An observational study in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, sponsored by Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong. Completed at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-17.
Sponsored by Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong · Observational
Ultrasound of the diaphragm is an easily reproducible bedside tool that provides a non-invasive measurement of inspiratory muscle function and respiratory efficiency. The diaphragmatic thickness correlates with the strength and muscle shortening and is reflective of its contribution to the respiratory workload. Diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) has been shown to be predictive of extubation failure in ventilated patients. However, whether measurements of DTF are predictive of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) remains unknown. The objective of this study is to identify predictors of HFNC failure by diaphragm ultrasound and to compare its performance with the well-established ROX index.
1,650 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency; 296 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 100 across 545 observational studies indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency.
Browse Respiratory Insufficiency studies →Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients suffering from acute hypoxemic respiratory requiring ventilatory support with high flow nasal cannula
Exclusion Criteria:
Diaphragm ultrasound to assess respiratory muscle function and respiratory efficiency
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapeutic failure
Predictive value of diaphragm ultrasound in detecting high flow nasal cannula (HFNC)therapeutic failure in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF)
Time frame: From the start of recruitment into study (i.e. start of HFNC use), till the date of study endpoint (i.e., step up to non-invasive ventilation, intubation, death on HFNC, or weaned off HFNC, whichever came first), assessed up to 4 weeks.
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong