all and 10 being maximally dyspneic.

    Time frame: 3 days of postoperatively

  7. Pulmonary Function Test FVC

    Noninvasive test that show how well the lungs are working, measuring of FVC

    Time frame: 3 days of postoperatively

  8. Pulmonary Function Test FEV

    Noninvasive tests that show how well the lungs are working, measuring of FEV

    Time frame: 3 days of postoperatively

  9. Pulmonary Function Test FEV1/FVC

    Noninvasive tests that show how well the lungs are working, measuring of FEV1/FVC

    Time frame: 3 days of postoperatively

  10. Pulmonary Function Test PEFR

    Noninvasive tests that show how well the lungs are working, measuring of PEFR.

    Time frame: 3 days of postoperatively

  11. Activity and Mobility Promotion (AMP)

    AMP is based on measuring increasing patient mobility during hospital stay. The initial goals of this program included mobilization of each patient 3 times per day, documentation of patient mobility levels on the AMP scale.

    Time frame: 3 days of postoperatively

  12. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    This measure is based on self-reported symptoms and is recorded with a single mark placed along a 10-cm line, which represents a continuum between "no pain" on the left end (0 cm) and "worst pain" on the right end. to determine the intensity of pain and its enhancement when coughing in the postoperative area.

    Time frame: 3 days of postoperatively

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • AL-ASSEMA Hospital
    Tripoli, 21821, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
  • AL-KHALIL Hospital
    Tripoli, 21821, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
  • ROYAL Clinic
    Tripoli, 21821, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Branson RD. The scientific basis for postoperative respiratory care. Respir Care. 2013 Nov;58(11):1974-84. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02832. PubMed 24155356 ↗
  • Moore JA, Conway DH, Thomas N, Cummings D, Atkinson D. Impact of a peri-operative quality improvement programme on postoperative pulmonary complications. Anaesthesia. 2017 Mar;72(3):317-327. doi: 10.1111/anae.13763. Epub 2017 Jan 4. PubMed 28054356 ↗
  • Smetana GW. Postoperative pulmonary complications: an update on risk assessment and reduction. Cleve Clin J Med. 2009 Nov;76 Suppl 4:S60-5. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.76.s4.10. PubMed 19880838 ↗
  • Odor PM, Bampoe S, Gilhooly D, Creagh-Brown B, Moonesinghe SR. Perioperative interventions for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020 Mar 11;368:m540. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m540. PubMed 32161042 ↗
  • Boden I, Skinner EH, Browning L, Reeve J, Anderson L, Hill C, Robertson IK, Story D, Denehy L. Preoperative physiotherapy for the prevention of respiratory complications after upper abdominal surgery: pragmatic, double blinded, multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2018 Jan 24;360:j5916. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5916. Erratum In: BMJ. 2019 Apr 25;365:l1862. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1862. PubMed 29367198 ↗
  • Brooks-Brunn JA. Predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications following abdominal surgery. Chest. 1997 Mar;111(3):564-71. doi: 10.1378/chest.111.3.564. PubMed 9118688 ↗
  • Manzano RM, Carvalho CR, Saraiva-Romanholo BM, Vieira JE. Chest physiotherapy during immediate postoperative period among patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: randomized clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med J. 2008 Sep;126(5):269-73. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802008000500005. PubMed 19099160 ↗
  • Fagevik Olsen M, Hahn I, Nordgren S, Lonroth H, Lundholm K. Randomized controlled trial of prophylactic chest physiotherapy in major abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 1997 Nov;84(11):1535-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2168.1997.02828.x. PubMed 9393272 ↗
  • Siafakas NM, Mitrouska I, Bouros D, Georgopoulos D. Surgery and the respiratory muscles. Thorax. 1999 May;54(5):458-65. doi: 10.1136/thx.54.5.458. No abstract available. PubMed 10212115 ↗
  • Jammer I, Wickboldt N, Sander M, Smith A, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Leva B, Rhodes A, Hoeft A, Walder B, Chew MS, Pearse RM; European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM); European Society of Anaesthesiology; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):88-105. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000118. PubMed 25058504 ↗
  • Cheifetz O, Lucy SD, Overend TJ, Crowe J. The effect of abdominal support on functional outcomes in patients following major abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Physiother Can. 2010 Summer;62(3):242-53. doi: 10.3138/physio.62.3.242. Epub 2010 Jul 23. PubMed 21629603 ↗
  • Smith PR, Baig MA, Brito V, Bader F, Bergman MI, Alfonso A. Postoperative pulmonary complications after laparotomy. Respiration. 2010;80(4):269-74. doi: 10.1159/000253881. Epub 2009 Oct 28. PubMed 19864881 ↗
  • Lawrence VA, Hilsenbeck SG, Mulrow CD, Dhanda R, Sapp J, Page CP. Incidence and hospital stay for cardiac and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery. J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Dec;10(12):671-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02602761. PubMed 8770719 ↗
  • Nafiu OO, Ramachandran SK, Ackwerh R, Tremper KK, Campbell DA Jr, Stanley JC. Factors associated with and consequences of unplanned post-operative intubation in elderly vascular and general surgery patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Mar;28(3):220-4. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328342659c. PubMed 21191304 ↗
  • Miskovic A, Lumb AB. Postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):317-334. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex002. PubMed 28186222 ↗
  • Sabate S, Mazo V, Canet J. Predicting postoperative pulmonary complications: implications for outcomes and costs. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Apr;27(2):201-9. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000045. PubMed 24419159 ↗
  • Davies SJ, Francis J, Dilley J, Wilson RJ, Howell SJ, Allgar V. Measuring outcomes after major abdominal surgery during hospitalization: reliability and validity of the Postoperative Morbidity Survey. Perioper Med (Lond). 2013 Feb 4;2(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2047-0525-2-1. PubMed 24472150 ↗
  • So MW, Heo HM, Koo BS, Kim YG, Lee CK, Yoo B. Efficacy of incentive spirometer exercise on pulmonary functions of patients with ankylosing spondylitis stabilized by tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy. J Rheumatol. 2012 Sep;39(9):1854-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120137. Epub 2012 Aug 1. PubMed 22859343 ↗
  • Restrepo RD, Wettstein R, Wittnebel L, Tracy M. Incentive spirometry: 2011. Respir Care. 2011 Oct;56(10):1600-4. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01471. PubMed 22008401 ↗
  • Tyson AF, Kendig CE, Mabedi C, Cairns BA, Charles AG. The effect of incentive spirometry on postoperative pulmonary function following laparotomy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2015 Mar 1;150(3):229-36. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1846. PubMed 25607594 ↗
  • Nishikawa M, Honda M, Kimura R, Kobayashi A, Yamaguchi Y, Hori S, Kobayashi H, Waragai M, Kawamura H, Nakayama Y, Todate Y, Takano Y, Yamaguchi H, Hamada K, Iketani S, Seto I, Izumi Y, Seto K. The bacterial association with oral cavity and intra-abdominal abscess after gastrectomy. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 9;15(11):e0242091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242091. eCollection 2020. PubMed 33166362 ↗
  • Cassidy MR, Rosenkranz P, McCabe K, Rosen JE, McAneny D. I COUGH: reducing postoperative pulmonary complications with a multidisciplinary patient care program. JAMA Surg. 2013 Aug;148(8):740-5. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.358. PubMed 23740240 ↗
  • Tazreean R, Nelson G, Twomey R. Early mobilization in enhanced recovery after surgery pathways: current evidence and recent advancements. J Comp Eff Res. 2022 Feb;11(2):121-129. doi: 10.2217/cer-2021-0258. Epub 2022 Jan 20. PubMed 35045757 ↗
  • Cassidy MR, Rosenkranz P, Macht RD, Talutis S, McAneny D. The I COUGH Multidisciplinary Perioperative Pulmonary Care Program: One Decade of Experience. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 May;46(5):241-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 Jan 30. PubMed 32122711 ↗
  • Weindler J, Kiefer RT. The efficacy of postoperative incentive spirometry is influenced by the device-specific imposed work of breathing. Chest. 2001 Jun;119(6):1858-64. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.6.1858. PubMed 11399715 ↗
  • Banerjee D, Kamuren J, Baird GL, Palmisciano A, Krishnan I, Whittenhall M, Klinger JR, Ventetuolo CE. The Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale does not predict hospitalization in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pulm Circ. 2017 Apr-Jun;7(2):384-390. doi: 10.1177/2045893217695568. Epub 2017 Mar 16. PubMed 28597751 ↗
  • Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, ZuWallack R, Nici L, Rochester C, Hill K, Holland AE, Lareau SC, Man WD, Pitta F, Sewell L, Raskin J, Bourbeau J, Crouch R, Franssen FM, Casaburi R, Vercoulen JH, Vogiatzis I, Gosselink R, Clini EM, Effing TW, Maltais F, van der Palen J, Troosters T, Janssen DJ, Collins E, Garcia-Aymerich J, Brooks D, Fahy BF, Puhan MA, Hoogendoorn M, Garrod R, Schols AM, Carlin B, Benzo R, Meek P, Morgan M, Rutten-van Molken MP, Ries AL, Make B, Goldstein RS, Dowson CA, Brozek JL, Donner CF, Wouters EF; ATS/ERS Task Force on Pulmonary Rehabilitation. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct 15;188(8):e13-64. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201309-1634ST. Erratum In: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Jun 15;189(12):1570. PubMed 24127811 ↗
  • McLaughlin KH, Friedman M, Hoyer EH, Kudchadkar S, Flanagan E, Klein L, Daley K, Lavezza A, Schechter N, Young D; JH-AMP Group. The Johns Hopkins Activity and Mobility Promotion Program: A Framework to Increase Activity and Mobility Among Hospitalized Patients. J Nurs Care Qual. 2023 Apr-Jun 01;38(2):164-170. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000678. Epub 2022 Dec 3. PubMed 36729980 ↗
  • Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, Harris JD. Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Mar 23;2(3):e088. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00088. eCollection 2018 Mar. PubMed 30211382 ↗
  • Hedenstierna G, Rothen HU. Respiratory function during anesthesia: effects on gas exchange. Compr Physiol. 2012 Jan;2(1):69-96. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c080111. PubMed 23728971 ↗
  • Hall JC, Tarala RA, Tapper J, Hall JL. Prevention of respiratory complications after abdominal surgery: a randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 1996 Jan 20;312(7024):148-52; discussion 152-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7024.148. PubMed 8563533 ↗
  • Wren SM, Martin M, Yoon JK, Bech F. Postoperative pneumonia-prevention program for the inpatient surgical ward. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Apr;210(4):491-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.009. PubMed 20347742 ↗
  • do Nascimento Junior P, Modolo NS, Andrade S, Guimaraes MM, Braz LG, El Dib R. Incentive spirometry for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications in upper abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 8;2014(2):CD006058. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006058.pub3. PubMed 24510642 ↗
  • Lawrence VA, Cornell JE, Smetana GW; American College of Physicians. Strategies to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications after noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 18;144(8):596-608. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00011. PubMed 16618957 ↗
  • Pasquina P, Tramer MR, Granier JM, Walder B. Respiratory physiotherapy to prevent pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Chest. 2006 Dec;130(6):1887-99. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.6.1887. PubMed 17167013 ↗
  • Weller WE, Rosati C. Comparing outcomes of laparoscopic versus open bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2008 Jul;248(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816d953a. PubMed 18580201 ↗
  • Sum SK, Peng YC, Yin SY, Huang PF, Wang YC, Chen TP, Tung HH, Yeh CH. Using an incentive spirometer reduces pulmonary complications in patients with traumatic rib fractures: a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Dec 30;20(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3943-x. PubMed 31888765 ↗
  • Louie A, Feiner JR, Bickler PE, Rhodes L, Bernstein M, Lucero J. Four Types of Pulse Oximeters Accurately Detect Hypoxia during Low Perfusion and Motion. Anesthesiology. 2018 Mar;128(3):520-530. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002002. PubMed 29200008 ↗
  • Crisafulli E, Clini EM. Measures of dyspnea in pulmonary rehabilitation. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2010 Jun 30;5(3):202-10. doi: 10.1186/2049-6958-5-3-202. PubMed 22958431 ↗
  • Katz S, Arish N, Rokach A, Zaltzman Y, Marcus EL. The effect of body position on pulmonary function: a systematic review. BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0723-4. PubMed 30305051 ↗
  • Spahija J, Marchie Md, Ghezzo H, Grassino A. Factors discriminating spontaneous pursed-lips breathing use in patients with COPD. COPD. 2010 Aug;7(4):254-61. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2010.496820. PubMed 20673034 ↗
  • Delgado HR, Braun SR, Skatrud JB, Reddan WG, Pegelow DF. Chest wall and abdominal motion during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Aug;126(2):200-5. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.2.200. PubMed 7103243 ↗
  • Sharp JT, Drutz WS, Moisan T, Foster J, Machnach W. Postural relief of dyspnea in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1980 Aug;122(2):201-11. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1980.122.2.201. No abstract available. PubMed 7416599 ↗
  • O'Neill S, McCarthy DS. Postural relief of dyspnoea in severe chronic airflow limitation: relationship to respiratory muscle strength. Thorax. 1983 Aug;38(8):595-600. doi: 10.1136/thx.38.8.595. PubMed 6612651 ↗
  • Kumar AS, Alaparthi GK, Augustine AJ, Pazhyaottayil ZC, Ramakrishna A, Krishnakumar SK. Comparison of Flow and Volume Incentive Spirometry on Pulmonary Function and Exercise Tolerance in Open Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jan;10(1):KC01-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16164.7064. Epub 2016 Jan 1. PubMed 26894090 ↗
  • Grams ST, Ono LM, Noronha MA, Schivinski CI, Paulin E. Breathing exercises in upper abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2012 Sep-Oct;16(5):345-53. doi: 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000052. Epub 2012 Oct 9. PubMed 23060237 ↗
  • Thomas JA, McIntosh JM. Are incentive spirometry, intermittent positive pressure breathing, and deep breathing exercises effective in the prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications after upper abdominal surgery? A systematic overview and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 1994 Jan;74(1):3-10; discussion 10-6. doi: 10.1093/ptj/74.1.3. PubMed 8265725 ↗
  • Sullivan KA, Churchill IF, Hylton DA, Hanna WC. Use of Incentive Spirometry in Adults following Cardiac, Thoracic, and Upper Abdominal Surgery to Prevent Post-Operative Pulmonary Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Respiration. 2021;100(11):1114-1127. doi: 10.1159/000517012. Epub 2021 Jul 16. PubMed 34274935 ↗
  • Rowley DD, Malinowski TP, Di Peppe JL, Sharkey RM, Gochenour DU, Enfield KB. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Lung Expansion Therapies After Upper Abdominal Surgery. Respir Care. 2019 Oct;64(10):1181-1192. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06812. Epub 2019 May 21. PubMed 31113857 ↗
  • Westwood K, Griffin M, Roberts K, Williams M, Yoong K, Digger T. Incentive spirometry decreases respiratory complications following major abdominal surgery. Surgeon. 2007 Dec;5(6):339-42. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(07)80086-2. PubMed 18080608 ↗
  • Spadaro S, Caramori G, Rizzuto C, Mojoli F, Zani G, Ragazzi R, Valpiani G, Dalla Corte F, Marangoni E, Volta CA. Expiratory Flow Limitation as a Risk Factor for Pulmonary Complications After Major Abdominal Surgery. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):524-530. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001424. PubMed 27537927 ↗
  • Silva YR, Li SK, Rickard MJ. Does the addition of deep breathing exercises to physiotherapy-directed early mobilisation alter patient outcomes following high-risk open upper abdominal surgery? Cluster randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2013 Sep;99(3):187-93. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Dec 1. PubMed 23206316 ↗
  • Souza Possa S, Braga Amador C, Meira Costa A, Takahama Sakamoto E, Seiko Kondo C, Maida Vasconcellos AL, Moran de Brito CM, Pereira Yamaguti W. Implementation of a guideline for physical therapy in the postoperative period of upper abdominal surgery reduces the incidence of atelectasis and length of hospital stay. Rev Port Pneumol. 2014 Mar-Apr;20(2):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.rppneu.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Nov 27. PubMed 24290563 ↗
  • Browning L, Denehy L, Scholes RL. The quantity of early upright mobilisation performed following upper abdominal surgery is low: an observational study. Aust J Physiother. 2007;53(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(07)70061-2. PubMed 17326738 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06255327
Lead sponsor
Yeditepe University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 13, 2024
Start date
Dec 26, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 5, 2024
Completion
Jan 10, 2024
Last update
May 6, 2024

Study contacts

Feras M Tana, MSc
principal investigator · Yeditepe University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion