ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06752395Updated Jan 3, 2025

Cryobiopsy Vs. Forceps Biopsy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

An interventional study of Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Cryobiopsy centered) and Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Forceps biopsy centered) in Lung Cancer (NSCLC), sponsored by Pusan National University Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 3 sites in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-03.

Sponsored by Pusan National University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Nov 2025, 1 year ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This multicenter clinical trial evaluates the diagnostic yields of cryobiopsy and forceps biopsy for peripheral lung nodules. In the cryobiopsy group, cryobiopsy is the primary method, supplemented by forceps biopsy. Conversely, in the forceps biopsy group, forceps biopsy is the primary method, supplemented by cryobiopsy. The study also explores the complementary relationship between the two methods and examines differences in diagnostic rates based on the order in which the procedures are performed.

Read the detailed description

This is a multi center, clinical trial evaluating the diagnostic yields of cryobiopsy and forceps biopsy methods used for the biopsy of peripheral lung nodules. In the cryobiopsy group, cryobiopsy is the primary method, with forceps biopsy used as an auxiliary technique, while in the forceps biopsy group, forceps biopsy is the primary method, with cryobiopsy as the auxiliary technique. The study also investigates the complementary relationship between these biopsy methods and evaluates differences in diagnostic rates based on the sequence of the procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Keywords

  • Bronchoscpy
  • Cryobiopsy
  • Forceps biopsy
  • Lung cancer
  • Radial probe EBUS
03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

5,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,346 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 60 across 3,656 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Pusan National University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 80 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Obtained written
  • Subjects having \<30mm nodule on computed tomography
  • Subjects without to brochoscopy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with central lesions that can be visually confirmed by bronchoscopy or those with suspicious findings of cancer in the mediastinal lymph nodes, who do not require radial bronchial endoscopic ultrasound (RP-EBUS).
  • Patients who cannot discontinue medications that increase bleeding risk, such as antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants.
  • Patients with bleeding disorders (e.g., count \< 100,000/mm³).
  • Patients with severe comorbidities (e.g., serious respiratory or cardiovascular diseases) that make bronchoscopy unsafe.
  • Patients with or allergies to drugs commonly used in endoscopic procedures, including lidocaine, midazolam, fentanyl, or flumazenil.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients.
  • Patients with confirmed lung cancer undergoing rebiopsy for genetic testing or other purposes.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cryobiopsy

    Cryobiopsy Group (Primary: Cryobiopsy, Auxiliary: Forceps Biopsy) In this group, cryobiopsy is performed as the primary biopsy method for sampling peripheral lung nodules. After the cryobiopsy is completed, forceps biopsy is conducted as an auxiliary method to obtain additional tissue samples.

    Diagnostic Test: Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Cryobiopsy centered)

  • Experimental
    Forceps biopsy

    Forceps Biopsy Group (Primary: Forceps Biopsy, Auxiliary: Cryobiopsy) In this group, forceps biopsy is performed as the primary biopsy method for sampling peripheral lung nodules. Following the forceps biopsy, cryobiopsy is conducted as an auxiliary method to obtain additional tissue samples.

    Diagnostic Test: Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Forceps biopsy centered)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testTransbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Cryobiopsy centered)

    When the lung nodule is visualized by bronchoscope using RP-EBUS, cryobiopsy is performed, followed by forceps biopsy.

  • Diagnostic testTransbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Forceps biopsy centered)

    When the lung nodule is visualized by bronchoscope using RP-EBUS, forceps biopsy is performed, followed by cryobiopsy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The overall cumulative diagnostic yield

    Pathologic diagnostic yield of primary method and overall procedures

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnosis Rate According to Lesion Size

    This outcome measures the diagnostic success rate based on the size of the peripheral lung nodule. Lesions are categorized by size (e.g., \<20 mm, 20 mm-30mm) to determine whether lesion size affects the accuracy and success of the biopsy method.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Diagnosis Rate According to Malignant and Benign Disease Classification

    This measures the diagnostic yield of cryobiopsy and forceps biopsy by differentiating between malignant and benign lesions. The diagnostic rate is compared between cases of cancerous and non-cancerous nodules to assess the performance of the biopsy methods in each category.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Diagnosis Rate According to Bronchus Sign

    The bronchus sign refers to whether or not the lesion is connected to a bronchus, as seen on imaging. This outcome evaluates whether the presence or absence of a bronchus sign impacts the diagnostic success of the biopsies.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Diagnosis Rate According to Image Classification Detected by Radial Bronchial Endoscopic Ultrasound (RP-EBUS)

    This outcome assesses the diagnostic rate based on the characteristics of the lesion as identified by RP-EBUS imaging (e.g., solid, partially solid, or ground-glass opacities). The study evaluates whether different imaging characteristics influence the biopsy's diagnostic accuracy.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Complication Rate

    This outcome measures the incidence of complications (e.g., bleeding, pneumothorax) that occur during or after the biopsy procedure. The complication rates are compared between the two biopsy methods to evaluate their safety profiles.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

3 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06752395
Lead sponsor
Pusan National University Hospital
Collaborators
Erbe-med
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 30, 2024
Start date
Nov 1, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 3, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion