CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06172946Updated Feb 18, 2025

Effect of Powerbreath Versus Transcutaneous Electrical Diaphragmatic Stimulation on The Severity of Copd

An interventional study of powerbreath and TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL DIAPHRAGMATIC STIMULATION in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, sponsored by Cairo University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to male participants aged 45 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-18.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Mar 2024, 2 years 6 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common and treatable disease characterized by progressive airflow limitation and tissue destruction. It is associated with structural lung changes due to chronic inflammation from prolonged exposure to noxious particles or gases most commonly cigarette smoke.

POWERbreathe device (POWER-breathe International Ltd., Southam, Warwickshire, UK) is an inspiratory muscle training and this device has recently shown benefits on pulmonary function. Also, the POWER-breathe® device's effects on the strength of the diaphragm muscle and minimize muscle weakness and wasting in COPD patients.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is commonly used in physical therapy to increase muscle strength and promote muscle hypertrophy. NMES applied to respiratory rehabilitation is called transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation (TEDS).

Read the detailed description

sixty Patients will be assigned randomly into two equal groups with pre and post treatment protocol application.

Group A:

Thirty patients will be treated by power breathe along with their prescribed medication.

Group B:

Thirty patients will be treated by Transcutaneous electrical Diaphragmatic Stimulation (TEDS) along with their prescribed medication.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
03

In context

Lung Diseases, Obstructive

2,592 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases, Obstructive; 198 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 66 across 1,837 interventional studies indexed under Lung Diseases, Obstructive.

Browse Lung Diseases, Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • The patient selection will be according to the following criteria:

    1. Male patients diagnosed with stage 2\&3 COPD.
    2. All patients are under full medical control.
    3. Their ages will range from forty-five to sixty-five years.
    4. Patients with BMI from 25-29.9 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with the following criteria will be excluded from the study:

    1. Lack of language or cognitive abilities to fill out questionnaire.
    2. Patients with cardiac pacemaker.
    3. Contraindications for inspiratory muscle training (e.g. a history of recent lung surgery, recent pulmonary embolism, history of recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax, other serious lung disease).
    4. Existing arterial aneurysm.
    5. Clinical signs of unstable cardiac event (eg. congestive heart failure).
    6. Patients with malignant disease.
    7. Acute COPD exacerbation within the last 4 weeks.
    8. Any need for supplemental oxygen.
    9. Patients with Gastro-esophageal reflux disease.
    10. Patients with active Hemoptysis.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    INSPIRATORY MUSCLE TRAINING

    Power Breathe: (3times/week for 8 weeks) The patient should inhale and exhale through the mouthpiece 30 times maximum. The training load is adjustable and should be set at a level appropriate for the patient to effectively train the inspiratory muscles. (Lázaro et al., 2021)

    Device: powerbreath

  • Active comparator
    TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL DIAPHRAGMATIC STIMULATION

    Transcutaneous electrical Diaphragmatic Stimulation(TEDS): (3times/week for 8 weeks) During each session, rectangular electrodes were placed on the parasternal region beside the xiphoid process; the sixth and seventh intercostal spaces in line with the mid-axillary line. The electrical current is pulsed, biphasic and symmetric, with the following parameters: frequency of 30 Hertz; 0.4ms phase width, rise time of 0.7 seconds; respiratory rate of 14 rpm; intensity is the minimum necessary to obtain diaphragm muscle contraction. TEDS intensity was gradually increased until visible muscle contraction was observed. (Hsin et al., 2022)

    Device: TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL DIAPHRAGMATIC STIMULATION

Interventions

  • Devicepowerbreath

    Previous studies have confirmed the efficacy of implementing IMT as part of a RR program in a certain profile of patients with COPD, showing improvements in maximum inspiratory pressure, perception of well-being, and other respiratory diseases, and dyspnea during exercise. (Gandullo et al., 2022)

  • DeviceTRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL DIAPHRAGMATIC STIMULATION

    Transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation (TEDS) has been used to improve respiratory muscle strength in patients with respiratory muscle weakness. A previous study reported that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) showed increased lung volume and oxygen saturation after a single session of TEDS. (Hsin et al., 2022)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The COPD Assessment Test (CAT)

    The COPD Assessment Test(CAT) is validated questionnaire consisting of eight items, which evaluate the most burdensome symptoms and limitations of the patients. The score for each item ranges from 0 to 5 and the total score (0-40)

    Time frame: COPD Assessment Test will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured again after eight weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pulmonary function: By Spirometry Device:

    • Pulmonary function: By Spirometry Device: it measure ventilatory functions. forced vital capacity (FVC)

    Time frame: Pulmonary function: By Spirometry Device: forced vital capacity will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured again after eight weeks

  2. Pulmonary function: By Spirometry Device:

    • Pulmonary function: By Spirometry Device: it measure ventilatory functions. forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)

    Time frame: Pulmonary function: By Spirometry Device: forced expiratory volume in one second will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured again after eight weeks

  3. Pulmonary function: By Spirometry Device:

    • Pulmonary function: By Spirometry Device: it measure ventilatory functions. forced expiratory volume in one second/forced expiratory volume (FEV1/FVC)

    Time frame: Pulmonary function: By Spirometry Device: forced expiratory volume in one second/forced expiratory volume will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured again after eight weeks

  4. Pulmonary function: By Spirometry Device:

    • Pulmonary function: By Spirometry Device: it measure ventilatory functions. forced expiratory floe(FEF25-75%)

    Time frame: Pulmonary function: By Spirometry Device: forced expiratory flow will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured again after eight weeks

  5. Diaphragmatic Thickness: By Ultrasonography:

    • Diaphragmatic Thickness: By Ultrasonography: provides a simple and non-invasive means of assessing diaphragmatic function. (Boussuges et al., 2020)

    Time frame: Diaphragmatic Thickness: By Ultrasonography:will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured again after eight weeks

  6. Measuring functional capacity: By Six-minute walk test (6MWT):

    • Measuring functional capacity: By Six-minute walk test (6MWT): is a self paced submaximal field exercise test , It will be performed according to the standard procedure is administered in a 30 meter hallway. (Launois et al., 2012 and ATS statement2002)

    Time frame: Measuring functional capacity: By Six-minute walk test (6MWT)::will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured again after eight weeks

  7. Modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC dyspnea scale):

    • Dyspnea: By Modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC dyspnea scale): It is a 5 point scale based on degrees of variable physical activities that precipitate dyspnea with a score ranging from 0 to 4. (Richards, 2017)

    Time frame: Modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC dyspnea scale):will be measured at baseline, and it will be measured again after eight weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cairo University
    Cairo, 11432, Egypt
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06172946
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Alaa Mohamed El-Moatasem Mohamed (lecturer of physical therapy, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 15, 2023
Start date
Dec 12, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 25, 2024
Completion
Jan 1, 2025
Last update
Feb 18, 2025

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion