ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06198400Updated Aug 21, 2024

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence in Evaluation of Pancreatic Remnant Perfusion.

An interventional study of Perioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green-VerDye in Pancreatic Fistula, sponsored by Charles University, Czech Republic. Recruiting at 1 site in Czechia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-21.

Sponsored by Charles University, Czech Republic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2024; still recruiting 2 years 6 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Main goal of this study is to evaluate the blood flow in a post resection pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy with use of indocyanine green fluorescence. If the hypothesis will be proven, evaluation of perfusion of the pancreatic remnant with indocyanine green could be used to estimate the increased risk of the development of pancreatic fistula.

Read the detailed description

Pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with nearly 25% incidence of postoperative complications. One of the most severe complications is a postoperative pancreatic fistula. The exact cause of postoperative fistula development is still unknown, but it appears to be multifactorial. Proper perfusion of pancreatic remnant is essential for the healing of pancreaticojejunostomy. To date, there is no method to reliably evaluate the vascular supply of the remnant. One of the methods for assessment of organ perfusion is the indocyanine green fluorescence. This study aims to determine if indocyanine green fluorescence is a reliable method to measure the perfusion of the post-resection pancreatic remnant. Secondary outcome is to determine, if perioperative evaluation of the vascular supply of the postresection remnant may predict the increased risk of the postoperative pancreatic fistula development.

This study is designed as a prospective experimental study. All consecutive patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy at our department in the 1.5.2024-31.12.2026 period will be enrolled. Exclusion criteria are allergy to indocyanine green and refusal by the patient.The adequacy of the vascular supply of the post-resection pancreatic remnant will be perioperatively evaluated using fluorescence detector. Patients will be divided into two groups. Those with hazardous and non-hazardous vascular supply. The incidence of pancreatic fistula in both groups is to be compared. Postoperative data including morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, intensive care unit stay and postoperative fistula development will be collected.

If a perioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green is proven to be a suitable method to estimate the increased risk of the pancreatic fistula, the list of the existing known risk factors could be expanded. In the most high-risk patients the modification of the surgical procedure could be considered.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Fistula

Keywords

  • Pancreatic surgery
  • ICG
  • Minimal invasive surgery,
  • Pancreatic cancer
  • Pancreatic perfusion
03

In context

Pancreatic Fistula

122 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Fistula; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 110 across 77 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Fistula.

Browse Pancreatic Fistula studies →

Lead sponsor

Charles University, Czech Republic is the lead sponsor of 228 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All consecutive patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy at our department in the selected period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to indocyanine green
  • Refusal by the patient
  • Mini-invasive procedure.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    All patients undergoing the pancreaticoduodenectomy

    All consecutive patients undergoing the pancreaticoduodenectomy at our institution in the 1.5.2024-31.12.2026 period will be enrolled in this study.

    Diagnostic Test: Perioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green-VerDye

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPerioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green-VerDye

    The adequacy of the vascular supply of the post resection pancreatic remnant after pancreatic neck division will be evaluated using ICG detector. Indocyanine green fluorescence product -Verdye™ will be intravenously applied. The application of the substance will be performed according to the current consensus statement and recommendation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the blood flow in pancreatic remnant with use of ICG

    Primary outcome of this study is to evaluate the blood flow in a post resection pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy with use of ICG fluorescence.

    Time frame: Intraoperatively: 5-10 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation between ICG perfusion and development of pancreatic fistula

    Secondary outcome of this study is to find possible correlation between ICG finding and higher rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula development which could lead to establishment of new predictive risk factor.

    Time frame: From admission to discharge, up to 2 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, Czech Republic
    Prag, Czech Republic 16000, Czechia
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rawla P, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of Pancreatic Cancer: Global Trends, Etiology and Risk Factors. World J Oncol. 2019 Feb;10(1):10-27. doi: 10.14740/wjon1166. Epub 2019 Feb 26. PubMed 30834048 ↗
  • Karim SAM, Abdulla KS, Abdulkarim QH, Rahim FH. The outcomes and complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure): Cross sectional study. Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:383-387. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.041. Epub 2018 Feb 10. PubMed 29438817 ↗
  • Rousek M, Whitley A, Kachlik D, Balko J, Zaruba P, Belbl M, Nikov A, Ryska M, Gurlich R, Pohnan R. The dorsal pancreatic artery: A meta-analysis with clinical correlations. Pancreatology. 2022 Mar;22(2):325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 11. PubMed 35177332 ↗
  • Nahm CB, Connor SJ, Samra JS, Mittal A. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: a review of traditional and emerging concepts. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar 15;11:105-118. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S120217. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29588609 ↗
  • Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CM, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 28. Erratum In: Surgery. 2024 Sep;176(3):988-989. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.043. PubMed 28040257 ↗
  • Bengtsson A, Andersson R, Ansari D. The actual 5-year survivors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on real-world data. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 2;10(1):16425. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73525-y. PubMed 33009477 ↗
  • de Muynck LDAN, White KP, Alseidi A, Bannone E, Boni L, Bouvet M, Falconi M, Fuchs HF, Ghadimi M, Gockel I, Hackert T, Ishizawa T, Kang CM, Kokudo N, Nickel F, Partelli S, Rangelova E, Swijnenburg RJ, Dip F, Rosenthal RJ, Vahrmeijer AL, Mieog JSD. Consensus Statement on the Use of Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging during Pancreatic Cancer Surgery Based on a Delphi Study: Surgeons' Perspectives on Current Use and Future Recommendations. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 20;15(3):652. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030652. PubMed 36765609 ↗
  • Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Mokadam NA, Green DW, Jones KL, Ehlers JP, Linehan D. Prospective trial of a blood supply-based technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: effect on anastomotic failure in the Whipple procedure. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Jun;194(6):746-58; discussion 759-60. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01202-4. PubMed 12081065 ↗
  • Boni L, David G, Mangano A, Dionigi G, Rausei S, Spampatti S, Cassinotti E, Fingerhut A. Clinical applications of indocyanine green (ICG) enhanced fluorescence in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):2046-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3895-x. Epub 2014 Oct 11. PubMed 25303914 ↗
  • CHERRICK GR, STEIN SW, LEEVY CM, DAVIDSON CS. Indocyanine green: observations on its physical properties, plasma decay, and hepatic extraction. J Clin Invest. 1960 Apr;39(4):592-600. doi: 10.1172/JCI104072. No abstract available. PubMed 13809697 ↗
  • Keller DS, Ishizawa T, Cohen R, Chand M. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in colorectal surgery: overview, applications, and future directions. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct;2(10):757-766. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30216-9. PubMed 28895551 ↗
  • Hackethal A, Hirschburger M, Eicker SO, Mucke T, Lindner C, Buchweitz O. Role of Indocyanine Green in Fluorescence Imaging with Near-Infrared Light to Identify Sentinel Lymph Nodes, Lymphatic Vessels and Pathways Prior to Surgery - A Critical Evaluation of Options. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018 Jan;78(1):54-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-123937. Epub 2018 Jan 22. PubMed 29375146 ↗
  • Degett TH, Andersen HS, Gogenur I. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography for intraoperative assessment of gastrointestinal anastomotic perfusion: a systematic review of clinical trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Sep;401(6):767-75. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1400-9. Epub 2016 Mar 11. PubMed 26968863 ↗
  • Doussot A, Decrock M, Calame P, Georges P, Turco C, Lakkis Z, Heyd B. Fluorescence-based pancreas stump perfusion is associated with postoperative acute pancreatitis after pancreatoduodenectomy a prospective cohort study. Pancreatology. 2021 May 18:S1424-3903(21)00161-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.05.009. Online ahead of print. PubMed 34030965 ↗
  • Marchegiani G, Perri G, Burelli A, Zoccatelli F, Andrianello S, Luchini C, Donadello K, Bassi C, Salvia R. High-risk Pancreatic Anastomosis Versus Total Pancreatectomy After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Postoperative Outcomes and Quality of Life Analysis. Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):e905-e913. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004840. Epub 2021 Mar 4. PubMed 33914471 ↗
  • Baiocchi GL, Diana M, Boni L. Indocyanine green-based fluorescence imaging in visceral and hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: State of the art and future directions. World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 21;24(27):2921-2930. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i27.2921. PubMed 30038461 ↗
  • Hu BY, Wan T, Zhang WZ, Dong JH. Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: Analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep 14;22(34):7797-805. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7797. PubMed 27678363 ↗
  • Fuks D, Piessen G, Huet E, Tavernier M, Zerbib P, Michot F, Scotte M, Triboulet JP, Mariette C, Chiche L, Salame E, Segol P, Pruvot FR, Mauvais F, Roman H, Verhaeghe P, Regimbeau JM. Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. Am J Surg. 2009 Jun;197(6):702-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.004. Epub 2008 Sep 7. PubMed 18778804 ↗
  • Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A, Noullet S, Clavel L, Rebours V, Levy P, Sauvanet A, Ruszniewski P, Belghiti J. Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 2010 Jul;148(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.12.005. PubMed 20138325 ↗
  • Pedrazzoli S. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF): A systematic review and analysis of the POPF-related mortality rate in 60,739 patients retrieved from the English literature published between 1990 and 2015. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(19):e6858. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006858. PubMed 28489778 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is not a plan to make IPD available.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started May 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2027, 32 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 6, 2023
First posted
Jan 10, 2024
StartActual
May 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2027
Last update
Aug 21, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06198400
Responsible party
Štěpán-Ota Schütz (Surgical resident, Postgraduate student, Charles University, Czech Republic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 10, 2024
Start date
May 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 21, 2024

Study contacts

Štěpán-Ota Schutz
Contact
schutz.stepan-ota@uvn.cz
+420 7332 24 640
Michael Rousek
Contact
Michael.Rousek@uvn.cz
+420 973 202 903
Radek Pohnán
study director · Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, Czech Republic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion