CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06227819Updated Jan 29, 2024

BVA-200 vs BVA-100 Validation Study

An observational study in Heart Failure, High Blood Pressure and High Cholesterol, sponsored by Daxor Corporation. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-29.

Sponsored by Daxor Corporation · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
62
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The proposed study is a prospective, observational, investigator and patient blinded study comparing the results of blood volume measurement using the FDA-cleared Daxor BVA-100 device to the Daxor BVA-200 device. Data from this study may be pooled with data from studies with similar design conducted at other sites, for the purposes of an FDA medical device submission.

Read the detailed description

Measurements of human blood volume will be made via the indicator dilution method, using gamma counter readings of the concentration of I-131 in a subject's blood sample taken after radio-iodinated Human Serum Albumin (HSA) has been injected into the bloodstream via venous access. Each subject receiving an injection will have five separate blood samples taken, which will be analyzed separately. Each of the five measurements will be conducted in duplicate with the BVA-100 instrument and the BVA-200 instrument. Sufficient blood will be withdrawn at each phlebotomy to permit such duplicate measurement.

Subjects will be enrolled who have been prescribed a blood volume procedure using the BVA-100, as a result either of their ordinary diagnostic care or of their participation in another study that uses blood volume measurement. Subjects will be adults under treatment for conditions normally associated with the need for volume assessment, such as Heart Failure, or scheduled to receive BVA-100 measurement as part of another study. An effort will be made to ensure a range of ages and a balance of the sexes.

Subjects will be enrolled and consented sequentially. The University of Tennessee Medical Center site will document any patient who is not enrolled in the study sequentially and the reason why or who declines enrollment. Demographics of patients not enrolled will be collected to permit identification of any trends in non-enrollment. We do not anticipate any sequential patient not being offered the opportunity to participate in order to assure that there is no bias in selection of patients ("all-comers").

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure
  • High Blood Pressure
  • High Cholesterol
  • Anemia
  • Diabetes
  • Thyroid Diseases
  • Kidney Diseases
  • Clotting Disorder
  • Trauma
  • Other Disease

Keywords

  • Blood volume
  • Point of care
  • Fluid management
  • Diagnostic
03

In context

Kidney Diseases

3,840 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Diseases; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is below the median of 192 across 1,033 observational studies indexed under Kidney Diseases.

Browse Kidney Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Daxor Corporation is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The proposed study will be open to any volunteer meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria listed below. We intend to highlight differential analysis of clinical patients from exemplary disease states (such as congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease), as well as other population characteristics such as age, sex, race, etc.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age: Over18 years;
  2. Able and willing to provide informed written consent.
  3. Subjects will be enrolled who have been prescribed a blood volume procedure using the BVA-100, as a result either of their ordinary diagnostic care or of their participation in another study that uses blood volume measurement. Subjects will be adults under treatment for conditions normally associated with the need for volume assessment, such as Heart Failure, or scheduled to receive BVA-100 measurement as part of another study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant women or nursing mothers.
  2. Women of childbearing potential not using adequate birth control methods.
  3. Known hypersensitivity to iodine or eggs.
  4. Other clinical basis for precluding the use of radioactive materials.
  5. Has previously been enrolled in, and completed, the study.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testBVA-200

    Blood samples collected for measurement with the BVA-100 will also be tested with the BVA-200. The BVA-200 uses whole blood collection cartridges which allow for a precise amount of blood to be measured without the need to first centrifuge and then pipette plasma aliquots. A small amount of whole blood from each sample will be set aside for BVA-200 use, while the remainder of the blood sample is used for BVA-100 measurement. The BVA-200 device was developed with the support of the Department of Defense through Phase I (W81XWH19C0048) and Phase II (W81XWH20C0025) SBIR contracts.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Establish equivalence of BVA-200 to BVA-100

    Comparison of a sufficient number of indicator-dilution volume measurements between BVA-100 and BVA-200 devices to establish substantial equivalence.

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Establish equivalence of BVA-200 to BVA-100 in TBV, RCV, PV and ATR

    Comparison of a sufficient number of full 5-point time-zero blood volume measurements between BVA-100 and BVA-200 devices, to establish substantial equivalence, including measurement of: * Total Blood Volume (TBV) * Red Cell Volume (RCV) * Plasma Volume (PV) * Albumin transudation rate (ATR)

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months.

  2. Filling consistency validation

    Validation of filling consistency of at least 100 whole blood quantitative collection cartridges, in at least 40 sets of 5 samples from the same patient

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months.

  3. Usability

    Validation of the ability of personnel who are not laboratorians to understand the test procedures and perform the measurement after receiving training materials (which may be a combination of written instructions, video instructions, and individual instruction) in the use of the instrument. Usability is evaluated through a User Validation Survey consisting of yes or no questions, as well as questions answered on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), where 5 is the most favorable outcome.

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Daxor Corporation
    Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be made available to other researchers.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06227819
Lead sponsor
Daxor Corporation
Collaborators
Stern Cardiovascular Foundation, Inc., Oregon Health and Science University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 29, 2024
Start date
May 23, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2023
Completion
Nov 30, 2023
Last update
Jan 29, 2024

Study contacts

Jonathan Feldschuh
principal investigator · Daxor Corporation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion