An observational study in Critical Illness, Ultrasound and POCUS, sponsored by Hospital General Universitario de Castellón. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Belgium. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.
Sponsored by Hospital General Universitario de Castellón · Observational
This study using a Delphi methodology, and involving international experts, will help define a training curriculum for core competencies for general intensive care ultrasound practice.
Intensive care ultrasound has become an integral component of modern intensive care practice. The previous ESICM Delphi consensus on core competencies in intensive care ultrasound was published in 2020. Since then, clinical practice, training standards and programs, technology, and the scope of ultrasound use in intensive care medicine have evolved substantially.
The ESICM General Intensive Care Ultrasound (GenIUS) Core Faculty therefore proposes to update the previous core competency framework through a structured international Delphi consensus process. The aim is to define which ultrasound competencies should be considered core, rather than ADVANCED, for general intensive care ultrasound practice.
The Delphi process is a well-established methodology to generate consensus on a particular topic using the "collective intelligence" of panel members. After reviewing the previous consensus, the steering committee members drafted the initial competencies and will conduct iterative Delphi rounds to generate consensus among the experts. Steering Committee (SC) members will not participate in the Delphi surveys. The study findings will be reported according to the ACCORD criteria.
The Delphi panel will comprise two participant groups: expert panelists and trainee panelists. Recruitment will aim to include at least 60 panelists overall, of whom at least 10% will be clinicians in training. The panel will be international, multidisciplinary, and balanced regarding geographical region, profession, clinical background, sex, ultrasound expertise, and level of training. Participants will be invited worldwide without country restrictions. To ensure representation of diverse healthcare and resource settings, at least 20% of panelists will be based in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Recruitment will also aim for broader representation across world regions. Including both experienced clinicians and clinicians in training is intended to ensure the resulting competency framework reflects the perspectives of both established experts and future users of the GenIUS curriculum.
Steps of the Delphi process
Step 1: Establishing a preliminary list of competencies. A focused literature review will be performed by the members of the SC and, based on their input, the steering committee will identify competencies, which will be used to draft Round One of the Delphi process. Prior to Round 1, the Delphi questionnaire will be pilot-tested with a small group of members from the SC.
Step 2: Preparation of the Delphi Round One Survey. The list of competencies will be sent to the Experts as a Delphi questionnaire. The anonymity of the Experts will be maintained until the end of the Delphi rounds. The Experts will be requested to answer questions related to the training curriculum based on their experience and knowledge of the subject. Questions will be based on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, strongly disagree). Experts can also provide opinions on additions, deletions, or changes to questions or choices through free text. The responses of experts will be collated during the analysis of results and shared in the following survey as controlled feedback.
Step 3: Subsequent Delphi Rounds. The steering committee will review the results of round one. The competencies listed will be modified, deleted, or added if found ambiguous based on the feedback and comments on the results. The remaining statements will continue in subsequent rounds until response stability is achieved. The cumulative results of round two will be presented to experts along with anonymized comments, and the survey process will be repeated with the modified questionnaire. The Delphi rounds will be continued until the desired consensus and stability are achieved for statements.
Step 4: Final Consensus. Only the competencies that achieved consensus and stability will be used to develop consensus statements. The results of the final survey, consensus statements, and the manuscript will be circulated among the experts for approval before submission for publication.
Statistics Consensus definitions
Stability assessment Starting from Round 2, stability will be assessed between two consecutive rounds. An item will be considered stable if there is no statistically significant change in the distribution of responses between consecutive rounds. Wilcoxon signed-rank test will be used, with p ≥ 0.05 indicating significant variation and therefore instability
Statistical reporting For each competency and each round, the methodologist should report the number of respondents, response rate, median, interquartile range, percentage agreement for inclusion, percentage agreement for exclusion, consensus status, stability status, and final classification. Continuous variables will be summarized using the median and IQR. Analysis should be performed using validated statistical software such as R.
1,780 studies on the registry are indexed under Critical Illness; 442 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 140 across 814 observational studies indexed under Critical Illness.
Browse Critical Illness studies →Hospital General Universitario de Castellón is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
A diverse (geography, sex, country income) group of physicians meeting all of the inclusion criteria.
Inclusion criteria for expert panellists (all criteria must apply):
Inclusion criteria for trainee panelists (all criteria must apply):
Exclusion Criteria:
The expert panelists meeting the eligibility criteria. The Delphi process will be conducted with the recruited panelists.
Other: Delphi procedure
The clinicians in training meeting the eligibility criteria. The Delphi process will be conducted with the recruited panelists.
Other: Delphi procedure
The study uses a Delphi process to generate consensus statements from experts and trainees on the training requirements for physicians using ultrasound in critically ill patients.
Consensus statements
Consensus amongst the panel regarding training requirements for physicians using ultrasound in critically ill patients will be achieved using Delphi method which includes iterative rounds of questions. Consensus will be considered reached when a statement achieves \>=80% of votes for multiple-choice questions and likert-scale statements.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Plan to share: No — IPD is available to the contact person to preserve panelist identities and avoid a breach of anonymity.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hospital General Universitario de Castellón