CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06043219Updated Nov 22, 2024

The Effects of Action Observation and Motor Imagery on Students' Ability to Locate Anatomical Locations: A Randomised Control Trial

An interventional study of Action Observation and Motor Imagery in Motor Imagery and Action Observation, sponsored by Teesside University. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-22.

Sponsored by Teesside University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
33
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this investigation is to measure if additional pedagogical techniques (Action Observation and Motor Imagery) improve student's ability to identify anatomical structures compared to traditional teaching techniques.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this investigation is to measure if additional pedagogical techniques (Action Observation and Motor Imagery) improve student's ability to identify anatomical structures compared to traditional teaching techniques. Action observation is defined as watching human movement either via a pre-recorded video or a live demonstration. Motor imagery is defined as the mental representation of human movement, including its sensory and motor aspects, without physically executing the action. For example, imagining the feeling and effort of moving your upper-limb to reach out and grasp a glass of water from on top of a table. Motor imagery practice is defined as the structured engagement in motor imagery over time for the purpose of acquiring and enhancing motor skills.

Traditional teaching of anatomy using a common powerpoint based method, will be compared to the traditional powerpoint method plus the addition of action observation techniques or action observation and motor imagery techniques. The investigation, will also look at whether these interventions have an effect on information retention, by retesting the groups at a later date.

02

Conditions studied

  • Motor Imagery
  • Action Observation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Teesside University is the lead sponsor of 54 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Level 4 (year one) pre-registration Teesside University physiotherapy/Occupational Therapy/Radiography/Sports Rehab students.
  • No previous specific University anatomy training.
  • Willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non Teesside University students
  • Healthcare students with previous University level anatomy knowledge (including those with past healthcare degrees).
  • Not willing to provide consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
33 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Traditional Teaching

    Traditional anatomical teaching provided by a powerpoint lecture.

    Other: Traditional Teaching

  • Experimental
    Action Observational

    Traditional anatomical teaching via a recorded powerpoint and additionally receiving practice of the task via action observation.

    Other: Action Observation · Other: Traditional Teaching

  • Experimental
    Action Observational and Motor Imagery

    Traditional anatomical teaching via a recorded powerpoint and additionally receiving practice of the task via action observation and at the same time imagine themselves executing the same action

    Other: Action Observation · Other: Motor Imagery · Other: Traditional Teaching

Interventions

  • OtherAction Observation

    Action observation is defined as watching human movement either via a pre-recorded video or a live demonstration (Eaves et al, 2022). In the current study action observation will be via a pre-recorded video. Eaves, D.L., Hodges, N.J., Buckingham, G., Buccino, G. and Vogt, S., 2022. Enhancing motor imagery practice using synchronous action observation. Psychological Research, pp.1-17.

  • OtherMotor Imagery

    Motor imagery practice is defined as the structured engagement in motor imagery over time for the purpose of acquiring and enhancing motor skills (Eaves et al, 2022). Eaves, D.L., Hodges, N.J., Buckingham, G., Buccino, G. and Vogt, S., 2022. Enhancing motor imagery practice using synchronous action observation. Psychological Research, pp.1-17.

  • OtherTraditional Teaching

    Traditional anatomical teaching via a powerpoint slide deck

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Location of key anatomical locations

    Each participant from each group will be required to required to palpate and locate 4 key anatomical locations from a list of Biceps Femoris Distal Tendon, Tibialis Posterior Tendon, tibiofemoral joint line, Talocrural joint line, Acromioclavicular Joint line, Long Head of Biceps, Glenohumeral joint line. The accuracy of location will be assessed by diagnostic ultrasound.

    Time frame: Immediately post intervention and one week later

Secondary outcomes

  1. Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire-2

    Screening participant ability to conduct motor imagery

    Time frame: Pre- and post intervention (one week later)

  2. Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3

    Screening participant ability to conduct motor imagery

    Time frame: Pre- and post intervention (one week later)

  3. The Edinburgh Handedness Inventory

    Screening participants dominant hand

    Time frame: Pre intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Teesside University
    Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06043219
Lead sponsor
Teesside University
Collaborators
Newcastle University
Responsible party
Paul Chesterton (Professor, Teesside University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2023
Start date
Sep 25, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2024
Completion
Jun 1, 2024
Last update
Nov 22, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion