An interventional study of Satir group in Drug Abuse, Self Esteem and Mental Health Wellness 1, sponsored by Hong Kong Metropolitan University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-23.
Sponsored by Hong Kong Metropolitan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Self-esteem and family functioning are associated with mental health and success of drug treatment among individuals with substance use disorders (SUD). The Satir model aims to empower individuals to explore their internal resources, address emotional issues, shift coping strategies, enhancing self-esteem, and develop healthier ways of relating to themselves and others. It offers a range of techniques to enhance self-esteem, challenging negative belief systems, and promote personal growth. The aim of the study is to investigate the acceptability and preliminary efficacy of the Satir model on self-esteem, mental health, and family function among individuals with SUD in China. The study will adopt a mixed-method approach. The quantitative phase will employ a randomized control trial (RCT) utilizing a pre-post study design. The qualitative phase will involve conducting semi-structured individual interviews.The data will be analyzed by using SPSS software package (IBM SPSS statistics version 26.0). The individual-interview will be analyzed by using the six-phase thematic analysis. The study has the potential to advance knowledge in the field of drug rehabilitation interventions, inform evidence-based practice, and improve the wellbeing and outcomes of individual with SUD. It can contribute to the ongoing efforts to address the complex challenges associated with substance use and support individual on their trajectory to recovery.
2,124 studies on the registry are indexed under Substance-Related Disorders; 393 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 108 across 1,727 interventional studies indexed under Substance-Related Disorders.
Browse Substance-Related Disorders studies →Hong Kong Metropolitan University is the lead sponsor of 56 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants in the intervention group will receive a 10-session Satir model intervention.
Other: Satir group
Participants in the control group will receive care as usual.
Participants in the intervention group will receive a 10-session, 3-hour/session intervention that spans over a period of five days (2 sessions/day). The intervention program will be conducted on specific weekends, with a gap of 1 to 2 weeks. The total duration of the intervention will be 30 hours.
Self-esteem
The changes of participants' self-esteem will be assessed by using the Chinese version of Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Total scores range from 10 to 40, with higher scores representing lower self-esteem.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of two months
Adult attachment
Adult attachment will be assessed by using Adult attachment scale (AAS).The scale consists of 18 items scored on a 5 point likert-type scale. It measures adult attachment styles named "Secure", "Anxious" and "Avoidant".
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of two months
Coping style
Coping style via Chinese version of simplified coping style questionnaire (SCSQ). It consists of 20 items referring to different ways of coping, with a total score range from 0 to 60. Two subscales are active coping and passive coping.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of two months
Self-efficacy
self-efficacy will be assessed by the general self-efficacy scale (GSES). The total score range from 10 to 40. Higher scores indicate higher perceived general self-efficacy
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of two months
Meaning in life
Meaning in life will be assessed by using the Chinese version of meaning in life questionnaire (MLQ). It includes 10 items with a total score range from 10 to 70. It consists two subscales: MLQ Presence (MLQ-P) and Search (MLQ-S), each of them containing five items. The internal consistency of MLQ is 0.819.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of two months
Resilience
Resilience will be assessed via. the 25-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-25). The items are evaluated on a five-point likert scale ranging from 1 to 4. These ratings result in a number between 0-100, and higher scores indicate higher resilience.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of two months
Positive and negative affect scale
Positive and negative affect scale via Positive and negative affect scale (PANAS). This brief scale is comprised of 20 items, with 10 items measuring positive affect (e.g., excited, inspired) and 10 items measuring negative affect (e.g., upset, afraid). Scores can range from 10 to 50 for both the Positive and Negative Affect, with the lower scores representing lower levels of Positive/Negative Affect and higher scores representing higher levels of Positive/Negative Affect.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of two months
Drug craving
Drug craving will be assessed via the drug craving scale. It measures five dimensions of substance craving, including (1) prizing substance craving; (2) reflecting substance craving; (3) social substance craving; (4) negative substance craving; and (5) eliminating substance craving. The items are evaluated on a seven-point likert scale ranging from 1(strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree),
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of two months
Motivation to abstain from drugs
Motivation to abstain from drugs will be assessed via the motivation to abstain from drugs. It includes 31 items, The items are evaluated on a five-point likert scale ranging from 1(strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), with higher score indicates higher level of motivation to abstain from drugs.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of two months
Family function
Family function via the Chinese version of the 60-item McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD). It includes seven subscale: problem solving, communication, roles, affective responsiveness, affective involvement, behavior control, and general function. The higher the overall score, the worse the level of family function.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of two months
Plan to share: Yes — The relevant anonymized participant-level data, full dataset, technical appendix, and statistical code are available on reasonable request. The approval from the Principal Investigator for the purpose of data use is required.
Supporting information: Sap, Icf, Csr
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hong Kong Metropolitan University