ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06159023Updated Apr 16, 2024

Conventional Bronchoscope With BAL vs. Thin Bronchoscope With BW to Diagnose Pulmonary TB

An interventional study of bronchial washing using a thin bronchoscope in Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, sponsored by Pusan National University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-16.

Sponsored by Pusan National University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Dec 2023; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
132
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to compare the diagnostic yield of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) using a thick conventional bronchoscope and bronchial washing (BW) using a thin bronchoscope in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Read the detailed description

In patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), confirm the presence of TB bacilli through sputum testing is essential for diagnosis. However, the sensitivity of sputum specimens is suboptimal, and some patients may be unable to produce sputum. In such situations, it is traditionally known that obtaining samples through bronchoscopy increases the diagnostic yield of pulmonary TB. Typically, the method of using a thick, conventional bronchoscope to perform bronchial washing (BW) or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is commonly employed. However, a drawback of the conventional bronchoscope is its inability to reach close to peripheral pulmonary TB lesions due to its larger diameter.

Recent studies have reported an increased diagnostic yield for pulmonary TB when using a thin bronchoscope for BW compared to using a thick, conventional bronchoscope for BW. However, a direct comparison with the method of performing BAL (BAL may have a higher diagnostic yield compared to BW) using a conventional bronchoscope has not been conducted. This study aims to prospectively compare the diagnostic yield for pulmonary TB between BAL using a conventional bronchoscope and BW using a thin bronchoscope.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
03

In context

Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

319 studies on the registry are indexed under Tuberculosis, Pulmonary; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 132 is close to the median of 146 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Tuberculosis, Pulmonary.

Browse Tuberculosis, Pulmonary studies →

Lead sponsor

Pusan National University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 80 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • participants age > 17 years with suspected pulmonary TB
  • possible active pulmonary TB evident on chest radiography or CT scan
  • negative AFB smear results (using two consecutive self-expectorated sputum)
  • negative TB-PCR results (using one self-expectorated sputum)
  • inability to produce self-expectorated sputum

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a request for empirical TB treatment rather than bronchoscopy
  • suspect pulmonary TB lesions that are difficult to target for BAL or BW (e.g., multiple discrete tiny nodules)
  • of bronchoscopy (e.g., bleeding tendency, hypoxemia requiring oxygen, or uncontrolled cardio/cerebrovascular disease)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
132 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Thick scope + BAL

    In this arm, participants with suspected pulmonary TB will be received bronchoscopic procedure using thick (5.9mm diameter) conventional bronchoscope and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL).

  • Experimental
    Thin scope + BW

    In this arm, participants with suspected pulmonary TB will be received bronchoscopic procedure using thin (4.0mm diameter) bronchoscope and bronchial washing (BW).

    Device: bronchial washing using a thin bronchoscope

Interventions

  • Devicebronchial washing using a thin bronchoscope

    For intervention, we plan to perform bronchial washing using a thin bronchoscope instead of bronchoalveolar lavage with the conventional thick bronchoscope to diagnose pulmonary TB.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. TB detection rate

    Positivity rate of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in BAL or BW fluid

    Time frame: within 2 weeks of bronchoscopy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture

    Positivity rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture in BAL or BW fluid

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of bronchoscopy

  2. AFB(acid-fast bacilli) smear

    Positivity rate of AFB smear in BAL or BW fluid

    Time frame: within 2 weeks of bronchoscopy

  3. Adverse event

    Adverse event related/unrelated to bronchoscopy

    Time frame: within 2 weeks of bronchoscopy

  4. Time to treatment

    Time to treatment (TB treatment commencing date - bronchoscopy date, day) in participants with confirmed TB

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of bronchoscopy

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2024, 12 months after the start.

Of 42 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 29. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 42 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 29.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 28, 2023
First posted
Dec 6, 2023
StartActual
Dec 15, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Apr 16, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06159023
Lead sponsor
Pusan National University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 6, 2023
Start date
Dec 15, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 16, 2024

Study contacts

Jeongha Mok
Contact
mokgamokga@gmail.com
82-51-240-7889
Jeongha Mok
principal investigator · Pusan National University Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion