CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06205875Updated May 14, 2025

High Versus Low Dose Serratus Anterior Plane Block After Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery.

An interventional study of High dose serratus anterior plane block (2.4 mg/kg patient ideal body weight) and Low dose serratus anterior plane block (1.2mg/kg patient ideal body weight) in Analgesia, Surgery and Cardiac Disease, sponsored by Jessa Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-14.

Sponsored by Jessa Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2024; still recruiting 2 years 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to compare the efficacy and quality of pain relief provided by the high-dose serratus anterior plane (SAP) block with the standard SAP block in preventing and treating acute postoperative pain after total endoscopic aortic or mitral valve surgery.

Read the detailed description

During the last two decades, cardiac surgical techniques have changed dramatically. Evidence for good short and long-term outcomes after endovascular and minimally invasive procedures is rising. This shift made it possible to avoid sternotomy and thus facilitating earlier patient recovery without compromising safety. Therefore, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented to aim for early extubation and ambulation. While policies for early extubation and discharge from the hospital have been implemented, the analgesic regimen has not been modified. Opioids remain the standard treatment in the postoperative setting after cardiac surgery despite known side effects such as nausea, constipation and the risk of addiction. Neuraxial anaesthesia techniques, which require fewer opioids in cardiac surgery, have been studied and validated but not yet implemented.

In 2013, the serratus anterior plane (SAP) block was described as a pain relief option for chest surgery. This anaesthesia technique injects local anaesthetics under the serratus muscle and between the latissimus dorsi and serratus anterior using ultrasound. Successful pain relief with this SAP block has been reported in thoracotomy, chest surgery, and rib fractures. In our previous study, we demonstrated a 40% reduction in morphine consumption during the first 24 hours after total endoscopic aortic valve replacement with an SAP block compared to a control group without an SAP block. Lower pain scores were also observed in the SAP group

As such, in this proposed study, we aim to optimise the intensity of the Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) to decrease opioid requirements further and to encounter more favourable secondary clinical outcome parameters. One strategy to increase the duration of action of plane blocks is injecting higher doses of local anaesthetics. A meta-analysis by De Oliveira et al. on transabdominal plane (TAP)-blocks for abdominal surgery showed a correlation between the local anaesthetic dose and the late block effect, impacting both pain scores and opioid consumption. In a randomised controlled trial by Suresh, a TAP block with bupivacaine 1.25 mcg/kg was compared to a TAP block with bupivacaine 2.5 mcg/kg, revealing a longer duration of analgesia and a lower need for additional analgesics up to 24 hours post-surgery. Moreover, loading doses up to 2mg/kg body weight are recommended for truncal blocks in general, but the mean injected dose in our intervention group was 1.25mg/kg, considering a mean patient body weight of 79.2kg. Notably, a pharmacokinetic study by Maximos and colleagues on an adrenalised bupivacaine mixture after pectointercostal fascial plane block (PIFB) after cardiac surgery showed that, despite injecting 2mcg/kg adrenalised bupivacain, both total and free arterial serum bupivacaine levels were 10-20 times lower than levels associated with neurologic or cardiovascular toxicity in the literature.

In conclusion, we are convinced we can safely improve the late effects of our SAPB compared to our first study by increasing the dose of the local anesthetic injectate.

02

Conditions studied

  • Analgesia
  • Surgery
  • Cardiac Disease
  • Post Operative Pain

Keywords

  • Aorta/mitral valve surgery
  • Serratus anterior plane block
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery
  • post operative pain
03

In context

Heart Diseases

3,639 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Diseases; 461 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 100 across 1,778 interventional studies indexed under Heart Diseases.

Browse Heart Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Jessa Hospital is the lead sponsor of 85 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Scheduled for elective aortic valve surgery or elective mitral valve surgery via right anterolateral thoracotomy
  • Adult patients (minimally 18 years old)
  • Bodyweight > 50kg
  • EuroScore ii \< 3%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate
  • Inability to communicate due to language or neurologic barriers
  • Inability to control and self-administer opioids with PCIA or to comprehend the NRS pain score due to confusion or learning difficulties
  • Chronic use of opioids
  • Chronic use of analgesic antidepressants and/or antiepileptics
  • Use of prohibited medication which possibly interacts with bupivacaine-epinephrine or opioids (mexiletine, ketoconazole, theophylline, IMAO, Digitalis and cimetidine)
  • History of major trauma or surgery to right chest wall
  • History of chronic pain at right chest wall
  • Allergy to opioids and/or local anesthetics
  • Allergy to paracetamol
  • Class 3 obesity (BMI 40 or more)
  • Pregnancy
  • Intraoperative events compromising early postoperative recovery (aortic dissection, systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve, cardiac tamponade, brady-arrhytmias requiring external pacing,...)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Patients in the intervention group will receive a mixture of high-dose local anesthetic and epinephrine administered via a serratus anterior plane block.

    Procedure: High dose serratus anterior plane block (2.4 mg/kg patient ideal body weight) · Drug: PCIA with morphine

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Patients in the control group will receive a serratus anterior plane block with a low dose local anesthetic (based upon our primary trial).

    Procedure: Low dose serratus anterior plane block (1.2mg/kg patient ideal body weight) · Drug: PCIA with morphine

Interventions

  • ProcedureHigh dose serratus anterior plane block (2.4 mg/kg patient ideal body weight)

    The needle will be introduced in-plane from supero-anterior to postero-inferior until the needle tip is positioned in the plane underneath the serratus muscle (deep compartment). Under continuous ultrasound guidance, 3/4th of the bupivacaine 0.25% plus epinephrine solution will be injected in the deep compartment. After the deep component of the serratus anterior plane block is completed, the needle will be withdrawn to the subcutaneous tissues. The needle will be flattened and advanced in-plane to the plane superficial to the serratus muscles. The remainder quarter of the bupivacaine 0.25% plus epinephrine solution will be injected superficial to the serratus muscles after correct placement of the needle tip is confirmed on ultrasound. In total a dose of 2.4mg/kg patient ideal body weight will be administered. There is a maximal dose of 200 mg adrenalized bupivacaine for patients with an ideal body weight of 83 kg or more.

  • ProcedureLow dose serratus anterior plane block (1.2mg/kg patient ideal body weight)

    The needle will be introduced in-plane from supero-anterior to postero-inferior until the needle tip is positioned in the plane underneath the serratus muscle (deep compartment). Under continuous ultrasound guidance, 3/4th of the bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected in the deep compartment. After the deep component of the serratus anterior plane block is completed, the needle will be withdrawn to the subcutaneous tissues. The needle will be flattened and advanced in-plane to the plane superficial to the serratus muscles. The remainder quarter of the bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected superficial to the serratus muscles after correct placement of the needle tip is confirmed on ultrasound.

  • DrugPCIA with morphine

    A patient controlled intravenous analgesia system (Bodyguard 595 Colorvision®) with morphine (Sterop®) using following settings: bolus 1.5 mg and lockout interval 7 min with maximal dose of 30mg per 4 hours.

    Also known as: PCIA with Sterop

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cumulative opioid consumption by patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA)

    Morphine consumption will be directly read from the PCIA-system after 24 hours

    Time frame: 24 hours after block placement

Secondary outcomes

  1. Opioid consumption during predetermined time intervals after surgery

    Morphine consumption will be directly read from PCIA-system at predetermined time intervals after performing the SAP block.

    Time frame: Every 4 hours until 24 hours after placement of the SAP block

  2. Opioid free patients first 24 postoperative hours

    Number of patients that do not require any additional opioids within the first 24 hours after block placement.

    Time frame: First 24 hours

  3. Postoperative pain score in rest and on deep respiration

    The postoperative pain in rest, as well as with deep respiration on the surgical site, is evaluated based on an 11-point numeric scale (NRS) where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain ever.

    Time frame: 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours after performing the SAP block and at postoperative day 7.

  4. Overall patient Satisfaction with analgesic therapy

    Overall patient satisfaction with analgesic therapy will be assessed with an 11-point NRS scale (where 0 = not satisfied at all and 10 = extremely satisfied)

    Time frame: 24 hours after performing the SAP block at postoperative day 1.

  5. Time to extubation

    Time from arrival to the ICU until extubation in minutes.

    Time frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 7 days

  6. Time to first mobilization

    Time from arrival to the ICU until first mobilization.

    Time frame: Intended at 6 hours after surgery

  7. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)

    The simplified PONV impact scale will be used to asses PONV. Clinically important PONV will be defined as a score of 5 or more.

    Time frame: 24 hours after performing the SAP block at postoperative day 1

  8. Constipation

    Time to first defecation (postoperative days) or need for laxatives during hospital stay (number of patients)

    Time frame: Until postoperative day 7

  9. ICU length of stay

    Time from arrival to the ICU until meeting discharge criteria to the ward in postoperative hours.

    Time frame: Until postoperative day 7

  10. Hospital length of stay

    Time to discharge out of the hospital in postoperative days (day of surgery = day 0)

    Time frame: Throughout study completion, an average of 7 days

  11. Pneumonia

    Defined as empirical antibiotic therapy for suspicion of pneumonia during hospital stay, in number of patients.

    Time frame: Until postoperative day 7

  12. Quality of recovery

    Quality of recovery will be assessed with Quality of Life questionnaires: EuroQol\*5D (EQ5D) and short form health survey (SF-36).

    Time frame: At postoperative day 2 and 7

  13. Bupivacaine dosage

    In the first 36 study patients, arterial blood samples will be taken to calculate the dosage of total and free plasma bupivacaine levels. For each patient 5 samples will be collected, with a total amount of 50 ml blood per patient.

    Time frame: at 30minutes as well as at 1, 2, 4 and 8 hours after block placement

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06205875
Lead sponsor
Jessa Hospital
Responsible party
Stessel Björn (Principle investigator, Jessa Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 16, 2024
Start date
Feb 21, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 14, 2025

Study contacts

Björn Stessel, Dr
Contact
bjorn.stessel@jessazh.be
003211222107
Ina Callebout, PhD
Contact
ina.callebaut@jessazh.be
003211339848

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion