ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06236685AVIMUpdated Jun 28, 2024

Optimizing the Assessment of Mechanical Ventilation by Integrating Advanced Monitoring Techniques [AVIM]

An interventional study of Electric impedance tomography in Mechanical Ventilation Complication and Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, sponsored by Czech Technical University in Prague. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Czechia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-28.

Sponsored by Czech Technical University in Prague · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to collect synchronized data from multiple monitoring techniques of mechanical ventilation (pressure/flow waves from the ventilator, electrical impedance tomography - EIT, esophageal pressure, capnography) in patients ventilated either on intensive care units or during anesthesia and evaluate the data by detailed mathematical analysis, to test three hypotheses:

  1. Various published methods of calculation of the expiratory time constant provide different results in most cases.
  2. Inhomogeneous ventilation (as described by EIT) affects the form of the expiratory flow curve and thus the calculated expiratory time constants.
  3. The calculation of mechanical energy transferred to the lungs is affected by the chosen technique and length of the inspiratory pause maneuver.

This study does not test any new or non-standard methods and does not in any way interfere with the course of treatment indicated by the clinician, apart from extending the monitoring techniques.

Read the detailed description

Mechanical ventilation is known to cause various complications, generally known as ventilator induced lung injury. Thus, detailed monitoring is essential. However, data interpretation is complicated in clinical practice. The investigators aim to collect synchronized data from multiple monitoring techniques of mechanical ventilation (pressure/flow waves from the ventilator, electrical impedance tomography - EIT, esophageal pressure, capnography) in patients ventilated either on intensive care units or during anesthesia and evaluate the data by detailed mathematical analysis. The results will be used to explore the complexity of seemingly simple and often used calculations describing the course of mechanical ventilation - mostly the expiratory time constant and amount of mechanical energy transferred to the lungs. The investigators primarily aim to test three hypotheses:

  1. Various published methods of calculation of the expiratory time constant provide different results in most cases.
  2. Inhomogeneous ventilation (as described by EIT) affects the form of the expiratory flow curve and thus the calculated expiratory time constants.
  3. The calculation of mechanical energy transferred to the lungs is affected by the chosen technique and length of the inspiratory pause maneuver.

For this, the investigators plan to recruit 50 patients undergoing general anesthesia with controlled mechanical ventilation and 50 patients hospitalized on intensive care units. Monitoring of those patients will be protocolized and will in all cases include pressure/flow monitoring of the mechanical ventilator, capnography, and electrical impedance tomography. Esophageal pressure monitoring will be introduced where indicated by the clinician or where nasogastric tube insertion will be indicated (as the pressure can be measured by a combined catheter).

This study thus does not test any new or non-standard methods and does not in any way interfere with the course of treatment indicated by the clinician, apart from extending the monitoring techniques. Patient data will be anonymized and all the enrolled patients or their families will sign an informed consent as agreed by the ethical committee of our hospital.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mechanical Ventilation Complication
  • Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury

Keywords

  • electrical impedance tomography
  • expiratory time constant
  • mechanical energy
  • lung protective ventilation
  • ventilator-induced lung injury
  • expiratory flow
  • inspiratory hold maneuver
03

In context

Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury

120 studies on the registry are indexed under Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 40 across 74 interventional studies indexed under Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury.

Browse Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury studies →

Lead sponsor

Czech Technical University in Prague is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • mechanical ventilation for anesthesia or in intensive care unit

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • disagreement with enrollment or incapacity to understand the patient information leaflet
  • to electric impedance tomography (skin lesions in the place of electrode placement etc.)
  • necessity to use a defined ventilator setting outside the study protocol
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    General anesthesia

    Patients undergoing general anesthesia with mechanical ventilation will be monitored by electrical impedance tomography in addition to standard monitoring. Moreover, esophageal pressure catheter will be used in cases where indicated by clinician or in case of an indication of nasogastric tube, as esophageal pressure can be measured by a combined catheter.

    Device: Electric impedance tomography

  • Experimental
    Intensive Care Unit

    Patients ventilated in the ICU for various reasons will receive standard care, including advanced monitoring of mechanical ventilation.

    Device: Electric impedance tomography

Interventions

  • DeviceElectric impedance tomography

    EIT is rarely used during general anesthesia for standard procedures. In the anesthesia arm, all patients will be monitored by EIT.

    Also known as: EIT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Expiratory time constant

    Time \[in seconds\], in which the lungs exhale 63% of the total volume.

    Time frame: 2 minutes after an intervention or a change in the ventilator settings

  2. Mechanical energy transferred to the lungs

    Mechanical energy (alternatively referred to as mechanical work) \[in Joules\] is the energy delivered to the respiratory system during a single inspiration cycle.

    Time frame: 2 minutes after an intervention or a change in the ventilator settings

Other outcomes

  1. Regional signals of electrical impedance tomography

    Changes of regional signals of electrical impedance tomography throughout the respiratory cycle correspond to changes in lung aeration.

    Time frame: 2 minutes after an intervention or a change in the ventilator settings

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Karagiannidis C, Waldmann AD, Roka PL, Schreiber T, Strassmann S, Windisch W, Bohm SH. Regional expiratory time constants in severe respiratory failure estimated by electrical impedance tomography: a feasibility study. Crit Care. 2018 Sep 21;22(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2137-3. PubMed 30236123 ↗
  • Brunner JX, Laubscher TP, Banner MJ, Iotti G, Braschi A. Simple method to measure total expiratory time constant based on the passive expiratory flow-volume curve. Crit Care Med. 1995 Jun;23(6):1117-22. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199506000-00019. PubMed 7774225 ↗
  • Candik P, Rybar D, Depta F, Sabol F, Kolesar A, Galkova K, Torok P, Donicova V, Imrecze S, Nosal M, Donic V. Relationship between dynamic expiratory time constant tau(edyn) and parameters of breathing cycle in pressure support ventilation mode. Physiol Res. 2018 Dec 18;67(6):875-879. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.933750. Epub 2018 Sep 11. PubMed 30204464 ↗
  • Henderson WR, Molgat-Seon Y, Vos W, Lipson R, Ferreira F, Kirby M, Holsbeke CV, Dominelli PB, Griesdale DE, Sekhon M, Coxson HO, Mayo J, Sheel AW. Functional respiratory imaging, regional strain, and expiratory time constants at three levels of positive end expiratory pressure in an ex vivo pig model. Physiol Rep. 2016 Dec;4(23):e13059. doi: 10.14814/phy2.13059. PubMed 27923979 ↗
  • Vogt B, Pulletz S, Elke G, Zhao Z, Zabel P, Weiler N, Frerichs I. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of regional lung ventilation determined by electrical impedance tomography during pulmonary function testing. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Oct;113(7):1154-61. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01630.2011. Epub 2012 Aug 16. PubMed 22898553 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — If any particularly interesting cases arise, the investigators plan to share the individual monitoring data together with the study protocol as anonymized case studies, either published or upon request to other researchers.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 44 months after the start.

Of 40 interventional studies with no phase under Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 54. This study's planned 44 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 24, 2024
First posted
Feb 1, 2024
StartActual
Apr 22, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Jun 28, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 28, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06236685
Lead sponsor
Czech Technical University in Prague
Collaborators
Military University Hospital, Prague
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 1, 2024
Start date
Apr 22, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 28, 2024

Study contacts

Karel Roubík, prof.
study director · Czech Technical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion