CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06183619Updated Feb 14, 2025

Superior Vena Cava Isolation Plus Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

An observational study in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-14.

Sponsored by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
400
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has limited success. The superior vena cava (SVC) has been identified as one of the most common non-pulmonary vein triggers for PAF. It is estimated that SVC isolation (SVCI) could improve the clinical results of patients with PAF. However, results from previous studies about SVCI remain controversial. Safety concerns for SVCI may outweigh its benefits and lead to inadequate ablation. To address this issue, the introduction of a quantitative ablation index (AI) for SVCI may provide a solution. Therefore, the investigators sought to initiate a retrospective, multi-center study, to explore the efficacy and safety of quantitative SVCI in addition to PVI in PAF.

Read the detailed description

Catheter ablation has emerged as an effective treatment for drug-refractory PAF and is recommended as first-line therapy by current guidelines. PVI is considered the cornerstone of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, despite persistent PVI, a subgroup of patients may experience recurrent AF due to focal ectopic discharges originating outside the pulmonary veins. Among the non-pulmonary vein triggers, the SVC stands out as a common culprit, making it a promising ablation target for maintaining sinus rhythm. Nevertheless, results from previous studies that evaluated the efficacy of SVCI showed conflicting results. One possible explanation is that SVC is adjacent to critical anatomical structures (such as the sinus node and the phrenic nerve), which raises safety concerns and often leads to inadequate ablation.

Therefore, it is necessary to establish a standardized ablation procedure for SVCI, ensuring both safety and efficacy. To address this issue, the investigators proposed the concept of "quantitative ablation for SVCI." By introducing AI as a quantitative measure, it is possible to achieve precise catheter ablation while minimizing the risk of procedure-related complications.

This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of quantitative AI-guided SVCI in addition to PVI. Participants with PAF who required catheter ablation will be consecutively enrolled in three hospitals in China.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 300 across 1,363 observational studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital is the lead sponsor of 141 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Symptomatic paroxysmal AF that are unresponsive to antiarrhythmic drugs (one or more than one).

Inclusion criteria

  • Symptomatic paroxysmal AF that are unresponsive to antiarrhythmic drugs (one or more than one).
  • Willing to undergo catheter ablation for AF.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of any type of catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias.
  • Sinus node dysfunction that requires permanent pacemaker implantation.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Pulmonary vein isolation plus superior vena cava isolation

    Procedure: Pulmonary vein isolation plus superior vena cava isolation

  • Pulmonary vein isolation

    Procedure: Pulmonary vein isolation

Interventions

  • ProcedurePulmonary vein isolation plus superior vena cava isolation

    Pulmonary vein isolation plus superior vena cava isolation

  • ProcedurePulmonary vein isolation

    Pulmonary vein isolation only

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. AT/AF recurrence

    atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia over 30s

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Fuwai hospital
    Beijing, Beijing 100037, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06183619
Lead sponsor
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
Responsible party
Jun Liu,MD (Attending doctor, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 27, 2023
Start date
Feb 1, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2024
Completion
May 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 14, 2025

Study contacts

Jun Liu, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Fuwai hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion