ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06241157PedodonticsUpdated Mar 5, 2026

Pediatric-Quiz Game Behaviour Guidance in Children

An interventional study of Pediatric Quiz Game in Behavior, Child, sponsored by Marmara University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 4 Years to 8 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-05.

Sponsored by Marmara University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2022, registered Jan 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
4 Years to 8 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Behavior orientation is the cornerstone of the success of pediatric dentistry. The use of behavior management techniques enables children to learn appropriate behavior and coping skills, reduce anxiety, and facilitate the delivery of adequate oral health care. Some behavior guidance systems have been tried to be created. On the basis of the magic game, it has been tried to move the children away from the current real situation, the reality of dental treatment, to move forward in communication and successful results have been obtained. The main thing in the technique is to start the communication with the child in the waiting room of the dentist and to reduce the anxiety of the child by improving the self-efficacy perception of the child. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of question-answer behavior guidance technique in dental treatment in pediatric patients.

Read the detailed description

Behavior orientation is the cornerstone of the success of pediatric dentistry. The use of behavior management techniques enables children to learn appropriate behavior and coping skills, reduce anxiety, and facilitate the delivery of adequate oral health care. Better communication can be achieved when children feel the freedom to express themselves. In the same way, parents may state that in cases where there is no coercion and verbal communication, the children are uncomfortable and they have problems during their second-third dentist visits.

However, in some cases, success may not be achieved even if different behavior management techniques are applied. Activities such as diverting attention in children to other areas, starting the communication in the waiting room before entering the practice environment can lead to self-confidence, relaxation and confidence. The method of rewarding can also be very effective in directing behavior in children. For this reason, it communicates with a combination of some techniques without depending on only one technique and can lead to applications in dentistry practice.

Based on this idea, some behavior guidance systems have been tried to be created. On the basis of the magic game, it has been tried to move the children away from the current real situation, the reality of dental treatment, to move forward in communication and successful results have been obtained.

With this information, the aim of our study is to experience a new behavior management technique in children. The main thing in the technique is to start the communication with the child in the waiting room of the dentist and to reduce the anxiety of the child by improving the self-efficacy perception of the child. In this direction, in order to increase the child's self-efficacy perception, simple questions are asked to the child about colors, fruits and animals, if necessary, clues are given to give correct answers, and verbal praise for correct answers aims to increase self-efficacy perception and reduce anxiety. After the communication is started in the waiting room, the dental examination, dental chair and planned procedures will be introduced to the child, together with the tell-show-do method, as always practiced in the dental chair. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of question-answer behavior guidance technique in dental treatment in pediatric patients. Children's pain and anxiety levels were assessed by various tests designed to purpose. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a self-reporting scale,was preferred to evaluate children's experience of pain. The scale displayed a colored spectrum on the front side ranging from no pain (white) to severe pain (red), which indicates relevant pain scores ranging from 0 to 10 on the reverse side.10

02

Conditions studied

  • Behavior, Child

Browse trials for

03

In context

Child Behavior

224 studies on the registry are indexed under Child Behavior; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is below the median of 140 across 197 interventional studies indexed under Child Behavior.

Browse Child Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Marmara University is the lead sponsor of 599 studies on the registry; 138 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 8 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Children of age group 4-8 years.
  2. with no previous dental experience.
  3. without any systemic or mental disorders.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Children or their families that could not agree to participate the study
  2. They had a previous serious dental experience in need of emergency treatment
  3. Having systemic or mental disorders
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pediatric Quiz Game

    Behavior Guidance Technique (BGT) group (Pedo-Quiz group) Whereas, with the novel BGT so called "The Pediatric-Quiz Game" (PQ), dentists start interacting with children in the waiting room before entering the operating room. It can be defined as "asking children basic questions on colors, animals, fruits and/or cities depending on the age of the child. Each child will be asked to fill out the "Facial Affective Scale" and the "Venham Picture Test" before the procedure. After the session, the Frankl Behavior Scale and the "Patient Evaluation Form" will be filled out by the dentist. Their families (parents/guardians) will be asked to fill out the "Child Fear Assessment Scale-Dental Subscale (CFSS-DSc) before the session. 35 children will be included in the study.Main goal in this sesion is to evaluate in which dental practice step can be progressed in an anxious child by using this new behavior managament technique.

    Other: Pediatric Quiz Game

  • No intervention
    Control

    This group is the control group. Tell-show-do technique, which is a frequently used behavioral management techniques will be used. In this group, each child will be asked to fill out the "Facial Shape Scale" and the "Venham Picture Test" before the procedure. After the session, the Frankl Behavior Scale and the "Patient Evaluation Form" will be filled out by the dentist. Their families (parents/guardians) will be asked to fill out the "Child Fear Assessment Scale-Dental Subscale (CFSS-DSc) before the session. 35 children will be included in the study. Main goal in this sesion is to evaluate in which dental practice step can be progressed in an anxious child by using classical behavior managament technique.

Interventions

  • OtherPediatric Quiz Game

    Investigator will start interacting with children upon their arrival and during their presence in the waiting room before entering the operating room. This will help to obtain better cooperation (frankl scale) and anxiety reductions (FIS and VPT) at different stages of the dental examination (e.g., entering the clinic, sitting on the dental chair, opening mouth, examination with mirror, probe, use of low-high-speed handpieces, ITR restoration). Pediatric Quiz is actually an ice-breaking quiz game developed for children, with the promise of a surprise gift at the end. It can be defined as "asking children basic questions on colors, animals, fruits and/or cities depending on the age of the child among which the child would choose him/herself and answer the question easily.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Participants' pain and anxiety levels were assessed. The scale displayed a colored spectrum on the front side ranging from no pain (white) to severe pain (red), which indicates relevant pain scores ranging from 0 to 10 on the reverse side.

    Time frame: 3 Months

  2. The Dental Subscale of Children's Fear Survey Schedule parental version (CFSS-DS pv)

    The Scale consists of 15 articles. The answers are given by parents on a Likert type scale, ranging from 15 to 75. For children with moderate and severe dental fear levels, threshold values are set as 32 and 38 points, respectively.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. The Venham Picture Test (VPT), a self-reporting scale

    The scale is used to evaluate children's situational anxiety. It consists of 16 illustrations in pairs.Among the pairs, one represents the presence of anxiety and the other represents absence of anxiety. Children's anxiety scores were calculated between 0 and 8, according to the illustration they chose, representing themselves. Higher scores indicate the presence of anxiety and its level.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Facial Image Scale (FIS).

    Self-report scale will be used in the study to evaluate children's state of anxiety. It displays nine faces showing emotions ranging from "non-anxious" to "very anxious." Participants are requested to indicate the face that represents their actual feelings. The scores range between 0.04 (positive/nonanxious) and 0.97 (negative/very anxious), demonstrating the state anxiety.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Marmara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry
    Istanbul, Istanbul 34854, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shahnavaz S, Hedman-Lagerlof E, Hasselblad T, Reuterskiold L, Kaldo V, Dahllof G. Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children and Adolescents With Dental Anxiety: Open Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 22;20(1):e12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7803. PubMed 29358158 ↗
  • Peretz B, Gluck G. Magic trick: a behavioural strategy for the management of strong-willed children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005 Nov;15(6):429-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2005.00668.x. PubMed 16238653 ↗
  • Grisolia BM, Dos Santos APP, Dhyppolito IM, Buchanan H, Hill K, Oliveira BH. Prevalence of dental anxiety in children and adolescents globally: A systematic review with meta-analyses. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021 Mar;31(2):168-183. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12712. Epub 2020 Sep 9. PubMed 33245591 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2022 to primary completion in Apr 2024, 26 months.

Of 140 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Child Behavior, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 42. This study's 26 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 141 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 41.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 5, 2024
First posted
Feb 5, 2024
StartActual
Jan 21, 2022
Primary completionActual
Apr 20, 2024
CompletionActual
May 1, 2024
Last update
Mar 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06241157
Lead sponsor
Marmara University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 5, 2024
Start date
Jan 21, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 20, 2024
Completion
May 1, 2024
Last update
Mar 5, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion