ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06160778KETOAPPUpdated Jun 24, 2024

Intravenous Ketorolac Vs. Morphine In Children With Acute Abdominal Pain

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ketorolac Tromethamine and Morphine Sulfate in Acute Pain, Abdomen, Acute and Abdominal Pain, sponsored by University of Calgary. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-24.

Sponsored by University of Calgary · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2024; still recruiting 2 years 5 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
495
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Appendicitis is a common condition in children 6-17 years of age, and the top reason for emergency surgery in Canada. Children with appendicitis can have very bad pain in their belly. Children often need pain medications given to them through a needle in their arm called an intravenous (IV). The most common IV pain medication is a type of opioid called morphine. We know that opioids work well to improve pain, but there are risks and side effects when taking them. There are non-opioid medications that doctors can give to patients, like ketorolac. Ketorolac helps decrease inflammation and pain and has fewer side effects when a patient takes it for a short period of time. Our past and present overuse of opioids, driven by an unproven assumption that opioids work best for pain, resulted in an Opioid Crisis and doctors are now looking for alternatives. To do this, we need to prove that there are other options to treat children's pain that are just as good as opioids, with less side effects.

The goal of our study is to discover if school aged children who arrive at the emergency department with belly pain, improve just as much with ketorolac as they do with morphine. To answer this question, we will need a very large number of patients in a study that includes several hospitals across Canada. With a flip of a coin, each participant will either get a single dose of morphine or a single dose of ketorolac. To make sure that our pain assessment is impartial, no one will know which medicine the child received except the pharmacist who prepared the medicine.

Read the detailed description

Background: Appendicitis, the most common surgical diagnosis in Canadian children aged 6-17 years, accounts for \~8000 admissions annually. Despite an ongoing opioid crisis, prescription narcotics remain a mainstay analgesic for children with suspected appendicitis. Ketorolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), which has a safer adverse event (AE) profile than opioids, is commonly used in emergency departments (EDs) for adults; however, use in children is considered off label due to a lack of randomized trials in this patient population. We propose a multi-centre clinical trial to address this knowledge gap,informed by our team's successful pilot trial.

Specific Aim 1: To determine if administering intravenous (IV) ketorolac is non inferior to IV morphine in reducing mean pain scores in children with suspected appendicitis.

Hypothesis: IV ketorolac will be non-inferior to IV morphine

Specific Aim 2: To determine between group differences in rates of AEs. Hypothesis: IV ketorolac will be associated with less AEs than IV morphine.

Design: A randomized quadruple blind (participant, clinician, outcome assessor, investigator) parallel group double-dummy trial in 4 Canadian pediatric EDs. Eligible patients will be 6-17 years with 5-days of moderate-severe pain (vNRS ≥5 ) being investigated for suspected appendicitis, with intravenous (IV) access, will be randomized to either:

  1. IV ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg up to 30 mg (intervention) + IV morphine placebo (normal saline), or
  2. IV morphine 0.1 mg/kg up to 5 mg (active control) + IV ketorolac placebo (normal saline).

Primary outcome: Between-group mean difference in pain on the vNRS at 60 minutes following administration.

Safety outcome: Proportion of children experiencing AEs related to study drug administration.

Secondary Outcomes: Between-group differences: (1) pain relief as measured on vNRS at 30, 90 and 120 minutes and at 6-8 hours; (2) proportion who achieves a 2-point vNRS (minimal important difference) pain score reduction at 60 and 120 minutes; (3) proportion of patients who change their baseline pain category (vNRS: mild 0-3, moderate 4-6, severe ≥7) at each time point; (4) time to effective analgesia as measured by the time when vNRS of \<3 is achieved (5) proportion of patients requiring additional analgesia; (6) total opioids administered (i.e., morphine equivalent mg/kg within 8 hours of treatment); (7) frequency of specific types of AEs (e.g., dizziness); (8) frequency of delayed appendicitis diagnosis; and (9) Ramsay Sedation Score at 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes.

Sample size:With a non-inferiority margin of 1.0 (50% of the minimal important difference), 600 participants would give a power of 0.9 (1- β) to establish non-inferiority of ketorolac vs. morphine (significance level α = 0.05).

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Pain
  • Abdomen, Acute
  • Abdominal Pain
  • Appendicitis
  • Emergencies
  • Child, Only
03

In context

Acute Pain

1,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Pain; 166 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 495 is above the median of 86 across 902 interventional studies indexed under Acute Pain.

Browse Acute Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Calgary is the lead sponsor of 703 studies on the registry; 196 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 6 to 17 years
  2. Abdominal pain ≤5 days duration
  3. Acute abdominal pain that is being investigated (suspected) by the clinical team for appendicitis
  4. Patient with IV cannula in situ or ordered
  5. Currently experiencing moderate to severe abdominal pain at rest or with movement: self-reported pain score ≥5 using the verbal Numerical Rating Scale

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous enrollment in the trial
  2. NSAID use within 3 hours and/or opioid use within 1 to 2 hours (1 hour post-IV or intra-nasal fentanyl and 2 hours post IV morphine).
  3. Children who need immediate resuscitation, are hemodynamically unstable as deemed by the clinical team or have a Canadian Triage Assessment Score of 1
  4. Significant caregiver and/or child cognitive impairment precluding the ability to complete study questions.
  5. Chronic pain requiring daily analgesic use: confounding as response to analgesics maybe altered.
  6. History of severe undiagnosed gastrointestinal bleeding requiring medical intervention, peptic or duodenal ulcer disease or inflammatory bowel disease, coagulation disorders, prior cerebrovascular bleeding, known arterio-vascular malformations. History of minor gastrointestinal bleeding from conditions such as resolved fissures, polyps or allergic colitis will not exclude patients from participating.
  7. History of chronic and active interstitial kidney disease
  8. History of chronic and active hepatocellular disease: ketorolac is metabolized by the liver.
  9. Known or suspected pregnancy at the time of enrollment or breastfeeding females
  10. Known to NSAIDs or opioids.
  11. Absence of a parent/guardian for children who are \<16 years of age if they are not a mature minor.
  12. Inability to obtain consent due to a language barrier and the absence of language translator in person or by a phone translation service available in the ED.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
495 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ketorolac Tromethamine

    Ketorolac tromethamine, an NSAID belonging to a group of non-opioid analgesics that inhibit the synthesis of prostaglandins and thromboxanes with strong analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. It is the only non-opioid parenteral non-sedating analgesic available in Canada for use to treat acute pain in the emergency department.

    Drug: Ketorolac Tromethamine · Drug: normal saline

  • Active comparator
    Morphine Sulfate

    An intravenous opioid that is commonly used as part of usual care for treament of pain in patients with acute abdominal pain and suspected appendicitis.

    Drug: Morphine Sulfate · Drug: Normal saline

Interventions

  • Intravenous ketorolac given at 0.5 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 30 mg in a single dose.

  • Intravenous morphine given at 0.1 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 5 mg in a single dose.

  • Drugnormal saline

    Intravenous normal saline placebo (labelled as morphine) given at 0.1 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 5 mg in a single dose.

    Also known as: Morphine Sulfate Placebo

  • DrugNormal saline

    Intravenous normal saline placebo (labelled as ketorolac) given at 0.5 mg/kg of body weight up to a maximum of 30 mg in a single dose.

    Also known as: Ketorolac Tromethamine Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain relief as measured on the verbal numerical rating scale

    Between group mean differences in pain as measured on an 11-point verbal Numerical Rating Scale (0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain ever)

    Time frame: 60 minutes post drug administration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain relief as measured on the verbal numerical rating scale

    Between group mean differences in pain as measured on an 11-point verbal

    Time frame: 30 minutes post drug administration

  2. Pain relief as measured on the verbal numerical rating scale

    Between group mean differences in pain as measured on an 11-point verbal

    Time frame: 90 minutes post drug administration

  3. Pain relief as measured on the verbal numerical rating scale

    Between group mean differences in pain as measured on an 11-point verbal

    Time frame: 120 minutes post drug administration

  4. Pain relief as measured on the verbal numerical rating scale

    Between group mean differences in pain as measured on an 11-point verbal

    Time frame: 6 hours post drug administration

  5. Pain relief as measured on the verbal numerical rating scale during the ultrasound diagnostic

    score from 0-10 on verbal numerical rating scale

    Time frame: up to 6 hours post drug administration

  6. Proportion who achieve the minimal important difference for pain relief

    Proportion of participants who achieves the 2-point verbal Numerical Rating Scale minimal important difference pain score reduction

    Time frame: 60 minutes post drug administration

  7. Proportion who achieve the minimal important difference for pain relief

    Proportion of participants who achieves the 2-point verbal Numerical Rating Scale minimal important difference pain score reduction

    Time frame: 120 minutes post drug administration

  8. Change in baseline pain category

    Proportion of participants who change the severity of their baseline pain category. Pain categories on the verbal numerical rating scale as follows: mild = 0 to 4, moderate = 5 to 7, severe \>7)

    Time frame: 30 minutes post drug administration

  9. Change in baseline pain category

    Proportion of participants who change the severity of their baseline pain category. Pain categories on the verbal numerical rating scale as follows: mild = 0 to 4, moderate = 5 to 7, severe \>7)

    Time frame: 60 minutes post drug administration

  10. Change in baseline pain category

    Proportion of participants who change the severity of their baseline pain category. Pain categories on the verbal numerical rating scale as follows: mild = 0 to 4, moderate = 5 to 7, severe \>7)

    Time frame: 90 minutes post drug administration

  11. Change in baseline pain category

    Proportion of participants who change the severity of their baseline pain category. Pain categories on the verbal numerical rating scale as follows: mild = 0 to 4, moderate = 5 to 7, severe \>7)

    Time frame: 120 minutes post drug administration

  12. Change in baseline pain category

    Proportion of participants who change the severity of their baseline pain category. Pain categories on the verbal numerical rating scale as follows: mild = 0 to 4, moderate = 5 to 7, severe \>7)

    Time frame: 6 hours post drug administration

  13. Time to effective analgesia

    Duration of time from time of drug administration to time at which a verbal Numerical Rating Scale ≤3 is achieved.

    Time frame: up to 6 hours post drug administration

  14. Additional analgesia requirment

    Proportion of participants requiring any additional analgesia in each trial arm

    Time frame: up to 6 hours post drug administration

  15. Total opioids administered

    total morphine-equivalent mg/kg administered for all trial participants

    Time frame: up to 8 hours post drug administration

  16. Ramsay sedation score

    Assessment of sedation levels post drug administration; score is 1-6 (1 is alert, 6 is not responsive)

    Time frame: 30 minutes post drug administration

  17. Ramsay sedation score

    Assessment of sedation levels post drug administration; score is 1-6 (1 is alert, 6 is not responsive)

    Time frame: 60 minutes post drug administration

  18. Ramsay sedation score

    Assessment of sedation levels post drug administration; score is 1-6 (1 is alert, 6 is not responsive)

    Time frame: 90 minutes post drug administration

  19. Ramsay sedation score

    Assessment of sedation levels post drug administration; score is 1-6 (1 is alert, 6 is not responsive)

    Time frame: 120 minutes post drug administration

  20. Adverse events per participant

    Frequency of specific adverse event occurrence per participant enrolled

    Time frame: up to 6 hours post drug administration

  21. Frequency of each specific adverse event

    Frequency of each specific adverse event occurrence

    Time frame: up to 6 hours post drug administration

Other outcomes

  1. Appendix visualization on ultrasound

    proportion of participants who had the appendix visualized on ultrasound

    Time frame: post-randomization and up to 8 hours post-intervention.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Alberta Children's Hospital Emergency Department
    Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — At the completion of the study and publication of main manuscript, anonymized participant data can be shared upon reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: within 10 years of study completion

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06160778
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 7, 2023
Start date
May 27, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 24, 2024

Study contacts

Mohamed M Eltorki, MBChB, MSc
Contact
mmeltork@ucalgary.ca
+1403-955-7723
Angela Wallace
Contact
angela.wallace@ahs.ca
403-955-5451
Mohamed Eltorki, MBChB
principal investigator · University of Calgary

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ketorolac Tromethamine

Start the discussion