CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06186141POPCORNUpdated Jul 21, 2026

Nausea and Vomiting in Postoperative Paediatric Patients With Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA): Morphine vs Oxycodone

A Phase 4 interventional study of Morphine and Oxycodone in Patient-Controlled Analgesia, sponsored by Murdoch Childrens Research Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in Australia. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-21.

Sponsored by Murdoch Childrens Research Institute · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 6 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
690
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

POPCORN trial will compare the side effects and effectiveness of Morphine versus Oxycodone medication when prescribed for use as patient controlled analgesia (PCA) for pain relief for paediatric patients after-surgery. This trial is embedded into routine patient care using the hospital electronic medical record (EMR). Participants will be randomly assigned to either medication after they enrol in the study.

The main questions the POPCORN trial aims to answer are:

  • 1. Is there a difference in the usage of medication to treat nausea and vomiting for those who received oxycodone PCA versus morphine PCA for post-surgery pain relief?
  • 2. Is there a difference in side effects or pain relief needed between the two groups?

Study activities are as follows:

  • Participants enrolled to study during their pre-operative consultation
  • Participants are randomly assigned to morphine or oxycodone
  • No further study-specific activities expected from participant after enrolment and randomisation
  • Participant receives routine medical care as planned
  • Clinicians record assessments as per routine care in electronic medical record (EMR)
  • EMR data are extracted as trial data
Read the detailed description

Morphine and oxycodone are commonly used intravenous (IV) opioids in adult and paediatric post-operative patients. Traditionally, morphine has been preferentially prescribed with PCA. However, IV oxycodone is rapidly becoming more popular. Despite systematic reviews describing their use within the adult population, very little is known about the comparative side-effect profiles of morphine versus oxycodone within the paediatric post-operative population. Both options are currently in use and considered standard of care at The Royal Children's Hospital (RCH), Melbourne, Australia. However, there is limited literature to support a clinician's choice between IV oxycodone PCA versus IV morphine PCA.

The aim of this embedded randomized controlled trial is to compare the side-effect profile of IV oxycodone PCA to IV morphine PCA in post-operative paediatric patients.

This is a single site, randomised, embedded trial with two intervention arms, namely IV morphine PCA and IV oxycodone PCA. The study will not be blinded due to the need for opioid syringes to be readily identifiable on the ward. Apart from the consent and randomisation process, there will be no change to current pre-existing practices around PCA use and patient care. Adopting a health informatics approach; patient identification, consent, randomization and reporting of outcomes will be embedded within the EMR.

The primary objective is to compare antiemetic use between the two intervention arms. The secondary objectives will be a comparison of PCA side effects, efficacy and opioid use between the two arms. Outcome data must be what is already recorded as part of usual clinical care within the EMR including: antiemetic administration, respiratory depression (new oxygen and/or high dose naloxone use), urinary retention (need for in-dwelling catheter insertion), constipation (medication laxative administration), itch (RCH Itch Score (0-4 Likert scale)), nausea and vomiting, sedation (0-4 University of Michigan Scoring System), pain (Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale/Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0-10) and total opioid consumption (mg/kg/day).

02

Conditions studied

  • Patient-Controlled Analgesia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Post-operative Pain
  • Paediatric
  • Patient-controlled analgesia
  • Paediatric analgesia
  • Post-operative
  • Embedded clinical trials
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 690 is above the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Murdoch Childrens Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 96 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Postoperative patients who are appropriate for a PCA including those aged 6 and above and up to age 18 years.
  • Those deemed appropriate for either morphine or oxycodone by their treating anaesthetist.
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score 1-3 inclusive
  • Those whose parents or legal guardians have provided informed consent on the patient's behalf.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patients with an allergy, hypersensitivity, or contraindication to morphine or oxycodone.
  • Patients in the age group with significant intellectual disability or physical incapacity rendering them incapable of using the PCA device
  • ASA score 4 or above
  • Inability or unwillingness of parent or legal guardian to provide informed consent for the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
690 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intravenous (IV) Morphine Patient controlled analgesia (PCA)

    Morphine PCA IV 20mcg/kg bolus to a maximum of 1mg with a 5-minute lockout- as per current RCH Children's Pain Management Service (CPMS) dosing and use.

    Drug: Morphine

  • Active comparator
    IV Oxycodone PCA

    Oxycodone PCA IV 20mcg/kg bolus to a maximum of 1mg with a 5-minute lockout- as per current RCH Children's Pain Management Service (CPMS) dosing and use.

    Drug: Oxycodone

Interventions

  • DrugMorphine

    Intravenous (IV) delivery via Patient Controlled Analgesia device (PCA) 20mcg/kg bolus to a maximum of 1mg with a 5-minute lockout

  • DrugOxycodone

    Intravenous (IV) delivery via Patient Controlled Analgesia device (PCA) 20mcg/kg bolus to a maximum of 1mg with a 5-minute lockout

    Also known as: Oxycodone Juno, Oxycodone HCI Medsurge

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Antiemetic use

    Prescription incidence and administration of any of the following to participant: Granisetron, Ondansetron, Droperidol, Metoclopramide, Cyclizine, Dexamethasone, and Promethazine

    Time frame: From PCA attachment to 72 hours or 4 hours after ceasing PCA, whichever is first.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Respiratory Depression

    Measured as any new oxygen and/or high dose naloxone use (10mcg/kg to max of 400mcg). This will exclude administration of low dose naloxone when used to manage incidence of itch.

    Time frame: The time at which the PCA is first attached to the child and either up to 72 hours or 4 hours after ceasing PCA, whichever is first.

  2. Incidence of Urinary Retention

    Indicated by need for an in-dwelling catheter (IDC) insertion

    Time frame: From PCA attachment to 72 hours or 4 hours after ceasing PCA, whichever is first.

  3. Reports of Itch

    Measured using RCH Itch Score (0-4 Likert scale) where a higher score indicates worse pruritus/itch. 0=comfortable, no itch, 1=itches a little, doesn't interfere with activity, 2= itches more, sometimes interferes with activity, 3= itches a lot, difficult to be still/concentrate, 4= itches most terribly, impossible to sit still/concentrate

    Time frame: From PCA attachment to 72 hours or 4 hours after ceasing PCA, whichever is first.

  4. Reports of Nausea

    Measured via 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) scale Nausea will be measured using the nausea scale (0-10 Baxter Retching Faces scale / VAS)

    Time frame: From PCA attachment to 72 hours or 4 hours after ceasing PCA, whichever is first.

  5. Sedation levels

    Measured via University of Michigan Scoring System (0-4 scale) where a higher score indicates higher sedation level. 0= awake and alert, 1= minimally sedated, 2=moderately sedated, 3=deep sedation, 4=unrousable

    Time frame: From PCA attachment to 72 hours or 4 hours after ceasing PCA, whichever is first.

  6. Incidence of Constipation

    Recorded laxative administered is indicative. Medication laxatives only, no food laxatives.

    Time frame: From PCA attachment to 72 hours or 4 hours after ceasing PCA, whichever is first.

  7. Reported pain levels

    Measured via Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale or Visual Analogue Scale (0-10) higher is more pain. If both a pain scale and a rating are reported but don't align the higher of the two will be used.

    Time frame: From PCA attachment to 72 hours or 4 hours after ceasing PCA, whichever is first.

  8. Total opioid consumption

    All opioids administered, including any background infusions are accurately documented in the EMR. Total opioid administered will be calculated from the EMR. The total morphine equivalent dose will be calculated.

    Time frame: From PCA attachment to 72 hours or 4 hours after ceasing PCA, whichever is first.

  9. Incidence of Vomiting

    Incidence of vomiting will be measured using the documentation of number of vomiting episodes. This will be reported for each day over the study period.

    Time frame: From PCA attachment to 72 hours or 4 hours after ceasing PCA, whichever is first.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Beginning 12 months following analysis and article publication, the following will be made available long-term for use by future researchers from a recognised research institution whose proposed use of the data has been ethically reviewed and approved by the Murdoch Children's Research Institute's (MCRI's) independent data use review committee (not including trial sponsor-investigator) and who accept MCRI's conditions, under a collaborator agreement, for accessing participant data after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) that underlies reported results, along with trial protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and Participant Information and Consent Forms (PICF).

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06186141
Lead sponsor
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 29, 2023
Start date
Mar 13, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 21, 2026

Study contacts

Justine Adams
Contact
justine.adams@mcri.edu.au
03 8341 6200
Suzette Sheppard
Contact
Suzette.sheppard@mcri.edu.au
03 9345 4901
Sue May Koh
principal investigator · Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion