An interventional study of Exergaming based sitting Tai Chi and Seated Stretching in Healthy, sponsored by Hong Kong Metropolitan University. Recruiting at 2 sites in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.
Sponsored by Hong Kong Metropolitan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
This study examines whether a single session of exergaming-based seated Tai Chi can acutely improve working memory, executive function, and prefrontal cortical efficiency in younger and older adults, compared with seated stretching. Using a within-subject crossover design, 40 participants aged 18-30 years and 60-75 years will complete both conditions in counterbalanced order on separate days. Cognitive performance will be assessed with Flanker and n-back tasks, while prefrontal activity will be recorded with fNIRS over the dorsolateral, ventrolateral, and frontopolar prefrontal cortex. Neural efficiency will be estimated by integrating task performance with task-evoked oxygenated hemoglobin responses.
The Tai Chi intervention is a 40-minute seated, exergame-guided 12-form routine preceded and followed by brief warm-up and cool-down periods. The control condition is a time-matched seated stretching programme without Tai Chi-specific movements or game feedback. Both conditions will be delivered at light-to-moderate intensity and supervised for safety and adherence.
The study tests whether acute exergaming-based seated Tai Chi produces greater post-intervention improvements in cognitive performance and more efficient prefrontal activation than stretching, and whether these effects differ by age group. Findings may clarify how a feasible seated mind-body exergame influences acute cognitive and neural responses across the adult lifespan.
This proposal examines the immediate cognitive and neural effects of a seated, exergame-supported Tai Chi session in younger and older adults. The study is designed to test whether a single bout of this low-impact mind-body exercise can influence working memory, inhibitory control, and prefrontal cortex activity more effectively than a seated stretching session of equal duration. By comparing two age groups, the project also seeks to determine whether age modifies the size or pattern of these acute responses.
The study uses a randomized within-subject crossover design, in which each participant completes both the exergaming-based seated Tai Chi condition and the control stretching condition on separate days. Forty older adults will be recruited, including 20 younger adults aged 18-30 years and 20 older adults aged 60-75 years. Before and after each session, participants will complete computerized cognitive tasks measuring executive function and working memory. At the same time, brain activity will be monitored with functional near-infrared spectroscopy, focusing on prefrontal regions linked to attention, control, and task monitoring.
The Tai Chi session is delivered through an interactive exergame platform that standardizes movement pace, provides visual and auditory cues, and includes a structured sequence of seated Tai Chi forms. This format is intended to preserve the cognitive-motor features of Tai Chi while making the activity accessible to adults who may have limited mobility. The comparison condition consists of seated stretching exercises matched for overall duration and physical effort but without Tai Chi-specific sequencing or game-based feedback.
Outcome analysis will compare changes in task performance, prefrontal oxygenation, and a combined neural efficiency index across conditions, time points, and age groups. The study aims to clarify whether this form of seated exergaming can produce measurable short-term benefits for cognition and brain efficiency, and whether such effects differ between younger and older adults.
Hong Kong Metropolitan University is the lead sponsor of 56 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
MMSE and MoCA
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
In the seated stretching condition, participants will complete a series of structured, low-intensity exercise program that would contain comparable social interaction and enjoyment without providing any strength and balance training benefits of Tai Chi. This will match in overall duration and approximate movement amplitude to the Tai Chi sequence but without game-based feedback or Tai Chi-specific components.
Behavioral: Seated Stretching
An acute exergaming-based seated Tai Chi protocol will be adapted from a newly developed 12-week training programme by our team, and will be further aligned with acute Tai Chi session parameters reported by a previous Tai Chi study, including comparable total duration, work-rest structure, and target light-to-moderate intensity. Participants will perform upper-limb and trunk movements derived from traditional Tai Chi forms, adapted for a seated posture and integrated into an interactive exergame environment that provides visual feedback and performance scoring to enhance engagement and standardize practice. Movements will be paced using on-screen cues and visual and auditory signals to control tempo across participants.
Behavioral: Exergaming based sitting Tai Chi
An acute exergaming-based seated Tai Chi protocol will be adapted from a newly developed 12-week training programme by our team, and will be further aligned with acute Tai Chi session parameters reported by a previous Tai Chi study, including comparable total duration, work-rest structure, and target light-to-moderate intensity. Participants will perform upper-limb and trunk movements derived from traditional Tai Chi forms, adapted for a seated posture and integrated into an interactive exergame environment that provides visual feedback and performance scoring to enhance engagement and standardize practice. Movements will be paced using on-screen cues and visual and auditory signals to control tempo across participants.
Also known as: Active control
In the seated stretching condition, participants will complete a series of structured, low-intensity exercise program that would contain comparable social interaction and enjoyment without providing any strength and balance training benefits of Tai Chi. This will match in overall duration and approximate movement amplitude to the Tai Chi sequence but without game-based feedback or Tai Chi-specific components.
Also known as: Intervention
Prefrontal cortical activation during inhibitory control (Flanker task)
Prefrontal cortical activity (oxyhemoglobin concentration, µM) will be recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during the Eriksen Flanker Task, which assesses inhibitory control. Regions of interest include the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), and frontopolar prefrontal cortex (FPC). Measurements will be taken before and immediately after a single session of exergaming-based seated Tai Chi and a single session of seated stretching in a crossover design. Data will be reported separately for each condition. Unit of Measure: µM (micromolar) oxyhemoglobin concentration.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-session) and immediately post-session on 2 consecutive days (Day 1 and 2).
Prefrontal cortical activation during working memory (n-back task)
Prefrontal cortical activity (oxyhemoglobin concentration, µM) will be recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during the n-back Task, which assesses working memory. Regions of interest include the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), and frontopolar prefrontal cortex (FPC). Measurements will be taken before and immediately after a single session of exergaming-based seated Tai Chi and a single session of seated stretching in a crossover design. Data will be reported separately for each condition. Unit of Measure: µM (micromolar) oxyhemoglobin concentration.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-session) and immediately post-session on 2 consecutive days (Day 1 and Day 2)
Inhibitory Control Performance on the Eriksen Flanker Task - reaction time
Inhibitory control will be assessed using the computerized Eriksen Flanker Task. Participants will respond to the direction of a central target arrow flanked by congruent or incongruent distractor arrows. Reaction time (milliseconds) will be recorded for incongruent and congruent trials. The outcome metric is the difference in mean reaction time between incongruent and congruent trials (Flanker cost in milliseconds). Lower or less positive values indicate better inhibitory control. Unit of Measure: milliseconds
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-Session) and Immediately Post-Session on 2 consecutive days (Day 1 and Day 2)
Working Memory Performance on the n-back Task - reaction time
Working memory capacity will be assessed using the computerized n-back Task (e.g., 2-back). Participants will view a sequence of stimuli and indicate whether the current stimulus matches the one presented n positions earlier. Reaction time (milliseconds) will be recorded for each correct response. Lower values indicate better performance (faster responses). The primary metric is the mean reaction time across all trials.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-Session) and Immediately Post-Session on 2 consecutive days (Day 1 and Day 2).
Title: Working Memory Performance on the n-back Task - Accuracy
Working memory capacity will be assessed using a computerized n-back task (e.g., 2-back). Participants will view a sequence of stimuli and indicate whether the current stimulus matches the one presented n positions earlier. Accuracy (percentage of correct responses) will be calculated. Higher values indicate better performance (fewer errors). The primary metric is the mean accuracy across all trials.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-Session) and immediately post-session on 2 consecutive days (Day 1 and Day 2).
Inhibitory Control Performance on the Eriksen Flanker Task - Accuracy
Inhibitory control will be assessed using the computerized Eriksen Flanker Task. Participants will respond to the direction of a central target arrow flanked by congruent or incongruent distractor arrows. Accuracy (percentage of correct responses) will be calculated for incongruent and congruent trials. The outcome metric is the difference in accuracy between incongruent and congruent trials (Flanker cost in percentage points). Higher or less negative values indicate better inhibitory control. Unit of Measure: percentage points
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-Session) and immediately post-session on 2 consecutive days (Day 1 and Day 2)
Plan to share: Yes — Non-identifiable individual participant data is available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author after the report published.
Supporting information: Statistical analysis plan
Time frame: After the study published.
Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2027, 9 months after the start.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hong Kong Metropolitan University