ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06073886Updated Feb 24, 2026

Personalized Brain Stimulation to Treat Chronic Concussive Symptoms

A Phase 2 interventional study of Active cTBS and Inactive/Sham cTBS in Post-Concussion Syndrome, Concussion, Brain and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-24.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2024; still recruiting 2 years 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to investigate a new treatment for chronic symptoms after concussion or mild traumatic brain injury in people aged 18-65 years old. Chronic symptoms could include dizziness, headache, fatigue, brain fog, memory difficulty, sleep disruption, irritability, or anxiety that occurred or worsened after the injury. These symptoms can interfere with daily functioning, causing difficulty returning to physical activity, work, or school. Previous concussion therapies have not been personalized nor involved direct treatments to the brain itself. The treatment being tested in the present study is a noninvasive, personalized form of brain stimulation, called transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

The investigators intend to answer the questions:

  1. Does personalized TMS improve brain connectivity after concussion?
  2. Does personalized TMS improve avoidance behaviors and chronic concussive symptoms?
  3. Do the improvements last up to 2 months post-treatment?
  4. Are there predictors of treatment response, or who might respond the best?

Participants will undergo 14 total visits to University of California Los Angeles (UCLA):

  1. One for the baseline symptom assessments and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  2. Ten for TMS administration
  3. Three for post-treatment symptom assessments and MRIs

Participants will have a 66% chance of being assigned to an active TMS group and 33% chance of being assigned to a sham, or inactive, TMS group. The difference is that the active TMS is more likely to cause functional changes in the brain than the inactive TMS.

Read the detailed description

The overall objective of the proposed project is to apply a well-studied and safe form of brain modulation to patients with chronic symptoms after concussion. These patients represent a vulnerable population in need of brain-targeted and personalized therapies. Chronic concussive symptoms can include emotional, physical, and cognitive problems, such as depression, anxiety, headache, dizziness, sensory sensitivities, and difficulties with memory and attention. These symptoms are costly and relatively common, representing a public health concern, yet there are no standard therapies. This is in part due to a limited understanding of the underlying cause of these symptoms.

Most concussions do not cause a visible injury to the brain based on clinical-grade brain imaging. Using research-grade brain imaging however, the investigators have identified an overactive brain circuit in patients who have more chronic symptoms after concussion and more severe forms of traumatic brain injury. Interestingly, this brain circuit connects the frontal lobe of the brain to a deep structure in the brain, called the amygdala, which is important for generating and regulating emotions. The investigators' finding suggests that this brain circuit may be involved in chronic concussive symptoms. This is promising because the frontal lobe can be targeted with noninvasive brain modulation treatment. In fact, these preliminary findings show that inhibiting the frontal lobe at the midline, over the forehead, can decrease the activity of this brain circuit.

Whereas these preliminary findings are promising, this target location and modulation technique have not been studied in patients with concussion. Here, the investigators propose leveraging this prior work to apply the same brain modulation approach to patients with chronic symptoms after concussion. The investigators will also advance this approach to personalize the brain modulation and optimize chances of modulating the intended brain circuit by mapping each individual's brain circuits prior to treatment. The study will be conducted in patients between 18 and 65 years old who have had a mild traumatic brain injury, including concussion, and report a significant burden of symptoms up to 12 months after their injury.

Seventy-five participants will be randomly assigned to active modulation and sham modulation (or inactive in which the participant receives only a sensation of brain modulation without actual modulation) groups. The investigators hypothesize that active brain modulation, as compared to sham modulation, will cause a decrease in activity in the brain circuit that the investigators found to be abnormally overactive in their prior studies of patients with chronic concussive symptoms. Furthermore, the investigators hypothesize that this personalized approach to frontal brain modulation will cause an improvement in chronic concussive symptoms in the active modulation but not sham modulation group, and that the improvements would be greatest for participants who showed the greatest decrease in activity of the targeted brain circuit. Finally, the investigators will also have collected many other data points about each individual that would allow us to determine what individual characteristics make one more likely to respond to this type of treatment.

This would be the first study to use brain circuit mapping on an individual level to treat patients with chronic concussive symptoms. It would not only have implications in this patient population but also any population that suffers from emotion regulation problems, such as in mood and anxiety disorders. Based on the investigators' analyses of treatment response, the investigators may even be able to determine which people would be most likely to respond to this form of frontal lobe modulation prior to recommending the treatment, a key prerequisite for precision medicine. Importantly, the findings from this work would be directly relevant to military personnel because of their higher risk of incurring combined physical and psychological trauma in battle and the higher prevalence of combined post-traumatic stress disorder and chronic concussive symptoms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post-Concussion Syndrome
  • Concussion, Brain
  • Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Head Injury
  • Headache
  • Dizziness
  • Cognitive Symptom
  • Dysautonomia
  • Anxiety
  • Irritability; Syndrome
  • Depression
  • Post-traumatic Stress Disorder

Keywords

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Functional MRI
  • Personalized neuromodulation
  • Amygdala
  • Prefrontal Cortex
03

In context

Post-Concussion Syndrome

141 studies on the registry are indexed under Post-Concussion Syndrome; 34 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 75 is above the median of 52 across 114 interventional studies indexed under Post-Concussion Syndrome.

Browse Post-Concussion Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,170 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 95 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 70 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) defined in accord with the World Health Organization criteria in the last 12 months
  • age 18-65 at the time of the mTBI
  • high burden of post-concussive symptoms defined as a score >=20 on the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • objective neurologic deficits
  • ongoing or prolonged (>3 months) post-concussive symptoms from a prior mTBI within 2 years of the index injury
  • history of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) therapy
  • for TMS or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (e.g., metallic implant other than dental, pacemaker)
  • severe mental, physical, or medical problems that would impede participation or pose a risk for the planned intervention (e.g., liver, kidney, or heart disease, uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension, , psychosis, previous seizure, pregnancy)
  • active alcohol or illicit drug abuse
  • inability to speak and read English
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
75 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) plus exposure

    10 days of active, continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) will be delivered to a personalized region of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) based on baseline brain circuit mapping for each individual participant.

    Device: Active cTBS · Behavioral: Imaginal exposure

  • Sham comparator
    Inactive/Sham continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) plus exposure

    10 days of inactive, or sham, continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) will be delivered to a personalized region of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) based on baseline brain circuit mapping for each individual participant.

    Device: Inactive/Sham cTBS · Behavioral: Imaginal exposure

  • Active comparator
    Active Comparator continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) plus exposure

    10 days of active, continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) will be delivered to a personalized region of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) based on baseline brain circuit mapping for each individual participant.

    Device: Active cTBS · Behavioral: Imaginal exposure

Interventions

  • DeviceActive cTBS

    600 active cTBS pulses will be delivered continuously (3 pulses at 50 hertz (Hz), repeated at 5 Hz, 15 pulses/sec, continuously for 40 seconds) twice/day for 1,200 pulses/day. The MagVenture MagPro active/sham system will be used to enable double blinding by universal serial bus (USB) key in which a current will be delivered through surface electrodes on the skin beneath the coil to mimic the sensory experience of cTBS for active and sham groups.

  • DeviceInactive/Sham cTBS

    600 inactive, or sham, cTBS pulses will be delivered continuously (3 pulses at 50 hertz (Hz), repeated at 5 Hz, 15 pulses/sec, continuously for 40 seconds) twice/day for 1,200 pulses/day. The MagVenture MagPro active/sham system will be used to enable double blinding by universal serial bus (USB) key in which a current will be delivered through surface electrodes on the skin beneath the coil to mimic the sensory experience of cTBS for active and sham groups.

  • BehavioralImaginal exposure

    Personalized recordings about participants' descriptions of triggering or neutral stimuli or activities

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Central target engagement, modulation, and durability

    Using resting-state functional magnetic resonance connectivity in the target frontoamygdala circuit

    Time frame: Change from baseline across all subsequent time points until completion of the study, an average of 4 months

  2. Peripheral target engagement, modulation, and durability

    Using heart rate variability as measured by electrocardiogram

    Time frame: Change from baseline across all subsequent time points until completion of the study, an average of 4 months

  3. Persistent post-concussive symptoms modulation and durability

    Using the Modified Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire where higher scores are worse. Scores range from 0-64.

    Time frame: Change from baseline across all subsequent time points until completion of the study, an average of 4 months

  4. Fear avoidance modulation and durability

    Using the Fear Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire for Traumatic Brain Injury where higher scores are worse. Scores range from 0-48.

    Time frame: Change from baseline across all subsequent time points until completion of the study, an average of 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nightly Sleep Score from Oura Ring

    Using sleep quality metric, called Sleep Score, from the Oura Ring where higher scores are better, ranging from 0-100.

    Time frame: Change from baseline across all subsequent time points until completion of the study, an average of 4 months

  2. Daily heart rate variability

    Using heart rate variability metric from the Oura Ring

    Time frame: Change from baseline across all subsequent time points until completion of the study, an average of 4 months

  3. Weekly avoidance behavior

    Using a single item question "I avoid activities that might make my symptoms worse" where higher ratings are worse. Ratings range from 1-10.

    Time frame: Change from baseline across all subsequent time points until completion of the study, an average of 4 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • UCLA
    Westwood, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
    Recruiting
    • Kevin Bickart, MD/PhD · Contact
    • Kevin Bickart, MD/PhD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bickart KC, Olsen A, Dennis EL, Babikian T, Hoffman AN, Snyder A, Sheridan CA, Fischer JT, Giza CC, Choe MC, Asarnow RF. Frontoamygdala hyperconnectivity predicts affective dysregulation in adolescent moderate-severe TBI. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Jan 4;3:1064215. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.1064215. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36684686 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2026, 28 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 20, 2023
First posted
Oct 10, 2023
StartActual
Mar 6, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2026
CompletionEst.
Jan 2027
Last update
Feb 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06073886
Collaborators
United States Department of Defense
Responsible party
Kevin Charles Bickart, MD, PhD (Assistant Professor, University of California, Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 10, 2023
Start date
Mar 6, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 24, 2026

Study contacts

Kevin Bickart, MD/PhD
Contact
bickartlab@gmail.com
(818)392-4614

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion