ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07912606PAN-SELECTUpdated Nov 3, 2026

D2 Gastrectomy With or Without Para-Aortic Lymph Node Dissection After Chemoimmunotherapy for Gastric Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of Gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy plus para-aortic lymph node dissection and Gastrectomy with standard D2 lymphadenectomy in Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma, sponsored by The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 3, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Some patients with gastric cancer have enlarged para-aortic lymph nodes, also called No. 16 lymph nodes, at diagnosis. After standard chemoimmunotherapy, these lymph nodes may shrink to less than 10 mm on imaging, but it is uncertain whether microscopic cancer remains and whether surgically removing these nodes improves disease control. This single-center randomized exploratory trial will enroll 32 patients whose suspicious No. 16a2 and/or No. 16b1 lymph nodes have regressed to less than 10 mm after 2 to 8 cycles of standard chemoimmunotherapy and who have no disease progression or new distant metastases. Participants will be assigned 1:1 to curative-intent gastrectomy with standard D2 lymphadenectomy either with or without para-aortic lymph node dissection. The main outcome is progression-free survival at 2 years after randomization.

Read the detailed description

PAN-SELECT is a prospective, open-label, parallel-group, single-center randomized exploratory trial. The study evaluates whether adding dissection of the No. 16a2 and No. 16b1 para-aortic lymph nodes to curative-intent gastrectomy and standard D2 lymphadenectomy improves outcomes in a response-selected population with gastric or eligible esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.

At initial diagnosis, eligible candidates must have radiologic evidence of involvement of No. 16a2 and/or No. 16b1 lymph nodes, defined by a short-axis diameter of at least 10 mm together with metastatic morphology, and no other distant metastases. Candidates receive 2 to 8 cycles of an immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy as routine clinical care outside the randomized intervention. The specific agents, doses, modifications, and number of cycles are selected by the multidisciplinary team according to current clinical practice and are recorded by the study.

After completion of the planned preoperative systemic therapy, chest, abdominal, and pelvic contrast-enhanced computed tomography is performed. Written informed consent for PAN-SELECT is obtained only after the first planned post-treatment reassessment confirms that all previously suspicious No. 16a2 and No. 16b1 lymph nodes have a short-axis diameter of less than 10 mm, there is no progression according to RECIST version 1.1 and clinical assessment, there is no new distant metastasis, curative-intent R0 resection appears feasible, and the patient is fit for either study operation.

After all randomization criteria are verified, an independent statistician-generated sequence using simple randomization with a fixed seed assigns participants 1:1 to one of two groups. The experimental group undergoes gastrectomy with standard D2 lymphadenectomy plus systematic dissection of No. 16a2 and No. 16b1 para-aortic lymph nodes. The active comparator group undergoes gastrectomy with standard D2 lymphadenectomy without planned systematic No. 16 dissection. Robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches are permitted. Surgery is planned 2 to 6 weeks after the last preoperative systemic treatment, after treatment-related toxicity has recovered and the participant is clinically fit.

Participants and surgeons are not masked because the surgical fields differ. Radiologic progression and recurrence are independently assessed by two radiologists who are not involved in clinical decision-making and are unaware of treatment assignment; disagreement is resolved by a third radiologist or multidisciplinary review. Pathology reporting includes ypTNM stage, Becker or College of American Pathologists tumor regression grade, margin and R0 status, and regional lymph node station-specific counts. In the experimental group, the No. 16 specimen is submitted separately and the number of examined and metastatic No. 16 lymph nodes is recorded.

The primary estimand is the between-group difference in 2-year progression-free survival under the intention-to-treat principle. The sample size of 32 participants is based on single-center feasibility and the precision needed for preliminary estimates rather than a formal superiority or noninferiority hypothesis test. Results will be used to estimate effect size, event rates, surgical safety, protocol adherence, and recruitment feasibility for a future multicenter confirmatory trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastric Adenocarcinoma
  • Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis
  • No. 16 Lymph Node
  • Para-Aortic Lymph Node Dissection
  • D2 Lymphadenectomy
  • Chemoimmunotherapy
  • Gastric Cancer
  • Randomized Exploratory Trial
03

In context

Stomach Neoplasms

3,399 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomach Neoplasms; 992 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 32 is below the median of 66 across 2,499 interventional studies indexed under Stomach Neoplasms.

Browse Stomach Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University is the lead sponsor of 568 studies on the registry; 317 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 75 years.
  • confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma limited to Siewert type III or Siewert type II disease not requiring a transthoracic combined operation.
  • Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ()-negative disease, defined as immunohistochemistry 0 or 1+, or immunohistochemistry 2+ with negative fluorescence in situ hybridization, or HER2 status unknown.
  • performance status of 0 or 1.
  • At initial diagnosis, thin-section contrast-enhanced computed tomography shows at least one No. 16a2 and/or No. 16b1 lymph node with a short-axis diameter of at least 10 mm and morphology, such as a round shape, irregular border, central necrosis, clustering, or abnormal enhancement, confirmed by two radiologists or gastric cancer multidisciplinary team physicians with relevant experience.
  • Regional lymph node metastases are permitted, but imaging shows no peritoneal, hepatic, pulmonary, osseous, or other distant metastasis apart from the eligible No. 16a2 and/or No. 16b1 lymph nodes.
  • Completion of 2 to 8 cycles of an combined with chemotherapy as routine clinical care before randomization, with the agents, doses, modifications, and number of cycles determined by the multidisciplinary team and completely documented.
  • At the first reassessment after completion of the planned preoperative systemic therapy, all previously suspicious No. 16a2 and No. 16b1 lymph nodes have a short-axis diameter of less than 10 mm.
  • No disease progression according to version 1.1 and clinical assessment, and no new distant metastasis at the post-treatment reassessment.
  • The gastric primary tumor and regional disease are considered resectable with curative intent and an R0 resection is expected; the participant is considered medically and technically eligible for either assigned operation.
  • Toxicities related to the last preoperative systemic therapy have recovered to version 5.0 grade 1 or lower or to the pretreatment baseline. Controlled immune-related endocrine events requiring only stable replacement therapy are permitted.
  • Adequate major organ function, cardiopulmonary reserve, and acceptable anesthetic risk for gastrectomy and possible para-aortic lymph node dissection.
  • Ability and willingness to complete study follow-up and provide written after post-treatment eligibility is confirmed.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Disease progression, a new distant , or any suspicious para-aortic lymph node with a short-axis diameter of 10 mm or greater at the post-treatment reassessment.
  • Curative-intent R0 resection is not considered feasible, or the participant cannot tolerate both assigned surgical strategies.
  • Previous radical gastric cancer surgery or para-aortic operation expected to substantially alter the planned lymphadenectomy, or severe intra-abdominal adhesions or another condition that prevents safe completion of the assigned surgery.
  • Uncontrolled active infection, severe cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal dysfunction, coagulopathy, or another disease that materially increases perioperative risk.
  • Preoperative treatment toxicity has not recovered to the allowed level, or an unstable immune-related adverse event requires high-dose systemic .
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding, or inability to comply with clinically required or follow-up.
  • Another active within the previous 5 years, except a cured malignancy with a low risk of recurrence as determined by the investigator and applicable ethics requirements.
  • Concurrent participation in another interventional study that may interfere with evaluation of the primary outcome.
  • Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes participation inappropriate.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

HER2

HER2 is a protein, made from the ERBB2 gene, that drives the growth of some cancers. A study may look for a level of the protein, extra copies of the gene, or a particular change in it.

In breast cancer, protein tests are read as HER2-positive, HER2-low or HER2-negative; other cancers use their own rules. Check which test result the study requires.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

PD-1, PD-L1 and checkpoint inhibitors

PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are proteins that act as brakes on the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab, block them so the immune system can attack a cancer.

PD-L1 can also be measured in a tumour sample. Some scores count stained tumour cells only (TPS); others also count certain immune cells (CPS). The study names the score and the minimum it uses.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
32 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    D2 plus PAND

    Participants undergo curative-intent gastrectomy with standard D2 lymphadenectomy plus systematic para-aortic lymph node dissection of No. 16a2 and No. 16b1. The No. 16 specimen is submitted separately for pathological examination.

    Procedure: Gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy plus para-aortic lymph node dissection

  • Experimental
    D2 alone

    Participants undergo curative-intent gastrectomy with standard D2 lymphadenectomy without planned systematic dissection of No. 16a2 or No. 16b1. Rescue removal or dissection is permitted only when an intraoperative finding requires treatment for safety or curative intent, and the reason and extent are recorded.

    Procedure: Gastrectomy with standard D2 lymphadenectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureGastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy plus para-aortic lymph node dissection

    Distal, proximal, or total gastrectomy is performed as appropriate for tumor location, with standard D2 lymphadenectomy and additional systematic dissection of No. 16a2 from the upper border of the celiac trunk to the lower border of the left renal vein and No. 16b1 from the lower border of the left renal vein to the upper border of the inferior mesenteric artery. Robotic, laparoscopic, or open surgery is permitted.

  • ProcedureGastrectomy with standard D2 lymphadenectomy

    Distal, proximal, or total gastrectomy is performed as appropriate for tumor location, with standard D2 lymphadenectomy and without planned systematic No. 16a2 or No. 16b1 dissection. Robotic, laparoscopic, or open surgery is permitted.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-free survival rate at 2 years

    Progression-free survival is measured from randomization to the earliest of radiologic or clinical disease progression, postoperative local, regional, or distant recurrence, or death from any cause. Participants without an event are censored at the date of their last adequate disease assessment. The 2-year progression-free survival rate will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From randomization to 2 years after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recurrence-free survival rate at 2 years after surgery

    Among participants who undergo R0 resection, recurrence-free survival is measured from surgery to the earliest of local, regional, or distant recurrence or death from any cause. Participants without an event are censored at the date of their last adequate disease assessment.

    Time frame: From surgery to 2 years after surgery

  2. Overall survival

    Overall survival is measured from randomization to death from any cause. Participants alive at the last follow-up are censored on that date.

    Time frame: From randomization through 5 years after surgery

  3. Cumulative incidence of para-aortic lymph node region recurrence

    Recurrence involving the No. 16a2 or No. 16b1 region is determined by imaging, pathology, or clinical evidence. The cumulative incidence will be estimated with death without para-aortic recurrence treated as a competing event, and recurrence patterns will be summarized.

    Time frame: From randomization through 5 years after surgery

  4. R0 resection rate

    The percentage of randomized participants with microscopically negative proximal, distal, and applicable circumferential or other resection margins.

    Time frame: At definitive postoperative pathological assessment, generally within 30 days after surgery

  5. Pathological complete response rate

    The percentage of participants with no residual viable tumor in the gastric primary tumor and all evaluated lymph nodes, defined as ypT0N0.

    Time frame: At definitive postoperative pathological assessment, generally within 30 days after surgery

  6. Number of examined and metastatic regional lymph nodes

    Regional lymph nodes will be recorded by station, including the number examined and the number with pathologically confirmed metastasis.

    Time frame: At definitive postoperative pathological assessment, generally within 30 days after surgery

  7. Pathological positivity rate of No. 16 para-aortic lymph nodes in the experimental arm

    Among participants assigned to D2 lymphadenectomy plus para-aortic lymph node dissection who have an evaluable No. 16 specimen, the percentage with at least one pathologically metastatic No. 16 lymph node and the numbers examined and metastatic will be reported.

    Time frame: At definitive postoperative pathological assessment, generally within 30 days after surgery

  8. Operative time

    Operative time in minutes, measured according to the institutional anesthesia and operative record, will be summarized by randomized group.

    Time frame: During the assigned surgery

  9. Estimated intraoperative blood loss

    Estimated blood loss in milliliters, as recorded in the operative and anesthesia records, will be summarized by randomized group.

    Time frame: During the assigned surgery

  10. Postoperative length of hospital stay

    The number of days from surgery to hospital discharge will be summarized by randomized group.

    Time frame: From surgery until discharge, generally within 30 days after surgery

  11. Rate of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher postoperative complications

    The percentage of participants with at least one postoperative complication requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiologic intervention, intensive care for organ dysfunction, or resulting in death, classified as Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after surgery

  12. All-cause postoperative mortality

    The percentage of participants who die from any cause within 90 days after surgery.

    Time frame: Within 90 days after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Due to ethic restriction.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07912606
Responsible party
Hao Xu (Professor, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2034 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Hao Xu, MD, PhD
Contact
hxu@njmu.edu.cn
+86-25-68306505
Hao Xu, MD, PhD
principal investigator · The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion