A Phase 2 interventional study of PET scan of 68Ga-FAPI in Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis, sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-09.
Sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France · Phase 2, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), estimated to be 17% prevalent in France, can lead to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which in turn can progress to fibrosis, the ultimate stage of which is cirrhosis, a major cause of liver transplantation. The prevalence of NASH is increasing worldwide, along with that of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Significant liver fibrosis is estimated to affect at least 2.6% of the adult population in France.
The prognosis of patients with NASH is directly linked to the stage of liver fibrosis determined by biopsy, and these biopsies must now be repeated to assess the effect of treatments. Hepatic fibrosis is traditionally classified into five stages, from the absence of fibrosis (F0) to severe cirrhosis (F4), and passage from one stage to another is considered to demonstrate significant variation, likely to impact prognosis.
However, liver biopsy is painful. It can only analyze a very small proportion of liver volume (1/50,000), whereas the distribution of fibrosis is generally heterogeneous. Above all, biopsy is not devoid of risks, primarily hemorrhage, which can sometimes be severe or even fatal.
In line with current recommendations, clinical-biological algorithms, as well as ultrasound elastography or MRI, are used to assess the risk of fibrosis and the value of a liver biopsy. Generally speaking, these tests have the advantage of very good negative predictive values, making it possible to exclude the possibility of significant fibrosis in a large proportion of patients. However, their positive predictive values are weaker, even when these tests are combined. Above all, they do not allow us to follow the evolution of the fibrosis stage over time. This is why liver biopsies remain indispensable for determining the stage and severity of hepatic fibrosis and monitoring its evolution. It is therefore essential to develop more precise, non-invasive methods for accurately assessing the extent of liver fibrosis. This is the objective of the FreSH national cohort, which uses conventional biological techniques and in which our patients will also be included.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), estimated to be 17% prevalent in France, can lead to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which in turn can progress to fibrosis, the ultimate stage of which is cirrhosis, a major cause of liver transplantation. The prevalence of NASH is increasing worldwide, along with that of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Significant liver fibrosis is estimated to affect at least 2.6% of the adult population in France The prognosis of patients with NASH is directly linked to the stage of liver fibrosis determined by biopsy, and these biopsies must now be repeated to assess the effect of treatments. Hepatic fibrosis is traditionally classified into five stages, from the absence of fibrosis (F0) to severe cirrhosis (F4), and passage from one stage to another is considered to demonstrate significant variation, likely to impact prognosis.
However, liver biopsy is painful. It can only analyze a very small proportion of liver volume (1/50,000), whereas the distribution of fibrosis is generally heterogeneous. Above all, biopsy is not devoid of risks, primarily hemorrhage, which can sometimes be severe or even fatal.
In line with current recommendations, clinical-biological algorithms, as well as ultrasound elastography or MRI, are used to assess the risk of fibrosis and the value of a liver biopsy. Generally speaking, these tests have the advantage of very good negative predictive values, making it possible to exclude the possibility of significant fibrosis in a large proportion of patients. However, their positive predictive values are weaker, even when these tests are combined. Above all, they do not allow us to follow the evolution of the fibrosis stage over time. This is why liver biopsies remain indispensable for determining the stage and severity of hepatic fibrosis and monitoring its evolution. It is therefore essential to develop more precise, non-invasive methods for accurately assessing the extent of liver fibrosis. This is the objective of the FreSH national cohort, which uses conventional biological techniques and in which our patients will also be included.
The hypothesis behind this initial pilot study is that 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT imaging, which targets fibroblast activating protein (FAP), could provide a precise assessment of the severity and stages of liver fibrosis, as well as its distribution throughout the liver volume, and could ultimately be a useful tool for non-invasive monitoring of patients undergoing treatment. This technique has already been validated for the detection of numerous cancers, including hepatocarcinomas, and is capable of assessing renal fibrosis (pilot study with 15 patients), with a good correlation to biopsy and a direct link to glomerular filtration rate.
Targeted receptor (FAP) data also strongly support our hypothesis:
The HEFITEP study will assess for the first time the discriminative power of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT for grading liver fibrosis with reference to centrally analyzed liver biopsy in patients biopsied for suspected or proven non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).
1,451 studies on the registry are indexed under Fatty Liver; 292 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 72 is above the median of 60 across 1,003 interventional studies indexed under Fatty Liver.
Browse Fatty Liver studies →Central Hospital, Nancy, France is the lead sponsor of 778 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Use of a positron emission tomograph equipped with an X-ray scanner (PET/CT), essential for recording images after injection of a positron-emitting radiopharmaceutical (in this study, 68Ga-FAPI-46).
Drug: PET scan of 68Ga-FAPI
Use of a positron emission tomograph equipped with an X-ray scanner (PET/CT), essential for recording images after injection of a positron-emitting radiopharmaceutical (in this study, 68Ga-FAPI-46).
Capture intensity measurement
Measurement of 68Ga-FAPI-46 uptake intensity, with standardized uptake values in areas centred on the biopsy sites, the reference then being a classification of fibrosis stages determined by centralized biopsy rereading
Time frame: 1 year
Standardized Uptake Value threshold values associated with each of the four fibrosis histological stage groups
Standardized Uptake Value threshold values associated with each of the four fibrosis histological stage groups (stages 4, 3, 2 and \< 2) by the naive Bayes classifier.
Time frame: 1 year
Localization of the capture zone with maximum activity
Localization of the capture zone with maximum activity (SUVmax and SUV pic zones, respectively)
Time frame: 1 year
Search, on whole-body images, for 68Ga-FAPI-46 uptake
Search, on whole-body images, for 68Ga-FAPI-46 uptake foci located outside the tracer's normal elimination zones (urinary excretory tracts), and which may correspond to abnormal areas of fibrosis and/or inflammation, or even cancer
Time frame: 1 year
Intra-class correlation coefficients
Intra-class correlation coefficients and their 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: 1 year
Variation in the degree of prediction of the four groups of histological stages of fibrosis
Variation in the degree of prediction of the four groups of histological stages of fibrosis when variables from 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT are added to variables from usual clinical-biological scores
Time frame: 1 year
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Central Hospital, Nancy, France