ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06238193Updated Feb 2, 2024

Molecular Characteristics of Early-onset Compared With Late-onset Colorectal Cancer

An observational study in Colorectal Cancer and Microsatellite Instability, sponsored by The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-02.

Sponsored by The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
11,344
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The distribution rate of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) was significantly higher in early-onset colorectal cancer, and early-onset colorectal cancer has a specific mutational profile and relatively high programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1) expression, which may be used to guide personalized treatment to better control the disease.

Read the detailed description

The prognosis of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is worse than that of late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC), and the incidence has gradually increased in recent years, so it is necessary to study the pathogenesis and explore the target of early-onset colorectal cancer patients. In this study, investigators aimed to explore the specific molecular pathologic map of EOCRC by comparing LOCRC. This study enrolled 11,344 patients with colorectal cancer treated at the Colorectal Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from 2003 to 2022, of whom 578 were EOCRC and 10,766 were LOCRC. The tumor-related mutation status and tumor mutation burden (TMB) of patients were detected by next-generation sequencing technology. PD-L1 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry. The microsatellite instability was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) coupled with capillary electrophoresis (2B3D NCI Panel) in all patients. Among the 11,344 patients, 180 patients with EOCRC and 90 patients with LOCRC patients underwent NGS investigation. Compared with LOCRC, EOCRC patients generally presented a later TNM stage, lower tumor differentiation, and poorer histological type. In LOCRC with MSI-H stupe, TNM stage is earlier than whom with MSI-L/MSS. In addition, the frequency of MSI-H was significantly higher in EOCRC (10.2%) than LOCRC (2.2%). The frequency of 7-mutation panel (ARID1A, FANCI, CASP8, DGFRA, DPYD, TSHR, and PRKCI) were relatively higher in LOCRC. In EOCRC group, the TNM stage of MSI-H subtype patients was earlier while harbored with worse tissue differentiation and higher proportion of mucinous adenocarcinoma. Besides, among the EOCRC patients, FBXW7, FAT1, ATM, ARID1A and KMT2B mutation frequencies were significantly increased in patients with MSI-H type. Comparing with MSI-H patients of LOCRC, the EOCRC patients with MSI-H presented a higher mutation frequencies of FGFBR2, PBRM1, RNF43, LRP1B, FBXW7, ATM and ARID1A. In addition, EOCRC patients were identified with higher tumor mutation burden, especially in the MSI-H type. PD-L1 expression calculated by tumor proportion score (TPS) was also elevated in EOCRC and correlated with MSI status.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Microsatellite Instability
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

6,541 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,667 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11,344 is above the median of 250 across 1,440 observational studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University is the lead sponsor of 568 studies on the registry; 317 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

No.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women aged 18-75 years old;
  • proven colon or rectal adenocarcinoma.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 80 years of age;
  • Recurrent colorectal cancer;
  • Multiple primary tumors.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
11,344 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Early-onset colorectal cancer

    Early-onset colorectal cancer

  • Late-onset colorectal cancer

    Late-onset colorectal cancer

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. MSI status

    (I) MSI-High (MSI-H) if two or more mononucleotide markers in tumor tissue had size variations of ≥3bp compared to normal tissue; (II) MSI-Low (MSI-L) if a single mononucleotide marker in tumor tissue exhibited a size variation of ≥3bp compared to normal tissue; (III) Microsatellite Stable (MSS) if there were no size variations of ≥3bp in mononucleotide markers in tumor tissue compared to normal tissue.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Copy-number variations (CNVs)

    Copy-number variations (CNVs) were detected using CNVkit with default parameters. Depth ratios of above 2.0(tissue) and below 0.6 were considered as CNV gain and CNV loss, respectively.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Other outcomes

  1. PD-L1 level

    PD-L1 expression was evaluated using the Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx kit (Agilent Technologies) in conjunction with the Dako Autostainer Link 48 system (Agilent Technologies). The assessment of PD-L1 expression included both the tumor proportion score (TPS) and the combined positive score (CPS).

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2003 to primary completion in Dec 2022, 239 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 22, 2024
First posted
Feb 2, 2024
StartActual
Jan 1, 2003
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2022
CompletionActual
Jan 1, 2024
Last update
Feb 2, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 2, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06238193
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 2, 2024
Start date
Jan 1, 2003
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2022
Completion
Jan 1, 2024
Last update
Feb 2, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion