ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06084442Updated Oct 16, 2023

Evaluation of The Techniques in Correcting Large-Angle Exotropia

An interventional study of Evaluation of The Techniques of Lateral Rectus Muscle Combined Recession with Hang Back and Combined Recession with Z-Tenotomy in Correcting Large-Angle Exotropia in Exotropia and Evaluation of Surgical Techniques in Correcting Exotropia, sponsored by Tanta University. Not yet recruiting. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-16.

Sponsored by Tanta University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2024, 2 years 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the techniques of combined lateral rectus muscle recession with hang back and combined lateral rectus muscle recession with z-tenotomy in correcting large-angle exotropia.

Read the detailed description

Strabismus was defined as any heterotropia at near or distance fixation, or both, on cover testing. Micro strabismus was known as a deviation of fewer than 10 prism diopters (PD). Different studies have defined large angle deviation as 35 Δ , 40 Δ, 50 Δ and 60 Δ.

Studies revealed that during the first decade of life, exotropia is most prevalent with intermittent exotropia and convergence insufficiency are the most frequent. Exotropic deviations include exophoria, infantile exotropia, intermittent exotropia, sensory exotropia and consecutive exotropia.

Large-angle constant exotropia has a negative impact on the patients and surgical treatment of exodeviations improves the patient's psychosocial functioning. Hence, many surgical techniques have been described for management of exotropia, including bilateral lateral rectus recessions or recess/resect procedures. Botulinum toxin injection combined with recession-resection procedures was used as another surgical technique.

As a fact large-angle exotropia usually requires greater amounts of surgery, often a surgery on a greater number of extraocular muscles. Hence, 3 or 4 horizontal muscle surgery was performed for correcting large angle exotropia. Single-staged three horizontal muscles surgery for large angle intermittent exotropia has been more successful.

Recently, medial rectus muscle surgery as bilateral medial rectus resection for primary large-angle exotropia has been used with successful results. A successful outcome of surgery was defined as deviation within 10 prism diopters for both distance and near.

Moreover, hang-back loop suspension surgical technique can be performed for lateral rectus (LR) muscle recession. This technique can offer potential advantages over the conventional rectus muscle recession, including better exposure of the site of scleral sutures, lower risk of scleral perforation , shorter procedure duration and lower postoperative induced astigmatism.

On the other hand, the hang-back recession has some limitations as a potential unpredictability in surgical outcomes.Although previous reports suggest that the hang-back technique for LR recession for exotropia results in poorer surgical success and may require a different surgical dosage, another study proved that the hang-back surgical technique was as effective as conventional LR recession surgery for children with exotropia.

Furthermore, many studies were performed on Z-tenotomy technique as an alternative procedure for muscle weakening. This technique was applied for superior oblique muscle in cases with mild to moderate over depression in adduction with success rate 90%. An Other study has revealed that z-tenotomy up to 50% progressively reduces extraocular tendon force transmission, but Z-tenotomy of ≥50% is biomechanically equivalent in vitro to complete tenotomy.

In the past it was thought that muscle recessions with the muscle placed behind the anatomical equator of the globe would cause limitation of ocular rotation. Postoperative abduction limitation is one of the main problems in large recession and/or resection for primary and recurrent exotropia with large angle. It is generally thought that keeping the lateral rectus recession to no more than 8 mm prevents this complication. However, several studies revealed that large amounts of recession can be done without causing significant ocular movement limitation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Exotropia
  • Evaluation of Surgical Techniques in Correcting Exotropia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Exotropia

58 studies on the registry are indexed under Exotropia; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 50 across 49 interventional studies indexed under Exotropia.

Browse Exotropia studies →

Lead sponsor

Tanta University is the lead sponsor of 1,010 studies on the registry; 321 are open to participants now.

Of its 15 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients suffering from large angle exotropia; defined, in this study, as an angle of deviation ≥ 40 prism diopters (PD).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients suffering from exotropia with angle \< 40 prism diopters (PD).
  2. Patient with paralytic strabismus.
  3. Patient with restrictive strabismus.
  4. Patient with combined vertical and horizontal deviation.
  5. Patients with previous strabismus surgery.
  6. Patients who had previously been administered botulinum toxin A.
  7. Patient refusal.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    combined lateral rectus muscle recession 7mm and hang back technique.

    The technique of combined LR recession 7mm and hang back technique: A. The muscle is exposed in the usual manner and locking suture is passed through full thickness of the LR muscle using nonabsorbable ethibond suture. B. The muscle is cut from its insertion site. C. Marking the sclera for the rectus muscle recession. a Measurement from the limbus, or b measurement from the original insertion site. D. Passage of the needles in the sclera using the "crossed swords" Technique E. The muscle has been pulled up to its new insertion point and the sutures have been tied and cut and the remainder of the procedure is identical to the standard hang-back method. The

    Procedure: Evaluation of The Techniques of Lateral Rectus Muscle Combined Recession with Hang Back and Combined Recession with Z-Tenotomy in Correcting Large-Angle Exotropia

  • Active comparator
    combined lateral rectus muscle recession 7mm and Z- tenotomy technique.

    The technique of lateral rectus muscle Z-tenotomy: A. The muscle is exposed in the usual manner and two hemostats are each placed 80% of the way across the muscle (or tendon) from opposite borders. The hemostats are placed 3 or 4 mm apart. B. The posterior hemostat is removed, and scissors are used to cut across the muscle in the crushed area. By cutting the muscle in the crushed area, bleeding is kept to a minimum. C. The hemostat nearer the insertion is removed, and the muscle is cut along the crushed area using small snips with scissors. D. lengthening of the muscle will occur. Any bleeding is controlled with pressure. E. After the distal myotomy has been performed, in a very tight muscle, a No. 15 Bard Parker blade can be used to divide the tendon fibers, cutting against the muscle hook. This can be accomplished with a scraping motion with the knife blade at nearly right angles to avoid scleral perforation.

    Procedure: Evaluation of The Techniques of Lateral Rectus Muscle Combined Recession with Hang Back and Combined Recession with Z-Tenotomy in Correcting Large-Angle Exotropia

Interventions

  • ProcedureEvaluation of The Techniques of Lateral Rectus Muscle Combined Recession with Hang Back and Combined Recession with Z-Tenotomy in Correcting Large-Angle Exotropia

    Patients will be divided into 2 groups: * Group (A): Patients will undergo combined LR recession 7mm and hang back technique. * Group (B): Patients will undergo combined LR recession 7mm and Z-tenotomy technique.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. sucessful alignment

    Successful motor alignment will be defined as orthotropia or ≤ 10 Δ Exotropia or Esotropia at 6 m distance with spectacle correction worn at 6 months. Successful sensory alignment will be by achievement of fusion and moderate or good stereoacuity postoperatively.

    Time frame: Follow up period of 6 month from the time of initial surgery. All patients will be examined at one week, one month, 3 month and 6 months.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Livir-Rallatos G, Gunton KB, Calhoun JH. Surgical results in large-angle exotropia. J AAPOS. 2002 Apr;6(2):77-80. doi: 10.1067/mpa.2002.122059. PubMed 11997802 ↗
  • Chen JH, Morrison DG, Donahue SP. Three and Four Horizontal Muscle Surgery for Large Angle Exotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2015 Sep-Oct;52(5):305-10. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20150609-02. Epub 2015 Jun 15. PubMed 26098544 ↗
  • Chung AK, Rehman SU, Bradbury JA. Comparison of modified anchored "hang-back technique (HBT)" with conventional HBT in bimedial rectus recession. J AAPOS. 2005 Jun;9(3):234-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2005.02.011. PubMed 15956942 ↗
  • Betts C, Olitsky S. Corneal astigmatic effects of conventional recession vs suspension recession ("hang-back") strabismus surgery: a pilot study. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2006;21(4):211-3. PubMed 17069557 ↗
  • Orlin A, Mills M, Ying GS, Liu C. A comparison of hang-back with conventional recession surgery for exotropia. J AAPOS. 2007 Dec;11(6):597-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Oct 24. PubMed 17920319 ↗
  • Shin A, Yoo L, Demer JL. Biomechanics of superior oblique Z-tenotomy. J AAPOS. 2013 Dec;17(6):612-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.09.004. PubMed 24321425 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2023; primary completion for Mar 2024, 5 months later.

Of 29 interventional studies with no phase under Exotropia, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 9, 2023
First posted
Oct 16, 2023
StartEst.
Oct 2023
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2024
CompletionEst.
Apr 2024
Last update
Oct 16, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06084442
Lead sponsor
Tanta University
Responsible party
Basma Gamal Mohamed Ahmed Sayed Ahmed (Assistant lecturer, Tanta University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 16, 2023
Start date
Oct 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2023

Study contacts

Basma Gamal Mohamed Ahmed Sayed Ahmed, Msc
Contact
basmagamal9090@yahoo.com
+20 1017954454
Ahmed Lotfi Ali, MD
Contact
ahmedlotfi@hotmail.com
+20 1223407373
El-Sayed Samir Arafa, MD
study director · Tanta University
Amr Mahmoud Awara, MD
study director · Tanta University
Heba Mohamed Shafik, MD
study director · Tanta University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion