CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06122363Updated Jun 12, 2025

Impact of Incomplete Endometrial Ablation

An observational study in Heavy Menstrual Bleeding, sponsored by Maxima Medical Center. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-12.

Sponsored by Maxima Medical Center · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
121
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim of the proposed protocol is to study the impact of incomplete endometrial ablation on the PBAC score, reintervention, satisfaction, controlled bleeding and dysmenorrhea at 24 months after Novasure endometrial ablation, in women with heavy menstrual bleeding treated at Máxima Medical Centre Veldhoven, in The Netherlands.

Read the detailed description

The primary outcome is blood loss at 24 months after treatment, measured with the PBAC-score according to Higham. To calculate this score women were asked, in the MIRA and MIRA2 study, to record their menstrual blood loss for one month counting the number of super tampons or pads used each day. The total score was calculated using a score of 1 for each lightly saturated tampons. For pads the scores were respectively 1, 5 and 20. Secondary outcome measures were controlled bleeding, defined as a PBAC-score not exceeding 75 points, PBAC score of zero, re-intervention rate 24 months after treatment, satisfaction with treatment (measured with a 5-point Likert scale) and dysmenorrhea.

In addition, multiple variables were analyzed in predicting the occurrence of incomplete endometrial ablation, including age, BMI, cavum length, cavum width, ablation time, ablation power, nulliparity, sterilization in history, section caesarea in history, position of the uterus (AVF/RVF), presence of myomas, the presence of adenomyosis and surgery under local anesthesia, generally without sterilization or generally in combination with sterilization. Information was collected from EPD and the MIRA and MIRA2 databases.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

Browse trials for

03

In context

Menorrhagia

182 studies on the registry are indexed under Menorrhagia; 33 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 121 is below the median of 300 across 41 observational studies indexed under Menorrhagia.

Browse Menorrhagia studies →

Lead sponsor

Maxima Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This retrospective cohort study was carried out using the data of women who participated in the MIRA study and the MIRA2 study including RCT and prospective cohort database. These women have given informed consent for their data to be used for future research into treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding. To be eligible for study inclusion, women had to suffer from heavy menstrual bleeding, and have undergone Novasure endometrial ablation at Máxima MC between January 2012 and July 2023. Women were excluded from the database if the hysteroscopy images were not saved, or these images were of poor quality.

Inclusion criteria

  • Endometrial ablation between 2012 and 2023 in Máxima Medical Centre
  • Women had to suffer from heavy menstrual bleeding

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No saved hysteroscopy images or bad quality hysteroscopy images
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
121 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Complete Novasure endometrial ablation

    After treatment with novasure, the hysteroscopy showed no remains of endometrium, , so a complete novasure endomentrial ablation

    Device: hysteroscopy

  • Incomplete Novasure endometrial ablation

    After treatment with novasure, the hysteroscopy showed remains of endometrium, so an incomplete novasure endomentrial ablation

    Device: hysteroscopy

Interventions

  • Devicehysteroscopy

    uterine hysteroscopy right after Novasure endometrial ablation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) score

    Blood loss of 1 month, measured by the number of needed tampons/pads and how heavily they are filled with blood. The higher the score, the more severe blood loss. From 150 points the amount is defined as heavy menstrual bleeding.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of reintervention

    Surgical and Medical reintervention

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Dysmennorrhea

    Presence of dysmennorrhea. Categorized as absence, mild, moderate and severe.

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. Number of patients having controlled bleeding

    Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) score less than 75.

    Time frame: 24 months

  4. Satisfaction of the patient with the treatment

    Satisfaction measured with a 5-point Likert scale. 1=very unsatisfied, 2= unsatisfied, 3= neutraal, 4= satisfied, 5= very satisfied.

    Time frame: 24 months

Other outcomes

  1. Number of possible prognostic variables predicting the occurrence of incomplete endometrial ablation.

    Age, BMI, cavum length, cavum width, ablation time, ablation power, nulliparity, sterilization in history, section caesarea in history, position of the uterus (AVF/RVF), presence of myomas, the presence of adenomyosis and surgery under local anesthesia, generally without sterilization or generally in combination with sterilization

    Time frame: baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Máxima MC
    Veldhoven, Noord-Brabant 5500MB, Netherlands
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06122363
Lead sponsor
Maxima Medical Center
Responsible party
Danique Roelen (Medical student, Maxima Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 8, 2023
Start date
Mar 1, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 12, 2025

Study contacts

Marlies M.Y. Bongers, PhD, MD
principal investigator · Maxima Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion