ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06247046Updated Apr 3, 2025

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Live SK08 Powder in Patients With IBS-D

A Phase 3 interventional study of Live SK08 powder and Placebo in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea, sponsored by Guangzhou Zhiyi Biotechnology Co., Ltd.. Recruiting at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-03.

Sponsored by Guangzhou Zhiyi Biotechnology Co., Ltd. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 7 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,298
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Live SK08 Powder compared with placebo in the treatment of participants with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea.

Read the detailed description

Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a chronic, functional bowel disease characterized by abdominal pain, bloating, or abdominal discomfort. Symptoms may improve after bowel movements, and are often accompanied by changes in bowel habits [frequency and/or fecal trait ]. There is a lack of organic lesions that can be detected by routine clinical examination to explain these symptoms.

The pathogenesis of IBS is the result of a combination of factors, including visceral hypersensitivity, intestinal immunity and inflammation, gastrointestinal motility abnormalities, and intestinal flora. SK08 can relieve abdominal pain and diarrhea by protecting intestinal barrier function, regulating immunity (such as reducing inflammatory factors TNF-α etc., promoting macrophages to phagocytosis of pathogenic bacteria), and correcting bacterial imbalance, to achieve the therapeutic effect.

02

Conditions studied

  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
03

In context

Diarrhea

877 studies on the registry are indexed under Diarrhea; 76 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,298 is above the median of 137 across 738 interventional studies indexed under Diarrhea.

Browse Diarrhea studies →

Lead sponsor

Guangzhou Zhiyi Biotechnology Co., Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1.Voluntarily sign , be able to comply with the protocol and be able to carry out related procedures, including the completion of diary during the induction period and throughout the study period.
    1. Age between 18 and 70 years old (including two-end values, based on the date of signing the Master Informed consent), regardless of gender.
    1. IBS-D patients with clinical symptoms meeting the Rome IV definition, that is, the course of disease for at least 6 months, repeated abdominal pain in the past 3 months, an average of at least 1 day per week, combined with two or more of the following conditions: (1) Abdominal pain is related to defecation; ② Abdominal pain accompanied by changes in the frequency of defecation; ③ Abdominal pain accompanied by changes in fecal trait. When abnormal stool occurred in the last 3 months, the proportion of abnormal stool was >25% for Bristol fecal trait type 6 or 7, and \<25% for Bristol fecal trait type 1 or 2 (see Appendix 13.3: IBS Rome IV diagnostic criteria and subtype classification criteria).
    1. Colonoscopy has been completed within 12 months before the run-in period. The ileocecal part should be observed during endoscopy, and the ileocecal flap image recording should be included in the report. They may be included if one of the following conditions is met: (i) The colonoscopy report is normal; (ii) Abnormalities reported by colonoscopy, such as hemorrhoids and intestinal polyps (diameter ≤5mm and number ≤3), were determined by the investigator to be eligible for inclusion; (iii) Colonoscopy reported that the diameter of intestinal polyps was >5mm or the number of intestinal polyps was >3; after endoscopic treatment, the diameter of residual intestinal polyps was ≤5mm and the number of intestinal polyps was ≤3, and the investigators determined that they could be included in the group.
    1. Colonoscopy or endoscopy should be performed at least 4 weeks before the run-in period, and IBS symptoms still occur before the run-in period.
    1. During the run-in period, the average number of days with type 6 or type 7 fecal traits per week was ≥4 days, and the average NRS score (the highest score within 24 hours) of daily abdominal pain intensity on days with type 6 or type 7 fecal traits was ≥3.0.
    1. Patients completed diary at least 5 days in the week before randomization (D-7 to D-1) and at least 10 days in the 2 weeks before randomization (D-14 to D-1).
    1. The patient had not used any relief drugs or analgesics in the 14 days prior to randomization.
    1. During the period from the signing of the master informed consent to the end of the final study visit, patients agreed to maintain their usual diet and lifestyle, such as no changes in dietary structure or exercise patterns.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Patients with constipated, mixed and amorphous IBS.
    1. Patients with organic gastrointestinal diseases were excluded from the following conditions: superficial gastritis, grade I erosive gastritis, chronic atrophic gastritis found by endoscopy but judged by the investigator to be eligible for admission (for example, no mucosal erosion or bleeding under endoscopy, and no abdominal distension, epigastric pain, acid reflux and other symptoms).
    1. Parenteral diseases of the digestive system such as tuberculous peritonitis, pancreatitis, cirrhosis, and biliary tract diseases are present, except for fatty liver disease that has not progressed to hepatitis, and gallstones that lack related symptoms.
    1. Known to have lactose intolerance and celiac disease.
    1. There are other systemic diseases, including serious diseases of the heart, lungs and kidneys, malignant tumors, diseases, metabolic diseases (such as diabetes, diseases affecting thyroid function), reproductive system diseases (such as nonphysiologic ovarian cysts, endometriosis, severe dysmenorrhea requiring medical treatment), etc.
    1. Previous history of abdominal and pelvic surgery, except appendectomy, caesarean section or tubal ligation without intestinal complications, hernia repair.
    1. Patients with a previously diagnosed psychiatric disorder or moderate to severe depression or generalized anxiety disorder requiring medication (PHQ-9≥10 or GAD-7≥10 during screening).
    1. Fecal examination results showed occult blood (+) and above (except for cases caused by hemorrhoids or female menstrual periods) or white blood cells (+) and above, and were judged by the investigator to be .
    1. People who are positive for antibodies against virus (HCV), or (HIV), or syphilis, or surface antigen (HBsAg) and need antiviral therapy at the screening stage.
    1. Laboratory tests showed significant abnormalities, and the investigator determined that the patient's participation in the study may compromise his or her safety, including but not limited to: (i) Creatinine ≥1.5 times the (ULN); (ii) ≥2 times upper limit of normal (ULN) and/or ALT≥2 times upper limit of normal (ULN) and/or total ≥1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN).
    1. A history of drug or alcohol abuse.
    1. Even with the help of liquids, patients are unable to take oral solid dosage forms.
    1. Allergic to experimental drugs, rescue drugs and their ingredients.
    1. During the trial, drugs that affect gastrointestinal movement and function cannot be discontinued, It includes antibiotics (such as erythromycin), drugs that regulate intestinal microecology (such as bifidobacterium), parasympathetic inhibitors (such as scopolamine, atropine, belladona, etc.), muscle relaxants (such as succinylcholine), antidiarrheal agents (such as loperamide, montmorillonite powder, etc.), opioids, drugs that inhibit gastric acid secretion, etc
    1. A woman who is pregnant or breastfeeding.
    1. At the time of the trial, both the patient and his partner were unable or unwilling to use reliable to prevent pregnancy, or the female or male patient's partner had a recent pregnancy plan.
    1. Have participated in any clinical trial and used the experimental drug or device within 3 months prior to signing the .
    1. The patient had previously participated in a clinical study of SK08.
  • 20.According to the judgment of the investigator, the participants are not suitable to participate in this clinical trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,298 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Live SK08 powder

    Live SK08 powder, (1-25)×10\^9 CFU, oral, twice daily for up to 52 weeks period.

    Drug: Live SK08 powder

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    SK08 placebo matching powder, oral, twice daily for up to 52 weeks period.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugLive SK08 powder

    Oral Powder

  • DrugPlacebo

    Oral Powder

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients Who Were Composite Weekly Responders

    A patient is categorized as a composite weekly responder if the patient achieved the prespecified response displayed in the following for at least 50% of the weeks during the interval from weeks 1-12. Abdominal pain response: a decrease in the weekly average of worst abdominal pain (as measured by the 11-point NRS-scale) in the past 24 hours score of at least 30% compared with baseline. Stool consistency response: a 50% or greater reduction in the number of days per week with at least one stool that has a consistency of Type 6 or 7 (as measured by the Bristol Stool Form Scale) compared with baseline.

    Time frame: 1-12 weeks

  2. Adverse events and serious adverse events

    Incidence of AE and SAE

    Time frame: 1-52weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients Who Were Composite Weekly Responders

    A patient is categorized as a composite weekly responder if the patient achieved the prespecified response displayed in the following for at least 50% of the weeks during the interval from weeks 1-8、weeks 1-4、weeks 5-8 or weeks 9-12. Abdominal pain response: a decrease in the weekly average of worst abdominal pain (as measured by the 11-point NRS-scale) in the past 24 hours score of at least 30% compared with baseline. Stool consistency response: a 50% or greater reduction in the number of days per week with at least one stool that has a consistency of Type 6 or 7 (as measured by the Bristol Stool Form Scale) compared with baseline.

    Time frame: 1-8weeks、1-4weeks、5-8weeks、9-12weeks

  2. Percentage of Patients Who Were Abdominal Pain Weekly Responder

    A patient is categorized as an abdominal pain weekly responder if the patient achieved prespecified response, i.e. a decrease in the weekly average of worst abdominal pain (as measured by the 11-point NRS-scale) in the past 24 hours score of at least 30% compared with baseline on at least 50% of weeks during the interval from weeks 1-12、weeks 1-8、weeks 1-4、weeks 5-8 or weeks 9-12.

    Time frame: 1-12weeks、1-8weeks、1-4weeks、5-8weeks、9-12weeks

  3. Percentage of Patients Who Were Stool Consistency Weekly Responder

    A patient is categorized as an stool consistency weekly responder if the patient achieved prespecified response, i.e. a 50% or greater reduction in the number of days per week with at least one stool that has a consistency of Type 6 or 7 (as measured by the Bristol Stool Form Scale) compared with baseline on at least 50% of weeks during the interval from weeks 1-12、weeks 1-8、weeks 1-4、weeks 5-8 or weeks 9-12.

    Time frame: 1-12weeks、1-8weeks、1-4weeks、5-8weeks、9-12weeks

  4. Percentage of Patients Who Were Abdominal Bloating Weekly Responder

    A patient is categorized as an abdominal bloating weekly responder if the patient achieved prespecified response, i.e. a decrease in the weekly average of worst abdominal bloating (as measured by the 11-point NRS-scale) in the past 24 hours score of at least 30% compared with baseline on at least 50% of weeks during the interval from weeks 1-12、weeks 1-8、weeks 1-4、weeks 5-8 or weeks 9-12.

    Time frame: 1-12weeks、1-8weeks、1-4weeks、5-8weeks、9-12weeks

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders in IBS Symptoms Relief Scale

    Relief of IBS symptoms was assessed once weekly by patients answering the IBS Symptoms Relief Scale in the electronic diary. Responders were defined as patients with a weekly response of "Yes" to relief of their IBS symptoms for at least 50% of weeks during the interval from weeks 1-12、weeks 1-8、weeks 1-4、weeks 5-8 or weeks 9-12.

    Time frame: 1-12weeks、1-8weeks、1-4weeks、5-8weeks、9-12weeks

  6. Change from Baseline in the Weekly Average of Worst Abdominal Pain in the Past 24 hours

    Symptoms of abdominal pain were measured by the 11-point NRS-scale, where 0 corresponded to no abdominal pain and 10 corresponded to worst imaginable abdominal pain. A negative change from Baseline indicates the abdominal pain decreased.

    Time frame: week1、week2、week3、week4、week5、week6、week7、week8、week9、week10、week11、week12.

  7. Change from Baseline in the Number of Days per Week with at Least One Stool with Consistency of Type 6 or 7

    Patients recorded the number of days per week with at least one stool with consistency of Type 6 or 7 during weeks 1-12. Stool consistency was measured by the Bristol Stool Form Scale.

    Time frame: week1、week2、week3、week4、week5、week6、week7、week8、week9、week10、week11、week12.

  8. Change from Baseline in the Number of Stools of Type 6 or 7 per Week

    Patients recorded the number of stools of Type 6 or 7 every day during weeks 1-12. Stool consistency was measured by the Bristol Stool Form Scale.

    Time frame: week1、week2、week3、week4、week5、week6、week7、week8、week9、week10、week11、week12.

  9. Change from Baseline in the Weekly Average of Worst Abdominal Bloating in the Past 24 Hours Score

    Symptoms of abdominal bloating were measured by the 11-point NRS-scale, where 0 corresponded to no abdominal bloating and 10 corresponded to worst imaginable abdominal bloating. A negative change from Baseline indicates the abdominal bloating decreased.

    Time frame: week1、week2、week3、week4、week5、week6、week7、week8、week9、week10、week11、week12.

  10. Change from baseline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) Scores

    The IBS Symptom Severity Score is produced from 5 symptom responses on the questionnaire, the total score with a possible range of scores from 0 to 500. A negative change from Baseline indicates that IBS symptom severity improved.

    Time frame: week4、week8、week9、week12、week20、week28、week36、week44、week52

  11. Change from baseline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life Scale (IBS-QoL) Total Scores

    The IBS-QoL consists of 34 items each with a 5-point response scale, where 1 generally represents better responses on items and 5 represents worse responses. The individual responses to the answered items were summed and standardized for a total score and then transformed to a 0- to 100- point scale (0=worst; 100=better) for ease of interpretation. A positive change from Baseline indicates that quality of life improved.

    Time frame: week4、week8、week9、week12、week20、week28、week36、week44、week52

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06247046
Lead sponsor
Guangzhou Zhiyi Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 7, 2024
Start date
Mar 16, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 3, 2025

Study contacts

Yangyang Liu, Doctor
Contact
liuyangyang@zypharm.com.cn
020-82258826
Minhu Chen, Doctor
study chair · First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Yinglian Xiao, Doctor
principal investigator · First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion