ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07726628TELEDYSUpdated Nov 5, 2026

The Impact of Telemedicine, Using the Caller's Mobile Phone Camera, on the Quality of Care Provided to Adult Patients Contacting the 15 Centre for Acute Dyspnea

An interventional study of Addition of telemedine to standard medical dispatching process in Dyspnea, sponsored by Poitiers University Hospital. Recruiting at 10 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Poitiers University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Updated Nov 5, 2026Now RecruitingStudy documents posted+4 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
778
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Dyspnea is the subjective sensation of difficult or uncomfortable breathing. It accounts for approximately 10% of emergency department visits and 8% of calls to Emergency Medical Communication Centers. Nearly half of patients presenting with dyspnea require hospital admission, 15% require ventilatory support, and approximately 5% die. Early recognition of signs of respiratory severity is therefore essential to accurately assess clinical urgency, guide diagnostic evaluation, and inform appropriate management decisions.

In France, patients are encouraged to contact an Emergency Medical Communication Centers before presenting to an emergency department. Calls are managed by an emergency physician responsible for medical regulation, who performs a remote clinical assessment and determines the most appropriate level of care. Depending on the clinical evaluation, the physician may provide medical advice, refer the patient to an emergency department, dispatch emergency medical services, or send a physician-staffed mobile intensive care unit for life-threatening emergencies.

The remote assessment of patients presenting with dyspnea is particularly challenging. The inability to directly observe or examine the patient, combined with the caller's difficulty in accurately describing the clinical situation, may impair the recognition of disease severity and result in inappropriate triage decisions, including under-triage and over-triage :

Under-triage, characterized by failure to dispatch appropriate emergency resources or to refer the patient to an emergency department when indicated, may delay treatment and increase the risk of adverse outcomes, including mortality.

Conversely, over-triage, defined as unnecessary referral to primary care or emergency departments or inappropriate dispatch of emergency resources, contributes to emergency department overcrowding, inefficient use of prehospital resources, and increased healthcare costs.

In a previous study, the investigators demonstrated that video-assisted medical triage improved emergency physicians' ability to assess the severity of patients presenting with acute dyspnea. This telemedicine tool enables real-time transmission of a live video stream from the caller's smartphone camera to the emergency physician through a secure digital platform, providing direct visualization of the patient's clinical condition. By enhancing remote clinical assessment, video-assisted triage has the potential to reduce both under-triage and over-triage.

In the present stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial, the investigators hypothesized that incorporating real-time video support into the medical regulation of adult patients contacting an Emergency Medical Communication Centers for acute dyspnea would improve the quality of medical decision-making compared with standard telephone triage alone.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dyspnea

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Telemedecine
  • Dispatch
  • Triage
03

In context

Dyspnea

894 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyspnea; 189 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 778 is above the median of 50 across 587 interventional studies indexed under Dyspnea.

Browse Dyspnea studies →

Lead sponsor

Poitiers University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 314 studies on the registry; 62 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

The criteria were revised on the registry on Oct 8, 2026. See what changed

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 or over
  • Contacting the Emergency Medical Communication Center regarding acute dyspnea, respiratory distress or shortness of breath, as the main reason for the call, regardless of the underlying cause
  • The patient or a bystander must have a mobile phone equipped with a camera and capable of making video calls
  • Emergency inclusion authorized by the emergency physician responsible for medical regulation in accordance with the emergency consent procedure applicable at the time of the call

Non-inclusion Criteria:

  • An immediate life-threatening emergency justifying the dispatch of an emergency response team on an automatic basis in accordance with local protocols
  • Patient at the end of life or where a decision to limit treatment is known at the time of the call.
  • Refusal to use telemedicine
  • Lack of a telephone network enabling video consultation.
  • Patient already included in the study.
  • Individuals requiring enhanced protection, namely minors, pregnant or breastfeeding women, persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, and adults under legal guardianship known at the time of the call

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria (post-inclusion):

  • Refusal to pursue the study (patient or relative consent withdrawal).
  • Patient not benefiting from a social security system.
  • Free subject, without guardianship nor subordination.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
778 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard medical dispatching process (Control group)
  • Experimental
    Addition of telemedecine to standard medical dispatching process (Experimental group)

    Other: Addition of telemedine to standard medical dispatching process

Interventions

  • OtherAddition of telemedine to standard medical dispatching process

    Patients included during the intervention phase will undergo video-assisted medical triage. Video-assisted triage will be performed using a secure web-based telemedicine hosted on a certified health data server. The emergency physician responsible for medical regulation will send a secure web link via SMS to the caller's smartphone or, when appropriate, to the smartphone of a relative or bystander. Once the link has been activated, a live video stream captured by the smartphone camera will be securely transmitted in real time to the physician's workstation at the Emergency Medical Communication Center, enabling direct visualization of the patient's clinical condition during the remote assessment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of inappropriate medical dispatch decisions (under-triage or over-triage)

    Under-triage is defined as the assignment of a level of response that is insufficient for the patient's actual clinical needs. Under-triage is defined: 1) either as a patient receiving a medical advice alone at the initial call and within 24 hours; referred to an ED after a second call to EMCC or non-scheduled hospitalization or death or secondary EMS unit dispatched; 2) either as a patient initially dispatched to an ED (not with an EMS) and within 3 hours; required ventilatory support or cardiac arrest or death or secondary EMS unit dispatched. Over-triage is defined as the assignment of a level of response that exceeds the patient's actual clinical needs. Over-triage is defined as an EMS unit being dispatched or a patient being referred to an ED after the initial call to an EMCC and, at the end of emergency management, no additional examination, no specific treatment , no hospitalization being required within 24 hours following the call to the EMCC.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients in under-triage situation

    Definition of under-triage is given in the primary outcome.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Proportion of patients in over-triage situation

    Definition of over-triage is given in the primary outcome

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Proportion of patients requiring advanced respiratory support (defined as any oxygenation or ventilatory support beyond conventional oxygen therapy)

    Time frame: 3 hours, 24 hours, 28 days

  4. Proportion of patients admitted to an intensive care unit

    Time frame: 24 hours

  5. Proportion of patients experiencing cardiac arrest

    Time frame: 3 hours, 24 hours, 28 days

  6. Proportion of deceased patients

    Time frame: 3 hours, 24 hours, 28 days

  7. Duration of the medical regulation process

    Duration of the call to the EMCC is defined as the time between the beginning of the call and the medical decision (assessed in minutes)

    Time frame: Immediately after the call to the EMCC

  8. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio

    The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is defined as the difference in mean costs divided by the difference in mean effectiveness. Effectiveness critrion will be the proportion of patients without serious complication (institution of in-hospital ventilatory support, occurence of cardiac arrest, or death from any cause).

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Study locations

10 of 10 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

3 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 6 months after the start.

Of 266 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dyspnea, half reached primary completion within 13 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 28. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 282 studies reached it within 13 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 28.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 13, 2026
First posted
Jul 24, 2026
StartActual
Nov 2, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 2027
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Nov 5, 2026
Sites
9 sites added. 10 sites changed recruiting status (10 now recruiting)
Show 10 sites
  • University Hospital of Angers · Angers, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • Bayonne Hospital Center · Bayonne, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • La Roche sur Yon Hospital · La Roche-sur-Yon, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • La Rochelle Hospital · La Rochelle, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • University Hospital of Montpellier · Montpellier, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • University Hospital of Nancy · Nancy, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • University Hospital of Poitiers · Poitiers, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • University Hospital of Rennes · Rennes, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • University Hospital of Strasbourg · Strasbourg, Franceno status→Recruiting
  • University Hospital of Toulouse · Toulouse, Franceno status→Recruiting
Show 9 added (9 France)
  • University Hospital of Angers · Angers, France
  • Bayonne Hospital Center · Bayonne, France
  • La Roche sur Yon Hospital · La Roche-sur-Yon, France
  • La Rochelle Hospital · La Rochelle, France
  • University Hospital of Montpellier · Montpellier, France
  • University Hospital of Nancy · Nancy, France
  • University Hospital of Rennes · Rennes, France
  • University Hospital of Strasbourg · Strasbourg, France
  • University Hospital of Toulouse · Toulouse, France
across 2 updates, Oct 8, 2026 – Nov 5, 2026
Eligibility
7 inclusion criteria added; 3 exclusion criteria added, 6 removed
What changed in the criteria
Inclusion criteria
  • AddedNon-inclusion Criteria:
  • AddedAn immediate life-threatening emergency justifying the dispatch of an emergency response team on an automatic basis in accordance with local protocols
  • AddedPatient at the end of life or where a decision to limit treatment is known at the time of the call.
  • AddedRefusal to use telemedicine
  • AddedLack of a telephone network enabling video consultation.
  • AddedPatient already included in the study.
  • AddedIndividuals requiring enhanced protection, namely minors, pregnant or breastfeeding women, persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, and adults under legal guardianship known at the time of the call
Exclusion criteria
  • RemovedAn immediate life-threatening emergency justifying the dispatch of an emergency response team on an automatic basis in accordance with local protocols
  • RemovedPatient at the end of life or where a decision to limit treatment is known at the time of the call.
  • RemovedRefusal to use telemedicine
  • RemovedLack of a telephone network enabling video consultation.
  • RemovedPatient already included in the study.
  • RemovedIndividuals requiring enhanced protection, namely minors, pregnant or breastfeeding women, persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, and adults under legal guardianship known at the time of the call
  • AddedRefusal to pursue the study (patient or relative consent withdrawal).
  • AddedPatient not benefiting from a social security system.
  • AddedFree subject, without guardianship nor subordination.
Oct 8, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • ChangedBefore To determine whether the use of video-assisted medical triage improves the quality of medical decision-making during the regulation of adult patients contacting Emergency Medical Communication Center with acute dyspneaNow Proportion of inappropriate medical dispatch decisions (under-triage or over-triage)Time frame: 28 days → 24 hours
Oct 8, 2026
Documents
Secondary outcomes
2 edited, 6 added, 6 removed
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedTo compare patients managed with and without video-assisted medical triage with respect to the proportionProportion of patients requiring advanced respiratory support (defined as any oxygenation or ventilatory support beyond conventional oxygen therapy)Time frame: 3 hours, 24 hours, 28 days
  • EditedTo compare patients managed with and without video-assisted medical triage with respect to the proportionProportion of patients admitted to an intensive care unitTime frame: 24 hours
  • AddedProportion of patients in under-triage situationTime frame: 24 hours
  • AddedProportion of patients in over-triage situationTime frame: 24 hours
  • AddedProportion of patients experiencing cardiac arrestTime frame: 3 hours, 24 hours, 28 days
  • AddedProportion of deceased patientsTime frame: 3 hours, 24 hours, 28 days
  • AddedDuration of the medical regulation processTime frame: Immediately after the call to the EMCC
  • AddedIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioTime frame: 28 days
  • RemovedTo compare patients managed with and without video-assisted medical triage with respect to the proportion of patients experiencing under-triageTime frame: 28 days
  • RemovedTo compare patients managed with and without video-assisted medical triage with respect to the proportion of patients experiencing over-triageTime frame: 28 days
  • RemovedTo compare patients managed with and without video-assisted medical triage with respect to the proportion of patients experiencing cardiac arrestTime frame: 3 hours, 24 hours, 28 days
  • RemovedTo compare patients managed with and without video-assisted medical triage with respect to all-cause mortalityTime frame: 3 hours, 24 hours, 28 days
  • RemovedTo compare patients managed with and without video-assisted medical triage with respect to the total duration of the medical regulation processTime frame: Immediately after the procedure
  • RemovedMedical economic impact: cost-effectiveness study (difference in costs divided by the difference in effectiveness: cost/serious complication avoided)Time frame: 28 days
Oct 8, 2026
Site contacts
Changed at 1 site. See the sites
Show the site
  • University Hospital of Strasbourg · Strasbourg, FranceContact s•••@chru-strasbourg.fr · •••1335→s•••@chru-strasbourg.fr · •••1335
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 3 updates
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    10 sites changed recruiting status (10 now recruiting)
    Show 10 sites
    • University Hospital of Angers · Angers, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • Bayonne Hospital Center · Bayonne, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • La Roche sur Yon Hospital · La Roche-sur-Yon, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • La Rochelle Hospital · La Rochelle, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • University Hospital of Montpellier · Montpellier, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • University Hospital of Nancy · Nancy, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • University Hospital of Poitiers · Poitiers, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • University Hospital of Rennes · Rennes, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • University Hospital of Strasbourg · Strasbourg, Franceno status→Recruiting
    • University Hospital of Toulouse · Toulouse, Franceno status→Recruiting
    Site contacts Changed at 1 site. See the sites
    Show the site
    • University Hospital of Strasbourg · Strasbourg, FranceContact s•••@chru-strasbourg.fr · •••1335→s•••@chru-strasbourg.fr · •••1335
    + 2 other changes: verification date and date precision
  2. Oct 16, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: description
  3. Oct 8, 2026
    9 sites added
    Show 9 added (9 France)
    • University Hospital of Angers · Angers, France
    • Bayonne Hospital Center · Bayonne, France
    • La Roche sur Yon Hospital · La Roche-sur-Yon, France
    • La Rochelle Hospital · La Rochelle, France
    • University Hospital of Montpellier · Montpellier, France
    • University Hospital of Nancy · Nancy, France
    • University Hospital of Rennes · Rennes, France
    • University Hospital of Strasbourg · Strasbourg, France
    • University Hospital of Toulouse · Toulouse, France
    Eligibility 7 inclusion criteria added; 3 exclusion criteria added, 6 removed
    What changed in the criteria
    Inclusion criteria
    • AddedNon-inclusion Criteria:
    • AddedAn immediate life-threatening emergency justifying the dispatch of an emergency response team on an automatic basis in accordance with local protocols
    • AddedPatient at the end of life or where a decision to limit treatment is known at the time of the call.
    • AddedRefusal to use telemedicine
    • AddedLack of a telephone network enabling video consultation.
    • AddedPatient already included in the study.
    • AddedIndividuals requiring enhanced protection, namely minors, pregnant or breastfeeding women, persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, and adults under legal guardianship known at the time of the call
    Exclusion criteria
    • RemovedAn immediate life-threatening emergency justifying the dispatch of an emergency response team on an automatic basis in accordance with local protocols
    • RemovedPatient at the end of life or where a decision to limit treatment is known at the time of the call.
    • RemovedRefusal to use telemedicine
    • RemovedLack of a telephone network enabling video consultation.
    • RemovedPatient already included in the study.
    • RemovedIndividuals requiring enhanced protection, namely minors, pregnant or breastfeeding women, persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, and adults under legal guardianship known at the time of the call
    • AddedRefusal to pursue the study (patient or relative consent withdrawal).
    • AddedPatient not benefiting from a social security system.
    • AddedFree subject, without guardianship nor subordination.
    Primary outcomes 1 edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • ChangedBefore To determine whether the use of video-assisted medical triage improves the quality of medical decision-making during the regulation of adult patients contacting Emergency Medical Communication Center with acute dyspneaNow Proportion of inappropriate medical dispatch decisions (under-triage or over-triage)Time frame: 28 days → 24 hours
    Secondary outcomes 2 edited, 6 added, 6 removed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedTo compare patients managed with and without video-assisted medical triage with respect to the proportionProportion of patients requiring advanced respiratory support (defined as any oxygenation or ventilatory support beyond conventional oxygen therapy)Time frame: 3 hours, 24 hours, 28 days
    • EditedTo compare patients managed with and without video-assisted medical triage with respect to the proportionProportion of patients admitted to an intensive care unitTime frame: 24 hours
    • AddedProportion of patients in under-triage situationTime frame: 24 hours
    • AddedProportion of patients in over-triage situationTime frame: 24 hours
    • AddedProportion of patients experiencing cardiac arrestTime frame: 3 hours, 24 hours, 28 days
    • AddedProportion of deceased patientsTime frame: 3 hours, 24 hours, 28 days
    • AddedDuration of the medical regulation processTime frame: Immediately after the call to the EMCC
    • AddedIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioTime frame: 28 days
    • RemovedTo compare patients managed with and without video-assisted medical triage with respect to the proportion of patients experiencing under-triageTime frame: 28 days
    • RemovedTo compare patients managed with and without video-assisted medical triage with respect to the proportion of patients experiencing over-triageTime frame: 28 days
    • RemovedTo compare patients managed with and without video-assisted medical triage with respect to the proportion of patients experiencing cardiac arrestTime frame: 3 hours, 24 hours, 28 days
    • RemovedTo compare patients managed with and without video-assisted medical triage with respect to all-cause mortalityTime frame: 3 hours, 24 hours, 28 days
    • RemovedTo compare patients managed with and without video-assisted medical triage with respect to the total duration of the medical regulation processTime frame: Immediately after the procedure
    • RemovedMedical economic impact: cost-effectiveness study (difference in costs divided by the difference in effectiveness: cost/serious complication avoided)Time frame: 28 days
    + 4 other changes: identifiers, verification date, design details and data sharing statement

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07726628
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 24, 2026
Start date
Nov 2, 2026
Primary completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Nicolas MARJANOVIC
Contact
nicolas.marjanovic@chu-poitiers.fr
+33549441873
Sabrina SEGUIN
Contact
sabrina.seguin@chu-poitiers.fr
+33549443229

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion