CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07852143Updated Oct 1, 2026

Heavy Menstrual Bleeding and Dysmenorrhea Among Undergraduate Females in the Faculty of Medicine of Assiut University

An observational study in Dysmenorrhea, Heavy Menstrual Bleeding and Menorrhagia, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-01.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

Updated Oct 1, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
486
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Menstrual disorders, particularly dysmenorrhea (painful menstruation) and heavy menstrual bleeding (excessive menstrual blood loss), are common conditions among young adult females that can substantially impact quality of life, university attendance, and academic performance. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of heavy menstrual bleeding and determine the intensity of dysmenorrhea among undergraduate female medical students at Assiut University.

Participants in this cross-sectional observational study include nulliparous and nulligravid female undergraduate students enrolled in the Faculty of Medicine. Data collection involves face-to-face interviews and self-completed assessment instruments during non-instructional hours. Dysmenorrhea severity, pain characteristics, and related functional impairment are evaluated using the Working ability, Location, Intensity, Days of pain and Dysmenorrhea (WaLIDD) score. Menstrual blood volume is quantified using the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBLAC) during the menstrual period to identify heavy menstrual bleeding. Additionally, the study assesses associated physical symptoms, academic absenteeism, and common pharmacological and non-pharmacological management strategies utilized by the participants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dysmenorrhea
  • Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
  • Menorrhagia

Keywords

  • WaLIDD Score
  • Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart
  • PBLAC
  • Primary Dysmenorrhea
  • Menstrual Disorders
  • Absenteeism
  • Medical Students
03

In context

Dysmenorrhea

398 studies on the registry are indexed under Dysmenorrhea; 96 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 486 is above the median of 123 across 56 observational studies indexed under Dysmenorrhea.

Browse Dysmenorrhea studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Undergraduate female medical students enrolled in the Faculty of Medicine at Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt. Eligible participants are nulliparous and nulligravid female students recruited on campus during non-learning hours to complete face-to-face interviews and menstrual symptom assessments.

Inclusion criteria

  • Undergraduate female students enrolled in the Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University
  • Nulliparous and nulligravid females

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of previous pregnancy or childbirth (currently gravid or parous females)
  • Students enrolled in non-medical faculties or postgraduate academic programs
  • Refusal or inability to complete the interview questionnaire or the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBLAC)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
486 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Female Undergraduate Medical Students

    Nulliparous and nulligravid undergraduate female students enrolled in the Faculty of Medicine at Assiut University. Participants complete an adapted semi-structured questionnaire incorporating the Working ability, Location, Intensity, Days of pain and Dysmenorrhea (WaLIDD) scale to assess dysmenorrhea severity, associated symptoms, academic impact, and management practices. In addition, participants evaluate menstrual blood loss during their menstrual cycle using the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBLAC) to determine the prevalence of heavy menstrual bleeding. No therapeutic or experimental intervention is administered.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dysmenorrhea Severity Assessed by the WaLIDD Score

    Assessed using the Working ability, Location, Intensity, Days of pain and Dysmenorrhea (WaLIDD) score. The instrument evaluates 4 domains: study/work ability (0 to 3), anatomical pain locations (0 to 3), pain intensity (0 to 3), and duration of pain in days (0 to 3). The total score ranges from 0 to 12 points, categorized as follows: 0 indicates no dysmenorrhea, 1 to 4 indicates mild dysmenorrhea, 5 to 7 indicates moderate dysmenorrhea, and 8 to 12 indicates severe dysmenorrhea. Higher scores reflect greater symptom severity and functional impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 1, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 1, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07852143
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Ghada Rady Ghyt (Resident, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 1, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 1, 2026
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion