ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06149598Updated Mar 4, 2025

Coughing at Time of Cervical Biopsy

An interventional study of Coughing at the time of biopsy in Cervical Cancer, Cervical Dysplasia and Colposcopy, sponsored by Zydolab - Institute of Cytology and Immune Cytochemistry. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-04.

Sponsored by Zydolab - Institute of Cytology and Immune Cytochemistry · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

To investigate the effect of coughing as an intervention to reduce pain in colposcopy guided biopsy.

Read the detailed description

Colposcopy is a frequently practiced examination and Colposcopy guided biopsy causes pain. A few trials Investigated whether medical interventions such as the application of lidocaine led to reduced pain perception with inconsistent results. Only one trial compared coughing versus no coughing at the moment of biopsy. Although the results of this study did not lead to a significant difference between the two study arms, coughing seems to positively affect pain perception.

Since the patients are, in the best case, their own controls when it comes to subjective parameters such as pain perception, we prefer a cross-over rather than a parallel group design.

Based on the descriptive variables for pain during biopsy with and without cough determined in the pilot study, a case estimate for a prospective randomized cross-over study will be carried out. Since two biopsies are usually taken from the cervix in daily practice, the now planned pilot study in a cross-over design envisages the following two study arms:

  1. Group I: Patients cough during the first biopsy, they do not cough during the second biopsy
  2. Group II: Patients cough during the second biopsy, they do not cough during the first biopsy

The primary Outcome measure is the difference in the patients' perception of pain during the first and second biopsy on the cervix (ectocervix), measured using an 11-part numerical analogue scale (11-item NAS).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Cancer
  • Cervical Dysplasia
  • Colposcopy
  • Pain Sensation
  • Cervical Biopsy

Keywords

  • cervical cancer
  • cervical dysplasia
  • cervical biopsy
  • pain
  • coughing
  • distraction
03

In context

Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

2,366 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; 677 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 100 across 1,738 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms.

Browse Uterine Cervical Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Zydolab - Institute of Cytology and Immune Cytochemistry is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Completed 18 years of age
  • written
  • first colposcopy
  • Clinically indicated colposcopy in case of an abnormal PAP smear or screening result and/or clinical abnormalities on the cervix uteri
  • Necessity to take exactly two

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Performing only one or more than two biopsies
  • Performing an endocervical curettage (biopsy on the endocervix)
  • Vaginal bleeding at the time of examination
  • inadequate colposcopy
  • Cervix uteri cannot be fully visualized
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with insufficient German language skills
  • known anxiety disorders or depressive disorders
  • Treatments already carried out on the cervix uteri
  • Patients with a chronic or acute illness that influences the perception of pain or lead to permanent pain due to the disease itself
  • psychosomatic illnesses
  • Chronic use of pain medications or psychotropic medications or other medications that may have an influence on the sensation of pain
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Coughing at the time of first biopsy

    Patients are asked to cough during the first biopsy. They should not cough during the second biopsy, and no additional interventions will be performed during the second biopsy.

    Behavioral: Coughing at the time of biopsy

  • Active comparator
    Coughing at the time of second biopsy

    Patients are asked to cough during the second biopsy. They should not cough during the first biopsy, and no additional interventions will be performed during the first biopsy.

    Behavioral: Coughing at the time of biopsy

Interventions

  • BehavioralCoughing at the time of biopsy

    Patients are asked to cough or not to cough during cervical biopsy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in pain between first and second biopsy

    the difference in the patients' perception of pain during the first and second biopsy on the cervix (ectocervix), measured using an 11-part numerical analogue scale (11-item NAS). The numerical analogue scale consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' (score 0) and 'pain as bad as it could be' (score 10). Women will be asked to mark her pain level on the line between the two endpoints.

    Time frame: Immediately after the examination

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain perception before examination

    the patients' perception of pain before examination, measured using an 11-part numerical analogue scale (11-item NAS). The numerical analogue scale consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' (score 0) and 'pain as bad as it could be' (score 10). Women will be asked to mark her pain level on the line between the two endpoints.

    Time frame: Immediately before the start of the examination

  2. Pain perception when inserting the specula

    the patients' perception of pain at the moment of the insertion of the specula, measured using an 11-part numerical analogue scale (11-item NAS). The numerical analogue scale consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' (score 0) and 'pain as bad as it could be' (score 10). Women will be asked to mark her pain level on the line between the two endpoints.

    Time frame: Immediately after the insertion of the specula

  3. Pain perception when using acetic acid

    the patients' perception of pain at the moment of the application of acetic acid, measured using an 11-part numerical analogue scale (11-item NAS). The numerical analogue scale consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' (score 0) and 'pain as bad as it could be' (score 10). Women will be asked to mark her pain level on the line between the two endpoints.

    Time frame: Immediately after the application of acetic acid

  4. Pain perception at first biopsy

    the patients' perception of pain during the first biopsy, measured using an 11-part numerical analogue scale (11-item NAS). The numerical analogue scale consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' (score 0) and 'pain as bad as it could be' (score 10). Women will be asked to mark her pain level on the line between the two endpoints.

    Time frame: Immediately after the first biopsy was performed

  5. Pain perception at second biopsy

    the patients' perception of pain during the second biopsy, measured using an 11-part numerical analogue scale (11-item NAS). The numerical analogue scale consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' (score 0) and 'pain as bad as it could be' (score 10). Women will be asked to mark her pain level on the line between the two endpoints.

    Time frame: Immediately after the second biopsy was performed

  6. Pain perception just after examination

    the patients' perception of pain just after finishing the examination, measured using an 11-part numerical analogue scale (11-item NAS). The numerical analogue scale consists of a straight line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'no pain at all' (score 0) and 'pain as bad as it could be' (score 10). Women will be asked to mark her pain level on the line between the two endpoints.

    Time frame: Immediately after the removal of the specula

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Zydolab - Institute of Cytology and Immune Cytochemistry
    Dortmund, NRW 44137, Germany
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2024 to primary completion in Apr 2024, 3 months.

Of 445 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 71. This study's 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 461 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 71.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 19, 2023
First posted
Nov 29, 2023
StartActual
Jan 2, 2024
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2024
CompletionActual
May 30, 2024
Last update
Mar 4, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06149598
Lead sponsor
Zydolab - Institute of Cytology and Immune Cytochemistry
Responsible party
Dr. med. Ziad Hilal (Principal Investigator, Zydolab - Institute of Cytology and Immune Cytochemistry) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 29, 2023
Start date
Jan 2, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2024
Completion
May 30, 2024
Last update
Mar 4, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion