ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06121336PROMISE-BD-100Updated Aug 20, 2026

PRecisiOn Medicine In StrokE: Evolution of Plasma Brain-Derived Tau in Acute Stroke

An observational study in Stroke, Stroke, Acute and Stroke, Ischemic, sponsored by Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-20.

Primary conditionIschemic StrokeRegistry: StrokeReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Stroke — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Ischemic Stroke
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Ischemic Stroke, a narrower term within Stroke.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2023; still recruiting 3 years 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators recently identified Brain-derived tau (BD-tau) as a sensitive blood-based biomarker for brain injury in acute ischemic stroke: in patients with acute ischemic stroke, plasma BD-tau was associated with imaging-based metrics of brain injury upon admission, increased within the first 24 hours in correlation with infarct progression, and at 24 hours was superior to final infarct volume in predicting 90-day functional outcome. While informing on the relation of BD-tau with imaging-based metrics of brain injury, this cross-sectional study was restricted to BD-tau assessments upon admission and at day 2 and could not inform on key characteristics of the evolution of plasma BD-tau, including when exactly it starts to rise, how long it continues to rise, and how it is determined by infarct characteristics as well as comorbidities. Here, the investigators aim to assess plasma BD-tau every hour from admission to 48 hours after onset to evaluate the hypothesis that BD-tau rises immediately after onset and plateaus between three and 48 hours after onset.

Read the detailed description

Ischemic stroke remains a leading cause of death and long-term disability worldwide,1 despite major advancements in reperfusion therapies.2,3 While neuroimaging modalities have expanded patient eligibility for reperfusion therapies by estimating ischemic core and salvageable tissue,4-7 their assessments are mostly single-timed. Currently available clinical algorithms lack the capacity to continuously track the dynamic evolution of how the primary core progresses to a final infarct, which, however, is a major determinant of functional outcome.8-10 Monitoring infarct trajectories could support therapeutic decision-making in patients with large-vessel occlusion stroke and unveil determinants of stroke progression, aiding in patient selection for trials evaluating cytoprotection11 and targeting clinically ineffective reperfusion.12 Previously studied blood-based biomarkers such as Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL),13 neuron-specific enolase (NSE),14 glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP),15,16 and S 100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B)17 either failed to capture the extent of brain injury within the acute phase of stroke or lack specificity. Plasma levels of brain-derived tau (BD-tau) were recently found to show high value for monitoring brain injury in patients with acute ischemic stroke: In 502 patients with acute IS, plasma BD-tau was associated with imaging-based metrics of brain injury upon admission, increased within the first 24 hours in correlation with infarct progression, and at 24 hours was superior to final infarct volume in predicting 90-day functional outcome.18 While informing on the relation of BD-tau with imaging-based metrics of brain injury, this large cross-sectional study was restricted to BD-tau assessments upon admission (median time from onset: 4.4 hours) and at day 2 (median time from onset: 22.7 hours) and could not inform on key characteristics of the evolution of plasma BD-tau, including when exactly it starts to rise, how long it continues to rise, and how it is determined by infarct characteristics as well as comorbidities. That knowledge would be of great value to determine the responsiveness of plasma BD-tau to brain injury after onset and to evaluate whether BD-tau plateaus at different time points after onset indicating no further infarct progression. Here, the investigators hypothesize that BD-tau rises immediately after onset and plateaus between three and 48 hours after onset. PROMISE-BD-100 will thus assess BD-tau levels every hour from admission to 48 hours from stroke onset in patients that present with the clinical diagnosis of an acute ischemic stroke due to a large- or medium-vessel occlusion within 9 hours from symptom onset.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Stroke, Acute
  • Stroke, Ischemic
  • Cerebrovascular Disorders
  • Brain Diseases
  • Central Nervous System Diseases
  • Brain Ischemia
  • Nervous System Diseases

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • Brain injury
  • Biomarker
  • Pathophysiology
03

In context

Ischemic Stroke Reclassified

2,612 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 971 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 300 across 771 observational studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.

Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich is the lead sponsor of 223 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Compared within Ischemic Stroke, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Stroke. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients will be recruited upon admission to a tertiary care hospital.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • clinical diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke
  • presentation within 9 hours of symptom onset
  • large- or medium-vessel occlusion (i.e. an occlusion of the ICA, MCA [segments M1-M4], ACA [segments A1-A3], basilar artery, or PCA [segments P1 to P3]) confirmed by CT or MRI angiography
  • at least 18 years of age
  • written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • CT or MRI showing intracranial hemorrhage upon admission
  • A history of ischemic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, epidural hematoma, CNS tumor, meningitis, or encephalitis within the last three months
  • dementia
  • pre-stroke disability defined as a premorbid modified Rankin Scale score > 2
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Ischemic Stroke

    100 patients admitted to a specialized stroke service because of an acute ischemic stroke due to large- or medium-vessel occlusion within 9 hours of stroke onset. BD-tau levels and other suggested markers of brain injury (e.g.. NfL) will be assessed every hour from admission to 48 hours after onset. Routinely collected clinical data including from neuroimaging will be collected throughout hospitalization. Clinical follow-up will be performed at 3 months.

    Diagnostic Test: Plasma levels of BD-tau

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPlasma levels of BD-tau

    Plasma levels of BD-tau will be assessed using a single-molecule array assay.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary outcome are plasma BD-tau levels in acute ischemic stroke.

    The evolution of BD-tau levels will be characterized by: * the time point when plasma BD-tau levels start to rise after onset (defined as the earliest time point \[in relation to onset\] that showed higher BD-tau levels compared with the previous assessment and lower levels compared with the next assessment), * the type of rise (e.g. linear, exponential, or logarithmic), and * until when plasma BD-tau levels continue to rise (defined as the time point \[in relation to onset\] compared to which BD-tau levels do not increase by ≥ 5 % compared to 1h, 2h, and 3h afterwards). 5 % were chosen without prior knowledge and in an attempt to account for assay-dependent variations of BD-tau quantifications (coefficient of variation 8-9 %)18 while keeping a biologically and clinically plausible value (rather than e.g. 10 %).

    Time frame: Every hour from admission to 48 hours after onset.

Secondary outcomes

  1. ASPECTS on non-contrast CT

    Time frame: Upon admission

  2. Ischemic core volume on CT perfusion

    Time frame: Upon admission

  3. Regional leptomeningeal collateral score on CT angiography

    Time frame: Upon admission

  4. Final infarct volume

    Final infarct volume will be assessed on delayed neuroimaging (CT or MRI), at least 48 after symptom onset.

    Time frame: Between 48 hours after symptom onset and discharge (latest 10 days after onset)

  5. Infarct progression

    Infarct progression is defined as the difference between ischemic core volume quantified on admission CT perfusion scans and infarct volume quantified on delayed neuroimaging.

    Time frame: Between admission and discharge (latest 10 days after onset)

  6. 90-day functional outcome

    Functional outcome at 90 days (± 14 days) will be assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The mRS is a valid and reliable clinician-reported measure of global disability that has been widely applied for evaluating recovery from stroke. It is a scale used to measure functional recovery (the degree of disability or dependence in daily activities) of people who have suffered a stroke. mRS scores range from 0 (best outcome) to 6 (worst outcome), with 0 indicating no residual symptoms; 5 indicating bedbound, requiring constant care; and 6 indicating death.

    Time frame: 90 days (± 14 days) after onset

  7. 7-day functional outcome

    Functional outcome at 7 days (or discharge if earlier) will be assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The mRS is a valid and reliable clinician-reported measure of global disability that has been widely applied for evaluating recovery from stroke. It is a scale used to measure functional recovery (the degree of disability or dependence in daily activities) of people who have suffered a stroke. mRS scores range from 0 (best outcome) to 6 (worst outcome), with 0 indicating no residual symptoms; 5 indicating bedbound, requiring constant care; and 6 indicating death.

    Time frame: 7 days after onset

  8. Early recurrent ischemic stroke

    The diagnosis of an early recurrent ischemic stroke will be based on i) sudden onset of a new focal neurological deficit within the first seven days after the index stroke that can not be explained by other non-ischemic causes such as seizure, metabolic derangement, or other systemic conditions, and ii) the presence of a new DWI-positive lesion on MRI or a new ischemic lesion on a delayed CT scan that is distinct from the index stroke lesion and that is consistent with the new clinical symptoms.

    Time frame: Between admission and discharge (latest 10 days after onset)

  9. Secondary intracerebral hemorrhage

    Secondary intracerebral hemorrhage is defined as a new intracerebral hemorrhage independent of the primary ischemic lesion that is observed between the initial hemorrhage-free neuroimaging scan and discharge

    Time frame: Between admission and discharge (latest 10 days after onset)

  10. Hemorrhagic transformation

    The occurrence of hemorrhagic transformation will be evaluated based on the morphological ECASS criteria.20

    Time frame: Between admission and discharge (latest 10 days after onset)

Other outcomes

  1. Plasma levels of NfL

    Plasma levels of NfL will be assessed at an hourly basis using a single-molecule array assay.

    Time frame: Hourly from admission to 48 hours after onset

  2. Plasma levels of GFAP

    Plasma levels of GFAP will be assessed at an hourly basis using a single-molecule array assay.

    Time frame: Hourly from admission to 48 hours after onset

  3. Plasma proteome and metabolome composition

    Plasma proteome and metabolome composition will be assessed using mass spectrometry or alternatives.

    Time frame: Hourly from admission to 48 hours after onset

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795-820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0. Epub 2021 Sep 3. PubMed 34487721 ↗
  • Thomalla G, Boutitie F, Ma H, Koga M, Ringleb P, Schwamm LH, Wu O, Bendszus M, Bladin CF, Campbell BCV, Cheng B, Churilov L, Ebinger M, Endres M, Fiebach JB, Fukuda-Doi M, Inoue M, Kleinig TJ, Latour LL, Lemmens R, Levi CR, Leys D, Miwa K, Molina CA, Muir KW, Nighoghossian N, Parsons MW, Pedraza S, Schellinger PD, Schwab S, Simonsen CZ, Song SS, Thijs V, Toni D, Hsu CY, Wahlgren N, Yamamoto H, Yassi N, Yoshimura S, Warach S, Hacke W, Toyoda K, Donnan GA, Davis SM, Gerloff C; Evaluation of unknown Onset Stroke thrombolysis trials (EOS) investigators. Intravenous alteplase for stroke with unknown time of onset guided by advanced imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2020 Nov 14;396(10262):1574-1584. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32163-2. Epub 2020 Nov 8. PubMed 33176180 ↗
  • Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, Davalos A, Majoie CB, van der Lugt A, de Miquel MA, Donnan GA, Roos YB, Bonafe A, Jahan R, Diener HC, van den Berg LA, Levy EI, Berkhemer OA, Pereira VM, Rempel J, Millan M, Davis SM, Roy D, Thornton J, Roman LS, Ribo M, Beumer D, Stouch B, Brown S, Campbell BC, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Saver JL, Hill MD, Jovin TG; HERMES collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X. Epub 2016 Feb 18. PubMed 26898852 ↗
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, Jauch EC, Kidwell CS, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Ovbiagele B, Scott PA, Sheth KN, Southerland AM, Summers DV, Tirschwell DL. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30. PubMed 31662037 ↗
  • Turc G, Tsivgoulis G, Audebert HJ, Boogaarts H, Bhogal P, De Marchis GM, Fonseca AC, Khatri P, Mazighi M, Perez de la Ossa N, Schellinger PD, Strbian D, Toni D, White P, Whiteley W, Zini A, van Zwam W, Fiehler J. European Stroke Organisation - European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy expedited recommendation on indication for intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. Eur Stroke J. 2022 Mar;7(1):I-XXVI. doi: 10.1177/23969873221076968. Epub 2022 Feb 17. PubMed 35300256 ↗
  • Turc G, Bhogal P, Fischer U, Khatri P, Lobotesis K, Mazighi M, Schellinger PD, Toni D, de Vries J, White P, Fiehler J. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) - European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) Guidelines on Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischaemic StrokeEndorsed by Stroke Alliance for Europe (SAFE). Eur Stroke J. 2019 Mar;4(1):6-12. doi: 10.1177/2396987319832140. Epub 2019 Feb 26. PubMed 31165090 ↗
  • Berge E, Whiteley W, Audebert H, De Marchis GM, Fonseca AC, Padiglioni C, de la Ossa NP, Strbian D, Tsivgoulis G, Turc G. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Stroke J. 2021 Mar;6(1):I-LXII. doi: 10.1177/2396987321989865. Epub 2021 Feb 19. PubMed 33817340 ↗
  • Boulouis G, Lauer A, Siddiqui AK, Charidimou A, Regenhardt RW, Viswanathan A, Rost N, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Schwamm LH. Clinical Imaging Factors Associated With Infarct Progression in Patients With Ischemic Stroke During Transfer for Mechanical Thrombectomy. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Nov 1;74(11):1361-1367. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2149. PubMed 28973081 ↗
  • Ospel JM, McDonough R, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, Almekhlafi MA, Nogueira RG, McTaggart RA, Poppe AY, Buck BH, Roy D, Haussen DC, Chapot R, Field TS, Jayaraman MV, Tymianski M, Hill MD, Goyal M; ESCAPE-NA1 investigators. Predictors and clinical impact of infarct progression rate in the ESCAPE-NA1 trial. J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Sep;14(9):886-891. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017994. Epub 2021 Sep 7. PubMed 34493575 ↗
  • Olivot JM, Mlynash M, Inoue M, Marks MP, Wheeler HM, Kemp S, Straka M, Zaharchuk G, Bammer R, Lansberg MG, Albers GW; DEFUSE 2 Investigators. Hypoperfusion intensity ratio predicts infarct progression and functional outcome in the DEFUSE 2 Cohort. Stroke. 2014 Apr;45(4):1018-23. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003857. Epub 2014 Mar 4. PubMed 24595591 ↗
  • Lyden P, Buchan A, Boltze J, Fisher M; STAIR XI Consortium*. Top Priorities for Cerebroprotective Studies-A Paradigm Shift: Report From STAIR XI. Stroke. 2021 Aug;52(9):3063-3071. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034947. Epub 2021 Jul 22. PubMed 34289707 ↗
  • Nie X, Leng X, Miao Z, Fisher M, Liu L. Clinically Ineffective Reperfusion After Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2023 Mar;54(3):873-881. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.038466. Epub 2022 Dec 7. PubMed 36475464 ↗
  • Tiedt S, Duering M, Barro C, Kaya AG, Boeck J, Bode FJ, Klein M, Dorn F, Gesierich B, Kellert L, Ertl-Wagner B, Goertler MW, Petzold GC, Kuhle J, Wollenweber FA, Peters N, Dichgans M. Serum neurofilament light: A biomarker of neuroaxonal injury after ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2018 Oct 2;91(14):e1338-e1347. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006282. Epub 2018 Sep 14. PubMed 30217937 ↗
  • Anand N, Stead LG. Neuron-specific enolase as a marker for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20(4):213-9. doi: 10.1159/000087701. Epub 2005 Aug 22. PubMed 16123539 ↗
  • Herrmann M, Vos P, Wunderlich MT, de Bruijn CH, Lamers KJ. Release of glial tissue-specific proteins after acute stroke: A comparative analysis of serum concentrations of protein S-100B and glial fibrillary acidic protein. Stroke. 2000 Nov;31(11):2670-7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.11.2670. PubMed 11062293 ↗
  • Wunderlich MT, Wallesch CW, Goertler M. Release of glial fibrillary acidic protein is related to the neurovascular status in acute ischemic stroke. Eur J Neurol. 2006 Oct;13(10):1118-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01435.x. PubMed 16987165 ↗
  • Foerch C, Singer OC, Neumann-Haefelin T, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Steinmetz H, Sitzer M. Evaluation of serum S100B as a surrogate marker for long-term outcome and infarct volume in acute middle cerebral artery infarction. Arch Neurol. 2005 Jul;62(7):1130-4. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.7.1130. PubMed 16009772 ↗
  • Vlegels N, Knuth NL, Steiner KA, Zhang L, Vix AL, Moumin D, Mirzen I, Khalifeh N, Forster C, Gesierich B, Muller F, Lohse P, Filler J, Fang R, Klein M, Dimitriadis K, Franzmeier N, Liebig T, Endres M, Goertler M, Petzold GC, Wunderlich S, Zerr I, Field TS, Pham M, Swartz RH, Poli S, Berrouschot J, Zafar A, Schneider H, Shankar JJ, Aamodt AH, Minnerup J, Mandzia JL, Reimann G, Psychogios MN, Mundiyanapurath S, Reich A, Yeo LLL, Duering M, Reidler P; DEMDAS study group; ESCAPE-NEXT biomarker substudy investigatorsdouble dagger; Goyal M, Tymianski M, Hill MD, Dichgans M, Tiedt S; DEMDAS study group collaborators; ESCAPE-NEXT biomarker substudy investigators. Brain-derived tau for monitoring brain injury in acute ischemic stroke. Sci Transl Med. 2026 Jan 14;18(832):eadz1280. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adz1280. Epub 2026 Jan 14. PubMed 41533774 ↗
  • Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Zhang J, Buchan AM. Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS Study Group. Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score. Lancet. 2000 May 13;355(9216):1670-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02237-6. PubMed 10905241 ↗
  • Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, Lesaffre E, von Kummer R, Boysen G, Bluhmki E, Hoxter G, Mahagne MH, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke. The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). JAMA. 1995 Oct 4;274(13):1017-25. PubMed 7563451 ↗
  • Gonzalez-Ortiz F, Turton M, Kac PR, Smirnov D, Premi E, Ghidoni R, Benussi L, Cantoni V, Saraceno C, Rivolta J, Ashton NJ, Borroni B, Galasko D, Harrison P, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Karikari TK. Brain-derived tau: a novel blood-based biomarker for Alzheimer's disease-type neurodegeneration. Brain. 2023 Mar 1;146(3):1152-1165. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac407. PubMed 36572122 ↗
  • Puetz V, Sylaja PN, Coutts SB, Hill MD, Dzialowski I, Mueller P, Becker U, Urban G, O'Reilly C, Barber PA, Sharma P, Goyal M, Gahn G, von Kummer R, Demchuk AM. Extent of hypoattenuation on CT angiography source images predicts functional outcome in patients with basilar artery occlusion. Stroke. 2008 Sep;39(9):2485-90. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.511162. Epub 2008 Jul 10. PubMed 18617663 ↗
  • Austein F, Riedel C, Kerby T, Meyne J, Binder A, Lindner T, Huhndorf M, Wodarg F, Jansen O. Comparison of Perfusion CT Software to Predict the Final Infarct Volume After Thrombectomy. Stroke. 2016 Sep;47(9):2311-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013147. Epub 2016 Aug 9. PubMed 27507864 ↗
  • Tan IY, Demchuk AM, Hopyan J, Zhang L, Gladstone D, Wong K, Martin M, Symons SP, Fox AJ, Aviv RI. CT angiography clot burden score and collateral score: correlation with clinical and radiologic outcomes in acute middle cerebral artery infarct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Mar;30(3):525-31. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1408. Epub 2009 Jan 15. PubMed 19147716 ↗
  • Menon BK, Smith EE, Modi J, Patel SK, Bhatia R, Watson TW, Hill MD, Demchuk AM, Goyal M. Regional leptomeningeal score on CT angiography predicts clinical and imaging outcomes in patients with acute anterior circulation occlusions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Oct;32(9):1640-5. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2564. Epub 2011 Jul 28. PubMed 21799045 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized individual participant data, including data dictionaries, that underlie results in a publication, will be made available.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: IPD and additional supporting information will become available starting 6 months after publication.

Access criteria: IPD and additional supporting information will be shared with academic researchers with a reasonable request to the corresponding author of the respective publication.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 45 months after the start.

Of 394 non-industry observational studies under Ischemic Stroke, half reached primary completion within 56 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 25 and three quarters within 140. This study's planned 45 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 436 studies reached it within 53 months; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 127.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 23, 2023
First posted
Nov 7, 2023
StartActual
Mar 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2027
Last update
Aug 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06121336
Responsible party
Steffen Tiedt (Principal Investigator, Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 7, 2023
Start date
Mar 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 20, 2026

Study contacts

Steffen Tiedt, MD PhD
Contact
steffen.tiedt@med.uni-muenchen.de
+4989440046046

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion