ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06239831Updated Apr 30, 2025

Postoperative Respiratory and Activity Monitoring

An observational study in Hypoventilation, Hypoxemia and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-30.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Dec 2022; still recruiting 3 years 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study plans to learn more about specific breathing and activity recommendations for patients after surgery. Participants will be monitored after abdominal surgery to identify what activities help them breathe better and reduce complications after surgery.

Read the detailed description

Investigators will study adults undergoing elective abdominal surgery with at least moderate risk for postoperative pulmonary complications.

Participants will be monitored on their chest and thigh with devices that record their breathing pattern (breath volume and frequency) and body position and movements. These monitors will be placed on their skin in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and will stay on for three days, or until the patient is able to ambulate freely or until their hospital discharge, whichever comes earlier. Investigators will analyze the association between the frequency, duration and intensity of various activities (e.g., sitting, walking) and breathing and other clinical complications, in combination with medications received and other hospital course events.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypoventilation
  • Hypoxemia
  • Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

Keywords

  • hypoventilation
  • postoperative activity
  • abdominal surgery
  • mobilization
  • predicted minute ventilation (MVPred)
  • accelerometer
  • chest monitor
  • postoperative pulmonary complications
  • surgical outcomes
03

In context

Hypoventilation

96 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypoventilation; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 74 across 28 observational studies indexed under Hypoventilation.

Browse Hypoventilation studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver is the lead sponsor of 1,543 studies on the registry; 317 are open to participants now.

Of its 147 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients over the age of 18 undergoing abdominal surgery at the University of Colorado Health Hospital (UCHealth) that it high-risk for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must be 18 or older
  • Must be undergoing abdominal surgery
  • Must be high-risk for PPCs (ARISCAT score equal to or greater than 26)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anyone under 18
  • Anyone not undergoing abdominal surgery
  • Anyone that is not high-risk for PPCs (ARISCAT score less than 26)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Postoperative monitoring

    ActivPAL accelerometer will be placed on the chest and thigh, an ExSpiron monitor placed on the chest, and the patient will be observed for three days, until fully ambulatory (able to walk 30 meters without assistance with or without a walker), or until discharge; whichever comes earlier.

    Device: ExSpiron and ActivPAL Monitors

Interventions

  • DeviceExSpiron and ActivPAL Monitors

    ExSpiron chest monitor will be placed on the chest ActivPAL accelerometer will be placed on the chest and thigh

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hypoventilation

    Minutes per hour of hypoventilation which is defined as \<40% of a predicted minute ventilation volume

    Time frame: First 3 postoperative days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Variability of MV

    Variability of minute ventilation (MV)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  2. Variability of VT

    Variability of tidal volume (VT)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  3. Variability of RR

    Variability of respiratory rate (RR)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  4. Events of Low MV

    Total number of events of low minute ventilation (MV)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  5. Events of Low VT

    Total number of events of low tidal volume (VT)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  6. Events of Low RR

    Total number of events of low respiratory rate (RR)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  7. Percentage of time free of low or high MV

    The percentage of hours per day free of any low or high minute ventilation (MV)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  8. Percentage of time free of low or high VT

    The percentage of hours per day free of any low or high tidal volume (VT)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  9. Percentage of time free of low or high RR

    The percentage of hours per day free of any low or high resting rate (RR).

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  10. Duration of low MV

    Duration of low minute ventilation (MV)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  11. Duration of low VT

    Duration of low tidal volume (VT)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  12. Duration of low RR

    Duration of low respiratory rate (RR)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  13. Duration of high MV

    Duration of low or high minute ventilation (MV)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  14. Duration of high TV

    Duration of high tidal volume (VT)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  15. Duration of high RR

    Duration of high respiratory rate (RR)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  16. Postoperative Pulmonary Complication (PPC) Incidence

    Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, or PPCs

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 7

  17. Postoperative Pulmonary Complication (PPC) Severity

    Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, or PPCs, will be observed in their severity. PPC severity is defined as the most serious from Grade 0 (none) to Grade 4 (severe)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 7

  18. Time After Surgery to Sitting

    Time it takes for the patient to sit in a chair after surgery

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  19. Time After Surgery to Ambulating

    Time it takes for the patient to ambulate with and without help

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  20. Total Minutes Walking

    Patient's total minutes of walking

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  21. Total Walking Distance

    Patient's total walking distance (in meters)

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  22. Frequency of Ambulation

    How many times the patient gets up to ambulate

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  23. Time Spent in Bed

    After the surgery, the patient's minutes spent in bed

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  24. Time Spent in Sitting

    After the surgery, the patient's minutes spent sitting

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  25. Time Spent Standing

    After the surgery, the patient's minutes spent standing

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  26. Time Spent Walking

    After the surgery, the patient's minutes spent walking

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  27. Average Speed of Ambulation

    After the surgery, the patient's average speed of ambulating

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  28. First Postoperative Day Achieving Independent Ambulation

    After the surgery, the patient's first day of ambulating by his or herself for 30 meters

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  29. Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) Score of Physical Activity

    After the surgery, the patient's intensity of physical activity measured in METs

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 3

  30. Other complications

    Incidence of any non-respiratory complications

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 7

  31. Adverse events

    Incidence of any adverse events

    Time frame: Through postoperative day 7

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fernandez-Bustamante A, Parker RA, Sprung J, Eikermann M, Gama de Abreu M, Ferrando C, Thompson BT, Vidal Melo MF. An anesthesia-centered bundle to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications: The PRIME-AIR study protocol. PLoS One. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0283748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283748. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37023031 ↗
  • Lawrence VA, Hilsenbeck SG, Mulrow CD, Dhanda R, Sapp J, Page CP. Incidence and hospital stay for cardiac and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery. J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Dec;10(12):671-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02602761. PubMed 8770719 ↗
  • Fernandez-Perez ER, Sprung J, Afessa B, Warner DO, Vachon CM, Schroeder DR, Brown DR, Hubmayr RD, Gajic O. Intraoperative ventilator settings and acute lung injury after elective surgery: a nested case control study. Thorax. 2009 Feb;64(2):121-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.102228. Epub 2008 Nov 6. PubMed 18988659 ↗
  • Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Valles J, Castillo J, Sabate S, Mazo V, Briones Z, Sanchis J; ARISCAT Group. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1338-50. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc6e0a. PubMed 21045639 ↗
  • Shander A, Fleisher LA, Barie PS, Bigatello LM, Sladen RN, Watson CB. Clinical and economic burden of postoperative pulmonary complications: patient safety summit on definition, risk-reducing interventions, and preventive strategies. Crit Care Med. 2011 Sep;39(9):2163-72. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821f0522. PubMed 21572323 ↗
  • Nijbroek SG, Schultz MJ, Hemmes SNT. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Jun;32(3):443-451. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000730. PubMed 30893115 ↗
  • Kor DJ, Lingineni RK, Gajic O, Park PK, Blum JM, Hou PC, Hoth JJ, Anderson HL 3rd, Bajwa EK, Bartz RR, Adesanya A, Festic E, Gong MN, Carter RE, Talmor DS. Predicting risk of postoperative lung injury in high-risk surgical patients: a multicenter cohort study. Anesthesiology. 2014 May;120(5):1168-81. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000216. PubMed 24755786 ↗
  • Sabate S, Mazo V, Canet J. Predicting postoperative pulmonary complications: implications for outcomes and costs. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Apr;27(2):201-9. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000045. PubMed 24419159 ↗
  • Brueckmann B, Villa-Uribe JL, Bateman BT, Grosse-Sundrup M, Hess DR, Schlett CL, Eikermann M. Development and validation of a score for prediction of postoperative respiratory complications. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1276-85. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318293065c. PubMed 23571640 ↗
  • LAS VEGAS investigators. Epidemiology, practice of ventilation and outcome for patients at increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications: LAS VEGAS - an observational study in 29 countries. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Aug;34(8):492-507. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000646. PubMed 28633157 ↗
  • Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C, Pascal J, Eurin M, Neuschwander A, Marret E, Beaussier M, Gutton C, Lefrant JY, Allaouchiche B, Verzilli D, Leone M, De Jong A, Bazin JE, Pereira B, Jaber S; IMPROVE Study Group. A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 1;369(5):428-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301082. PubMed 23902482 ↗
  • PROVE Network Investigators for the Clinical Trial Network of the European Society of Anaesthesiology; Hemmes SN, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ. High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery (PROVHILO trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014 Aug 9;384(9942):495-503. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60416-5. Epub 2014 Jun 2. PubMed 24894577 ↗
  • Milot J, Perron J, Lacasse Y, Letourneau L, Cartier PC, Maltais F. Incidence and predictors of ARDS after cardiac surgery. Chest. 2001 Mar;119(3):884-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.3.884. PubMed 11243972 ↗
  • Blum JM, Stentz MJ, Dechert R, Jewell E, Engoren M, Rosenberg AL, Park PK. Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome in a general surgical population. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jan;118(1):19-29. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182794975. PubMed 23221870 ↗
  • Fernandez-Bustamante A, Frendl G, Sprung J, Kor DJ, Subramaniam B, Martinez Ruiz R, Lee JW, Henderson WG, Moss A, Mehdiratta N, Colwell MM, Bartels K, Kolodzie K, Giquel J, Vidal Melo MF. Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, Early Mortality, and Hospital Stay Following Noncardiothoracic Surgery: A Multicenter Study by the Perioperative Research Network Investigators. JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 1;152(2):157-166. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4065. PubMed 27829093 ↗
  • Sun Z, Sessler DI, Dalton JE, Devereaux PJ, Shahinyan A, Naylor AJ, Hutcherson MT, Finnegan PS, Tandon V, Darvish-Kazem S, Chugh S, Alzayer H, Kurz A. Postoperative Hypoxemia Is Common and Persistent: A Prospective Blinded Observational Study. Anesth Analg. 2015 Sep;121(3):709-715. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000836. PubMed 26287299 ↗
  • Bartels K, Kaizer A, Jameson L, Bullard K, Dingmann C, Fernandez-Bustamante A. Hypoxemia Within the First 3 Postoperative Days Is Associated With Increased 1-Year Postoperative Mortality After Adjusting for Perioperative Opioids and Other Confounders. Anesth Analg. 2020 Aug;131(2):555-563. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004553. PubMed 31971921 ↗
  • Bojesen RD, Fitzgerald P, Munk-Madsen P, Eriksen JR, Kehlet H, Gogenur I. Hypoxaemia during recovery after surgery for colorectal cancer: a prospective observational study. Anaesthesia. 2019 Aug;74(8):1009-1017. doi: 10.1111/anae.14691. Epub 2019 May 17. PubMed 31099028 ↗
  • Belcher AW, Khanna AK, Leung S, Naylor AJ, Hutcherson MT, Nguyen BM, Makarova N, Sessler DI, Devereaux PJ, Saager L. Long-Acting Patient-Controlled Opioids Are Not Associated With More Postoperative Hypoxemia Than Short-Acting Patient-Controlled Opioids After Noncardiac Surgery: A Cohort Analysis. Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1471-1479. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001534. PubMed 27607476 ↗
  • Zeng C, Lagier D, Lee JW, Vidal Melo MF. Perioperative Pulmonary Atelectasis: Part I. Biology and Mechanisms. Anesthesiology. 2022 Jan 1;136(1):181-205. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003943. PubMed 34499087 ↗
  • Hedenstierna G, Edmark L. Mechanisms of atelectasis in the perioperative period. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;24(2):157-69. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2009.12.002. PubMed 20608554 ↗
  • Brooks-Brunn JA. Postoperative atelectasis and pneumonia: risk factors. Am J Crit Care. 1995 Sep;4(5):340-9; quiz 350-1. PubMed 7489036 ↗
  • Hewlett AM, Branthwaite MA. Postoperative pulmonary function. Br J Anaesth. 1975 Feb;47(2):102-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/47.2.102. No abstract available. PubMed 1096910 ↗
  • Zwillich C, Kryger M, Weil J. Hypoventilation: consequences and management. Adv Intern Med. 1978;23:287-306. No abstract available. PubMed 343542 ↗
  • Craig DB, Wahba WM, Don HF, Couture JG, Becklake MR. "Closing volume" and its relationship to gas exchange in seated and supine positions. J Appl Physiol. 1971 Nov;31(5):717-21. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1971.31.5.717. No abstract available. PubMed 5117187 ↗
  • Noba L, Rodgers S, Chandler C, Balfour A, Hariharan D, Yip VS. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Reduces Hospital Costs and Improve Clinical Outcomes in Liver Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Apr;24(4):918-932. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04499-0. Epub 2020 Jan 3. PubMed 31900738 ↗
  • Ripolles-Melchor J, Ramirez-Rodriguez JM, Casans-Frances R, Aldecoa C, Abad-Motos A, Logrono-Egea M, Garcia-Erce JA, Camps-Cervantes A, Ferrando-Ortola C, Suarez de la Rica A, Cuellar-Martinez A, Marmana-Mezquita S, Abad-Gurumeta A, Calvo-Vecino JM; POWER Study Investigators Group for the Spanish Perioperative Audit and Research Network (REDGERM). Association Between Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Postoperative Complications in Colorectal Surgery: The Postoperative Outcomes Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol (POWER) Study. JAMA Surg. 2019 Aug 1;154(8):725-736. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0995. PubMed 31066889 ↗
  • Lillemoe HA, Aloia TA. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Hepatobiliary. Surg Clin North Am. 2018 Dec;98(6):1251-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Aug 24. PubMed 30390857 ↗
  • Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952. PubMed 28097305 ↗
  • Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;(2):CD007635. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007635.pub2. PubMed 21328298 ↗
  • Castelino T, Fiore JF Jr, Niculiseanu P, Landry T, Augustin B, Feldman LS. The effect of early mobilization protocols on postoperative outcomes following abdominal and thoracic surgery: A systematic review. Surgery. 2016 Apr;159(4):991-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.11.029. Epub 2016 Jan 21. PubMed 26804821 ↗
  • Lumb AB, Nunn JF. Respiratory function and ribcage contribution to ventilation in body positions commonly used during anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1991 Oct;73(4):422-6. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199110000-00010. PubMed 1897767 ↗
  • Meyers JR, Lembeck L, O'Kane H, Baue AE. Changes in functional residual capacity of the lung after operation. Arch Surg. 1975 May;110(5):576-83. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360110122020. PubMed 1093513 ↗
  • Ceylan B, Khorshid L, Gunes UY, Zaybak A. Evaluation of oxygen saturation values in different body positions in healthy individuals. J Clin Nurs. 2016 Apr;25(7-8):1095-100. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13189. Epub 2016 Feb 16. PubMed 26879626 ↗
  • Hardie JA, Morkve O, Ellingsen I. Effect of body position on arterial oxygen tension in the elderly. Respiration. 2002;69(2):123-8. doi: 10.1159/000056314. PubMed 11961425 ↗
  • van der Leeden M, Huijsmans R, Geleijn E, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Dekker J, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL. Early enforced mobilisation following surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: feasibility and outcomes. Physiotherapy. 2016 Mar;102(1):103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.3722. Epub 2015 May 7. PubMed 26059985 ↗
  • Haines KJ, Skinner EH, Berney S; Austin Health POST Study Investigators. Association of postoperative pulmonary complications with delayed mobilisation following major abdominal surgery: an observational cohort study. Physiotherapy. 2013 Jun;99(2):119-25. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.05.013. Epub 2012 Sep 23. PubMed 23219632 ↗
  • Jonsson LR, Ingelsrud LH, Tengberg LT, Bandholm T, Foss NB, Kristensen MT. Physical performance following acute high-risk abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study. Can J Surg. 2018 Feb;61(1):42-49. doi: 10.1503/cjs.012616. Epub 2017 Dec 1. PubMed 29368676 ↗
  • Cassidy MR, Rosenkranz P, McCabe K, Rosen JE, McAneny D. I COUGH: reducing postoperative pulmonary complications with a multidisciplinary patient care program. JAMA Surg. 2013 Aug;148(8):740-5. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.358. PubMed 23740240 ↗
  • Oliver CM, Warnakulasuriya S, McGuckin D, Singleton G, Martin P, Santos C, Bedford J, Wagstaff D, Sahni A, Gilhooly D, Wilson J, Edwards K, Baumber R, Vindrola-Padros C, Dorey J, Leeman I, Boyd-Carson H, Vohra R, Singh P, Bedford M, Vallance A, Aresu G, Tucker O, Swart M, Mythen MG; PQIP project delivery team; Moonesinghe SR; PQIP collaborative. Delivery of drinking, eating and mobilising (DrEaMing) and its association with length of hospital stay after major noncardiac surgery: observational cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jul;129(1):114-126. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.021. Epub 2022 May 12. PubMed 35568508 ↗
  • Grass F, Pache B, Martin D, Addor V, Hahnloser D, Demartines N, Hubner M. Feasibility of early postoperative mobilisation after colorectal surgery: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:161-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.024. Epub 2018 Jun 20. PubMed 29935366 ↗
  • Fiore JF Jr, Castelino T, Pecorelli N, Niculiseanu P, Balvardi S, Hershorn O, Liberman S, Charlebois P, Stein B, Carli F, Mayo NE, Feldman LS. Ensuring Early Mobilization Within an Enhanced Recovery Program for Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):223-231. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002114. PubMed 27997472 ↗
  • Balvardi S, Pecorelli N, Castelino T, Niculiseanu P, Alhashemi M, Liberman AS, Charlebois P, Stein B, Carli F, Mayo NE, Feldman LS, Fiore JF Jr. Impact of Facilitation of Early Mobilization on Postoperative Pulmonary Outcomes After Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2021 May 1;273(5):868-875. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003919. PubMed 32324693 ↗
  • Pottenger BC, Pronovost PJ, Kreif J, Klein L, Hobson D, Young D, Hoyer EH. Towards improving hospital workflows: An evaluation of resources to mobilize patients. J Nurs Manag. 2019 Jan;27(1):27-34. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12644. Epub 2018 Aug 16. PubMed 30117210 ↗
  • Schumann R, Kwater AP, Bonney I, Ladd D, Kim J, Gupta A, Gumbert SD, Pivalizza EG. Respiratory volume monitoring in an obese surgical population and the prediction of postoperative respiratory depression by the STOP-bang OSA risk score. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.029. Epub 2016 Jun 1. PubMed 27687395 ↗
  • Mehta JH, Cattano D, Brayanov JB, George EE. Assessment of perioperative minute ventilation in obese versus non-obese patients with a non-invasive respiratory volume monitor. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0352-0. PubMed 28446134 ↗
  • Cella D, Choi SW, Condon DM, Schalet B, Hays RD, Rothrock NE, Yount S, Cook KF, Gershon RC, Amtmann D, DeWalt DA, Pilkonis PA, Stone AA, Weinfurt K, Reeve BB. PROMIS(R) Adult Health Profiles: Efficient Short-Form Measures of Seven Health Domains. Value Health. 2019 May;22(5):537-544. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.004. PubMed 31104731 ↗
  • Atkinson DB, Sens BA, Bernier RS, Gomez-Morad AD, Imsirovic J, Nasr VG. The Evaluation of a Noninvasive Respiratory Volume Monitor in Mechanically Ventilated Neonates and Infants. Anesth Analg. 2022 Jan 1;134(1):141-148. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005562. PubMed 33929346 ↗
  • Gomez-Morad AD, Cravero JP, Harvey BC, Bernier R, Halpin E, Walsh B, Nasr VG. The Evaluation of a Noninvasive Respiratory Volume Monitor in Pediatric Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2017 Dec;125(6):1913-1919. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002029. PubMed 28759491 ↗
  • Gonzalez Castro LN, Mehta JH, Brayanov JB, Mullen GJ. Quantification of respiratory depression during pre-operative administration of midazolam using a non-invasive respiratory volume monitor. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172750. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28235069 ↗
  • Ebert TJ, Middleton AH, Makhija N. Ventilation monitoring during moderate sedation in GI patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Feb;31(1):53-57. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9809-1. Epub 2015 Dec 1. PubMed 26628270 ↗
  • van den Bosch OFC, Alvarez-Jimenez R, Stam MMH, den Boer FC, Loer SA. Variations in respiratory rate do not reflect changes in tidal volume or minute ventilation after major abdominal surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Aug;35(4):787-796. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00538-3. Epub 2020 Jun 1. PubMed 32488678 ↗
  • Williams GW 2nd, George CA, Harvey BC, Freeman JE. A Comparison of Measurements of Change in Respiratory Status in Spontaneously Breathing Volunteers by the ExSpiron Noninvasive Respiratory Volume Monitor Versus the Capnostream Capnometer. Anesth Analg. 2017 Jan;124(1):120-126. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001395. PubMed 27384980 ↗
  • O'Brien CM, Duda JL, Kitas GD, Veldhuijzen van Zanten JJCS, Metsios GS, Fenton SAM. Measurement of sedentary time and physical activity in rheumatoid arthritis: an ActiGraph and activPAL validation study. Rheumatol Int. 2020 Sep;40(9):1509-1518. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04608-2. Epub 2020 May 29. PubMed 32472303 ↗
  • Crowley P, Skotte J, Stamatakis E, Hamer M, Aadahl M, Stevens ML, Rangul V, Mork PJ, Holtermann A. Comparison of physical behavior estimates from three different thigh-worn accelerometers brands: a proof-of-concept for the Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting, and Sleep consortium (ProPASS). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Aug 16;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0835-0. PubMed 31419998 ↗
  • Rosenberger ME, Buman MP, Haskell WL, McConnell MV, Carstensen LL. Twenty-four Hours of Sleep, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Activity with Nine Wearable Devices. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Mar;48(3):457-65. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000778. PubMed 26484953 ↗
  • Lyden K, John D, Dall P, Granat MH. Differentiating Sitting and Lying Using a Thigh-Worn Accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Apr;48(4):742-7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000804. PubMed 26516691 ↗
  • Steeves JA, Bowles HR, McClain JJ, Dodd KW, Brychta RJ, Wang J, Chen KY. Ability of thigh-worn ActiGraph and activPAL monitors to classify posture and motion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 May;47(5):952-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000497. PubMed 25202847 ↗
  • Creasy SA, Crane TE, Garcia DO, Thomson CA, Kohler LN, Wertheim BC, Baker LD, Coday M, Hale L, Womack CR, Wright KP, Melanson EL. Higher amounts of sedentary time are associated with short sleep duration and poor sleep quality in postmenopausal women. Sleep. 2019 Jul 8;42(7):zsz093. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsz093. PubMed 30994175 ↗
  • Ostendorf DM, Lyden K, Pan Z, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, Melanson EL, Catenacci VA. Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Successful Weight Loss Maintainers. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018 Jan;26(1):53-60. doi: 10.1002/oby.22052. Epub 2017 Nov 1. PubMed 29090513 ↗
  • Carney MJ, Weissler JM, Fox JP, Tecce MG, Hsu JY, Fischer JP. Trends in open abdominal surgery in the United States-Observations from 9,950,759 discharges using the 2009-2013 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) datasets. Am J Surg. 2017 Aug;214(2):287-292. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 12. PubMed 28202162 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Dec 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 36 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 28, 2023
First posted
Feb 2, 2024
StartActual
Dec 22, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 22, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jun 22, 2026
Last update
Apr 30, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06239831
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 2, 2024
Start date
Dec 22, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 22, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 22, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 30, 2025

Study contacts

Emily G. Helmer
Contact
emily.helmer@cuanschutz.edu
(303)-724-2938
Ana Fernandez-Bustamante, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Health Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion